Skip to main content

tv   All In With Chris Hayes  MSNBC  September 21, 2017 5:00pm-6:00pm PDT

5:00 pm
elsewhere. all this "cat on a hot tin roof" stuff is no doubt exactly what the prosecutors walk, the kind of heated atmosphere that gets people doing whatever they can to save their skins. that's "hardball" for now. "all in with chris hayes" starts right now. tonight on "all in." >> all these percolations are breathtaking to me. >> as mueller closes in on manna port. >> he's a respected man. >> trump world finds a fall guy. >> i don't think he'll last. >> tonight the white house fallout over paul manafort. then, as sean spicer re-emerges -- >> have you ever lied to the american people? >> i don't think so. >> new intrigue over his copious white house notes. >> period! he either doesn't understand his own bill or he lied to me, it's as simple as that. >> the untold reason republicans are pushing a wildly unpopular health care bill. and as rescue missions start in puerto rico, a look at the disaster that hit the island before the hurricane.
5:01 pm
>> we were desperate. i have lived here 35 years and this is too much. >> "all in" starts right now. good evening from austin, i'm chris hayes. as special counsel robert mueller closes in on paul manafort, the president's allies appear ready to throw his one-time campaign chairman under the bus. responding to the latest revelations about manna port's russia connections, one of the president's lawyers ty cobb told bloomberg, "it would be truly shocking if it's true that paul manafort tried to monetize his relationship with the president." but no one in trump world should be shocked that manafort has landed them in hot water. this was just one headline all the way back in april 2016 when he first joined the trump campaign as a strategist. "trump just hired his next scandal." manafort's ties to russian interests in ukraine were well known, well documented at the time. we didn't learn till yesterday
5:02 pm
that he may have tried to exploit those ties during the election as campaign chair to make a buck. "the washington post" reporting manafort offered private briefings on the campaign to a russian billionaire with kremlin connections. recall how he responded at the time when asked about russian oligarchs. >> to be clear mr. trump has no financial relationships with any russian oligarchs? >> that's what he said, that's what i said, that's obviously what our position is. >> obviously what our position is. according to the "post," one e-mail exchange between manafort and a ukrainian intermediary includes a reference to black caviar what investigators believe is a veiled reference to payments manafort hoped to receive from former clients. in another exchange just days after manafort was named to the campaign, he referred to his positive press and growing reputation and asked, how do we use to get whole? political reports manafort used his trump campaign e-mail account to send those messages.
5:03 pm
manafort's spokesperson told the "post" the e-mails reflected a "innocuous effort to collect money" he was owed by past clients. special counsel has been stepping up pressure, compelling testimony from his lawyer and other associates, searching his home, reportedly warning him to expect an indictment. those are just the activities we know about. now it's not just the president's lawyer. anonymous former campaign officials told the "post" they privately shared concerns about whether manafort was always putting the candidate's interests first. tuesday corey lewandowski who manafort replaced weighed in before an audience at george washington university. >> look, i think if anybody, and i've said this, paul manna port, roger stone, carter paige, or anybody else, attempted to influence the outcome of the u.s. election, through any means that's inappropriate, through
5:04 pm
collusion, coordination, or cooperation, i hope they go to jail for the rest of their lives. >> asked this morning mike pence who was picked for that job thanks largely to manafort's efforts downplayed the former campaign chairman's role. >> paul manafort was your campaign chairman for both you and mr. trump. and he was reportedly offering briefings to a top russian oligarch who has close ties with vladimir putin about what was going on. was that appropriate? >> i -- you know, i've read those accounts in the newspaper. and, you know, paul manafort was on the campaign for -- at the same time i was, for about a month. and so, look, we're just going to let this process go forward. >> i'm joined by two journalists who have been following the story very closely, two that i read every day on this story. natasha bertrand, political correspondent for "business insider," betsy woodruff, "the daily beast." betsy, the sort of story taking
5:05 pm
shape, i thought it was so fascinating in "the washington post" article that anonymous sources were talking about hope hicks, who's very close to the president, loyal and trusted, was already a little worried about manafort back even when they were doing this. you can see them starting to prepare the story about how manafort was a rogue agent and they didn't know what he was up to. >> right. there are clearly plenty of folks close to the president that are delighted to anonymously criticize manafort to reporters. the fact that manafort has taken so much heat at this particular moment is itself interesting. clearly this criticism is important. it's significant. these stories are important. but behind the scenes, it's also key to remember, there are a lot of other folks who also have major legal liabilitieser on the course of the mueller investigation. particularly jared kushner. we don't hear as much about him because folks don't seem to be quite as chatty about his situation vis-a-vis the mueller investigation. but based on the conversations that i have been having over and
5:06 pm
over, what i hear is that the top concern for people in the white house and for the president's outside allies is what mueller is going to learn about jared. everyone has kind of already assumed that manafort is going to take a significant beating from the mueller team. these new revelations are important. but that said, they're kind of baked in. the big wild card is what, if anything, does mueller find about the role kushner played on the campaign transition in early days of the presidency, and that's something where silence itself is almost telling. >> that is a fascinating point. because kushner obviously is still there, manafort they can try to cordon themselves off from. however, you've been writing about in sort of time line of when you lay out the timeline, i want to walk through it and t t natas natasha, maybe talk about what was going on. june 9th is the famous trump tower meeting with the russian lawyer. manafort was taking notes on his iphone. almost a month later carter page gives a speech in moscow, he
5:07 pm
gets a green light from the campaign to do. the same damon that fort is offering the private briefing to a russian oligarch. a few days later the crazy intervention by the trump campaign to change a platform item in the rnc over armed aid to ukraine, sort of fighting the russians. then of course the hack happened. so that was a very active period, it seems to me, natasha, that he was on that campaign. >> right and are in elgds experts that i've been speaking to about this for the better part of a year have always wondered whether or not paul manafort himself was kind of a russian plant in the campaign from the very beginning. he was in debt to pro-russian interests by as much as $17 million by the time he joined the trump campaign. and the first e-mail that he wrote asking his long-time employee, this russian ukrainian operative who has ties to russian military intelligence, the first e-mail he wrote to him was asking, how can i use my newfound role in the trump campaign to get whole? which is a very common
5:08 pm
expression for, how can i clear my debt in the second e-mail that was disclosed yesterday in "the washington post" was an e-mail he sent offering these private briefings to a russian billionaire and close putin ally. what was really interesting about that to me was oleg and manafort had a falling-out in 2014 when oleg accused manafort of stealing, essentially, $19 million from him. so the idea that manafort is now offering to give him private briefings in 2016 about the campaign indicates that oleg was somehow, he had forgiven that debt or he was willing to hear him out in exchange for whatever information that manafort had. >> i want to be really clear to hang a light on something you said there. because the manafort story is he was trying to collect debts owed to him. your point is that the reporting indicates he himself owed lots of money, and that this oligarch had apparently initiated legal
5:09 pm
proceedings in the cayman islands that he stole $faen 19 million from him. it's important folks keep the valance of that in their heads. it makes more sense if he's working off a debt rather than trying to collect it. the other thing i wanted to ask about the scope of these document asks that are coming from mueller, you've got manafort, but how worried are the folk in the white house about getting all of these documents together? and what they themselves might learn when they start going through them? >> one challenge, of course, is that manafort -- or mueller is asking for a significant number, a significant breadth of documents. it just takes time to find all those documents. and to make sure that you've gotten them all in one place and you've correctly delivered them. so that's a pretty -- that's something of a different for the white house. remember, the president's legal team specifically working on this for the white house as a whole is not huge, right? it's just a couple of people compared to at least more than as do that are working on the mueller probe. so my understanding is that
5:10 pm
they're hustling. part of the issue though is it's a big ask. and of course the content of those documents is clearly key are remains to i seen what's in them. without a doubt it's something folks have significant anxiety over. >> natasha bertrand and betsy woodruff, thank you both. joyce vance, former u.s. attorney who retired just before the president took office. nick ackerman, former watergate prosecutor. nick, i want to ask about one detail here, how to think about manafort's relationship to this enterprise. so manafort worked for free for the campaign. which is itself somewhat odd, particularly as he appears to have been -- his people say he was owed money or had financial straits he was trying to work his way out of. but he also continued to talk to donald trump as an adviser. and i wonder -- they kept talking to each other even though lawyers had to get them to stop. what kind of message do you think he's getting from the trump white house as he's thinking about what he's going
5:11 pm
to do and whether he's going to talk to mueller. we have no idea what kind of message he's going to get. but certainly donald trump doesn't want him talking. i think that they realize that he is a key person in this entire enterprise. if you look at the context again, how did he get to be the campaign manager for donald trump? he was brought into the campaign by donald trump's own dirty trickster, roger stone. that's the person who put him in place there. roger stone has admitted having conversations with the russian hacker as well as with julian assange who wound up publishing all these e-mails that were stolen from the democratic headquarters. you've got him dealing with people in that june 9th meeting. he knows what jared kushner knows. he knows what donald jr. knows. he's about as important as flynn is in terms of the kind of information that they could use
5:12 pm
against not only the president, but his entire family, including don jr., kushner, ivanka. so he is somebody that they really want to keep on a short leash and keep in the ballpark if they can. >> joyce, there's some more reporting tonight, i'd love you to walk us through this from a legal perspective if you can. about the nature of the surveillance paul manafort was under. we learned there was a fisa warrant, two fisa warrants, it lapsed, there was a new one. today we got more information. i want to read this from "the wall street journal" and get your reaction to this information. the u.s. monitored manafort after he left the trump campaign, the surveillance did not involve listening to phone communications in real tyke but investigators still could have conducted clandestine surveillance of mr. manafort, possibly by obtaining copies of his e-mails and other electronically stored communications or having agents follow him or conduct physical
5:13 pm
searches of his property. what's that -- what do you think that says? >> so we know that manafort at different points in time had been subjected to surveillance, both under a fisa warrant as you've indicated, part of a national security-type process for investigating people who are suspected of being foreign agents and having ties to foreign governments. we also know, though that manafort was under criminal investigation, at least by mueller. that there was a search warrant obtained using an article 3 judge, a federal trial judge, who authorized that process. this reporting sounds a lot more like what you would expect to see if there was fisa coverage of mr. manafort. it sounds like they were perhaps obtaining stored electronic communications. and that wine date that there were ongoing concerns that he was playing a role involving a foreign government that was adverse to the interests of the united states. >> and that's even -- i mean,
5:14 pm
what's sort of remarkable here, this is after the election, right? so the -- and i want to ask you as someone who worked for the justice department, and that is an institution that's always fascinating to me. just what is your sense -- i mean, can you imagine the conversations that were had and the application that was put together when people inside the justice department are considering a fisa warrant on a man who's advising the person who is now the incoming president of the united states. >> so no fisa applications are routine. but in a typical fisa case, there's still a very intense level of scrutiny of these papers. they take, you know, weeks, not days, to compile absent an emergency situation. prosecutors and the u.s. attorneys office work with their counterparts in the national security division in washington, d.c. the fbi engages in high-level conversations. the whole goal here is never to take an application to a judge
5:15 pm
on the fisa court that they reject. the justice department works really hard to ensure the integrity of these proceedings. really, i don't think you can overstate the scrutiny that would have occurred for a files sa request of this nature. it would have certainly gone to the highest levels at both the justice department and the fbi. >> nick, given your experience in watergate, does it surprise you at all or is it what you would expect to hear from manafort's spokesperson that they're alleging this was essentially a political witch hunt? >> they say it's essentially a political witch hunt. manafort himself made a statement about the fact that there had been a public listy over these fisa warrants. but interestingly enough what he didn't say and what he didn't deny was that he was told by mueller's team that he is a target of the justice department's investigation. that means, under the justice department rules, that they have
5:16 pm
enough evidence to indict him, such that he is a putative defendant. right now, as best i can tell on all these public announcements and even the little bits of pieces that we get here and there, what they're doing now is buttoning down their case. they're making sure that the case is solid. and they're making sure that it will be easy to convict him beyond a reasonable doubt. >> joyce vance and nick ackerman, thanks for your time tonight. coming up, an update on the private jet travel of president trump's. hs secretary. the tab for tom price's private planes is ten times larger than we first knew. that story ahead. next, why sean spicer is getting very testy about what secrets may lie in the many notes he took in the white house. after this two-minute break. what did we do before phones?
5:17 pm
5:18 pm
they save us from getting lost, getting hungry, and getting tired of places like this. phones changed everything - shouldn't the way pay for them change too? introducing xfinity mobile. where you can pay for data by the gig, and share it across all of your lines. no one else lets you do that. see how much you can save when you pay by the gig. xfinity mobile. it's a new kind of network designed to save you money. call, visit, or go to this was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration, period. both in person and around the
5:19 pm
globe. these attempts to lessen the enthusiasm of the inauguration are shameful and wrong. >> that was former white house press secretary sean spicer back in january. remember that? claiming that donald trump's inauguration had the largest audience ever. which, as was very evident, painfully, crushingly evident from the photos that anyone could see, was clearly not true. but in an interview that aired today, spicer told abc news he never "knowingly" told a lie. >> have you ever lied to the american people? >> i don't think so. >> you don't think so? >> nope. i don't cheat on my taxes. >> unequivocally you can say no? >> look, again, you want to find -- i have not knowingly done anything to do that, no. >> what sean spicer did knowingly do, according to axios, is take extensive notes, reportedly filling notebook after notebook in meetings with both donald trump before and after the 20 skaection election, and these notebooks could be of interest to special counsel
5:20 pm
mueller who according to the "washington post" has alerted the white house his team will probably seek to interview the former press secretary. there seems to be some consternation about the existence of these notes. and that they are distinct among the folks that worked in that white house. >> right, sean spicer was present at almost every meeting for the first six, seven months of the administration. and was known to take copious notes. and, you know, bob mueller, special counsel, has already made it clear that he wants to interview mr. spicer and he wants all documentary evident of 13 or so disparate places. in many of those places sean spicer was there and likely had notes or was privy to the conversations of the meetings. so it's kind of understood that all of his notes, all of his e-mails, all the things would be of interest to the special counsel. >> what's your reaction to him saying he never knowingly lied? >> oh, i don't know. i think all press secretaries
5:21 pm
have a very difficult job. i think sean said some things that clearly were not true or did not square with what the public record eventually showed. i think it's hard to know if someone knowingly lied or not. i can't speak to his soul. i do know there were a number of statements that mr. spicer made that did not prove to be true. >> there's the sort of bizarre exchange with mike allen that he had. so allen is texting spicer for comment on his note-taking practices. he replied, mike, please stop texting/e-mailing me unsolicited anymore. when mike followed up, from a legal standpoint, i want to be clear, do not e-mail me or text me again, should you do again i will report to the appropriate authorities. does that sound like the person that you interacted with? >> sean could be combative at times. sean is in a lot of ways mercurial. i've had shoun be very pleasant. he often actually was more pleasant than the cameras showed. but at times he could be very 18. i mean volcanic and angry.
5:22 pm
and that note was not entirely surprising to me. it's interesting because mike and sean have known each other for more than a decade as mike pointed out today. and i think it would maybe, you know -- took him very much by surprise to get a note like that back, when he simply asked for comment on a question. but i've certainly had sean and i think other reporters in town have too, get really frustrated on a story or a line of inquiry. >> all right, josh tossy, thanks for making time. why over 3 million americans could be without power for months in the wake of hurricane maria. later could senator cassidy and fellow republicans have ulterior motives pushing their wildly unpopular health care. >> he proposed a bill to allow all the states he said he would not let them do. which means he either doesn't understand his own bill or he lied to me, it's as simple as that. this is john. he's on his way to work in new mexico.
5:23 pm
willie and john both work for us, a business that employs over 90,000 people in the u.s. alone. we are the coca-cola company, and we make much more than our name suggests. we're an organic tea company. a premium juice company. we've got drinks for long days. for birthdays. for turning over new leaves. and all of our products rely on the same thing we all do... clean water. which is why we have john leading our efforts to replenish every drop of water we use. we believe our business thrives when our communities thrive. which is just one of the reasons we help make college a reality for thousands of students. today, companies need to do more. so john and willie are trying to do just that. thank you for listening. we're listening too.
5:24 pm
the horrific aftermath of a devastating earthquake in mexico unfolded today as search and rescue efforts continued, including at a collapsed school in the capital where 19 children, six adults, had already been confirmed dead. but with 11 other children rescued and being treated in local hospitals. hours of reporting centered on another child supposedly still in that rubble. later today mexican officials said all children had been accounted for at that collapsed school. but they were still picking up signs of life. so the search continued. then there's the disaster, we're getting our first look today in puerto rico. hurricane maria's impact is expected to leave the island's over 3 million u.s. citizens without power for months.
5:25 pm
we'll explain why that is, and it's a crucial story, next.
5:26 pm
5:27 pm
5:28 pm
today puerto rico faces a long, slow recovery after hurricane maria. people are returning to homes without power and officials are saying it could be months before power is returned. nbc news gadi schwartz is there. >> reporter: dog days in puerto rico expected to last months after hurricane maria ripped apart the island's entire power
5:29 pm
grid. nearly all its 3.5 million residents without electricity tonight. cell phone service so unreliable that people like angelica haven't heard from their family. >> oh, we're desperate. i have lived here 35 years. and this is too much to handle. >> reporter: she's desperate for any news of her mother. >> i haven't talked to my mom either. i'm trying to go to my mom's house. it's -- it's -- it's hard. >> reporter: the streets are littered with downed power lines. the storm cracking concrete in half. damaging an infrastructure that was already crumbling. officials say help is on the way but full recovery could take half a year. which is going to be worse, the storm or work after the storm? >> aiv the storm. >> reporter: terrifying for those standing in line for hours to get gas to power their generator. she's scared of what the next six months are going to bring, she's a single mother, she's got to take care of her daughter and she doesn't know what's going to
5:30 pm
happen. >> reporter: families across the island trying to prepare for the humid darkness of life off the grid. >> gadi schwartz reporting. puerto rico faces a particularly brutal challenge. even before hurricane maria hit as a powerful category 4 storm, puerto rico's power company was bankrupt. $9 billion in debt. the territory has been in the throes of extended financial crisis. now it will almost certainly need lots of resources and aid from an american congress where it has no voting members. for more on why this crisis is magnitude by troubles that predated the storm, i'm joined by jillian white who's reported extensively at puerto rico's financial crisis, senior editor at "the atlantic." tell me the financial condition of puerto rico before the storm hit. >> if you remember around this time the conversation we were having was about promessa. that was an attempt to have the
5:31 pm
government on the mainland deal with the massive fiscal crisis that puerto rico was facing, about $70 billion of debt they cannot repay. because puerto rico is a territory, they do not have the right to file bankruptcy the way a place like detroit might. so they were kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place where you have all these debtors who want their money back on their investments, and a commonwealth that had absolutely no way to repay them. among those, among some of the utilities that were stuck between a rock and a hard place, were as you said preppa, their electric utility. >> so the electric utility, you've got a situation essentially there's in this unelected board that is sort of overseeing an austerity regime where they make decisions about where the money flows. and now you're just going to need a lot more money and it's going to -- i can't imagine them saying bondholders have to get paid off rather than the lights coming back on in san juan. am i wrong that that's the choice that's going to be before them? >> so the choice is one that
5:32 pm
truly i don't think we've seen before. so you have bondholders who still want their money. preppa filed for bankruptcy. that negotiation didn't go particularly well. but now you are starting at this space where the electric grid and even kind of the nonfunctioning utility that they had is now essentially gone. as was mentioned in the clip before, the electric grid there has been wiped out. there is no power. there isn't just a case of trying to rebuild slowly. it's a case having to completely build everything from scratch. >> it seems inevitable to me that there is going to have to be significant federal aid from the united states congress appropriated to aid puerto rico. i mean, we've seen it with harvey, we'll see it with irma. is that your anticipation as well? and what do you think the politics of that will be like? >> yeah, absolutely. so as of late wednesday night, early thursday morning, president trump had signed an executive order saying that all of puerto rico was an emergency disaster zone.
5:33 pm
which means that fema can give aid. as you mentioned, there are already two other big storms before maria, so fema is stretched pretty thin. when it comes to disaster relief, a lot of people think that you see the devastation on television and it's a foregone conclusion that congress will pony up as much money as they can to get things done. but even when it came to the big relief package for harvey, there were still house republicans who dissented, who didn't want to give, or didn't want to give as much. it's still a political calculation. when you think about the fact that there was so much strife when it came to passing and figuring out how to help puerto rico in the first place, their debt struggles have been very, very long-term and it took a long time to push that through. it's unclear how much aid they'll actually get, especially given that what they'll need to do is so much more vast than what needs to happen in texas or florida. >> they don't have any home state senators that can push it at all. jillian white, thanks for your time tonight. >> thanks for having me.
5:34 pm
why are republicans so eager to pass a health care bill that would hurt their own constituents? the dark money at work behind the scenes coming up. when you look at the mercedes-benz glc... with its high-tech cameras and radar, contemporary cockpit, three hundred and sixty degree network of driver-assist technologies, and sporty performance... what's most impressive about the glc? all depends on your point of view.
5:35 pm
lease the glc300 for $479 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. when food is good and clean and real, it's ok to crave. and with panera catering, there's more to go around. panera. food as it should be. for tech advice. dell small business advisor with one phone call, i get products that suit my needs and i get back to business. ♪ when you're close to the people you love, does psoriasis ever get in the way of a touching moment? if you have moderate to severe psoriasis, you can embrace the chance of completely clear skin with taltz. taltz is proven to give you a chance at completely clear skin. with taltz, up to 90% of patients
5:36 pm
had a significant improvement of their psoriasis plaques. in fact, 4 out of 10 even achieved completely clear skin. do not use if you are allergic to taltz. before starting you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you are being treated for an infection or have symptoms. or if you have received a vaccine or plan to. inflammatory bowel disease can happen with taltz. including worsening of symptoms. serious allergic reactions can occur. now's your chance at completely clear skin. just ask your doctor about taltz.
5:37 pm
"thing 1" tonight. we brought you the story about hhs secretary tom price's private jet problem last night. politico reporting last night that price spent $60,000 on charter jets in just three days last week. including having this 30-seat plane ferry him and kellyanne conway 130 miles between d.c. and philadelphia at a cost of $25,000. now politico's report also had a really interesting nugget, a bread crumb trail that i noticed. it quoted current and former staffers that said, speaking on condition of anonymity say price has been taking private jets to travel domestically for months.
5:38 pm
so if tom price spent $60,000 of taxpayer dollars on private planes in three days what's the price tag for the last several months? we have an answer to that. that's "thing 2" in 60 seconds. ♪ the all-new volkswagen tiguan with available pedestrian monitoring. the new king of the concrete jungle.
5:39 pm
so hhs secretary tom price reportedly spent 60 grand on private jets in three days last week. but how frequent is that habit? tonight politico following up with another blockbuster peat of reporter that says price's travel by private plane at least 24 times since may. since may. the cost of the trips identify politico exceeds $300,000, according to review of federal contracts and similar trip itinera itineraries. $300,000. far more than price's annual salary, spent on private jets in just four months. put it in perspective just how abnormal this is, kathleen sa bib yus, who served as hhs secretary under obama, told politico she took a charter flight only to reach remote
5:40 pm
areas in alaska that were otherwise inaccessible. tom price it appears to have defaulted to private planes instead of commercial flights at similar times such as a june 6 trip from d.c. to nashville. according to politico, sample round trip fares for those flights were as low as $202. price's charter according to hhs contract with classic air charter cost $17,760. hhs would not say how many charter trips price has taken but cited the recent hurricanes as justification. price has used charter aircraft for official business to accommodate his demanding schedule, the week of september 13th was one of those times the secretary was directing the recovery effort for irma, simultaneously directing the ongoing recovery for hurricane harvey. politico found 17 charter flights price took before the first storm hit in late august, including june, a lear jet 60 from san diego to the aspen ideas festival, a glamorous conference at the colorado
5:41 pm
resort town that arrived at 3:33 p.m. on saturday afternoon, june 14th, nearly 19 hours before his scheduled panel. that flight likely cost more than $7,100. america's beverage companies have come together to bring you more ways to help reduce calories from sugar. with more great tasting beverages with less sugar or no sugar at all, smaller portion sizes, clear calorie labels, and signs reminding everyone to think balance before choosing their beverages. we know you care about reducing the sugar in your family's diet, and we're working to support your efforts. more beverage choices. smaller portions. less sugar.
5:42 pm
5:43 pm
as republicans instead ofs huddle in backroom negotiations and prepare to vote next week on their last-ditch attempt to repeal obamacare, the list of groups who oppose the bill keeps getting longer. among the groups that have rejected it are the american medical association, the aarp, the american hospital association, and a whole host of others. and now the health insurance industry itself has come out forcefully against it. saying the bill would increase costs, destabilize the market, and undermine safeguards for people with pre-existing conditions. keep in mind the american people, including much of the gop base as far as we can tell, are not fans of the gop repeal and replace effort either. every bill republicans have put
5:44 pm
forth has polled abysmally, even among republican voters. last month the majority of the public, 60%, said it was a good thing the senate did not pass the gop health care bill last time around. all of which raises the question, why are republican lawmakers trying so hard to pass this thing? we got a clue a few months ago when associated press reported a gop donor at a koch brothers retreat republican lawmakers that his "dallas piggy bank" was closed until obamacare was repealed and he got his tax cut. june nevada republican dean heller denounced a gop health care bill and then faced serious immediate blowback from gop mega donor sheldon adelson and fellow billionaire casino magnate steve winn. these are the people republican lawmakers are probably at this point most worried about, wealthy donors who hate obamacare and who fund their re-election campaigns. the gop base has rejected the repeal and replace bills, yet republican senator pat roberts,
5:45 pm
"if we do nothing i think it has a tremendous impact on the 2018 elections. and whether or not republicans still maintain control and we have the gavel." chuck grassley told reporters, "they just have to pass something. i can maybe give you 10 reasons why this bill shouldn't be considerate. but republicans campaigned on this so often that you have a responsibility to carry out what you said in the campaign, that's pretty much as much of a reason as the substance of the bill." we come back, wipe going to ask a republican lawmaker why his party is so eager to foist this on the american people, and whether he is willing to vote for a bill that would cut more than $2,000 per person in health care funding for his own state. that's next.
5:46 pm
wemost familiar companies,'s but we make more than our name suggests. we're an organic tea company. a premium juice company. a coconut water company. we've got drinks for long days. for birthdays. for turning over new leaves. and we make them for every moment in every corner of the country. we are the coca-cola company, and we're proud to offer so much more. ugh. heartburn. sorry ma'am. no burning here. try alka-seltzer heartburn relief gummies. they don't taste chalky and work fast. mmmm. incredible. can i try? she doesn't have heartburn. alka-seltzer heartburn relief gummies. enjoy the relief.
5:47 pm
whoamike and jen doyle?than i thought. yeah. time for medicare, huh. i have no idea how we're going to get through this. follow me. choosing a plan can be super-complicated. but it doesn't have to be. unitedhealthcare can guide you through the confusion, with helpful people, tools and plans. including the only plans with the aarp name. well that wasn't so bad at all. that's how we like it. aarp medicare plans, from unitedhealthcare.
5:48 pm
expestandard.e lexus rx with advance safety... lease the 2017 rx 350 for $399 a month for 36 months. experience amazing at your lexus dealer.
5:49 pm
one of the most remarkable aspects of the senate gop's health care bill is it cuts billions of funding in the mostly blue states that expanded medicaid under obamacare and gives money to the states that refused to do so. the biggest cuts per person according to the new york states are in oregon, vermont, massachusetts, new york, delaware. the biggest gains to mississippi, alabama, kansas, south dakota, texas. six blue states are poised to see funding cuts of over $2,000 per person, among them the state of new york. i'm joined by republican lawmaker from the state of new york, representative tom reid. representative reid, i wanted to
5:50 pm
show you what chris christie and your regional neighbor and republican and ally to the president had to say about this bill, take a listen. >> i opposed the bill for the significant reason that it's bad for my state. significant reason that it's bad for my state. i'm the governor of new jersey. this bill will cut $4 billion in medicate funding to the people of my state. i can't be in favor of that. >> here is what your colleague in new york peter king said. right now i don't see how i could vote for it. it extremely damaging to new york. how would you be able to vote for it if that math pertains? >> obviously, i share that concern by governor christie and pete king but at the end of the day, wihen we look at theis ish shaw of obamacare, deductibles are going forward. we can take a bipartisan and work to get to the issue of health care costs in america. i believe that will be the outcome and that's where i'd
5:51 pm
like to see this debate go. >> i want to be clear, if this were to happen and i just want to make it clear this isn't some sort of panic among the media class. lindsey graham said into a microphone, paul ryan told me we pass it, if the senate passes it, the house will past it. you may have to vote for this in like a few days. >> sure. you know, obviously, i don't take a position until i've actually had a chance to read the final bill. that's very important when you legislate. at the end of the day, i don't think that is going to happen. what we're seeing is a lot of politics. i'm about getting to solutions for the people back home. when people are losing health care. we can't do nothing. if this fails if and when it fails, which i think it will, now there is the opportunity to say let's put the politics aside and start solving problems for the american people. >> here is the problem. the senate had started this bipartisan under taking. they restored regular order and you have lamar alexander and
5:52 pm
patty murray and together had witnesses come forward to talk about the things you're talking about. how can we attach fixes to the insurance marketplace to keep premiums down, et cetera. alexander unilaterally pulled the plug to force republicans to vote on cassidy gram. should he have not done that? >> what he did, we in the problem solvers caucus, my co-chair on the democratic side. we united as 43 members to say we would support the propels. we talked to senator alexander personally multiple times and i appreciate the work he was doing and i think what he's doing is clearing the deck saying look, we have until september 30th on this partisan approach and when that fails, i don't think a senator like senator alexander or murray will just allow people to suffer. and that is my hope is the outcome of this will come down because then we can focus on the people back home, rather than the politics that have gotten us
5:53 pm
into this partisan divide we see today. >> can you explain to me why you seem so -- i feel like you have information i don't have. you're an actual republican member of congress. this is obviously this is your work and this is very important. it's important to you and constituents. you seem far more confident this will fail in the senate than the people i've been talking to. why do you have that confidence? >> i've been in congress since 2010 and seen this partisan path before just blow up. and it doesn't work. you look at the affordable care act itself and the flaws that the partisan bill it was created to the american people. when you do things on a partisan basis, that's not the best way to approach this and that's why i look forward to working with good faith legislators and given where we are right now and where the health care debacle was a few months ago, i don't see the votes being there to have this go forward and get signed into law. >> but correct me if i'm wrong, you did vote yes on the ahca,
5:54 pm
which was an entirely partisan vote, right? >> i did. that moved the ball for the people back home in the bill i supported in the house, we were going to alleviate 70% of the local people's tax bills they by every day. we're a struggling district -- >> congressman -- >> have that type of tax relief is significant on top of the other reforms we were advocating for. >> that was my favorite feature of the so-called buffalo buyout in which medicaid payments were shifted to new york city. away from districts like your own which good for you you delivered for your people but isn't that now happening to you on the wrong end with this? we're seeing is something that looks like that but instead of being on the right end, fighting for the people in your district to make sure they are paying less for the property taxes, what you're looking at is a net out flow of money from the people you represent to people that live in texas and alabama. >> well, absolutely.
5:55 pm
that's a significant concern and that's why i share that concern like governor christie and peter king do how that will impact our people statewide and in our district. i'm very concerned about that. we got to look at the final bill because you'll have all these amendments. right now we won't have to face that in the house. >> we'll see. representative tom reid thanks for making time tonight. i really appreciate it. >> i appreciate being on, chris. with me one of the leading voices against the gop health care bill. chris murphy of connecticut. he seemed to think this thing is not happening. you're in the senate, what do you think? >> this bill is failing but that's not reality. the reality is is that this bill is one vote away from passing and the folks who voted against it last time have not come out in opposition like susan collins and republicans are working really hard to arrange things so that they change their votes and i don't know, tom reid says he's
5:56 pm
a problem solver. the problem is is that this bill is days away from passing and you solve that problem as a so-called moderate republican by coming out and speaking loudly against a bill that is going to uninsured 32 million americans and transfer vast amounts of money from states like connecticut and new york to states that didn't engage in medicaid expansion. there is a problem. the only way to solve it if you're in his position is to actually come out and speak against it. >> one of the things that the happening right now and i just think this is remarkable from a dramatic irony standpoint. a holdout, alaska has particular challenges as a very high cost state. they are trying to get her to support the bill by essentially letting alaska keep the care. it shows in 2026 his health care proposal would award each state precisely $4400 in federal subsidy for each eligible
5:57 pm
beneficiary except alaska which would receive 6500 or 48% more than everybody else. what do you think of that? >> well, listen, i think there is an easy way to solve the problem. just give every state the deal that alaska may be getting, the ability to keep obamacare and this is an open and shut case. yeah, i mean, listen, this is going to be i hope an easy call for senator. she said on the record very clearly back in the spring that she was not going to be bought off by an alaska specific provision. she said listen, you give us short-term relief but set up an overall health care system doomed for failure and that's what the gram cassidy bill would do by cutting funds so badly for states getting rid of the individual mandate cratering protections for people with preexisting conditions and ultimately would land in alaska's lap, as well. i'll hold her to what she said
5:58 pm
in the spring and i can expect she'll oppose this legislation, too. >> you raised a point under noticed and mario senator had a good piece, let's say this passes. all of a sudden you got 50 states that have to erect from scratch in two years of health care system with less funding than now. this is the mississippi state insurance commission there said he was wary about the change. which evil do you like better, the one you know or don't know. there are better ways to do this. that the someone in the heart mississippi would benefit as much as anyone. he's a republican sounds pretty nervous about what would happen if they actually make this law. >> so i think this is a really important point. lost in this is the fact this bill would end the exchanges set up under the affordable care act. now, in connecticut, we have our own state based exchange. now, we couldn't make it work with the amount of money that we would get. it would fall apart but at least if we wanted to, we could put
5:59 pm
state dollars behind our existing exchange. in states that didn't set up a state-based exchange that rely on the federal exchange. if they want to continue subsidizing through the individual market, they would have to set up an exchange and simply could not do it because the only way we did it in connecticut was we were funded by the federal government in the first couple years to get it up and running. states that don't have those, largely red states couldn't do it on their own. so these subsides that people are getting in the red states would absolutely disappear. they are not coming back. and i think we have to be very clear about what that means in those states. >> just want to be clear so people track this. the subsides that exist in obamacare, they -- you only get them if you purchase on the exchange but if this were to happen, the laws of the state you live in not having exchange no subsides is high meaning the money goes away. doesn't happen. >> right. doesn't happen. what cassidy says they will
6:00 pm
package all that money and hand it to the states. over time that money gets less and less but the mechanism by which you got the money, the federal exchange and a credit on your federal income tax, disappears and so the state-based flexibility they talk about is achieved by robbing money that currently goes to individuals and handing it at a lesser amount to state-based politicians. that's not a good deal for people in the red states. >> senator chris murphy, thank you for your time tonight. >> thanks. >> that is is "all in" for this evening. "the rachel maddow show" starts right now. >> good evening, chris. thank you for joining us this hour. his name was josh. he was 28 years old at the time. he was a young-looking 28. he was working in the treasury department and while he had been working in the treasury department, turns out, he was keeping a diary. >> several members of this


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on