tv Hardball With Chris Matthews MSNBC March 5, 2018 4:00pm-5:00pm PST
he is now i can tell you the top trending story in the country on twitter. he also made some news saying he won't comply with the subpoena. >> they're not going to send me to jail. you know what, mr. mueller, if he wants to send me to jail, he can send me 20 jail. and then i'll laugh about it and make a bigger spectacle than i am on your tv show right now. >> we'll stay on the story that does it for "the beat." thanks for watching. "hardball" starts now. screw loose. let's play "hardball." >> good evening. i'm chris matthews in washington. a campaign to donald trump said again today that trump knew about the june meeting at trump tower with the russians to get dirt on hillary clinton. the little known witness in the special counsel's russia probe is speaking out today, and in the process revealing new
details about the investigation into donald trump and his campaign. after being questioned by the special counsel last month, former trump campaign adviser sam nunberg today confirm head has received a subpoena to turn over documents as well as to testify before a grand jury this friday. however, in a series of interviews on multiple cable networks today, nunberg made clear that he intends to defy that subpoena, a move that will inevitably set up legal showdown he sun likely to win. but nunberg is now telling all about his experience in the hot seat with robert mueller's prosecutors. and he says he believes that the special counsel has already got the goods on trump. today nunberg said the president might have done something wrong during the election. here is how he expanded on that with ari melber just moments ago. >> i think they were interested in something with his business. >> with his business? >> yes. did they ask you about the way he run his business?
>> yes, they asked me about his business. and by the way, i have no idea what he did. and he may not have done anything and i could be wrong. >> you felt they were asking you more about potential crimes related to trump organization more than the trump campaign? >> that's what i felt, yeah. >> above all nunberg was adamant saying he would not comply with robert mueller's subpoena which was issue bade federal grand jury. they want e-mails, text messages, work papers, telephone logs and other documents going back to 1, 2015. it covers all communications and other materials indicating president trump and all of his associates, all of whom have been under scrutiny in the unfolding federal investigation. despite the the potential legal repercussions, nunberg said multiple times today he'll refuse to comply. as one of the president's earliest political advisers, he worked alongside roger stone known to peddle in the dark arts of american politics.
stone is also under scrutiny the russia probe. starting in 2014, nunberg worked with trump through the official launch of the campaign in june of 2015. he was fires just days before roger stone himself was fired. today white house press secretary sarah huckabee sanders was asked about nunberg's suggestion, the special counsel has something on the president. here is what she said. >> you just said on msnbc moments ago i think he, meaning the president may have done something during the election, but i don't know that for sure. your reaction. >> well, i think he definitely doesn't know that for sure because he is incorrect. as we've said many times before, there was no collusion with the trump campaign. >> anyway, reacting to that late today, nunberg took a shot across the bow at the white house, attacking sarah sanders by name. here is nunberg. >> sarah should shut up. she is a terrible communications. by the way, her presidential -- the person she defends every
day, he is a 35% approval rating. she should shut her mouth. >> let me ask you the important question. >> yes. >> and i'm warning her by the way to shut her mouth. >> i'm joined right now by julia ainsley and reporter for nbc news. paul butt is msnbc legal analyst and eli stokols. joyce vance, a former u.s. attorney. she is with us also. there you had a taste of roy cohn in the night. that shut up that whole manner of talking, the sort of street corner manner, and then saying they've got something on trump, but i'm not going to talk about it. i'm going ignore the subpoena. put it all together. >> this is definitely one of the big characters in what he portrayed today that is really grabbing a lot of headlines. but i think at the end of the day, sam nunberg, it's not about defending trump at all. he is really throwing trump under the bus. he is saying he doesn't want to comply with the subpoena right here because it's too much work. that he doesn't want to hand
over everything, all of his communications on these ten people. that's not really how one usually deals with the justice department. and he is sort of turning this into him against them. like they're a political opponent and not the justice department. and at the end of the day, it really seems to be more about saving his mentor, roger stone than it is about donald trump. >> that's what it sounded like. nunberg said he believes mueller's investigation, investigators are using him to build a case against roger stone. and he said that he was offered immunity if he gives the prosecutor something. >> they're trying to set up a perjury stone against roger stone, and i'm not going to visit. roger is my mentor. roger is like family to me. and i'm not going to do it. i'm not going to do it. and roger did not talk. roger may have lied about it -- >> are you basing that view trying to use you to get to roger based on a theory or based on the question sthas asked you? >> based on the questions they asked me. i had no idea in advance what
they wanted for the grand jury. but what they did tell me was i wasn't going to be a subject or a target, and i was going to get the same kind of immunity. but they wanted something. >> joyce, i think we heard here the honor among thieves? you will, the ability to be quite proud about loyalty as a value but not truth there you have his best friend saying he may lie because that's okay, but he's not going give up trump. tell me what the prosecutors are going -- given the fact this nunberg saying i'm loyal to roger. roger he says is loyal to trump. how are they going unravel all of this and use them against each other back to trump? >> it's really crazy. the most important thing we know about the rule of law is witnesses don't get to decide who they will testify against. so if special counsel's investigation wants this testimony, they'll get it one way or the other. and nunberg inviting mueller to put him in jail seems like an invitation that mueller be capable and likely to take him up on. you can't let witnesses run amok
and decide when they will and won't testify. >> well, nunberg also laughed off the prospect at his refusal to comply with the subpoena would land him in jail. let's watch. >> if a witness refuses, then i do think they face contempt of court and possible jail. >> and contempt of court as mr. nunberg and i were discussing earlier can lead to jail. >> i'm not going to jail. come on. you think i'm going to jail? >> what is this, judgment by nunberg? how does this guy -- he is a little bit like carter page. they all seem a little screwy. they don't seem like the normal professionals you deal with in washington. they admit that their best friends and the hero of their life is a liar, can lie, but not give away his other guy? it's mob talk. >> so fast forward into the trial. robert mueller, if anyone actually goes to trial, he is going to have a hard time with witnesses because all of his witnesses so far have either plead guilty to lying or they're kind of crazy like carter page
and nunberg. mr. nunberg, if your lawyer is listening, your lawyer needs to call you and talk to you. because no lawyer wants to see a client self-destruct like this. he is so going to jail. what you do as a prosecutor, a guy doesn't show up or says he is not going to talk you ask the united states marshall, first you have to and hold him into contempt. the marshal marches him off to the penitentiary and he sit there's until he gets with the program. >> it's all down the road did the president do something criminal. that's somewhere in the background. and now we have this guy, this witness who is refusing to be a witness, but every show he can talk about, trump knew about the june meeting with his family members, meeting with the russians to get dirt on hillary. admitting collusion i would think or certainly close to collusion. and he just spits it right out there. i mean i think that's still the story that we're working here. >> and he says he wants to protect roger stone, his mentor.
and he is not doing roger stony favors blurting out he may have lied about it. stone hasn't talked to the special counsel. he has only talked to congress. but telling the special counsel, signaling that hey, all these things that roger stone has said before may have been untruthful, coming from someone who claims to talk to roger stone more than a dozen times a day, not all that helpful to roger stone. helpful to the special counsel and people in that office. and i just think sam nunberg, this is a guy, all reporters have talked to, anybody covering trump, we've all talked to him dozens of times. and you take what he says with a grain of salt. he is not in the inner circle. everything he hears is second or third hand. >> is he a kato kalin type? >> he has people compared today in the full nunberg to the o.j. chase and watching this sort of thing that you're stunned to see going on for hours and hours. >> he is not that shy. as i mentioned, nunberg also said that donald trump knew about that infamous meeting with russians at trump tower in june
of 2016. let's watch him sort of give it away here. >> do you think that donald trump says that president trump says he knew nothing about the meeting. do you think that's true? >> no. >> you don't think that's true? >> no. you know it's not true. he talked about it the week before. and i don't know why he did this. all he had to say was, yeah, we met with the russians. the russians offered us something, and we thought they had something. and that was it. i don't know why he went around trying to hide it. >> bob, just a minute. i want to get to the law here. if he did agree to meet, that's a fact of law, a question of law. if he did send people, he had agents doing it, get some dirt on hillary, get it from a foreign operative, is that a crime? >> well, so it depends on whether it's a thing of value. you can talk about financial campaign contribution. you could talk if there is an agreement to hack e-mails or to
strategically coordinate e-mails. all that of is a crime. it's conspiracy to defraud the united states of america. and this guy, sam nunberg, this is another sign that special counsel mueller is shifting his focus from obstruction to collusion with trump as the target. this guy is allegedly the kind of whisperer for roger stone. roger stone's directly implicated in collusion. he exchanged e-mails with wikileaks. >> in another interview today, nunberg also discussed carter page, the foreign policy adviser in the trump campaign who has been under scrutiny as well for his moscow trips during and after the campaign. here is what nunberg said when asked whether he had ever corresponded with page. >> he asked me about communications with carter page. do you think i would communicate with carter page? carter page is a scumbag. >> okay. so the answer is. no you would not communicate
with carter page. >> so the answer is. no and carter page was including with the russians. >> so carter page was including with the russians, you think? >> yes, i believe carter page was colluding with the russians. >> he is talking. he is singing like a songbird about everybody, not saying a good word about anybody. >> if he didn't want to go before the green jury, he could go before the green jury and not say anything. he could plead the fifth. he is taking a far more legally damning route by going public with this. >> is he afraid of bad language in the e-mails, stuff that is embarrassing personally he may have said? that's what he seems to be getting at. just personally embarrassing conversation. >> that was the case, he could go before them and plead the fifth. he has that right to do. >> on a documentary. >> on the documents, yes. he could plead the fifth before the grand jury. the documents he would eventually need to give up. but the thing is here, he instead decided to take this route where he wants to not talk to the grand jury, but talk to
everybody else in town. >> joyce, let's go to that point of law and that question about that. paul shaking his head. he can always take the fifth. any grounds for it like personal embarrassment? i thought you had to defend yourself against incriminating yourself. that's the fifth amendment. do you have to point to a crime you might be guilty of to claim the fifth? >> you do. and the way it works in the grand jury is when a witness takes the fifth amendment, there will often be that littcolloquyh prosecutors what the crime is. in this case nunberg, if he is to be believed said he was offered immunity by prosecutors that means he would no longer have a fifth amendment to assert and he would have to respond to questions or face being held in contempt of court and held until he decided to answer questions down the road. so that won't work for him here. >> paul, we've talked about this for weeks, months now, how a
smart prosecutor like mueller will work his way up to the tree. he'll work one person to get to the other person to get to the other person and work his way. why is he going in the crazy world now? why is he going into the roger stone, carter page, sam nunberg crowd? these aren't considered serious people in terms of government or even politics, but they are willing to do stuff that's off the grid. >> so what does it mean, chris? now we know his target is president donald trump. so he is getting in touch with people who are in trump world, close to him. and he is hanging out with crazies. he is talking to people who are crazy, who happen to have pertinent information, again, about collusion. >> i mean, sam said in the interview with ari, he said well, the interview with mueller, or the special counsel attorneys, they were really not asking about the campaign stuff. they were mostly asking about his businesses. well, sam was there the years before he was a presidential candidate. he wasn't on the campaign. so just because they weren't asking him about the campaign doesn't mean they're not interested but it does tell you
they're looking at other stuff. >> how long has sam nunberg attached to trump? >> 2011. >> roger goes back to the 20th century. >> right. >> we had a town meeting and there he was sitting next to melania. he was there just tagging along. speaking about the subpoena in his interview earlier in msnbc, nunberg specifically denied finding any damaging e-mails that he was worried about, saying he had not even looked at the e-mails, his e-mails after being contacted by the prosecutors. let's watch this defense of sorts. >> sam, did you find an e-mail in the last 24 hours that made you worried? an e-mail you didn't want to hand over? >> not at all. did somebody just feed you that question by the way into your ear? >> no. it's a question i came up with off the top of my head. >> it's a very good question. no i did not. i did not at all. in fact, you know what i did, katie, i did not go over any of my e-mails since i've been contacted by them.
>> that's one way to win the part of the person interviewing you. did somebody just give you the idea to ask the question? minutes later in same interview nunberg said he had gone over his e-mails within the last couple of hours. >> has anybody at all contacted you in the last few days, the last 24 hours to encourage you not to talk to the special counsel? >> i decided -- >> i'm sorry, the grand jury. >> i decided a couple of hours, a couple hours ago, i decided this when i was going over all my e-mails. >> well, let's do a little psychobabble, because sometimes the best we can do in this crazy world. we now know this guy has a lot of stuff to say against the president if he gets called into a witness box or before the congress next year in an impeachment hearing. it's all coming out of this guy. why is he afraid to answer honestly the subpoena to produce his e-mails? what's your bet? he is facing a contempt. and, you know, we know people have spent months in prison, serious over here and over here in arlington, alexandria, if i
visited somebody over there, a pretty well-known journalist who was over there. and you sit there for months in prison garb, eating prison food in a cold cell because you won't abide by a subpoena. >> yeah, that's right. just kind of based on what he is saying here, he seems to be protecting roger stone. it could be that roger stone doesn't want information to come out in these e-mails. >> he says they already have stone's e-mails with him. >> that's true. but he somehow doesn't want to cooperate because he says there could be a perjury case against roger stone. i will say another thing that is interesting, because i think that's a tough question to answer is that we've heard at the white house today, and i know certainly in our offices at nbc, everybody had these interviews up on full volume. but the one person who was not watching this today was robert mueller. we checked in at the special counsel's office. this is sort of a sideshow to them. they of course want the guy to come. >> let's not kid yourselves. they'll heel be asking for the video tomorrow. >> he was doing a public dance here. >> it will be on youtube.
>> if nunberg is saying that stone lied, that's more leverage that he can use against stone. so this about nunberg to stone to the president of the united states. >> i think it's not squealing rather than anything else. >> some people say i don't think nunberg knows who he is deal with. trump sued him. trump is bluffing. mueller is not a bluffer. but you can look at this in another way in that sam nunberg realize he's is under immense pressure here, doesn't know what to do and that's what generated this public freak-out today. >> paul butler, eli stokols and joyce chance. coming up, as the russia probe inches closer to trump, trump is once again blaming president obama saying he did not to stop russian interference in 2016. and of course that's just another effort by trump to distract, especially now that we know his own state department was given $120 million to stop russian meddle, and then spent zero. they're not doing nothing, we as a country because of trump isn't doing anything right now. plus, the chaos inside the white house is being described as pure madness.
even trump's allies say negotiating with him is like a pinball machine. and now trump is joking about being president for life. and thou to guard against fake news in the age of trump? there is so much of 80 there tonight a new effort under way to help you weed out the wheat from the chaff, as we say in the bible. finally, let me finish with last night's academy awards. this is "hardball," where the action. >> tech: ...every minute counts. and you don't have time for a cracked windshield. that's why at safelite, we'll show you exactly when we'll be there. with a replacement you can trust. all done sir. >> grandpa: looks great! >> tech: thanks for choosing safelite. >> grandpa: thank you! >> child: bye! >> tech: bye! saving you time... so you can keep saving the world. >> kids: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪
don't we need that cable box to watch tv? nope. don't we need to run? nope. it just explodes in a high pitched 'yeahhh.' yeahhh! try directv now for $10 a month for 3 months. no satellite needed. the 2018 primary season kicks off tomorrow, and there are signs that things are looking up for democrats. even in places you might not expect. democrats are seeing record early vote numbers ahead in tomorrow's texas primary. that's tuesday. in the top 15 counties in that state, the democratic early vote has jumped 105% when compared to the last midterm elections in 2014. on republican side, they've only seen a 15% uptick that translates to nearly 50,000 more democrats than republicans
you know what's not awesome? gig-speed internet. when only certain people can get it. let's fix that. let's give this guy gig- really? and these kids, and these guys, him, ah. oh hello. that lady, these houses! yes, yes and yes. and don't forget about them. uh huh, sure. still yes! xfinity delivers gig speed to more homes than anyone. now you can get it, too. welcome to the party.
welcome back to "hardball." special counsel robert mueller zeros in on president trump and his allies' connections to russia, the former soviet republic's brazen assault on our democracy goes unpunished. instead, president trump continues to cast blame on the obama administration for not doing enough on russia. this morning, he tweeted why did the obama administration start an investigation into the trump campaign with zero proof of wrongdoing long before the election in november? wanted to discredit so crooked hillary would win? unprecedented. bigger than watergate. plus, obama did nothing about russia meddling. meanwhile, trump's only national officials say they haven't been directed to stop russian meddling. >> have you been directed to do so given the strategic threat that faces the united states and the specific consequencious
recognize already? >> no, have i not. >> what do you think our adversaries think right now if you do a cyberattack on america? what's going to happen to them? >> basically i would say right now they do not think that much will happen to them. our adversaries have not seen our response in sufficient detail to change their behavior. >> when asked what steps the administration has taken, here is what white house press secretary sarah huckabee sanders had to say. >> look, just this week, they announced through the state department that $40 million is being given to the global engagement center to begin providing immediate support to private and public partners that expose and uncover russian and chinese propaganda and misinformation. >> however, the state department has yet to spend any of the $120 million to counter meddling in our elections. not one of the 23 analysts working in the department's global engagement center which has been tasked with countering
moscow's disinformation campaign speaks russian. and a department hiring freeze has hindered efforts to recruit the computer experts needed to track the russian efforts. i'm joined by ruth markus, ruth, i want -- maehl maybe i'll start with you. >> a high bar for more evan here. >> i think it's fascinating. we had this thing struck news 2016. here we are going into 2018. usually, you know, you fool me once, fool me twice, that whole thing. we're letting it happen? >> absolutely. so why are we letting it happen? i think the answer lies with the president. he is our commander in chief. he has the authority to respond to russia in a way that would punish them and deter them. but he isn't. and so there is some conflict there. there is some reason why he isn't. >> give me that. you're a political guy. you ran for president. tell me why he is not doing it. we know there is a reason. >> the reason could be that he has done something wrong in the past that putin is aware of, and putin holds that over him. or it could be, and that is what
i sense, this part of it as well, that look, the president, like other politicians in europe who are supported by putin that. >> want the help. they want the russian help. and so they're not going to push against it or counteract it. >> these are the right wing people? >> right now it's far right. in the past it's been the far last. sometimes now it's in the far left too. but these interest extremes that russia tries to promote. right now they're with trump. i don't think he wants to stop it. i think he wants the help. and that's why he isn't. but i also think putin knows something about trump and his activities whether it's business activities or some other action or activity he was involved in that was compromising to trump. and he has that and he holds it over trump. that's not an uncommon thing. it's actually very common, especially among leaders that putin supports. that's what the situation is. and it's unfortunate. so we're left without a commander in chief who is going to deter future atake, ruth, we've all sort of figured out putin. he is a bullty. he is a tyrant. he fits the old preworld war ii
order. what's trump's motive? if he recognizes the threat from russia, he is recognizing there was one in 2016, or nefariously, he doesn't want to ruffle the feathers of a guy whose got stuff on him? are you in that? >> so i don't know what his motive is. it could being? nefarious, as evan suggests. it could be something as less nefarious as he just feels threatened. he feels like the legitimacy of his election is threatened if he allows any possibility that russian meddling existed and therefore could have affected the outcome. my position on this is i don't care what the reason is. because he is guilty of dereliction of duty. whatever happened in 2016, whatever that says about his election, he is the president now. he's got a country to protect in 2018 and 2020. what is he doing about it? he is tweeting about 2016 and
obama. come on. let's have a security council meeting. let's have a serious effort to make sure this doesn't happen. we haven't seen that that's the outrage. >> jane mayer of the "new yorker" magazine is out a profile of christopher steele, the former british officer who compiled the trump dossier. steel is believed to have shared information from a senior russian official about president trump's search for a secretary of state just before the election in november of 2016. quote, the official said that he was merely relying to talk circulating in the ministry of foreign affairs. but what he heard was astonishing. people were saying that the kremlin had intervened to block trump's initial voice for secretary of state, mitt romney. furthermore, steel further learned that the kremlin through unspecified channels had asked someone who would be prepared to lift ukraine-related sanction and would cooperate on security issues of interest to russia. well, i don't know how far to go
with this, evan. but if we had a blackballing situation in moscow where the president was thinking, the president-elect was thinking romney is sort of good. he is not my best friend, but he is competent. he speaks other languages. he has been around the world. he is a smart guy. but i'm not going to do it because the russkis said i couldn't do it. that's frightening. >> that is frightening. i think we have to get past this idea that the president is just irresponsible or he is offended by accusations that the russians helped him get elected and it wasn't his win. >> are you putting down ruth's theory here? >> get beyond it. >> i do think --. that was a slap shot. >> no, no. [ overlapping dialog ] >> i'm sticking with the evidence we know so far. >> we know he can't say the word "russia" in his cabinet because it's like you can't say that word. >> it sets him off. we know it sets him off. >> ruth's view is the most accepted view. i fully acknowledge that all i'm
saying is this is what happens in every country. when putin intervenes, he chooses a candidate. he promotes extremist movements that are anti-democratic. those leaders that he promotes, that he supports they're responsive to his -- this is how it works. >> do you think he is known what's going on tonight with this guy sam nunberg? the guy out there blabbing away about these things with the russians, about he and roger stone, all their connections over there, and who was at trump tower and who knew about it. is he getting that stuff in realtime, putin? >> no, i don't think so. >> it's late at night. >> there are a lot of people involved here. many of them are crazy or incompetent. i don't think there is so much control. >> can i ask a question, since we're playing ask the spy. my question is wouldn't the smart play for putin and the russians now in 2018, if they wanted to meddle in the election be to meddle on behalf of democrats so that you could set up a democratic house and have an impeachment scenario? because then you have the chaos that they're looking for.
>> perhaps. but then you get more sanctions to moscow. >> nixon -- i used to listen to the tapes. nixon tried to get his crowd of henchmen to break into the republican headquarters and make it look like a democratic job. thank you, evan mccollum, mr. spymaster, and ruth markus. general information from her. up next, president trump is reportedly being driven to madness by cable news coverage. he is so erratic that some are comparing his negotiating tactics to that of a pinball machine. and against this backdrop, trump is joking about being president for life. this is "hardball," where the action is. you not only want a clean feeling every day, you want your denture to be stain free. did you know there's a specialty cleanser that's gentle enough for everyday use and cleans better than regular toothpaste? try polident cleanser. it has a four in one cleaning system that kills ten times more odor causing bacteria than regular toothpaste, deep cleans where brushing may miss, helps remove tough stains, and maintains the original color of your dentures when used daily. for a cleaner, fresher, brighter denture, use polident every day.
who's the new guy? they call him the whisperer. the whisperer? why do they call him the whisperer? he talks to planes. he talks to planes. watch this. hey watson, what's avionics telling you? maintenance records and performance data suggest replacing capacitor c4. not bad. what's with the coffee maker? sorry. we are not on speaking terms.
we're not worried about a trade war, thank you. no trade war. i don't think so. i don't think you're going have a trade war. no. >> welcome back to "hardball." president trump stunned even some of his own aides last week announcing new tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. he defended his proposal with tough talk, saying trade wars are good and easy to win. while trump insists he is not backing down, his tariffs are causing turmoil for republicans on capitol hill who were left in the dark prior to the announcement. a spokeswoman for house speaker paul ryan told nbc news we are extremely worried about the consequences of a trade war and are urging the white house to not advance with this plan. well, the new tax reform law has boosted the economy, and we certainly don't want to jeopardize those gains. that's the house talking. it's not the first time in recent weeks trump has teased taking action counter to
republican orthodoxy. he did that with guns and with the dreamers. however, he ultimately backed off in both cases. anyway, the "washington post" reports lawmakers have learned to expect the unexpected from this president. peter king said of president trump's negotiating style, it's a zigzagging, something like a pinball machine. over the weekend the post also reported trump's quick change policies on trade and guns are fuelled by the scandals roiling the white house and trump's ominous moods. according to the post, trump's friends are increasingly concerned about his well-being, worried that the president's obsession with cable commentary and perceived slights is taking a toll on the 71-year-old. pure madness, lamb meanted one exasperated ally. given all that, it can sometimes be a challenge to defend trump. that was certainly the case this weekend with one stunning example. we'll be back with that incredible piece of tape and the "hardball" round table after this break. something new can be exciting. empowering. downright exhilarating.
see for yourself why chevrolet is the most awarded and fastest growing brand, the last four years overall. switch into a new chevy now. current qualified competitive owners and lessees can get this 2018 chevy equinox for around $199 a month. chevrolet. find new roads. you or joints. something for your heart... for around $199 a month. but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally found in jellyfish, prevagen is the number one selling brain-health supplement in drug stores nationwide. prevagen. the name to remember. i'm your phone,istle text alert. stuck down here between your seat and your console, playing a little hide-n-seek. cold... warmer... warmer... ah boiling. jackpot. and if you've got cut-rate car insurance, you could be picking up these charges yourself. so get allstate, where agents help keep you protected from mayhem...
so this is going to happen this week for sure. the way he said it, 25%, 10%. >> whatever his final decision is what will happen. >> meaning this isn't a done deal? >> i didn't say that. i just said what he has said, he has said. if he says something different, it will be something different. i have no reason to think he is going to change. >> welcome back to "hardball" that was wilbur ross covering himself, trying to explain president trump's position after his tariff announcement last week. it comes as "the washington post" quotes a trump ally who describes the scene inside the white house as pure madness. by the way, what kind of ally says it's pure madness there is something wacky here. robert costa, who knows this guy, national political reporter for "the washington post." annie linskey for "the boston globe" and jeffrey bennett reporter for msnbc. thank you all. let's just do this. i had a little time with the president, not just chatting with him and melania. i guess all politicians are good at chatting and charm.
and he is as good as anybody. i didn't sense in any sweat. let me go to you. you were there the other night, weren't you? >> at the gridiron? >> no. >> annie was there. >> i was there. >> he put on a show. his speech was good for about five or ten minutes and then bad and good at the end. >> it was a very surprising speech. it's not the kind of speech i've ever heard from him before. you automatically think back to the al hunt dinner where his jokes didn't go over well. >> al hunt -- oh my goodness, you're right. al smith dinner. and this speech, he made some very edgy remarks. >> it wasn't funny and charming. but it started off with the funny thing. i can do self deprecation. i'm the best there is at self-deprecation. you can tell when a person, i was watching him up at the podium. he was starting to go to his notes and people came up and started to talk to him. he wasn't as prepared as much as he should have been.
but he didn't look shook. your view. >> you have you to look at president trump and say he may seem unrattled, but that doesn't tell you everything behind the scenes. >> have you ever seen him rattled? >> he personally and temperamentally he can be very thin-skinned with attacks. if he sees a crowd number he doesn't like reported, if he cease an take on twitter, then you saw earlier on the day on the gridiron, he was going off on the media on twitter. then he comes in, puts the performance at the gridiron dinner. his aides tell me he is so unpredictable. sometimes he'll come down from the residence in the morning and he'll be in a mood and they'll have meetings and he'll be in great spirits all day. everything is cool, even if the russia investigation has all these indictments and everything else. other days he'll come down after watching a few shows in the morning and he'll be erupting all day. >> you pointed out there are five stories in "the new york times" recently, all on the front page, all against him. nurture, nature, right? part of who he is. the other part of him is in the legitimate criticism of the guy
is so strong. how does he take it? he deserves it. but taking it is another question. jeff? >> the question is how does he compartmentalize? >> bill clinton created his own problem but could give a speech for an hour and a half even when they had the wrong stuff on the teleproermt. remember that one? >> yeah. >> you didn't see the president sweat, but that's certainly not the case of the aides. the way the whole tariff issue has unfolded is a case study of the disorder and dysfunction. >> i agree. >> within the west wing. >> i agree. >> and it wasn't the president's decision to announce the tariffs. it wasn't at all motived by policy. it was because he was seething after the news of hope hicks leaving. >> he was spitballing. >> he was seething and looking for a fight and he settled on tarif tariffs. as a result of that off the cuff comment you have u.s. policy being created. >> so create a lot of exceptions. you don't remember in pennsylvania and ohio that he tried. and he'll be the only president
whoever tried to look out for the steel guys. >> and people close to him say that's why he is pushing the trade issue is because of the house seat up for grabs. >> the 18th. >> republican lawmakers tell me they don't know what is going on here because they just passed a tax cut. and they say they're going to run traditional republicans in some of the swing districts. now the president is going out on a limb on trade. >> it's democratic policy, protectionism. this is the kind of stuff democrats in pennsylvania, bob casey have been fighting for going back to john den of western pennsylvania. iowa i've heard this all my life. leo gerard of the steelworkers, somebody has to look out for us, the price trigger mechanism, all that stuff from over the years going back to jimmy carter. we have to help the steel industry. finally a guy comes on, i'm going to help you guys. it could be bs. what about the politics? isn't it a sure disaster? >> it really feels to me like brainstorming. all of these issues whether it's guns, it's dhakacdaca, here is
idea. >> the average person is tired of we know better economics because people with their advanced degrees in economics and law degrees and the people working up there in steel don't know what they're talk about. >> every time he ends up in the same place, which is the follow the republican orthodoxy. >> you think he'll pull back free trade? >> if you look at his pattern, he says things that are surprising but ends up in the same place. >> and just as we're speculating here what the president or may or may not do, so are white house officials we talked to today. they have no idea what is going to happen. >> we have to go. the round table is stay with us. up next, these three will tell me something i don't know. you're watching "hardball." (avo) if you've been struggling with belly pain
and constipation, and you're overwhelmed by everything you've tried-- all those laxatives, daily probiotics, endless fiber-- it could be wearing on you. tell your doctor what you've tried, and how long you've been at it. linzess works differently from laxatives. linzess treats adults with ibs with constipation or chronic constipation. it can help relieve your belly pain and lets you have more frequent and complete bowel movements that are easier to pass. do not give linzess to children less than six and it should not be given to children six to less than eighteen. it may harm them. don't take linzess if you have a bowel blockage. get immediate help if you develop unusual or severe stomach pain, especially with bloody or black stools. the most common side effect is diarrhea, sometimes severe. if it's severe, stop taking linzess and call your doctor right away. other side effects include gas, stomach-area pain and swelling. ask your doctor if
90 days of linzess may be right for you. we're back with the "hardball" round table for monday night. robert, tell me something i don't know. >> you to think babak to nunberg. he was bannon before bannon. he came up with the populism, the outsider run for trump. >> really? hi, is out there today. he is saying wild statements publicly. but if you knew him back then, he was the one telling trump way back when to run as an outsider, run on immigration. >> that's good. >> smarter than he looks. go ahead. >> so changing gears for a second. i was look -- i wrote a story for tglobe in today's paper. trump came in with the promise he was going to cut government. he tried to cut 19 agencies, and a year later we found out they're all ticking along. and it looks like they'll continue for the next certainly year, likely two years.
it's much harder than it apie, yeah, it's more complicated. >> jon stewart joined new york lawmakers today to protest a white house plan that would reorganize the health care fund for 9/11 first responders. white house officials today more or less dismissed their concerns. but new york lawmakers and the bipartisan basis make a point that this is a program that is actually working and shouldn't be tinkered with. >> it's take care of the 9/11 responders good for that case. robert costa, annie linskey, jeff bennett. up next, fighting fake news. one journalist has come up with a new way to fight fake news in the age of trump. you're watching "hardball." relieve nasal congestion. flonase allergy relief is different. flonase relieves sneezing, itchy, watery eyes and a runny nose, plus nasal congestion, which pills don't. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. and 6 is greater than 1. start your day with flonase for more complete allergy relief. flonase. this changes everything.
you can switch and save time. it pays to switch things up. [cars honking] [car accelerating] you can switch and save worry. ♪ you can switch and save hassle. [vacuuming sound] and when you switch to esurance, you can save time, worry, hassle and yup, money. in fact, drivers who switched from geico to esurance saved hundreds. so you might want to think about pulling the ol' switcheroo. that's auto and home insurance for the modern world. esurance. an allstate company. click or call.
today, the new new york is sparking innovation. you see it in the southern tier with companies that are developing powerful batteries that make everything from cell phones to rail cars more efficient. which helps improve every aspect of advanced rail technology. all with support from a highly-educated workforce and vocational job training. across new york state, we're building the new new york. to grow your business with us in new york state, visit esd.ny.gov. you see this? the fake news back there. look. fake news. >> it was fake news. it was a totally phony story. thank you very much. it was made up. >> it's totally fake news. it's just fake. it's fake. it's made-up stuff. >> welcome back to "hardball." president trump loves to call the media fake news when they
report something he doesn't like. the term also refers to disinformation that is spread online like this made-up story about hillary clinton posted on a fake news website. according to a dartmouth story in the weeks surrounding the 2016 election, over 27% of adults visited an article on a pro trump or a pro-clinton site that has been identified as a fake news hub. it's a problem that will continue to affect our elections, and it's one that journalist steven brill is attempting to address before the 2018 midterms with his new company newsguard. he is planning on hiring journalists to evaluate 7500 websites for accuracy and transparency. the goal is to have the ratings appear when people search for news on facebook or google if those platforms allow. i'm joined by steven brill, co-founder of newsguard. you're going to make enemies because the very people you're trying to protect us from are going to go to war with you. the people who spew propaganda want to spew it and they want to confuse us into believing it's news. >> well, i'm used to doing some
controversial stuff. but i actually, i will think this is going to be less controversial than it seems the basic thing we're doing is applying basic common sense to solve a problem that the algorithms are unable to solve. there is a real newspaper called the denver post disneyland is a fake news site called the denver guardian which i think is a site that posted some of the stuff you just referred to. so we're going to have human beings, people who are trained as journalists read the sites and just rate the sites green, yellow or red, the overwhelming majority likely to give the green rating. we're not going to rate individual articles. we're not going to be terribly nuanced about it. but fake is fake. and real is real. and what we're going to so is warn people with a red dot that something they're to be read or about to share is probably not reliable and they can click on
that rating and read a newsguard nutrition label which will be a two or three or 400 word description of who the site is, whose behind it, how is it financed, what's their reputation. and those nutrition labels will talk about, you know, the history of the baltimore sun or the history of msnbc, what their approach is, who their people are, and the history of the denver guardian. >> what's to stop people just googling stuff, if you put somebody's name like steve brill down, everything that is written about you will show up. how do you get somebody to discriminate that process? >> well, it is show up in the search under that, the search that pops up may have ten different headlines and articles. nine of which will be green and one of which will be red. and that won't stop people from reading the red. but they'll know that they maybe should take wit a grain of salt. we're not trying to block
anything. we're not trying ing ting to c anything. what rear trying do is apply common sense from journalists just to arm people with more information about what they're reading, just the way they used to have that information if they walked into a magazine store, or went to a newsstand and they could see those brands, and they could tell the difference between the philadelphia enquirer and the national inquirer. >> now they can't always tell that difference. i always tell people go to an edited newspaper. i worked for a newspaper for 15 years. the great thing about editors is, it's friday night, 6:30, i have a couple of questions, you call them back, they say good story. somebody has to check the facts. and i got to tell you, a great newspaper can do it. and people that don't want to do it should be around. i hope you can clarify that and separate this wheat from the chaff as they say in the bible. >> that's what we're doing, chris. >> good luck with that. >> thanks, chris. when we return, let me
finish with last night's academy awards. you're watching "hardball." finally. hey ron! they're finally taking down that schwab billboard. oh, not so fast, carl. ♪ oh no. schwab, again? index investing for that low? that's three times less than fidelity... ...and four times less than vanguard. what's next, no minimums? ...no minimums. schwab has lowered the cost of investing again. introducing the lowest cost index funds in the industry with no minimums. i bet they're calling about the schwab news. schwab. a modern approach to wealth management.
♪ if you wear a denture, you not only want a clean feeling every day, you want your denture to be stain free. did you know there's a specialty cleanser that's gentle enough for everyday use and cleans better than regular toothpaste? try polident cleanser. it has a four in one cleaning system that kills ten times more odor causing bacteria than regular toothpaste, deep cleans where brushing may miss, helps remove tough stains, and maintains the original color of your dentures when used daily. for a cleaner, fresher, brighter denture, use polident every day.
let me finish tonight with last night's academy awards. i have the same reaction every year. it's now i identify with the writers, the people with the talent to make all the movie magics possible. these interest people i look up to. the movie up for best picture this year, the movie i've been watching over and over is "darkest hour" about winston churchill in world war ii. we owe the movie to the writers
because some of the best scenes in the movie never happened like his visit, churchill's visit to the london subway when he heard the regular working people showed their passion to stand up against hitler. that scene, i think the heart of the movie showed winston churchill at his best. so i wonder where we'll find the person to take on president trump in 2020. that person of talent. yes, we have many candidates said to be attractive. but who has the talent? who has aversion to what worked before, and a worry panic-stricken company in the depths of the great depression or reagan's talent for making the country feel good about itself again, or barack obama believing in american exceptionalism. that is a story like obama is possible. i saw mitch landrieu of new orleans on saturday night at the gridiron dinner. let me put it on the record. he is the best candidate 2020 so far should he enter the race. he shows the right stuff to take on donald trump. i think trump saw it himself saturday night as he watched and
listened to drand drew. landrieu was strong and consistent and most of all downright impressive, describing the accountability a person running a cities that to show. the best qualification for someone promising to govern. and that in 2018 going on '20 is talent. and that's talent. that's "hardball" for now. thanks for being with us. "all in with chris hayes" starts right now. tonight on "all in" -- >> do you think they have something on the president? >> i think they may. >> a former trump campaign aide who thinks the mueller team has something on the president. >> i think that he may have done something during the election. >> tonight jaw-dropping confessions from sam nunbernunb >> i think they were interested in something with his business, which his business? >> yes. >> did they ask you about the way he runs his business? >> yes. >> why he is ignoring a subpoena. >> i'm not going to cooperate. >> and who he thinks colluded with russia. >> i think carrag