tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC May 31, 2018 7:00pm-8:00pm PDT
it's almost certain to collapse again when the next hurricane hits. residents are being told to stock pile enough emergency supplies to survive ten days without help. fema has stock piled emergency supplies, because, of course, statistically speaking it's a matter of when not if puerto rico is going to hit with one of these storms again. power was supposed to be restored to the entire island after maria by may, last month, 11,000 homes still don't have power. and now hurricane season again. that does it for us tonight. we'll see you tomorrow. time good evening lawrence. >> good evening. i listened to those tapes and it did remind me, as it did you, of the watergate tapes, the nixon tapes that brought down that
presidency. tape changes everything when you wear the words, the voice, it's different from having read the same words from michael cohen that we read months ago. >> we had basically the transcribed words of those threats from michael cohen to that reporter for months i've read them a number of times. it just doesn't capture it until you hear the way he delivered those threats. then you realize, that's the kind of work he does. there's no way to convey it until you hear it from the proverbial horse's mouth. >> rachel, i hate to say it you can't do what michael cohen does. when you read michael cohen it just isn't the same. i tried it too. i can't do michael cohen. that's why these tapes are an amazing window. we'll hear more. there are more tapes out there. they will emerge. we are going to hear more of these things. >> i will say, lawrence, between you or i trying to do the best
michael cohen. you technically can act. >> i'm just a tiny bit closer to michael cohen -- my michael cohen is a tiny bit closer than yours. but as my audience will hear during my hour as they heard during yours -- >> no substitute for the real thing. >> you have to get the best hollywood guys to do michael cohen. >> hollywood or somewhere. >> thank you, rachel. >> good night, lawrence. >> today the president of the united states began his day by getting in a fight with the president of the united states. and the president publically toyed with the one absolute power of the presidency, the pardon power in order to pardon, dinesh d'souza a republican racist and convicted criminal. we will have more on the president's feverish approach to pardons with lawrence tribe, but first the president's fight with the president. donald trump called donald trump
corrupt today. it was president trump's latest demonstration that he can get his most devoted followers to believe anything he says even when it's the opposite of something donald trump has previously said. and donald trump seems to count on his followers' inability to remember what he has said in the past, especially if the past is a full year ago. so this morning donald trump tweeted, not that it matters but i never fired james comey because of russia! the corrupt main stream media loves to keep pushing that narrative, but they know it's not true! here is the corrupt main stream media's biggest pusher of that narrative. >> regardless of recommendation i was going to fire comey. knowing there was no good time to do it. and, in fact, when i decided to just do it, i said to myself, i said, you know, this russia
thing with trump and russia is a made-up story. >> the firing of james comey got president trump a special prosecutor. a special prosecutor who is investigating the president for obstruction of justice for, among other things, firing james comey. the firing of james comey went so badly for president trump that the president has apparently decided that he cannot fire attorney general jeff sessions, who just yesterday on twitter the president said once again he wishes he had never appointed as his attorney general. the associated press is reporting tonight that the president threatened to fire jeff sessions last summer but was talk abouted out of it by reince priebus and steve bannon. and senate republicans told the president they will not confirm another attorney general if he fires jeff sessions. so the president switched tactics from trying to fire jeff sessions to trying to get jeff sessions to reverse himself on his recusal from supervising the
investigation of the president. earlier this week the "new york times" broke the news that two days after jeff sessions recused himself president trump quote berated mr. sessions and told him he should reverse his decision, an unusual and potentially inappropriate request. mr. sessions refused. the confrontation is being investigated by the special prosecutor robert mueller, iii, as are the president's public and private attacks on mr. sessions and efforts to get him to resign. and tonight axios is reporting, quote, president trump pressured attorney general jeff sessions to reclaim control of the russia investigation on at least four separate occasions, three times in person and once over the phone, according to sources familiar with the conversations. jonathan swan's axios report said quote the sustained pressure made several officials uncomfortable because they viewed it as improper and worried it could be politically and legally problematic.
axios says trump's conversations with sessions about reversing his recusal occurred throughout last year and that trump told sessions he'd be a hero to conservatives if he did the right thing and took back control over the russia investigation, according to two sources with knowledge of their conversations, trump also told sessions he'd be a hero if he investigated hillary clinton. and today we got the first taste of the cohen tapes as rachel and i were just discussing. the michael cohen tapes, as was acknowledged in an ef den tear proceedings in manhattan yesterday donald trump's in-house lawyer, michael cohen, made audio recordings of some of his conversations. and today national public radio correspondent tim mack released on mpr his audio recording of a threatening phone call he received from michael cohen about a story that tim mack was writing during the presidential campaign for the daily beast
about donald trump's first wife and mother of his first three children who testified under oath in her divorce proceedings that donald trump raped her. tim mack published all of the michael cohen threats to him in quotation marks in if his original story in the daily beast, but he never released the audio recording of those threats until now. and you might remember some of the things you're about to hear michael cohen say on this recording, but this is the first time we get to hear michael cohen in action on the phone doing the job that he was paid to do for donald trump. and as you listen to this recording, just imagine, just imagine what we are going to be hearing later this year when some of michael cohen's audio recordings will surely become public. this voice, and this tone, that you are about to hear is probably going to become very familiar to us.
>> i know what you're planning on doing. and if there's any inference whatsoever, whether it's in the headline or any aspect of your article that indicates a rape, and i don't care about some small [bleep] line that you're going to throw away somewhere, mark my words for it, i will make sure that you and i meet one day over in the courthouse and i will take you for every penny you still don't have. >> michael cohen has children. and he decided to drag his children into a discussion of donald trump raping his first wife. >> i swear as god on my children, i will find you, i will serve you personally, and i will be nothing but happy when i turn around and i get a judgment for defamation against you and the [bleep] paper you work for. do you understand what i'm saying? >> he wasn't finished. here is a sample of the next
couple of minutes of the call. >> i'm warning you, tread very [bleep] lightly because what i'm going to do to you is going to be [bleep] disgusting. do you understand me? there is nothing reasonable about using donald trump's name with the word rape. do you understand that? do you understand what a disgusting word that is? you put mr. trump's name in on to it, rest assured, you will suffer the consequence. so you do whatever you want. you want to ruin your life at the age of 20, you do that. and i'm going to be happy to serve it right up to you. leading off our discussion matt miller, spokesperson for eric holder, and david corn coauthor of the new best selling book "russian roulette" also an msnbc political analyst. and maya wiley is with us, former counsel to the mayor of new york city. maya, i want to start with you on the michael cohen tapes.
and let's just remember, also within this tape, we didn't play this part, he insists that it is legally impossible to rape your wife and the reporter tim mac, who he was talking to corrected him on that. and there's this long moment of silence where michael cohen is apparently having a law school moment where he's discovering for the first time no, you can legally rape your wife, treat your wife in such a way that constitutes rape. but this michael cohen, this is the michael cohen, who is -- we're going to learn a lot more about in this proceeding in the southern district of new york. >> this is the michael cohen that michael avenatti, the attorney for stormy daniels, stephanie clifford, calls a thug and calls his tactics thuggish. this is the first confirmation we have seen from actual tapes that yes, he, in fact, is extremely thuggish. he's threatening. he's not just having a legal argument, to your point,
lawrence, he's not just saying, look, here's the possibility of a defamation case against you because here you do not have facts -- that's not having a lawyerly conversation. he is literally threatening. he is extremely aggressive and abusi abusive. remember that we have also been told. we don't yet have it confirmed but we've also been told by michael avenatti that he knows that donald trump is on at least one of those conversations about what we don't know. it will be interesting to see what the exchange and the kind of communication is like if that ever comes to light. >> to tim mack's credit, he is completely calm throughout this. none of the threats that michael cohen issues works in any way, and the daily beast then goes ahead but not only does the article but they include in the article all of what michael cohen had to say, including repeatedly using the phrase rape with donald trump because in his statements he's saying you can't
use the word rape with donald trump, so in the article rape with donald trump appears most frequently from the mouth of michael cohen because he's so bad at what he does. >> that's the point. the headline here is what michael cohen did. and the news business we have the deck, sort of the secondary headline and that should be, michael cohen is a really bad fixer. he kind of had one job and he totally screwed it up. i think he thinks he's better at this than he is. that if he adopts the persona of what a fixer should be and do, that's good enough. but he's no roy cohen, who was a mentor for donald trump years earlier, who was a fixer, who represented the mob. but he was able to keep things quiet and do things. i think michael cohen believes that bluster is 90% of the game. and it really isn't. you have to know the law.
you have to know how to deal with people individually. he blew it with tim mack, he's blown the stormy daniels case. he's the opposite of a fixer. whatever that might. >> he's obviously a weak, small minded man of no real power whatsoever, who's watched way too much "soprano's" episodes. i want to move to the issue of the president switching discussions in his first year as president about trying to fire jeff sessions to then moving on to let's get him to reverse his recusal and the president spending the better part of a year to do that. >> what you see in the conversations with jeff sessions is president's approach to federal law enforcement. that is he expects federal law enforcement to go after his opponents, prosecute hillary clinton, and back off investigations into himself.
it's adamning piece of evidence because sessions must have told him at some point, the recusal was not a discretion nar act on sessions' part because someone might question him after the fact. it's written in the department of justice regulations that if you worked on a campaign, you cannot subsequently serve in investigative capacity into that campaign. which is the position that sessions found himself in. so when donald trump is coming and asking him to withdraw his recusal. he's basicallying asking him to violate doj regulations, for what purpose? there can be no other purpose but to shut down the investigation. otherwise you shouldn't care who's conducting the investigation because you're not worried about where it's going to go. >> now the firing of james comey which the president tried to rewrite has having nothing to do
with russia but the firing of james comey and the harassing ongoing of jeff sessions has become part of the investigation of the president. >> absolutely. part of what the justice department has to investigate in this case is whether donald trump has what's called corrupt intent. right. whether he intended to actually interfere in order to protect himself. that would be corrupt intent. he has been fairly explicit as these reports are coming out in trying to protect himself. that if one of the sources reportedly saying that he said this would -- you would be a hero to the republican party if you reversed this recusal. he's clearly indicating that what he's looking for is about as subtle as a volcano in hawaii. what he's really looking for is protect me. protect the republican party in this investigation. in fact, deflect it back to hillary clinton e-mails, which has already been an investigation that's said and done. i think that's really, really clear. in fact, even before some of these statements there was a
pretty strong case, at least in the court of public opinion, that there was some pretty intentional efforts by the president to make this go his way. >> david corn, i know you've studied the work, if we can call it that, of dinesh d'souza. and the president began his day by announcing that he intends to pardon him and called him on the phone last night, telling him that he was going to pardon him. it does look like the president is trying to get this country very accustomed to maybe, i don't know, a pardon a day. >> what it seems he's trying to get the country accustomed to is the political use of pardons. his major pardons have been scooter libby, sheriff joe arpaio, and now dinesh d'souza. these are all heroes to the right who have made the case they've been politically persecuted in their prosecutions by the federal government.
so as trump and his minions accuse the deep state of trying to politicize the russia investigation, basically undermine federal law enforcement, he's now pardoning people that he's defining as victims of law enforcement to delejet mize the notion of prosecution. so he may be sending a message to everyone, i'll take care of you, but at the same time he's also discrediting this institution of his own government. >> matt miller, he's bypassing the pardon office in the justice department completely. >> yes, which is supposed to weigh pardons and prns applications and make recommendations to the president. pardons are supposed to exist to correct injustices or show mercy to people who maybe commmaybe a mistake. that's not the true for the
president's pardon issues. he views the pardon power the same way as he views every other aspect of law enforcement. that is a way to punish his critics, in this case the prosecutors who brought these cases, people like preet bharara, pat fitzgerald, and to reward allies and, you know, people who are supportive of him. it's very hard to justice any of these pardons on their own. when you lay over the top of that, the message he's sending, it's a clear message to people in the russia investigation, and that is i am ready and willing to use this power to my benefit. "the washington post" has a quote from roger stone, one of the targets of the investigation who makes it clear to the post that he got that message loud and clear that the president is willing to use his pardon power in these cases and potentially the russia investigation. >> maya, he talked about the
possibility today of pardoning martha stewart. it seems like he's trying to in a certain extent, turn this into a reality show, the pardon power. >> i think you're right. i think it's also that martha stewart was prosecuted by james comey in the southern district of new york where michael cohen is now under investigation. so i think there's a clear wink, wink, nod, nod, as well as a bit of a punishment to comey, in his book he talked about the decision to prosecute a wealthy person, if he was going to prosecute a black pastor for a low level crime, he couldn't pass over prosecuting martha stewart for a white collar crime. and remember, barack obama has one of the highest numbers of clemency decisions, other than
gerald ford who dg vietnam draft evaders. but because it was low level offenders, almost 2,000 people in total he pardoned but around a societal issue. donald trump said he was going to clean up the swamp. dinesh d'souza, campaign finance reform, pled guilty. aloe cuted to it. said he was remorsableleful and suddenly now saying i have restored faith in the american system because of the pardon. i don't. >> maya wiley gets the last word. when we come back, harvard law professor lawrence tribe says the pardon today is an elephant whistle to michael
cohen and all who know damning things about trump. professor tribe joins us later. and how the border policies went from abhorrent to evil. aging power grids, ...aging everything. we also have the age-old problem of bias in the workplace. really... never heard of it. the question is... who's going to fix all of this? an actor? probably not. but you know who can solve it? business. because solving big problems is what business does best. so let's take on the wage gap, the opportunity gap, the achievement gap. whatever the problem, business can help. and i know who can help them do it.
president simply talk about people he's thinking about maybe pardoning without getting a question about it from anyone, and without getting a request from that person for a pardon. when the president volunteered today on air force one that he is thinking about commuting the prison sentence of former illinois governor rod blagojevich, the president lied. he said that rod blagojevich did nothing wrong when he got caught on tape trying to sell the appointment to senator barack obama's senate seat after barack obama was elected president of the united states. that is a classic case of bribery. but today the president said that all politicians do that, there was nothing do it and that rod blagojevich saying he wanted to sell the senate seat was just, quote, a stupid thing to say. he also said he was thinking about pardoning martha stewart who was convicted of lying to the fbi. he already decided to pardon dinesh d'souza for violating
campaign finance laws. it seems the president is sitting around the oval office looking to pardon people who were convicted of the offenses that donald trump's friends and staff and others near donald trump just might be charged with. joining our discussion now, lawrence tribe, harvard law school professor and author of a new book "the power of impeachment" thank you for joining us tonight. i want to get your reaction to what the president revealed today about his use of the pardon power. >> i think he made absolutely clear that he's using it to protect the rich and famous and the people who do the very kinds of things that he seems to think aren't so bad and that the people around him have done, obstruct justice, lie to the federal authorities, manipulate the election system, cheat basically undermine the american
government. the big first pardon that he gave to arpaio, the first time he was sort of dangling the get out of jail free card to people like manafort and, you know, michael flynn and all these other guys, it was pardoning someone for defying a judicial order that he stop mistreating and discriminating against immigrants of color. i mean, first of all, using the pardon to basically undermine the ability of courts to enforce the law when you came to be a law and order candidate, turns the world upside down. so he's sending, as i think maya and matt and david corn all indicated, he's sending all the wrong signals. he's sending signals to the people who have damning evidence about him. that if they just stay strong
he'll have their back, or he might. he's sending signals to the country, his base, that people like conspiracy theorists like dinesh d'souza are doing the right thing. they are really on the right side of the law. dinesh d'souza is a great example. he's somebody who was fairly prosecuted, he pled guilty, he realized -- he basically admitted in open court that he had deliberately manipulated the election system to evade the limits on how much you can contribute. he had done that and all he was given was five years of probation with one peasly day a week of public service. that was a light sentence and now we're supposed to sympathize with him. the pardon power was never meant to rip the system of law apart. it's totally ghastly. >> "the washington post" is carrying a report tonight
quoting roger stone as saying, basically what you've just said, about the pardon of dinesh d'souza, this is what roger stone says tonight about the pardon of dinesh d'souza in "the washington post." it has to be a signal to michael flynn and paul manafort and even robert s. mueller iii, indict people for crimes that don't pertain to russian collusion and this is what could happen. the special counsel has awesome powers, as you know, but the president has even more awesome powers. so there's roger stone translating the pardon for us. >> he got the signal, although i wouldn't say there's any exception for russian collusion. i mean, this is a very strong signal to everybody who's being investigated by the southern district of new york or by robert mueller that if they just don't hurt the president, he will protect them. it's a terrible message to send. and even though the pardon power itself is very broad, when
pardons are used as part of a conspiracy or a scheme to obstruct justice and take down the legal system, they can form a pattern offi impeachable offenses that's what we're seeing. >> alan dershowitz says that anything that's a presidential power, whenever exercised by the president, by definition you can't impeach the president for that. you two have a sharp disagreement over this for example in the pardon power. professor dershowitz would hold that any use of the pardon power is justifiable and cannot be an impeachable offense. >> i don't know what planet my former colleague is on but he has it upside down and inside out. the whole point of the
impeachment power, which has to be used with great care, the whole point of it is to prevent the gross and dangerous abuse of the very powers the president has. if, for example, donald trump is guilty, even now of tax evasion, which does not involve abusing a presidential power, he can't be impeached for that, but if he uses the power he has, like the power to fire the fbi director, for corrupt purposes, that's the whole point of the pardon power. it's just completely crazy to say when you abuse your powers, then you can't be removed from office. i mean, that's what's true of a king, a queen, an emperor, but not of the head of the american government. that's not what america is all about. nobody here is above the law. >> harvard law school professor lawrence tribe, author of "to end a presidency" thank you for
joining us. appreciate it. >> thank you, lawrence. coming up, one of the big trump team lies of the week is that the fbi should have told donald trump that russians were trying to influence the presidential campaign. rudy giuliani is telling that lie, donald trump is telling the lie, rush limbaugh is now telling the lie for donald trump and donald trump is retweeting rush limbaugh, and, in fact, the fbi did tell candidate donald trump that the russians were trying to influence the campaign. now that i'm on my wa♪ ♪ do you still think i'm crazy standing here today ♪ ♪ i couldn't make you love me ♪ but i always dreamed about living in your radio ♪ ♪ how do you like me now?! ♪ applebee's 2 for $20, now with steak. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood. want in on the secret to ageless skin? take the olay 28 day challenge.
millions of real women see results starting day 1. there is not a friend that i have, that will not own this product. visible results or your money back olay. ageless (burke) seen it. covered it. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪
i support the affordable care act, and voted against all trump's attempts to repeal it. but we need to do more. i believe in universal health care. in a public health option to compete with private insurance companies. and expanding medicare to everyone over 55. and i believe medicare must be empowered to negotiate the price of drugs. california values senator dianne feinstein to negotiate the price of drugs. californians are leading against donald trump.
our senator should, too. kevin de león is the only candidate for senate who passed laws protecting immigrants from trump... and helped dreamers stay in school. he led bold action against climate change. and only de león fought for universal, medicare for all. democrat kevin de león the only true progressive for senate. change california now is responsible for the content of this advertising. this week the trump team is pushing the big lie that the fbi never told candidate donald trump that they were
investigating russians trying to influence the campaign. >> of course, they should have come to the trump campaign if it wasn't spying. they could have come to me. my goodness, i was the fbi man of the year that year. they cold could have to me, and told me, and i could have briefed the president. or they could have briefed the president. >> they did brief the president. today donald trump continued pushing the false attacks with this tweet quoting radio host rush limbaugh saying if the fbi was so concerned and if they weren't targeting trump they should have told trump if they were really concerned about the russians infiltrating a campaign hoax then why not try to stop it? why not tell trump? because they were pushing this scam. of course, they did tell trump. the fbi did tell candidate trump. according to the nbc news, the fbi warned trump in 2016 russians would try to infiltrate
his campaign. joining us now julia ainsley of nbc news and back with us is matt miller. julia, you worked on that nbc news story that revealed that the fbi told donald trump that russians would try to infiltrate his campaign. >> that's right, lawrence. covering this is like drinking out of a fire hose sometimes. we had a reemergence of this story. a lot of people have been picking it up on social media and talking about it because it's direct evidence to the contrary of what you just showed that giuliani is saying, the president said, what rush limbaugh is saying that the fbi should have gone and told the president. we know that in the summer of 2016 after he had become the republican nominee he was briefed and warned by counterintelligence officials at the fbi. they told him he should be on the lookout for anyone from russia trying to infiltrate his campaign, as well as other
countries. and they made this specifically to him. this was supposed to be a broad threat assessment, but they wanted to also carve out this piece and say there are people potentially in your campaign who could be compromised and there are ways that the russians could be trying to infiltrate your campaign and to boost you to win. this was also right before paul manafort stepped down and it was thought that he might have had connections to russia by supporting pro-russian interest in the ukraine. so all of this played out around a time it should have definitely been high on the radar of the president. it wasn't someone low level in his campaign, they briefed the president himself. according to that december reporting we have. so all of this now, either it slipped the mind of the president when he's coming out and making these statements now, or he wants to forget it because it doesn't fit into the narrative that he has now that he was just scammed by the intelligence community and they wanted to spy on him this whole time.
>> i for one do not believe it slips his mind or he forgets it. this is what we call lying. i want to narrow down one thing. you didn't get an exact date on when the fbi briefed candidate trump? >> it would have been around late july, early august. we believe it was sometime after he received the nomination, which was july 16th and right before paul manafort left so august 16th. so that's a narrow time frame, talking to people who might have been a part of it, sometimes it's hard to give us an exact date but we know he was briefed and warned, the candidate, now president himself. >> so right around that time we have a video of donald trump speaking to his rally audience about russia. let's listen to this. >> russia, if you're listening, i hope you're able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing. i think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press. >> she goes, donald trump,
donald trump, think of it, wants to be friend putin and other things she said. i'm saying to myself, what's wrong with that? >> if he says great things about me, i'm going to say great things about him. i've said he is much of a leader. certainly in that system he's been a leader far more than our president has been a leader. >> matt miller it's unclear what effect the briefing had on candidate trump. >> that's rights. one thing about julia's reporting it shows a remarkable act of good faith to brief the presidential candidate at that time about this potential infiltration given what they knew. remember in july they had started the counterintelligence investigation into his campaign and they had seen those public remarks he made, in addition to the public remarks he made at his own convention where he said he might not back nato allies in
the event of a russian invasion. so the fbi would have been looking at this, and might have had suspicions about donald trump already given they're investigating his campaign, but still went on to warn him anyway, to give him a chance, if there was anything suspicious he saw, to tell the fbi or push it out of his campaign. i think what's important also is yes, he got that private briefing and he should have been responsive to that but fast forward later in the campaign, in october the intelligence community came out publically and said that the russian intelligence service were trying to influence this election, they had hacked into -- it was reported that they hacked into john podesta's e-mails. in donald trump publically talked about wikileaks, talked about the fruits of espionage dozens of times on the campaign trail. >> thank you both for joining our discussion tonight. really appreciate it. up next, what's happening on
the southern border with the trump administration ripping children out of their parents' arms is evil. that is the word that "new york times" columnist nicholas christophe, himself the son of a refug refugee, used in his column today to describe what the trump administration is doing. evil. nick christophe is our next guest. (vo) what if this didn't have to happen? i didn't see it. (vo) what if we could go back?
what if our car... could stop itself? in iihs front-end crash prevention testing, nobody beats the subaru impreza. not toyota. not honda. not ford. the subaru impreza. more than a car, it's a subaru. you always get the lowest price on our rooms, guaranteed?m let's get someone to say it with a really low voice. carl? lowest price guaranteed. what about the world's lowest limbo stick? how low can you go? nice one, carl. hey i've got an idea. just say, badda book. badda boom. badda book. badda boom. nice. always the lowest price, guaranteed. book now at choicehotels.com
( ♪ ) face the world as a face to be reckoned with. only botox® cosmetic is fda approved to temporarily make moderate to severe frown lines, crow's feet and forehead lines look better. it's a quick 10 minute cosmetic treatment given by a doctor to reduce those lines. there is only one botox® cosmetic, ask for it by name. the effects of botox® cosmetic, may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness can be a sign of a life-threatening condition. do not receive botox® cosmetic if you have a skin infection. side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain,
headache, eyelid and eyebrow drooping and eyelid swelling. tell your doctor about your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, and medications including botulinum toxins as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. leave your mark on the world. minimize its mark on you. get started at botoxcosmetic.com. minimize its mark on you. i'm all-business when i, travel... even when i travel... for leisure. so i go national, where i can choose any available upgrade in the aisle - without starting any conversations- -or paying any upcharges. what can i say? control suits me. go national. go like a pro. from abhorrent to evil. that's what donald trump has done.
moved from abhorrent to evil on immigration policy according to our next guest, "new york times" columnist nicholas christophe who wrote today the policy of removing children from their parents has veered from merely abhorrent to truly evil. diane feinstein said she will produce legislation to prevent immigrant children from being separated from their parents at the southern border. she said it's hard to conceive of a policy more horrific than intentionally separating children from their parents as a form of punishment. these terrible policies call into question whether we are in violation of our own laws and our obligations under international law. what about moral law? the moral law that so many in the trump administration claim to live by, including the president of the united states. the teachings of jesus christ.
no one in the trump administration has come forward with a moral justification for what they are willfully doing to children at the southern border. none of the self-proclaimed christians in the trump white house have cited anything jesus christ ever said to justify what they are choosing to do to children every day. of course, no one in government ever needs to cite a religious justification for doing anything, but it would be nice. if they're going to publically violate the teachings of their own religion to just shut up about religion and not try to repeatedly claim that their lives and governing decisions are guided by religion. >> every life is sacred and that every child is a precious gift from god. so true.
as the lord says in jeremiah, before i formed you in the womb, i knew you, before you were born, i set you apart. >> but after you were born, donald trump set you apart from your mother at the southern border. nicholas christophe, who is himself the son of a refugee has heard the stories of some of the parents who have had their children ripped out of their arms at the southern border. and he will join us next and explain why he says the trump immigration policy is now truly evil. . simply add water, and use in your kitchen for burnt on food, in your bathroom to remove soap scum, and on walls to remove scuffs and marks. it erases 4x more permanent marker per swipe.
hello. let's go for a ride on a peloton. let's go grab a couple thousand friends and chase each other up a hill. let's go make a personal best, then beat it with your personal better than best. let's go bring the world's best instructors right to you. better yet, let's go bring the entire new york studio - live. let's go anytime, anywhere, with anyone who's willing. and let's go do it all right here. ready to go? peloton. delivery should look like this. handcrafted layers of clean food you can give your kids.
attorney general jeff sessions is one of the trump administration's biggest cheerleaders for their new policy that "new york times" columnist nick kristof has called evil in his column today, the policy of separating children from their parents. >> if you cross the border unlawfully, then we will prosecute you. it's that simple. if you smuggle illegal aliens across our border, then we will prosecute you. if you are smuggling a child, then we will prosecute you. and that child may be separated from you as required by law. >> joining our discussion now, nicholas kristof, pulitzer prize-winning columnist for "the
new york times." nick, try as i might, listening to jeff sessions say that and watching him say it, i could not detect the slightest discomfort on his part, moral or any kind of discomfort about separating children from their parents. >> well, boy, i must say reporting this, i was just shaken to the core. it is so disingenuous to hear attorney general sessions say these things because it's not simply people who cross the border illegally who are subjected to this, not that it should happen to anybody. but i talked to -- or i wrote about honduran woman, for example, who completely followed procedures. she went to the southern side of the border of mexico, presented herself to u.s. officials, and requested asylum, was taken by u.s. officials across the border. and then her 18-month-old child was taken away from her. another woman, a mexican woman, who is in the same aclu lawsuit,
presented her officially, doing everything just right, broke no law, and her 4-year-old son and 6-year-old blind daughter were taken away from her. and they've done nothing wrong. they followed procedures perfectly. and so to be talking about how they are law-breakers and this is what you get when you break the law is just utterly wrong and offensive. and i must say john kelly talks -- general kelly, the white house chief of staff, talks about how, well, this is an effective deterrent. you know, at a policy level, perhaps he's right. if you brutalize children, that may well indeed deter parents from being their kids. but, you know, my god, i mean we could gouge out their eyes. we could put out east german-style -- >> killing them would be a
deterrent too. one of the things you have to decide in government is when you're formulating penalties for conduct, you have to decide what is the appropriate and what is the productive penalty in relation to what the thing you're talking about is. >> that's right. >> finding a deterrent is easy. it's a question of from killing back to lesser deterrents, where do you find the right one? >> that's right. i mean essentially it's a policy question. it's a moral question. and we have to protect not only our border, but we have to protect our values. and i'm afraid that right here the trump administration is deterring to protect our borders in a way that completely betrays our soul. >> let's listen to what john kelly had to say. i have to read what he had to say on npr. this is a quote that has become pretty famous. he said, the children will be taken care of. they'll be put into foster care or whatever. that is the statement of a man who has no idea what happens to those children. >> and, i mean, this is the
family values party? and one of the things we know about early childhood is that trauma lasts a lifetime, that it affects brain development, and that parents are best for a child. and then to rip these children off, nationally they're typically put in an institution. and then after a while, they're farmed out to some kind of foster parent somewhere. in one case, it seemed that two siblings had been sent to different foster parents. the parents have no idea, for a while at least, where their kids are. they're terrified. i mean, you know, this is just unconscionable. >> nicholas kristof, really brilliant reporting today in your column coupled with solid moral judgment, which we're not getting from the trump administration. thank you very much for joining us tonight. >> thank you, lawrence. tonight's last word is next. woman 1: proof of less joint pain... woman 2: ...and clearer skin. woman 3: this is my body of proof. man 2: proof that i can fight psoriatic arthritis...
woman 4: ...with humira. woman 5: humira targets and blocks a specific source of inflammation that contributes to both joint and skin symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain, stop further irreversible joint damage, and clear skin in many adults. humira is the #1 prescribed biologic for psoriatic arthritis. avo: humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. woman 6: need more proof? woman 7: ask your rheumatologist about humira. man 1: what's your body of proof?
my secret visitors. hallucinations and delusions. the unknown parts of living with parkinson's. what plots they unfold, but only in my mind. over 50% of people with parkinson's will experience hallucinations or delusions during the course of their disease. if your loved one is experiencing these symptoms, talk to your parkinson's specialist. there are treatment options that can help. my visitors should be the ones i want to see.
time for tonight's last word, and that word is "equal." last night the illinois house of representatives voted 72-45 to ratify the equal rights amendment. the illinois senate voted to ratify the e.r.a. in april. so illinois is now the 37th state to ratify the e.r.a., which was introduced and passed by congress in 1972. two-thirds of the states are required by the constitution to ratify a new amendment. so only one more state is needed to pass the equal rights amendment, which would enshrine equal rights for women in the constitution. the e.r.a. has been introduced in the legislatures of five states this year -- florida, georgia, missouri, arizona, and virginia. e.r.a. activists believe their best chance to win another state
is in arizona or virginia. arizona's legislature is now 40% women, making it the most female legislature in the united states. and today democratic congressman don beyer of virginia tweeted virginia could and should put the equal rights amendment over the top. if virginia does that, the equal rights amendment will be the next amendment to the constitution. equal means equal. that's tonight's last word. "the 11th hour" with brian williams starts now. tonight a wild day's worth of news even by trump administration standards, including a presidential pardon for a man who pleaded guilty to a federal crime and word that two members of the apprentice kwiegs family may be pardoned next. there's also the looming questions are these pardons meant as a message to people like cohen and manafort. also the president reportedly pressured jeff sessions to take control of the russia investigation not once,