tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC June 12, 2018 6:00pm-7:00pm PDT
white slips of paper, that had their name and then their kids' names, and one woman said to me, these are not my children, the names that were listed on the paper, were not even her children. >> congresswoman pramila jayapal, thank you so much for reporting that out for us. i appreciate it. >> thank you, chris. >> as i've mentioned before, we have a great episode about this topic on "why is this happening?" plus we have a brand new episode today with amy chu on political tribalism. also very good in my opinion. check it out. on tune in or whenever you get your podc that is "all in" for this evening. "the rachel maddow show" starts right now. good evening, rachel. >> good evening, chris. that was stunning with congresswoman jayapal. i saw her reporting, i saw her talking about it, and i saw the video that she posted on facebook about it, but her going into that kind of detail with you right now is -- >> unreal. >> -- just chilling. unbelievable. thank you. and thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. glad to have you with us. lots of news going on. here's your pop quiz. north korea. north korea has borders with three other countries. what are the three other countries? i will spot you the first two.
obviously, north korea has a border with south korea, one of the most famous borders on earth. it features a real live dmz. it's one of the mostught conflict lines on the planet, and it has been for decades. so that's one of the two i will spot you. obviously, north korea borders south korea. north korea also borders china. north korean border with china is way longer than its border with south korea. the length of that border, the 23 different road crossings across that north korea-china border, all those things make china acutely interested in north korean affairs. not justs i friendly neighbor but also because china quite desperately doesn't want north korea to suffer some sort of catastrophic collapse. north korea falling apart, war in north korea, an unimaginable korea, anything that might cause the collapse of that weird isolated repressed, poor place,
that would produce potentially millions of north korean refugees, which china believes would become their instant problem and one they do not want. so that worry, that balancing act with north korea over that big long porous border they've got with north korea, i think that explains a lot china's attitude toward them. particularly as china's economic rise has created such an increasing contrast between ving standards in china and what peohave to endure in north korea. they're very conscious of that bo big important international geopolitical thing. so that's two of the three, right? north korea borders south korea. north korea borders china. what is the third country with which north korea has a border? it's right up there on the sea coast in the northeastern corner of north korea, where the tumen river filters into a muddy delta and reaches the sea. it's up there in the far north. it's a wicked cold, winged eye laited gray little corner of the
world. north korea has a tiny little sniglet of a border way third country there. there's only one crossing over that border. it's a bridge. it is a bridge you cannot walk across, nor can you drive across it. you can only take a train across it. it's the one crossing on that border between north korea and that third country. if you take that train, which doesn't come very often, if you take that train across are that bridge from north korea and they let you cross that border, where you end up in is russia. that's the third country that borders north korea. in 1860 russia anne came in and annexed that little spift land at the delta of the tumen river. previously, that territory had been china. but russia came in while we were busy starting our own civil war in 1860, and they pushed the chinese border back 11 miles inland.
and that had one very important consequence for china. it cut off ina's access to the sea anywhere north of the korean peninsula. and russia in taking that peace of land, they also bought themselves a weird little 11-mile-long border between russia and the other weirdest country on earth. chnically, north korea is a communist country, one of the last few communist countries on earth. when the soviet union still existed, the ussr was the main outside entity that was propping up north korea, more than any other ally or any other benefactor. one of the great humanitarian catastrophes of the 20th century happened very late in the 20th century. it happened in the 1990s in north korea, when widespread sustained famine country is estimated to have killed hundreds of thousands if not millions of people. in the '90s. that famine and its astounding death toll were sort of hard for
the rest of the world to see because north korea is such a closed and secretive and ed country. but that famine didn't happen in isolation. part of the reason that famine is believed to havepened and happened then is because of the cose of e soviet union. at the end of the '80s, beginning of the '90s. they really had been north korea's main lifeline in terms of economic support. when the soviet union collapsed at the start of the '90s, so did north korea's ability to feed its population. its patron went into chaos. north korea started to starve to death. well, now of course it's china that is the ascendant economic superpower in that region and in the world. and now it is china that is keeping north korea alive economically. accounting for more than 90% of north korea's trade. but it's both china and russia who both have a big stake in that country. china and russia are both literally neighbors with north korea. they're abutters.
even if russia's north korea bot has that one train bridge and a bunch of miserable guards and nothing else. when president trump met with kim jong un last night, it was easy to be caught up in the strange spectacle of that meeting. when things happen that have neve hned before. hings happen for which there's no parallel in american history, it can be hard to sort of get your bearings in terms of what you ought to expect and what should be seen as a shocking departure from what you expected. it can be counted to see what can be counted as a good g. outcome versus a bad outcome when nothing like it has happened before. the thing bun precedented events is they exist in a categ of their own. you have nothing to stack up next to them to try to keep speshlth, to know when something is right or something is defini
definitely off. but even with those caveats about last night, i think it is safe to say there is one thing, one very big thing that was definitely off about that meeting last night. and that is the baseline reality that we don't know what it was for. why did that happen? what was tt for? no u.s. president h ever reed to meet with a korean dictator before. they've sought this for decades. kim jong un has wanted this for years. his father want td before him. his grandfather wanted it before him. all u.s. presidents have been asked. all u.s. presidents have considered it, at least to a certaidegree. none of them have said yes. why did this u.s. president agree to this meeting? why give north korea a one-on-one in-person summit wth this pageantry and all the honorifics? after every other president said no why did this president say yes? what was it for? i mean, north korea made no new promises in order to get this
summit. no new promises about their weaps program or their own behavior toward their own people or anything else. the nor korean dictator did reassert what has been a long-time vague assurance from the north korean government that they seek to denuclearize the korean peninsula. but you what? north dictators have been saying that to the united states in the context of various agreemts and negotiations for more than 25 years now. that's nothing new. they start pledging they would denuclearize the korean peninsula in the early '90 since then they have dropped out of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. they've mastered and completed multiple nuclear fuel cycles. they've successfully developed operational nuclear weapons. they've manufactured what are believed to be dozens of operational nuclear bombs. m so thehave rel their missile short, medium, and long-range missiles that they could use to fire those nuclear weapons as far away as chicago if they so desire. and they got themselves even a hydrogen bomb as of 2017.
that's what they've done since they first started promising in the early '90s that they'd be happy to denuclearize the korean peninsula. thatheir vision of a denuclearized korean peninsula and their role in it. them having dozens of nuclear weapons and vehicles to deliver them all over the globe. that's what they mean by we want to denuclearize. so in order to get this summit last night with the amecan ident the north korean dictator and the north korean government appeared to have not promised change of any kind in their nuclear program or in any other policy. literally, they gave up nothing. they promised nothing. in exchange for that generous offer president trump gave north korea this royal wedding-style summit in which north korea was billed as a nation equal in stature to the united states and the north kotator wasbilled as leader equal in stature to the president of the united states.
as a bonus the president also threw literally hours of unwavering over-e for the north korean dictator and his repeated insistence it was his h as president of the united states to hthe opportunity to meet with the dictat dictator. and then, surprise, presid trump announc when it was all over that h end the joint military exercises between t u.s. and south korea. what? south korea is supposed to be one of our closest allies, but apparently they had no idea this was coming. "south korea appears to have been blindsided by trump's change of heart on war games. u.s. officials could not confirm that trump had told counterparts in seoul about the plan to suspend military exercises." south korea soon put out a statement saying they were trying to figure out the exact meaning and intentions in president trump's comments.
because they had no idea this announcement was coming. in addition to blindsiding south korea about ending joint military exercises between the u.s. and south korean militaries, president trump also appears to have blindsided the u.s. mary with his announcement. "the u.s. military" -- excuse me. "the united states military in south korea was also apparently blindsided by mr. trump's remarks. u.s. forces korea said they had received no updated guidance on execution or cessation of training exercises." so big picture, what was this summit all about? they had the summit. right? they had the one op wun meeting and then the extend bilateral meeting with other aides and put out the written statement. the written statement didn't say anything about ending military exercises. but after all that happens the president sort of casually announces, after the wedding was over, that at some point during the festivities he had told them
that he'd be calling off u.s. and south korean joint military exercises. we've been doing those every year since the 1950s. u.s. forces korea, the u.s. military in korea, had absolutely no idea this was coming. and that turns out to not just be strange. it's materially consequential because right now u.s. forces korea are in the midst of preparing for their next big round of military exercises with south korea. the ones they do ery year. if you look athe longer statement u.s. forces korea put out in response to the president's remarks, it seemed to indicate that maybe the defense department, maybe the u.s. military might even be planning on going ahead with those next exercises with south korea because they're not sure if trump actually meant what he so casually mentioned after the summit was ov what the u.s. forces korea statement said was "we have received no updated guidance on execution or cessation of
training exercises to include this fall's scheduled ulchi freedom guardian. in coordination with our republic of korea partners we will continue with our military pos until we receive updated guidance from theepartment of defense." ulchi freedom guardian is a very large joint military exercise that's scheduled to start in late august. i think it's like 11 days long. it's one of theiggest military exercises on earth. tens of thousands of south korean troops. nearly 20,000 u.s troops. apparently, the defense department is going to proceed they are still doing that because they haven't received any official word and maybe this is like trump announce he wants hillary clinton investigated or maybe i'm going to pardon martha stewart. like they have to wonder if this is just a thought he's had and it's not something he's going to follow through on and so it's therefore not something they're supposed to follow through on. but if he did mean it, if he is actually ordering an end to these jot military exercises
between the u.s. and south korea, that is an absolute jackpot for the north korean dictator. that is one of the things he wants most on earth that he and his father and grandfather have been trying to get for decades. and now trump has apparently just given it them in exchange for nothing. do you remember last year when north korea threatened to nuke guam? remember they said they were going to shoot nuclear missiles at guam, they made very detailed threats about the four nuclear bombs they were going to drop on guam and how exactly they were going to do that? remember that? they made that threat to protest last year's ulchi freedom guardian, last year's big joint u.s.-south korea military exercises in august. remember before then the flames and ashes threat? "if we push the buttons to annihilate the enemies even right now all bases of provocations will be reduced to
seas in flames and ashes in a moment." that threat was in protest of u.s.-south korea military exercises. when they threatened ton the saef japan into a nuclear sea of fire, that was in protest of south-south korea military exercises. when they freaking torpedoed a south korean ship and killed more than 40 sou korean sailors in 2010, thain response to u.s.-south korean military exercises. whorth korea announced that they considered themselves to no longer be bound by the ceasefire that ended the korean war in the '50s, that was in protest of u.s.-south korean military exercises. for years, for decades, north korea has not just demanded. they have hysterically demanded and fired missiles and killed people and sunk ships and shelled inhabited south korean islands to stop these joint u.s.-south korean military exercises. and now trump has just given them that forree, for nothing, apparently without talking to anybody else about it, including his own military or the south
koreans or anybody. the u.s. government, the trump administration insisted there would be no concessions to north korea unless they had complete verifiable irreversible denuclearization. right? they'd have to do that before the u.s. gave them anything. they didn't give any of that. they didn't even promise to do it. and they got an end to u.s. joint military exercises with south korea, one of the things they want most in the world, that they've been trying to get for decades? why'd they get that? why did trump give that to them? he didn't apparently negotiate it with anyone else even in the u.s. government or u.s. military. he just himself gave it away. why did he do that? you know who else wants the u.s. to stop its joint military exercises with south korea? the abutters. china naturally sees itself as the great power in the region and increasingly in the world. they definitely see north korea as not just a troublesome
neighbor but a neighbor that is squarely within their sphere of exclusive influence. from china's perspective if there are supposed to be foreign troops circulating in that part of the world that would be chinese troops and not anybody else's. china for years has advocated that the u.s. stop these joint military exercises with south korea. the other entity thateally wants the u.s. to stop its joint military exercises with south korea, the other country that has been insistent that those exercises are prove ka provocations and they must stop, the country cha tha has been speaking out on that more and more in the last couple of years specifically is north korea's other abutter. here's russia. march of 2016. expressing their opposition to south korean-u.s. military exercises. here's russia again march of 2017 when those same u.s.-south korean joint militar exercises rolled around again the same time the next year because they're annual exercises. but russia's starting to get a little more bold in the past year or two in expressing their
opposition to the u.s. participating in these joint military exercises. theerz russia in december 2017 getting even pushier about it, sending the head of the russian armed forces to the russian city let of the north korean little border to personally proclaim his opposition to the u.s. forces -- to u.s. forces participating in these joint military operations with south korea. russia has just this tiny little border, 11-mile-long border with north korea-w one ckorea, with on a train and they've got a troubled and varied history with that country. but russia is also increasingly straining at its borders right now and shoving back u.s. and western influence, espec u.nd western military presence, anywhere near what it considers to be its own geopolitical interests. and one of the things that they have started to loudly insist on is that the u.s. drop those joint military exercises with south korea.
the u.s. has kept those going as a pillar of u.s. national security strategy for, ooh, 70 years now. until last night. when trump casually announced that that's over now, he's doing away with those. blindsided everybody involved. and gave north korea something they desperately want and would do almost anything for. except he gave it to them for free. how come? this is a jungle gym... and a baseball dmond... ...a mythical castle ...and a grand banquet hall. this is not just a yard. it's where memories are made. the john deere x350 select series with the exclusive one-touch mulchcontrol system. nothing runs like a deere™ save $300 on the x350 select series™ tractors with purchase of a mulchcontrol™ kit. save $300 on the x350 select series™ proven to protect street skaters and freestylers. stops up to 97% uv.
lasts through heat. througsweat. coppertone. proven to protect. let someone else do the heavy lifting. tripadvisor compares prices from over 200 booking sites to find the right hotel for you at the lowest price. so you barely have to lift a finger. or a wing. tripadvisor. you're smart,eat you already knew that. but it's also great for finding the perfect used car.
you'll see what a fair price is and you can connect with a truecar certified dealer. now you're even smarter. this is trueca but as it grew bigger and bigger,ness. it took a whole lot more. that's why i switched to the spark cash card from capital one. with it, i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy. everything. what's in your wallet?
in the 2008 presidential election one of the earliest primary debates of that election barack obama, then a candidate, was asked whether he'd be willing to meet without preconditions in the first year of his presidency with the leaders of iran, syria, venezuela, cuba, or north korea. his answer caused an uproar. >> senator obama? >> i would. and the reason is this. that the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them, which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration, is ridiculous. >> senator clinton? >> well, i will not promise to
me with the leaders of these countries during my first year. i don't want to be used for propaganda purposes. certainly we're not going to just have our president meet with fidel c and hugo chavez and you know, the president of north korea. >> this was the a.p. headline day. "obama debate comments set off firestorm." and that was true in the primary. it was true later on too. hillary clinton went after barack obama on the campaign trail on that for months. she said that stanceas irresponsible and frankly naive. national republican party went nuts over what he had said as well and when obama became the general election nominee republicans hammered him on that as much as they hammered him on anything. saying he would meet with foreign leaders without preconditions that was as far as they were concerned pretty much the end of the world. >> what senator obama doesn't seem to understand, that if without precondition you sit down across the table from
someone who has called israel a stinking corpse and wants to destroy that country and wipe it off the map, you legitimize those comments. this is dangerous. isn't naive. it's erous. the north koreans have broken every agreement they've entered into. and we ought to go back to a little bit of ronald reagan's trust but verify. and certainly not sit down acrohe table from -- without precondition as senator obama said he did twice. it's just dangerous. >> >> that was republicans then. this is republicans now. the republican national committee boldly declaring today,"trump's historic summit stands in contrast to obama's north korea failures." as a general rule you might have noticed that in this hour on the show here on msnbc i don't go out of my way to play tape of the president speaking. nor do i tend to spend too much
time parsing whatever the latest quote is from him. that is not out of any animus on my part. it's just that the president very frequently says things that aren't true. he admits he says things that he calls it, you know, like hyperbole. but he lies. and i feel like on this show i'd like you to be able to trust me to give you true information. because i generally feel like i can't trust what purports to be true information from this president. i just try to dot news without words from him most of the time. even though that is the general rule arounde i'm going to break that rule for a second. because just as people living through this time on earth, i think we all really do need to grapple with what the president's political party is praising him for now. we have to grapple with what he just said as the sitting president of the united states about the most repressive dictator on earth. >> he really has been very open.
and i think very honorable. >> we're getting along. you see the relationship. we're getting along. >> great personality and very smart. good combination. very worthy, very smart negotiator. absolutely. >> he's a very talented man. >> really he's got a great personality. he's a funny guy. he's a very smart guy. he's a great negotiator. >> so we got along very well. we got along from the beginning. >> he's very talented. >> very smart. very good negotiator. wants to do the right thing. >> you trust him? >> i do trust him, yeah. he trusts i believe. i really do. >> we got along very well. we have a great chemistry. i know people where there is no chemistry, no matter what you do you just don't have it. we had it right from the beginning. >> i would love to have him at the white house whatever it takes. i would love to have him at the white house. and i think he'd love to be there. the american president has a new best friend. and it is apparently unconditional love. senator chris murphy is a member of the senate foreign relations committee.
he put out this statement today in response to the president's summit. "the president's disastrous treatment of our allies makes the syrupy photo op he just gave the brutal dictator kim jong un soerous. i have no quarrelh an ericanresident talking to our enemies. but how and when you talk to your enemies, that matters." senator chris murphy, thank you very much for joining us tonight, sir. pleasure to have you here. >> thanks for having me. >> so when you said how and when you talk to your enemies, that matters, what did you mean specifically in this context? >> what i mean is that the context here matters and coming on the heels of a g7eeting in which the president was absolutely brutalizing our closest allies, people who have historically had ourback, those that literally responded to our call after september 11th. it makes his over-the-top generous praise of kim even worse because it sends this very clear message that if you stand with us you are going to get no credit for that. in fact, you might be humiliated and embarrassed in front of the
entire world. and if you engage in the kind of atrocities that kim has you get praise from the president without any substantial reform up front. none of us sd kill the president for talking to a country that is largely antithetical to the united states. but when you do it literally in the same 72-hour period you that just pushed aside some of the people who have been closest to the united states and then you go out of your way to praise a guy who literally runes gulags, of political prisonersreds of and still engages in the open public execution of his political opponents, yeah, the context and the way in which you epigauge really does matter. people notice. >> do you think that north korea gave up anything, made any sort of meaningful concession or promise in order to get these declarations of love from the president? >> no, clearly they didn't.
in fact, you could argue that they've backtracked on previous commitments. it's all semantics because there's really no there there to this document. but the language that you referenced having been included in previous agreements between the north korean regime and the united states and other partners actually included stronger language. this is the weakest that has been included in any recent document that has emerged from north korea and the united states. and even president obama, when he began the beginning negotiations with iran he said in the campaign he'd do it without preconditions. but those early stage agreements, the confidence-building measures involved give and take from both the united states and iran. there is simply no give from the north koreans in this agreement. they get a wonderful photo op. they get to run the clock now for a period of months or years as these negotiations play out and we're no closer to actually
nuclear disarmament. >> the president didn't include in the written statement that was released at the end of the negotiations but did sort of casually mention when he talked to the press after that he also wants to call off joint u.s.-south korean military exercises. that struck me as interesting for several reasons. one is that north korea has wanted that so badly for decades and no u.s. president has previously seen fit to give that to them. the other thing is it seems like it was the president's sort of riffin the moment. i don't know if he -- that just occurred to him while he was talking to the press or if he actually offered that to narth koreans inotiatis. but even the u.s. military doesn't seem to have known that was coming. as far as i can tell the other entities that really, really want that besides north korea are russia and china. did you know this was coming? do you think this is significant in terms of u.s. national security? do you know where this came from? >> we certainly didn't know it was coming. but it's not shocking given that
the president has open pined to withdraw the u.s. military commitment from the peninsula, which as you mention is something that the russians and chinese have been asking for for a long time. there is this very interesting port from earlier today that suggests the chinese may have announced this cion of the exercises before trump did. suggesting that maybe this commitment was made before trump announced it, the chinese may have known about it. it is also very possible, rachel, that he's just a terrible negotiator and in fact if you look at the reason why he went bankrupt over and over again, it's because he took a very tough stand ahead of his netiation with business partners or creditors and then he gave them everything that they asked for once he sat down at the table. so if it really was just a last-minute throwaway concession, it would be in some ways completely consistent with the ways that he negotiated as a private citizen. >> so we have total consistency with his business bankruptcy record and total inconsistency
and a complete break from all modern u.s. history and presidential negotiation before him. that's -- that's a reorientation of my world. senator chris murphy, member of the foreign relations committee, thank you for being with us tonight, sir. >> thanks a lot. >> appreciate it. lots more to come tonight. stay with us. you might take something for your heart... or joints. but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally found in jellyfish, prevagen is the number one selling brain-health supplement in drug stores nationwide. prevagen. the name to remember.
the line between work and life hasn't just blurred. it's gone. that's why you need someone behind you. not just a card. an entire support system. whether visiting the airport lounge to catch up on what's really important. or even using those hard-earned points to squeeze in a little family time. no one has your back like american express. so no matter where you're going... we're right th you. the powerful backing of american express. don't do business without it. don't live life without it. and the wolf huffed and puffed... like you do sometimes, grandpa? it can be hard to breathe. so my doctor said... symbicort can help you breathe better. starting within 5 minutes. it doesn't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden symptoms.
doctor: symbicort helps provide significant improvement of your lung function. symbicort is for copd, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema. it should not be taken more than twice a day. it may increase your risk of lung infections, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. symbicort could mean a day with better breathing. watch out, piggy! (giggles) get symbicort free at saveonsymbicort.com. if you can't afrd your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. and help you feel more strength & energy in just 2 weeks. i'll take that. ensure high protein, with 16 grams of protein and 4 grams of sugar. ensure®
they should call in the fbi and say we wish for the country don't go any further into this case, period. that was president richard nixon on junerd, 1972, trying to shut down the watergate investigation. that was him concocting a plot whereby the cia would go to the fbi and tell the fbi they needed to back off of watergate for some bogus made up national security reason that wasn't the real thi. that was the smoking gun tape. nixon fought tooth and nail to stop the public release of all the tapes he made in the oval office. the legacy of nixon's failed
fight to block access to the tapes back then is now a law that applies to all presidents. it's called the presidential records act. it requires presidents to materials.heir documentary and that includes papers, pamphlets, videotapes, audiotapes, maybe even a single post-it note, depending on the circumstances. he anything that the president touches. any rorgd of the president's actions or behavior or notes. it all gets preserved. and the process for that is supposed to be orderly. it is supposed to be lawful. that is an apparently what has been happening within the trump administration. and it has led to two guys being fired under very, very mystery circumstances. they are now talking about the circumstances of their firing. and it is a story that will curl your hair. and that's next. kyle: mom! mom!
kyle, we talked about this. there's no monsters. but you said they'd be watching us all the time. no, no. no, honey, we meant that progressive would be protecting us 24/7. we just bundled home and auto and saved money. that's nothing to be afraid of. -but -- -good night, kyle. [ switch clicks, door closes ] ♪ i told you i was just checking the wiring in here, kyle. he's never like this. i think something's going on at school. -[ sighs ] -he's not engaging. i think something's going on at school. and the nx hybrid with a class-leading 31 mpg combined estimate. lease the 2018 nx 300 for $339 a month for 36 months. experience amazing at your lexus dealer.
yes. it's a targeted medicine proven to help prevent severe asthma attacks, about 50% of people with severe asthma have too many cells called eosinophils in their lungs. fasenra™ is designed to work with the body to target and remove eosinophils. fasenra™ is an add-on injection for people 12 and up with severe eosinophilic asthma. don't use fasenra™ for suddenathing problems
or other problems caused by eosinophils. fasenra™ may cause headache, sore throat, and allergic reactions. get help right away if you have swelling of your face, mouth, and tongue, or trouble breathing. don't stop your asthma treatments unless your you to. tell your doctor if your asthma worsens or if you have a parasitic infection. fasenra™ is a targeted treatment for eosinophilic asthma. that's important. ask an asthma specialist about fasenra™. if his denture can cope with a steak. luckily for him, he uses super poligrip. it helps give him 65% more chewing power. leaving brad to dig in and enjoy. super poligrip. one month after donald trump was sworn in as president the white house counsel's office this memo to the entire white house staff.
subject, presidential records act obligation. purpose, to remind all personnel of their oigation to preserve and maintain presidential records as required by the presidential records act. and the memo lays out quite specifically the broad and particular sweep of what must be kept for posterity by law, down to powerpoint presentations and text messages and old-fashioned letters. "you should preserve hard copy presidential records in organized files. to the extent practical tickable you should categorize materials as presidential records when they are created or received. you should file presidential records separately from other material, and so on. "the willful destruction or concealment of federal records is a federal crime punishable by fines and imprisonment." imprisonment. by law. documents that pertain to a sitting president must be collected and preserved. they get handed over to the national archives.
national archives saves everything. it's required by law. and after that president leaves office those records, a lot of them, they eventually become public. that's how we learn what happened inside a particular white house even if that icular administration didn't tell us about it at the time. history gets made every day in the white house. we as americans eventually get to learn that h of presidential r act. it's how we get the history being made now, that we can't yet see. and that is why i have been unable to erase this headline from the bk of my eyelids. "meet the guys who tape trump's papers back together." tape? what? the president's unofficial filing system involves tearing up documents into pieces, even when they are supposed to be preserved. "white house aides realized early on that they were unable to stop trump from ripping up paper after he was done with it and throwing it in the trash or, classy, on the floor.
instead they chose to clean it up for him in order to make sure the president wasn't violating the law. staffers had the fragments of paper collected from the oval office as well as the private residence. and then they sent those fragments of paper over to the records management office across the street from the white house to be reassembled. armed with rolls of clear scotch tape, staffers sift through large piles of shrded paper and put them back together like a jigsaw puzzle. sometimes the papers would just be split down the middle but other times they would be torn into pieces so small they looked like confetti. torn by the president's own enormous hands. one career government official with close to 30 years under his belt and a top secret security clearance explained, we got scotch tape, the clear kind. you found pieces and taped it back together and then you gave it back tthe supervisor." or at least that's what they were doing. this past spring, according to politico's new report, that department where they had the
people from the archives taping together the president's torn up documents, this past spring they started firing people out of that department. two of them who had been taping the president's documents back together. they were both stripped of their badges with no explanation and marched off the white house grounds by secret service. they both then had their personal effects from their offices mailed to them at ho a few questions here. why were the career staffers from the national archives fired from their jobs taping the president's papers back together again, humpty-dumpty style? is anybody on that same scotch tape duty now? and what assurances do we the public have that records are being kept as the law requires? what just happened here? joining us now is the woman who broke this story, annie carney, who's a white house reporter for politico.com. miss carney, congratulations on this super weird scoop, and thank you for joining us.
>> thank you for having me. >> first let me ask you do we know if there are still people who are scotch-taping together the president's torn-up documents, or did this end when the gentlemen who are the suect of your piece got fired? >> no, there are still people doing it, although the amo of torn-up participator thed is less than it was at the beginning of the administration. solomon lardy, one of the men i talked, to said for the first five months it was basically their entire department doing this is what he told me. and when he was fired, he said there was still a woman doing it daily and a few other people. so it was still going on but the vomit had decreasekra decreased. >> do you have any sense since your piece came out after your discussions with these sources who had these jobs, do you have any sense why they were fired? >> i really don't know. there could be a good reason why these two men were fired, don't kn i don't know what their record was in 30 years of government,
if something came out that was a fireable idea. i have no idea. the point is theyere given no explanation except they serve at the pleasure of the president and escorted off the grounds by hr. i e-mailed the hr woman who fired them. they forwarded me e-mails with her. i saw the back and forth they had with her. she never gave them any response. she never responded to me. the press office never responded to me at all on this story. the ripping part or the firing part. i never got any answer from the white house. so i have no insight into why they were fired, and it remains a mystery to them too. >> it is a interesting window into the personality and habits of a president to learn that as a matter of course apparently the president according to your piece tears stuff in half or tears it into teeny tiny little pieces after he's done looking like a document, he's like a human shredder, which is a thing. i don't know anybody else who does that. when you say the volume of torn-up materials that the national archive staff are trying to put back together with
tape, the volume of paper they're having to deal with has shrunk, is that because the president is doing this less, or is it because white house staff are collecting fewer of the shreds and sending them to the archives to be reassembled? >> my impression of it was that they have -- aides have tried to tell him, explain to him that these papers need to be saved, don't tear them up. and it took a long time for an old dog to learn new tricks here. this is the way he's been doing it forever. after the piece posted i talked to people who've worked with trump at various times in his career who said they -- you know, they remember him ripping, shredding paper. so the message didn't sink in. so they just cleaned up after him to make sure that he doesn't violate the law. because they were scared. his aides were scared tha he would. maybe that message has sunk in over the course of 1 1/2 years now that he's been in office. and he could be, you know,
changing his habits now. but at the beginning of the administration it was just -- the volume was enough for the whole department to be working on this. >> so it could be that he's getting better. it could be conceivably that they're not cleaning up as much after him. >> i don't kno maybe thatl be one of the letters we find when this all becomes history and we get more insight into what is going on. >> this is so insane. this is an incredible stor you who've been doing this incredibly weird thing. but wow, what a weird new window. >> it's what a few people said to me is kind of like a metaphor for the whole presidency. he's -- donald trump doesn't have a lot of preservational instincts, a lot of sense of history. and might not even have known that there were many people who have pride in their work who were tasked with this menial duty in order to clean up after him. >> known or cared. yeah. annie karni, politico's white house reporter. again, congratulations. thanks for being here tonight. appreciate it.
>> thank you. >> it's election night tonight. and we might have an ups in the making. that's next. i can't even mach myself throw this stuff on the ground as a joke. like it would be too much of a mess. for weakness. do not misjudge quiet tranquility for the power of 335 turbo-chard horses. the lincoln mkx, more horsepower than the lexus rx350. and a quiet interior from which to admire them. for a limited time, get 0% apr on the lincoln mkx plus get $1,000 bonus cash. get 0% apr on the lincoln mkx the full value of your new car? you're better off throwing your money right into the harbor. i'm gonna regret that. with new car replacement, if your brand new car gets totaled, liberty mutual will pay the entire value plus depreciation. liberty stands with you. liberty mutual insurance. looking for a hotel that fits... whoooo.
...your budget? tripadvisor now searches over... ...200 sites to find you the... ...hotel you want at the lowest price. grazi, gino! find a price that fits. tripadvisor. and that's how he intended to keep it. then he met the love of his life. who came with a three foot, two inch bonus. for this new stepdad, the love of his life. it's promising to care for his daughter as if she's his own. every way we look out for those we love is an act of mutuality. we can help with the financial ones. learn more or find asor at massmutual.com
tonight is election night. it's been on the calendars for a long time. it's been on the calendars for some time now. we've all known this is happening. somebody arrived a little late to the party this evening. the president tonight tweeting from air force one a presidential endorsement in the south carolina first district congressional race. this is the seat held by mark sanford, former south carolina governor. today at about 4:15 in the afternoon, less than three hours before the polls closed in south carolina, president trump endorsed the primary opponent to mark sanford, saying that congressman sanford has been, quote, nothing but trouble. now, by the time trump sent out that tweet, people in sth carolina had been voting for ab. so it was sort of an interesting decision for the president to make this last-minute intrusion into the race when there is only a couple of hours of voting left. whatever the strategy, though, it does not look good for mark sanford tonight. polls closed in south carolina a little over two hours ago with
about 50% of the vote in. congressman sanford is currently trailing behind his primary opponent, katie arrington, who is the one trump endorsed in the today. these votes are still coming in. if arrington gets more than 50% of the vote when all the vote is in, she will unseat mark sanford tonight. that would make congressman sanford the second congressman primaried out of offe this year. the first was robert pittenger of north carolina. these results from north carolina are coming in very, very slowly tonight. so we'll brushfire be watching these over the course of the evening. if when all the vote comes in, neither katie arrington nor mark sanford gets 50% of the vote, their race will go to a between the two of them, and that is one that sanford would probably not be expected to survive either. not looking good tonight for congressman and former governor mark sanford. now in virginia, one of the most vulnerable republicans in congress right now is congresswoman barbara comstock. she won her republican primary tonight, though for an incumbent
she faced a pretty strong opponent in tonight's primary. you see these are the results tonight in barbara comstock's race. tonit virginia's tenth dirict nominated barbara comstock's prima opponent. it will be state senator jennifer wexton. this seat is one of four vulnerable congressional seats in west virginia. democrats tonight nominated female candidates in all four of those districts where they want to unseat a publican. virginia democrats ran a recor number of women candidates in the house of delegates last year. they appear to be continuing that streak with tonight's congressional primary results. democratic u.s. senator tim kaine is up for reelection. he won his democratic senate primary tonight with nobody running against him. virginia republicans were in an interesting fight, though, tonight, to nominate who they're going pick to run against him. it's been a close race all night between a house delegate named nick freitas and a very controversial supervisor named cory stewart who has struggled with his tie toes white
supremacists and anti-semitic figures in politics. he has campaigned to conserve confederate statues and appeared alongside members of unite the white group that sparked the summer.n charlottesville establishment republicans had been pushing hard to to stop cory stewart from winning this primary tonight. but look at those results. he appears to have won this primary, whether republicans like it or not, this is the candidate they have chosen to face democratic senator tim kaine in the fall. senate campaigns is so far declining to comment on whether or not they're going to support corey stewart in the general election race this fall. polls are still open tonight in north dakota and nevada for primary races there. it's turning out to be an exciting night. ith us. mmission investment prod, fisher investments avoids them. some advisers have hidden and layered fees. fisher investments never does. and while some advisers are happy to earn issions
from you whether you do well or not, fisher investments fee are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management. gives skin the moisture it needs and keeps it there longer with lock-in moisture technology skin is petal smooth after all, a cleanser's just a cleanser unless it's olay.
but as it grew bigger and bigger,ness. it took a whole lot more. th switched to the spark cash card from capital one. with it, i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy. everything. what's in your wallet? only tuesday. already this week feels ten days long. but you should know the rest of this week is going to be a little bit nuts in ter of the
news. heads up tomorrow the former security director is going to be arraigned in d.c. james wolfe is expected to plead not guilty tomorrow for allegedly lying to the fbi about his contacts with with porters.sed to have leaked information to reporters about trump campaign aide carter page. the following day the justice department's inspector general on thursday is going to release his findings on the fbi's investigation into hillary clinton and her e-mail server. also that day, justice department and the fbi are going to brief congressional leaders on that fbi source who met with three trump campaign aides, which should bring up that whole controversy again. on friday, trump campaign chair paul manafort is going to be arraigned on a third felony indictment, this time for allegedly trying to tamp were witnesses. manafort's bail could be revised or revoked at that arraignment. that could land him in jail immediately on friday. it's already tuesday. keep your vitamins close at