tv All In With Chris Hayes MSNBC June 16, 2018 12:00am-1:00am PDT
our broadcast for tomorrow night. thank you for be with us. good night from nbc news he headquarters in new york. >> tonight on "all in." >> paul manafort has done an amazing job. he's here some place. where's paul. >> the president's campaign chairman in jail tonight. >> the you know, paul manafort worked for me for a very short period of time. >> a judge revoked paul manafort's bail after new charges of obstruction of justice. >> like manafort has nothing to do with our campaign. >> tonight, what this means for the mueller investigation and at increasing evidence of collusion. then. >> i always liked michael. >> the feds recover 700 pages of encrypted messages from trump's henchman michael cohen. >> look, i did nothing wrong. >> all in" has ob tabbed exclusive new details on some of
the 2,000 children taken from their parents at the boarder. >> this is where at least 65 kids, 65 migrant children from central america are living. >> when "all in" starts right now. >> good evening from new york. i'm chris hayes. the former campaign chairman to the president of the united states is behind barses. he's behind bars for allegedly colluding with a suspected russian'g to sub born perjury and obstruct justice while he was under house arrest. today a judge in washington, d.c. revoked manafort's bail after the special counsel accused him of tampering with witnesses while he was out under house arrest filing new obstruction of charges against manafort and con tan tin kilimnik who is believed to have ties to russian intelligence. the judge sent manafort to jail to await his two upcoming trials on multiple counts of conspiracy and fraud among other charges. did he get to ditch his two
ankle monitors. quite the record for a campaign whose unofficial slogan chanted was lock her up. let's review. the top national security advisor who let the chance the at the convention has been cooperating with investigators and pled guilty. foreign policy adviser pleaded guilty to a felony, agreed to cooperate. the deputy campaign chairman pleaded guilty to a felony. now the chairman who ran the show during a crucial period of the campaign, the guy on top of the entire thing is behind bars after being decided on numerous charges going out on bail and having his bail revoked. it is simply the most criminal group of people surrounding a sitting president since richard nixon. when all is said and done, it may turn out to be much worse. according to a reporter at the hearing today, he gave a stilled wave to his wife and the marshals led him out of the courtroom. later a marshall returned to his wife his brown leather belt,
wallet and burgundy tie. officers declined to say where he is being held. one official said normal procedure for a defendant whose bail is revoked would be to end up at dc central jail. conditions are as they are in nearly all of america's overfull jails har. >> there's a metal shelf for a bed literally and roaches are walking all over that as well as on the celings and the floors. so you're spending the night killing roaches. >> it's going to be a an justed to a man who according to prosecutors laundered millions of dollars for designer clothes and a million dollars worth of rugs. that may be what mueller is hoping for. and that could be a lot. after all, manafort worked for russian interests for years before joining the campaign. we know he got an e-mail from george papadopoulos about his russian emissary and attended
the trump tower meeting. we know he was in touch throughout the campaign with his friend kilimnik, the suspected russian operative since indicted. just a couple hours after manafort was taken into custody, the president's lawyer offered him a reason not to cooperate. rudy giuliani, former federal prosecutor, a man known for loving law and order here in new york city telling the "new york daily news," "when the whole thing is over, things might get cleaned up with some presidential pardons oistd i'm joined by two journalists, ken vogel from "the new york times" and natasha bertrand from the atlantic. ken, what a stunning turn of events for paul manafort. >> that's right. this is a guy who could have sort of faded away and maybe he would have been under some financial pressure. that's the reason that we understand that he decided to come back and sort of try to refresh his bona fides and
republican and u.s. politics to be able to be go and market those connections around the world. he had done an amazing job of that really pioneered a particular type of foreign lobbying where u.s. consultants went around the world and worked for some of these unsavory characters both helping them with their own campaigns introducing american campaign technique buzz also helping them with their connections in washington to try to buff their images. that is the type of work that he is now being prosecuted for his work on behalf of the ukrainian strong man president yanukovych how manafort got him elected but he was chased from power in 2014. manafort continued to try to work in ukraine for a follow-up party to yanukovych's party. that party didn't pay him. he found himself short of money. so he needed to refresh his credentials and that's sort of the circumstances that found him on the trump campaign, not only did it not work out, did he not
get to refresh his credentials to continue to make these huge sums of money, it has put him very much at risk of spending the rest of his life behind bars. >> there is a man who was in desperate need of money who worked for free for the campaign and within a day or two of that sent an e-mail to the man who has subsequently been indicted konstantin kilimnik to say has russia oligarch seen this and how do we use this to get made whole. >> that's his importance it the entire saga is he joined the campaign. he was desperate really. he was in a lot of debt. he was roughly 17 million in debt to pro-russian interests. sloobs he got to the campaign, he was trying to figure out a way to levering and his high level campaign position in audio to repay the debts. we have the e-mails and have seen those conversations had he with kilimnik who has also been indicted for allegedly beak a co-conspirator with paul manafort to obstruct justice.
he put it in black and white, how can i get whole. >> let's be clear. i have taken a position running the campaign of one of the two major party presidential nominees in america. how can i use that position for which i'm not being compensated to make money? please tell me my ukrainian buddy suspected to be a russian intelligence asset. >> paul manafort had an extreme incentive here. he had to make it so he was giving valuable information about the trump campaign to a russian. whether or not that panned out, we don't know. that is something mueller is probably looking into quite closely. of course, paul manafort's rise in terms of his role in the campaign also coincided with all of the most significant russia related events during the election. and whether or not that's a coincidence is a little bit hard to believe but of course, paul manafort was at that the trump tower meeting. he was the campaign chairman when that platform at the go op convention was changed to favor
russia in terms of the war on ukraine and, of course, he resigned a day after it was discovered that avenues still in debt to all of these pro-russian ukrainian interests. >> you know, chris, if i could point out, it wasn't just the relationship with derepaska and the financial, the debt there. he was also owed. he and kilimnik believed they were owed tens of millions of dollars by this opposition block, the pro-russian sort of follow-up success ker party to viktor yanukovych's party of re-jens. kilimnik traveled twice to the u.s. during the campaign when trump -- when manafort was chairman of the campaign. my sources tell me at one point said he was in trump tower meeting with manafort and they were discussing both the relationship with deripaska and how they could collect on what that he believed were these unpaid fees from this ongoing political party in ukraine that was aligned with russia. this is during the campaign. >> so here's the big question, natasha.
we we're all looking at michael cohen. there's news he might be ready to flip. manafort has shown no signs of wanting to do that despite the fact that there's a good chance that he enters is jail tonight and never sees the outside of a jail cell for the rest of his natural life. >> prosecutors that i've spoken to have expressed confusioning abouting this because if you're paul manafort, you really have an incentive to cooperate with prosecutors here. then again, maybe you don't because of course, from what we saw from giuliani today kind of signalling to paul manafort he might expect a presidential pardon. that might be something and, of course, we don't know for sure. it might be something that the president has dangled in front of manafort. if that's the case, that is a whoa other level of obstruction. if he's promising a presidential pardon to a subject of the investigation, a targeting in exchange for him not talking, that's going to be very, very damaging to the president. >> ken vogel and natasha bertrand, have a great weekends. >> for more on manafort's options now that he's behind
bars i'm joined by matt miller who served as spokesman for the justice department in the obama administration and harry litman at maine justice. harry, i'll start with you on the rudy giuliani floating of the pardon today. this might all need to be cleaned up. that strikes meese a pardon of manafort strikes me as much of a red line as firing mueller or rose be stein. do you agree? >> what a choice of words, huh? might have to be cleaned up. yeah, i totally agree. there's some dispute about the reach of the pardon power. but this i think is one that would be front and center a kind of obstruction. when you use it to -- you use this word, chris, it's the right one, dang in that way. not even to do the pardon but just with a kind of public wink and nod stay quiet it will be good at the end of the day. corrupt intent there just you
know wafts from the words. so yeah, i mean some have even suggested giuliani is putting himself in hot water. i don't know about that but yes, i think it absolutely it stinks as a matter of you know just politics but it stinks as a matter of law, as well. he would be playing with fire for sure. >> matt, here's what the president tweeted today. what a tough innocence for fall. it's not a sentence. it's detention who has represented reagan, bob dole and many other top people in campaigns. didn't know he was head of the mob. what about comey and crooked hillary and all others? very unfair. >> what the president today was dangerous. you talk about it being a red line if they pardoned manafort. even what they did today has tainted this process. look where paul manafort is. in the place where he faces the biggest choice for the rest of his life which is to cooperate, to lessen his sentence so he
doesn't spend the rest of his life in jail, flip on the president if he has anything to give or not. the president by saying this was unfair and rudy giuliani dak ling a pardon has put doubt into manafort's mind maybe he doesn't have to cooperate. probably removed the threat of jailtime. it is an insidious thing they've done. at some point, i think harry makes a good point about it. it's tough to ask whether giuliani crossed a legal line here. if you saw a mob boss where the number two in the mob family was facing the trial and the mob boss's lawyer came out and offered him a financial incentive or dangled a financial inventive, the justice department would consider whether that attorney ought to be investigated for obstruction of justice. what giuliani has done is worse. he's very close to crossing a serious line. >> i also have to imagine robert mueller and his team are just
watching this, harry, just horrified and flabbergasted. honestly these seem like people who are very by the book folks, take the law very seriously. watching the president's lawrence the president's behavior in response to all this i imagine they very to understand what they're dealing with in terms of the lengths these people will go to. >> we forgetting abouting there. but it's true. every week has brought unprecedented you know cavalier, crass, misbehavior of the sort you never see from the defendants and no one's ever seen from public officials. it really is mind blowing. >> let me stop you there. that's important. every prosecutor that i've talked to said the same thing. i've never seen this be kind of behavior from a defendant. they said criminals in my whole time in life prosecuting people accuses of crimes many of whom are guilty, i've never seen them act this way.
>> totally in their face. there's been one guy played it by the book. he seems to now possibly be emerging. that's jared kushner with his lawyer abbe lowell. it's not simply that the tweet war is from trump. it's everything in this and all the lawyering which has been both substandard and unbelievely aggressive and confrontational. it's been by the book of how and including with manafort this week how long not to be a defendant in a major probe and it just redoubles redouble appearance redoubles again. in the meantime, mueller so patiently collects you know, mountains of information that he'll be ready to unveil but not knowing exactly what sort of reception it will get given did the whole political context that this plays out in. >> final point, this a matt iglesias tweet. he says trump says -- trump has
thousands of children separated from their moms and dads because he's ordered pretrial detention for every asylum seeker who arrives at the border. gives you a sense what the president thinks the law should protect and who it shouldn't. >> one of the things interesting about the situation manafort faces, the peculiarity of the system where the d.c. attorney prosecutes federal and state crimes. there's no state prosecutor. the jail manafort is going into houses state prisoners prosecuted by the u.s. tosh's office. it is a very tough place. he'll have a lot to think about. this morning may have been the last time he ever sees, forever draws a free braeth breath in his life. >> great to have you bowing. >> thanks, chris. the government announces a treasure trove of material that donald trump's lawyer did not want them to see. michael cohen's very, very bad day is coming up next.
the possible patient zero for russian collusion with the trump campaign is now behind the bars. the case for collusioning in two minutes. ahh... summer is coming. and it's time to get outside. pack in even more adventure with audible. with the largest selection of audiobooks. audible lets you follow plot twists off the beaten track. or discover magic when you hit the open road. with the free audible app, your stories go wherever you do. and for just $14.95 a month you get a credit, good for any audiobook. if you don't like it exchange it any time. no questions asked. you can also roll your credits to the next month if you don't use them. so take audible with you this summer... on the road... on the trail... or to the beach. start a 30-day trial and your first audiobook is free. cancel anytime, and your books are yours to keep forever. no matter where you go this summer make it better with audible. text summer17 to 500500 to start listening today.
maybe the most significant thing about paul manafort going to jail today if there's anyone who is most likely to have colluded with russians during the campaign who kept colluding with an alleged intelligence asset after being indicted and out on bay, it's manafort. according to law professor ryan good man, any fair reading of the public record would come to the conclusion there is significant evidence of collusion or evidence of a conspiracy with russians and violations of federal campaign finance law. joining me now is ryan goodman, founding co-editor in chief of the national security blog. just security. okay, make your case. >> so i think it's a pretty strong case based on the public record. we have paul manafort for example communicating with there kiev-based operative who the fbi
assesses to have kern ties or active ties with russian military intelligence during 2016. mrt tells politico their discussions is include the dnc hack. that's one piece. >> told politico that. >> he told them that but adds i didn't know that the russians had hacked. but that's impossible because the very first report on the hack from the west at the outset attributed it to russia. he's got a problem with that. >> he's on the record. somehow even in my capacious missed that detail he admitted to politico he discussed the dnc hack with the man who will be subsequent indicted assessed to be an asset of russian intelligence. >> that's one. two, many people missed this because it was buried in a cnn report back in august. they reported there are u.s. intercepts of russian operatives discussing manafort and their discussions say he encouraged
them to help in the campaign and that they made an effort towards manafort to coordinate information on clinton so that's number two. just in terms of evidence. not proof of. >> evidence. >> i would say significant evidence. it's even kind of amusing to me in a sense or depressing that there's even a public discussion if there is evidence or not evidence. >> there's clearly i have had. the question is whether there's proof. >> or how strong is the evidence is another way. yeah. third, he in 2005, the "associated press" has his e-mails in had i he makes a pitch to the russian oligarch dare pass can i who is a putin ally and the pitch is he could work for him that would greatly benefit putin. that's in 2005. they enter the agreement 10 maryland a year. and. >> let's stop right there. that's a lot of money. >> what's he doing. >> 10 maryland a year is a lot of money. i want to note that. >> okay. and then in many july of 2016,
at the is tells it the same operative with active ties to the russian military intelligence that he wants to make himself whole as your previous guest talked about it oleg dare pass can i because he owe him $18.9 million. how is he going to make him whole? he offered him private briefings on the status of the trump campaign. i would think a private briefing of just a news letter is not going to be worth $18.9 million. you would think it's worth something much more than that. that's another data point. another is if you look through the papadopoulos employee agreement there are a lot of signals from mueller. papadopoulos is told by a russian agent in april of 2016 the russians have dirt on hillary clinton in the form of thousands of e-mails. >> prior to any of it being public. >> the public has no idea about this. >> that's what's so significant about that disclosure. >> yeah, absolutely. that's in april. adam schiff, representative adam
schiff on your show says if you look at his memo from the house intelligence committee it had a new revelation which is that papadopoulos was also -- the russians previewed for papadopoulos their plan to disseminate the e-mails. that's a further step. >> and that papadopoulos copies manafort on e-mails riltded to these exchanges. >> one of which is titled something like russia wants to meet putin. sorry, russia wants to meet trump. after that, after the being told of the e-mails and manafort sends this e-mail to rick gates that says we shouldn't let dt do this, somebody low level to do it so as to send no signal. >> okay, that's a pretty good case. that is what is hanging over paul manafort. public record langing over paul manafort and his decision making as he spends the night in d.c. jail. thanks for joining us. >> more new reporting on the scope of the trump administration's family separation policy.
>> there is a new government filing concerning the april raid on long time trump personal lawyer michael cohen and if you are michael cohen and hi, michael, if you're watching it does not sound like awesome news. feds today informing a judge they had recovered more than 700 pages worth of encrypted messages and call logs from one of the blackberries seizes in that raid and said they would piece together and this one hurts, 16 pages of documents found in a paper shredder. no word yet on the content of the encrypted messages or documents though one imagines
cohen didn't want them seen amid multiple reports cohen believes he has been treated badly by trump and al lines moving closer to cooperating. trump claimed that he had nothing to worry about. >> are you worried michael cohen might flip. >> i did nothing wrong. you have to understand. this stuff would have come out a long time ago. i don't do anything wrong. it's really nice. >> is he still your friend. >> i always liked michael cohen. i haven't spoken to him in a long time. >> is he still your personal lawyer. >> no, he's not my lawyer. >> but i always liked michael. he's a good person. excuse me, do you find if i walk. >> you're asking me a question, i'm trying to answer it. >> i'm wondering if you're worried he's going to cooperate with investigators. >> no, because i did nothing wronging. >> joining me now msnbc legal analyst paul butler, rosalynn helderman, political investigations and enterprise reporter at "the washington post." rosalynn what, does your
reporting suggest about where cohen is at right now? >> our reporting suggests that he's very disturbed with his situation. he's distressed at sort of the lack of attention by the president. is he being crushed by legal bills which is very challenging. and understands that he faces sort of intensifying pressure from the southern district of new york prosecutor's office but also still from the mueller probe. >> we should note cnn has a story cohen is now signaling openness cooperating with federal investigateders saying he believes trump and his allies are touching on him. i'm a layperson but 700 pages of encrypted messages and shredded documents doesn't seem great from where i stand. what do you think. >> in that clip when the reporter asked trump was mr. cohen still his lawyer. trump looked surprises. why would you think that? he was never really a lawyer, he was a mr. fix it.
mr. fix it is running out of options. some of his hopes were pinned on millions of documents protected bid lawyer client privilege. the judge has gone through. for the texts 148 out of 300,000 and now today secret stuff that he was shredding, the government has access to that and so again, it's a perfect storm for mr. trump when it's a bad day not only for cohen but for paul manafort. >> you wonder whether michael cohen is -- i mean, mueller seems to be spreading this out a bit. right? i wonder what -- cohen must wake up every day wondering if today is the day. >> yeah, there has been some reporting, i can't confirm this but he told people he expected to be arrested any day now. and what we do know is these investigations continue very aggressively. obviously as you've been talking about, the document review
continues in new york. and we had reported this weeking that a witness who appeared before mueller's grand jury within just the last week, a week ago today said that many of the questions that he was asked were all about michael cohen and that's from robert mueller here in d.c. >> that's a crucial point. we will relayed that reporting. a ukrainian politician in town to talk to the grand jury to passed mike cohen a peace proposal that would have lifted sanctions. he said they kept asking me go about michael cohen which is relevant because when the raid first happened there was all this talk they kicked it over to sdny. it must have nothing to do with russia. >> mr. cohen is in effect being double-teamed. everything the new york prosecutors get and the mueller prosecutors get, they can share with each other and so and plus, now we know that mr. cohen isn't really feeling rudy giuliani and president trump. so he's prime to cut a deal. next step would be a proffer.
if it goes to this, the next step is a proffer which means he goes in and sits down with the special prosecutor mueller and tells him how he can help him make his case about collusion and obstruction of justice. >> rosalind, we have reporting here, have you reporting there. there's no reporting to indicate as far as i can tell that that moment has happened. am i correct? >> that's right. in fact, our best reporting is that there's been no contact yet. i think the first step would be for the prosecutors to reach out and say okay, we're ready to start telling you what we've got. and you know, and we would be interested to hear what you might have to share to mitigate that. there's been no indication that has happened. >> what rosalind says is what i've heard, as well which is that there's -- mueller's team isn't reaching out. sdny isn't reaching out. is that a common tactic. >> they're going to increase pressure on him building day by day. can you imagine, they put
together shredded documents. they're going hard-core. the main question is, we know from his nemesis, michael avenatti, we got the bank records from michael cohen. all this money coming in. where did it go and was there some kind of profit sharing arrangement, cohen's making all this money off trump's name. does trump know about it, is he getting a piece of the pie. >> those documents aren't just in his possession but other people can get to them. paul and rosalind, many thanks to you both. more exclusive reporting. we have numbers, the only people we think that have these numbers how many children the trump administration is tearing away from parents at the border in the first week of june. you'll never guess who has a bunch of new scandals since his last thing 1, thing 2 on wednesday. that's next.
paul ryan was asked yesterday about his level of confidence in scandal plagued epa administrator scott pruitt, he pulled one out of the old head in the sand playbook. >> frankly, i haven't paid that close attention to it. i would refer to you the authorizing complete that oversees the epa. i'm glad with the regulatory position they've taken. i don't know enough about what he's done or has not done to give you a good comment. >> i'm just the speaker of the house of representatives. he hasn't paid that close attention. we fellow he's busy but he really wants to us believe he
hasn't checked any news sites or twitter or watched tv or a newspaper or talked to anyone in washington for months? he hasn't overheard anyone in the house talking about the 15 investigations pruitt is currently facing or his possible legal exposure for violating federal law you? know what, that's okay because we here at all in have been paying attention and have an update for the speaker full of shiny brand-new prtt scandals. it's thing 2 in 60 seconds.
epa administrator scott pruitt is far and away the swampiest member of the cabinet. today his ever growing list of scandals somehow improbably got even longer. "new york times" reporting several more instances of pruitt using his position and government paid staff for personal favors. that's a no, no including tasking at least three star members to help his daughter obtain a summer internship at the white house and pulled stringsings to help his daughter get into law school at the university of virginia reaching out to the speaker who wrote a letter to the school's dean.
merit. there were some requests for himself, too. pruitt had an epa aide again who is paid with public money book his travel to last year's rose bowl where he secured tickets to the sold out game at face value. hmm. from the head of a large marketing firm whose clients have, you guessed it, business before the epa. today, the president sounded a little wobbly on old scott. >> i'm looking at scott and scott's done a fantastic job at epa. but -- >> you see problems with his ethical. >> i'm not happy about certain things. >> he's done a fantastic job running the epa. which is very overriding. but i am not happy about. >> cut out a nine-minute monologuing about lotion. i'm kidding, of course. as we said before pruitt remainses in office because he's enacting the president's agenda. yesterday he tweeted at trump announcing the rollback of a obama era clean water. yes, he gave the president the
everything's changed. we're not on an island anymore. genetic power has now been unleashed. we've entered a new era. welcome to jurassic world. [ scream ] rated pg-13. we have more exclusive reporting tonight on immigration, immigrant children being torn from their families. earlier today nbc news reported almost 2,000 children were taken from their parents in the six weeks from april 19th to may 31st, a rate of about 46 children ripped out of their parents' hands a day. now, we at "all in" have obtained internal border patrol
documents that show that from june 3rd to june 11th, 366 additional children were taken from their families, about 41 children a day, a bit of a slower pace. if you project these numbers out over a full year, you're looking at well over 10,000 kids taken by our government. the documents we've obtained also crucially put the lie to the administration's claim that this is all somehow business as usual that it's mandated by the law. in fact, one page in here is titled "prosecution initiative update." there's a red line labeled single dalt adult increased prosecution initiative started april 27th, in other words when they started this policy. additionally the new data we obtained shows the vast majority of parents, this is important, a whopping 91% who were referred for prosecution after having their children forcibly taken from them were only being charged with a misdemeanor. that is first time illegal entry.
customs and border patrol declined to comment on these numbers to con film or deny. this new data fits with what we already know about this inhumane practice. today gadi schwartz toured a facility in el cajon, california, where some of the children are being held. what do you see behind the gates today? >> well, lots to unpack. i want to give you the lay of the land because people have been coming it out to see it for themselves. they're incredit u lus about this happening so close to their homes. this is beak where the facility is. behind this fence. you see from the street you can't see what's going on. you've got somebody down here. she just came out to also see. she had seen what was going on on the news. she is with a mental health organization and she wanted to see it for herself. we've seen a bunch of neighbors coming out. i'm going to show you. it's not the biggest facility. it's a lot smaller than that walmart that we saw the jacob sober rof showed us earlier this
week. that's where it ends that fence line. it goes all the way down this way and there are 65 kids or 63 kids being housed right now. the capacity here is 65. but we understand that there are more beds being brought in across the country in anticipation for what is to be a lot more of these minors being brought to shelters like this because they have been separated from their family. right here at this facility, as you were talking about a little bit earlier, we understand that the number is about 10% so far. in the last six, six weeks those numbers have been climbing. 10% of the kids here may have been separated from their families. the other ones were unaccompanied minors that were crossing the border. this facility has been here for quite some time. secretly. the community around here is flabbergasted about what's going on. in fact, one man a little while ago we talked to ran out here as soon as he saw where it was on
msnbc. here's what he had to say. take a lis. >> and i was stunned to find out one of the facilities was within walking distance of my home. how does this happen in america? i'm a u.s. neighbor veteran of 12 years, spent every penny, every dime of that time trying to insure this sort of thing didn't happen in america. we should point and say not in our backyard. not here in america. >> now, david was telling us that as a child evers abandoned and left in a chicken coop and was found and was later adopted and he said that that never left him. he has been traumatized for life because of that. he was feeling what a lot of these kids were going through. now in terms of what we saw on the inside, there already staff members here that are doing remarkable work trying to make things normal. they have organized events for these kids. it's very odd to hear some of the things that these kids are experiencing here.
we were told that they have a prom where there are fee mays that come from other shelters and have a prom here with some of the boys that come to this shelter. but the staff is trying to make things as normal as possible. but as you can imagine, there's nothing about this that's normal. >> chris. >> goody swartz, thank you for that excellent reporting. next i'm going to talk to a congressman who represents a border city and who got access to some of the facilities we're talking about. congressman beta o'rourke joins me after this.
jeff sessions and donald trump are ripping an average of about 50 children, just a few less, a day away from their parents at the border. and so repugnant is this policy, so odious to basically everyone's moral intuitions the president and his allies keep lying about why they're doing this or that they're doing it. today, though, a u.s. attorney from texas admitted that yes, it is the administration's choice to be this cruel. >> we are following the law. there's many people who --
>> but let's remember also you can follow the law in a different way. previous administrations have. this is a policy choice. >> well, it is a policy choice by the presint and by the attorney general. >> congressman beto o'rourke visited several immigration facilities in mcallen, texas and he joins me now. the facilities you visitroad different than the longer-term shelters for children that o.r.r. is running. these are kind of processing intake facilities run by customs and border patrol. what did you see there? >> well, i went to the border patrol station in mcallen, texas, which is the busiest station in the busiest border patrol sector along the 2,000 miles of the u.s.-mexico border. and that's where families, mothers in this case and their young children, are brought after they are arrested, trying to cross in between the ports of entry. i should make clear, those border patrol acts that i met along with those families are doing the toughest jobs that i can imagine, and they tell me that those young mothers and children are turning themselves
in. not trying to flee or evade detection. they are turning themselves in to those border patrol agents. but that's where i met a 27-year-old mother, her 7-year-old child. they just made the 2,000-mile journey from honduras. had been arrested hours before. and unbeknownst to them they were about to be separated. and chris, i will never forget seeing that 7-year-old girl clutching her mother's hand as she must have been for the last three weeks and 2,000 miles of that journey. and just as they thought they had reached safety and asylum and refuge that little girl was about to be taken away from her mother. the next place i went was a border patrol processing center in mcallen, where behind those cyclone fence cages we saw in 20-by-20-foot pods dozen upon dozens of children sleeping on these polished concrete floors, on slim mattresses with mylar blankets, men who had been
separated into their own pods, women into theirs. i went to the international bridge where i met asylum seekers who were trying to cross into the u.s. and do this lawfully and were being turned away by customs and border protection, thereby providing an incentive for them to cross in between ports of entry illegally. and the last place i went was a privately run detention center by the geo corporation in the rio grande valley, where i met a young man who had fled guatemala with his 12-year-old daughter whom he had not seen for the last five days. this is what we e doing right now in the united states. and i was able to see all of that for myself. >> there's a few thengz i want to follow up on. the position of jeff sessions and prosecutors is that it is illegal for yourself to present yourself for asiel fum you done go through a port of entry. that is arguable. but stipulating that for a second, what you're saying is when people try to do it legally and come through a proper port of entry to prevent themselves for asylum they are being turned away.
>> they are being told that we do not have capacity and to come back at another time. i met two asylum seekers from guatemala who by the time they reached reynoso which is just on the other side of mcallen they were kidnapped, held 12 days without their clothes for ransom, 7 rkts $500, upon which they were released, made their way to the international bridge, and were not allowed to petition for asylum in the u.s. and were scared to death literally of going back to reynoso where they might get picked up again by the cartels. when i asked that 27-year-old mother with her 7-year-old child why did you not cross at the ports of entry and do this lawfully, she said [ speaking spanish ] i was scared, i didn't know where to cross. a border patrol agent pulled her aside and she said she had no choice in where to cross. the cartels, they control all of the crossings, they decide who goes in between the ports of entry, who goes to the ports of entry. and at the end of the day why are we prosecuting this young mother like a common criminal for doing what any single one of
us would do for our own kids in the same situation. let us allow her to petition for asylum. if she meets the credible fear test, there's a process for us to allow her to continue to stay in this country. if she does not, she will be sent back to her country of origin. those are our laws. they're the way they're intended to work. we should allow them to do so. right now we are doing something so inhumane, so un-american that i'm ashamed. but it's now on all of us. this is who we are. this is what we're doing as a country. we now have the opportunity to act. >> the white house, the president and others are lying about what they're doing. they are not admitting this is a prosecution initiative that they have created. jeff sessions has been a bit more honest. people in customs and border patrol know what they're doing, right? they understand this is a new policy they're putting in in fact. and they started going to work one day where their job now included taking children from parents, right?
>> i met with somebody in customs and border protection that has the job description of consequence delivery, which sounds like something orwell would have come up with. and she was sharing with me that that child who's just been separated from that parent are both assigned what is known as an a number. as a family group they're assigned a number as well. that's for the purposes of the department of homeland security and customs and border protection. but that mother is about to be sent to the department of justice for criminal prosecution, then to ice for their enforcement and removal operations. that child becomes property of health and human services and the office of refugee and resettlement specifically. so i asked this woman what happens to those "a" nukz and the family unit numbers? do those track through doj and hhs? she said i don't know. so we have no idea when or if mother and child will be reunited. more importantly, they, that mother and that child, have no idea what they're going to be reunited. i cannot imagine anything more terrifying for that kid or for that mom who's just risked and
sacrificed everything to bring her daughter to safety, and now we take her away from her. >> let me make sure. so it is an open -- what i hear from you is it is an open question whether there's a central data base that at least stores the matching numbers between the parents and children we're ripping away from them. it is unclear whether that information is stored centrally across the different agencies that are managing the parents and the kids. >> the people that i've spoken with in customs and border protection cannot answer the question. the pro bono attorney with whom i visited, that father in the privately run detention center later that night, said she had been calling the 1-800 number that she had been given to see if she could help that father find his 12-year-old daughter. they've been looking for five days and cannot make the connection. i'm not saying that it doesn't exist. but you know, a member of congress, somebody who's in charge of a processing center in
the busiest border patrol sector in the country, an attorney who's working for a client, none of us have been able to find the answer. this is because in part my belief, this is brand new for the united states of america. at least in my lifetime. i thought we didn't do things like this. we're not prepared to do things like this. but in fact, we're doing things like this not too far from my hometown where i'm raising my 11, 9, and 7-year-old, we're building a tent city. there are already 100 kids in tornio. and it's 100 degrees in el paso in june. and they're going to be there we think at a minimum for two months but the reality is no one knows. and the lasting consequence and terror of being taken away from your parents in a strange land and not knowing if you're ever going to be connected, that will be with them for the rest of their lives. that will be with us as a country for the rest of our lives. and it is now on us to do everything within our power to make this right. and that's what i'm committed to, and that's what i know a lot of good people in this country are committed to.