tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC August 23, 2018 10:00pm-11:01pm PDT
enough to make itself known. more than 20 inches of rain falling. landslides blocking one major highway. we are warned that the most damage could come from dangerous winds and flooding over the next four to five hurricanes have only made land fall on the hawaii islands twice since the 1950s. this is a rare thing, but obviously this is serious. we will be keeping eyes on this overnight and into tomorrow. that does it for us tonight. now it is time for the last word with lawrence o'donnell. >> good evening, rachel. i wanted you to do another minute on the hurricane, so i could speed read this story about a manhattan d.a. it is all there, rachel, as you know, in what the federal prosecutors released on tuesday. it says in their documents that the trump organization paid $420,000 to michael cohen, which was money for the stormy daniels payout, and that michael cohen had sent them invoices monthly, $35,000 a month saying legal fees.
>> yeah. >> now, that's a company that is deducting from its taxes legal fees, and they are fraudulently labeled legal fees. you cannot deduct payments to the girlfriends. those cannot be deducted. and it's tough in a company like the trump organization. but you can't. >> that's the funnest day of tax law school. when you find out what you can do with the payments to the girl friends and what you can't do. they are in trouble here because it wasn't legal fees. it was payments to the girlfriends. and if they were deducted -- if they weren't deducting it, if they weren't taking it off their taxes, that implies they knew it wasn't legal fees. that's a problem. but if they were deducting it as legal fees, if they were putting it on their taxes, as you say, that's tax fraud. this is not a good way to run a business either way. >> you know what would help here? donald trump's tax returns and
his company tax returns. that would really help. >> you know, the manhattan d.a. going after the trump organization as an entity potentially raises questions about the availability of those tax returns. but also the other piece that is imbedded in that story that doesn't make the headline, what i think is maybe potentially a bigger deal is that the new york attorney general is also reportedly seeking a criminal referral for michael cohen with regard to his taxes at the state level, his state taxes. that's how barbara underwood was able to flip the taxi king, which gave us, i think, basically most of the criminal charges against michael cohen already this week. if she is going to put the same kind of squeeze on cohen at the state level, nothing what he pled to at federal court will help and that will be a whole new level of hell for him. >> and as you have been pointing
out this week, donald trump can't pardon his way out of new york state charges with any of these people, including himself. >> exactly, exactly. >> thank you, rachel. >> thanks, lawrence. >> here is something you have never heard a president say before: if i ever got impeached. the word impeach has not crossed the minds of most presidents. there is no reason to even mention the word during most presidencies, and there has been much media debate this year about whether it is too soon to discuss impeachment in the trump presidency. that debate ended today when the president of the united states discussed his own impeachment when he was asked about it on fox news. >> hard to believe. if the democrats take back power, do you believe they will try to impeach you? >> well, you know, i guess it says something like high crimes. i don't know how you can beat somebody who has done a great job.
i'll tell you what, if i ever got impeached, i think the market would crash. i think everybody would be very poor because without this thinking you would see -- you would see numbers that you wouldn't believe in reverse. >> without this thinking, we never would have heard the president of the united states say if i ever got impeached. and right there, right there, stop right there because i think right there are two definite song titles. in the musical about the trump presidency that will be written some time the road, without this thinking will be one song title. we know that. and of course the melodic, if i ever got impeached has to be a song title in the trump musical. fox news and the president have decisively ended the debate on whether it's too soon to be discussing impeachment. on tuesday night on this
program, i realized that we had shifted from investigation coverage to impeachment coverage after federal prosecutors and michael cohen made history by declaring under oath in federal court in manhattan that the president of the united states had committed two federal crimes for the principal purpose of influencing the election. but as we discussed here last night, donald trump was not the only person in addition to michael cohen who was accused of committing federal times in that courtroom on tuesday. prosecutors said that still unnamed members of the trump campaign participated actively in those crimes and new everything about those crimes and that david pecker, the chairman and ceo of the company that runs the "national enquirer" also were very important participantparticipant last night at the beginning of this program we wondered whether david pecker might already be cooperating with federal prosecutors, and about ten minutes later we delivered the breaking news that david pecker was indeed reportedly cooperating with federal prosecutors.
that's what we knew last night. today we discovered that david pecker has already been granted immunity, along with dillon howard. as the day wore on, we learned more about what david pecker knows and what he might possess. the associated press is confirming they kept a safe on hush money payments and other damaging stories leading up to the 2016 presidential election. dillon howard removed them from the safe in the weeks before trump's inauguration, according to one person directly familiar with the events. it was unclear whether the documents were destroyed or simply moved to a location known to fewer people. here is who knows what was in that safe: pecker, cohen, howard and trump. with today's reporting, the president might have more
trouble sleeping tonight than he did last night. the president has to somehow fall asleep knowing that david pecker is telling federal prosecutors everything he knows about donald trump. and he has been collecting the dirt on donald trump for years and years and years and stashing it in the "national enquirer"'s safe. that dirt might include recordings. prosecutors said the evidence they have obtained to prove that michael cohen and donald trump and david pecker conspired includes hard copy documents, audio recordings made by michael cohen and "the new york times" is reporting the prosecutors might have more recordings from the "national enquirer." the company's chief content officer, who said to be cooperating was known to have a recording device in his office, according to people familiar with his operations. and so the "national enquirer" after many years of protecting donald trump is helping a federal criminal investigation of donald trump. in other words, david pecker and the "national enquirer" have flipped.
>> this whole thing about flipping, they call it, i know all about flipping for that 30, 40 years i have been watching flippers. everything is woerndful and then they get ten years in jail and they flip on whoever the next highest one is or as high as you can go. it almost ought to be outlawed. >> i have had many friends involved in this stuff. it is called flipping and it ought to be illegal. >> he knows david pecker has flipped and he knows what david pecker knows about him. and last night at 1:10 a.m., the sleepless president tweeted this primal scream. no collusion-rigged witch hunt! there is the president of the united states, three hours after we first reported on this program that david pecker had flipped and the president is rage tweeting no collusion-rigged witch hunt. when the special prosecutor was closing in on richard nixon, he wandered the halls of the white
house at all hours of the night. but he didn't have twitter. so we didn't know the next day what he had been thinking at 1:10 a.m. tonight is going to be worse. because tonight donald trump knows not only that david pecker is cooperating but that he's been granted immunity and now there is more new york prosecution -- investigation going on of the president that might lead to new york city and new york state prosecutions. and the president knows that his power of persuasion over even his own voters doesn't work when they take an oath as jurors. the president discovered last night watching fox news that paula duncan, who is a proud trump voter, is also a juror who voted to convict paul manafort. he revealed that all of the rest of the jurors wanted to convict paul manafort on all 18 counts except for one holdout juror. and that's the reason paul manafort was convicted on eight counts and there was a hung jury on the other ten.
and president trump should by now know that paul manafort's likelihood of pleading guilty next month skyrocketed after that fox news interview with that juror in manafort's virginia case because it is possible that a washington, d.c. jury won't have even a single trump voter on it. donald trump got 4% of the vote in washington, d.c. if paul manafort goes to trial in washington, d.c., he's not going to have a jury more sympathetic to him and donald trump than he had in virginia this week. and paul manafort has now discovered that even a hard core supporter of donald trump was overwhelmed with the evidence of paul manafort's guilt. she had no problem voting guilty on every count. in his fox news interview, donald trump praised paul manafort for not flipping and said he has, quote, great respect. great respect for paul manafort.
and rudy giuliani delivered the hope of a pardon today to convicted felon paul manafort in an interview with the washington post. at 5:00 p.m. today, president trump asked his lawyers several weeks ago for their advice on the possibility of pardoning paul manafort and other aids. the subject came as trump's former campaign chairman faced multiple charges of bank charges. rudy giuliani said in an interview trump's lawyers counseled trump against pardoning anyone. according to giuliani saying trump should at least wait until special counsel robert s. mueller, iii has concluded the probe. so there is manafort's almost promise of a pardon at the end of the investigation. and on the same day that the president discussed his own
impeachment, he once again attacked his own attorney general ral. >> i put in an attorney general that never took control of the justice department, never took control of the justice department. >> and so the president who began his presidency by asking fbi director james comey to drop the investigation of donald trump's national security adviser michael flynn lying to the fbi and then fired james comey after james comey refused to drop that investigation, the president who has spent the better part of two years now publically attacking the fbi, the president who has spent two years attacking the department of justice, the president who has attacked the deputy attorney general who he appointed, rod rosenstein, for not stopping an investigation into this presidency, the president who attacks every federal prosecutor assigned to robert mueller's investigation of the president and has repeatedly lied about
and attacked robert mueller himself, that same person once again today attacked his own attorney general, a former senator who was even thoous yat ically supported by every senator. but lindsey graham just could not take it anymore and said this. >> we believe he assaulted our legal system in every way. let it be said that any president who cheats our institutions shall be impeached. >> no, that wasn't today. that was congressman lindsey graham explaining why he voted to impeach president bill clinton. today after the president of the united states once again threatened the rule of law in this country and attacked and insulted lindsey graham's dear friend, the attorney general of the united states, senator lindsey graham could not remember the words that congressman lindsey graham said on that historic day on the house floor and instead lindsey
graham said this. >> the president's entitled to an attorney general he has faith in, somebody that's qualified for the job. and i think there will come a time sooner rather than later where it will be time to have a new face and a fresh voice at the department of justice. >> and there you just witnessed the collapse of a political civilization. the president is entitled to an attorney general he has faith in. lindsey graham actually said that on the same day that the president said that the standard prosecutorial tool that all attorneys general have used, flipping witnesses, should be illegal. lindsey graham said the president is entitled to an attorney general he has faith in and lindsey graham knows the only attorney general this president would have faith in is an attorney general that would always protect the president of the united states, which now means protect the president from his friends, michael cohen and david pecker, the friends who federal prosecutors and new york
city say colluded to commit crimes with the president of the united states to effect an election. joining our discussion, jill wine-banks, brett stevens and eugene robinson. all three are now msnbc contributors. jill, i wanted to get your reaction to what we saw here today in terms of the president actually once again going after the attorney general and the weakness we are seeing in the republicans in the senate very publically now talking about the possibility of replacing jeff sessions. >> it is appalling, of course, to hear this kind of conversation. the president once again is really obstructing justice in
plain sight. his tweets are constantly attacking our systems, our institutions of justice and are having an effect. we saw that in the manafort trial. the juror who is a big supporter of his said this is a witch hunt, but the evidence is there. so on the one hand, it shows that a jury will convict because they pay attention to the actual evidence, but it also shows how much influence he's had in undermining the mueller investigation and the department of justice, the fbi and that has an effect that we should not be tolerating. this is just totally wrong and we should stop the president from being able to do this. >> gene, when it rains, it ours, especially when you are talking about criminal tax investigations and financial shenanigans. the breaking news at the beginning of this hour that new york state now, the district attorney in new york city, looking at exactly what happened
in the trump company in the payoff to stormy daniels. >> right. and guess what, lawrence? if you start turning over rocks at the trump organization, you are going to find all sorts of awful, nasty things down there. you know, there is a continuum here that the trump organization from the campaign, the trump white house, it is kind of a long running, continuing criminal enterprise in the sense of cutting corners, not following rules, not following laws and so it's really no surprise that state and municipal authorities are going to look at the organization and wait until they get -- start talking to allen, the chief financial officer and accountant. there is no accountant-client privilege to be respected. and he knows where all the bodies are buried.
so this is big trouble. if i might just, two things that really jumped out at me today. one was lindsey graham saying trump is entitled to the attorney general of his liking. well, what he wants is an attorney general who is corrupt and he's not entitled to that. and the illustration of what he wants, he got from rudy giuliani with that hint, that message, that he sent to paul manafort. just wait. just wait. stick it out and you are going to get a pardon. it couldn't have been clearer. >> brett, what has happened to lindsey graham in the 19 years between the two videos that we just show snd. >> you had a democratic president in '98 and you have a republican president today. it seems to me that obvious and that nakedly partisan. one of the things i observed, in the late 1990s on the clinton impeachment saga is almost
precisely the same standards that republicans and conservatives used against president clinton would apply both legally as well as morally to president trump. you remember that book by william bennett, "the death of outrage." where is the outrage against this president? we're talking about clinton, his depry dagss against him in his office. when i heard rudy giuliani say truth isn't truth, i recalled clinton's famous line about, you know, it depends on what "is" is. that use of language. the difference is that now of course you have a republican president, a pliant congress, but all i would say to my conservative friends, especially those i've known since back in the days, just use the same standards you applied with
president clinton and ask yourself, how do they not apply exactly, in fact, with much greater force against president trump morally and legally? >> yeah. jill, that's why i have been playing these republican senators this week, lindsey graham we heard orrin hatch last night. more from chuck grassley, all of whom voted to remove bill clinton from the presidency and for less cause than what we've seen this week in the accusations in federal court, which none of them at this point seem particularly curious about. a real quiet reaction from republican senators, republican congressmen from what they learned in federal court from michael cohen on tuesday. >> what they heard michael cohen say should have been what brennan calls the red light flashing because it really was a dramatic moment in our history when you heard a defendant pleading guilty and saying, i was doing this at the direction
of the president or who was then the candidate donald trump. he named him, basically, as an unindicted coconspirator in his crime. now the best the trump administration can do is to say, well, it is not really a crime. so crime is not illegal anymore. truth isn't truth. and i just don't get where the goldwaters are from the senate now. who is a congressman who is a republican with any spine or any decency? someone that will tell the truth and recognize this is just not good for our country. we have to do something to stop it. and the republicans are just sitting on their hands and ignoring it and allowing him to get away with it. >> i want to show a banner that was on fox news earlier tonight. i rarely do this, but this one is too perfect.
it was talking about -- you see? it is the left's new obsession with impeachment. now, this is the left's obsession. and this is on fox news. and fox news employs the only reporter who has asked the president of the united states about impeachment, and that happened this very day on fox news. and, so, the fox news reporter and the president of the united states discussing impeachment on fox news, but, gene, fox news is accusing the rest of the world with some kind of obsession. >> yeah, yeah. i mean, there is -- you know. but i miss irony. i liked it when irony existed. but irony is so dead. it's quite amazing. of course, that is -- you know, the president has raised the issue, in fact, at rallies. he is essentially trying to whip up enthusiasm among the base by saying, look, they're going to impeach me.
you've got to come save me. the way he did it today in that interview was truly bizarre when he got to, you know, this thinking. it was -- we were -- i was thinking, you know, nixon wandering the halls in some sort of altered reality. it was quite weird. >> jeff sessions issued a statement today basically in response to the president saying, while i am attorney general, the actions of the department of justice will not be improperly influenced by political considerations. i demand the highest standards and where they are not met, i take action. however, no nation has a more talented, more dedicated group of law enforcement and investigators and prosecutors than the united states. that sounds like the kind of thing the president of the united states used to say before this presidency. >> yeah. but we have a presidency in which donald trump seems to expect kind of kim jong-un style, you know, the field notation guys or the applause that putin enjoys.
i have to say i own the world's smallest violin, which i would gladly donate for the sake of jeff sessions because has, in fact, been nothing but loyal. and he's been taking it from the president for at least a year. i think it was the summer of 2017 when donald trump first unloaded on him in public. it stuns me that the man didn't have the self-respect then and there to walk into the oval office, offer his resignation, walk out and say, get the walk. >> there is one report that he did and they chased him out to the car. reince priebus chased him to the car and had to talk him into staying on. >> he did stay on. he wants to keep his job in order to separate families. his higher calling is to separate families at the border. but what the president wants is not loyalty. he wants cravenness. that is what happens to even who goes to work in the administration.
they either turn into a toadie or forced to betray the president. >> thank you for starting us off tonight. when we come back, michael avenatti is here. he believes he will get president trump under oath before robert mueller does. he will tell you why now that michael cohen has pleaded guilty he believe it is door is open. michael avenatti will join us next. first word you think of
this wi-fi is fast. i know! i know! i know! i know! when did brian move back in? brian's back? he doesn't get my room. he's only going to be here for like a week. like a month, tops. oh boy. wi-fi fast enough for the whole family is simple, easy, awesome. in many cultures, young men would stay with their families until their 40's.
we have breaking news at this hour, expressed in this headline in "the new york times" tonight. manhattan d.a. eyes criminal charges against the trump organization. this is because of the revelations tuesday in federal court that michael cohen was paid $420,000 in legal fees, what was labeled legal fees by the trump organization to cover for the payment of hush money to stormy daniels. legal fees, of course, being tax deductible to a business if the business did deduct those, that would be a criminal tax violation, and there are other business records violations that are particular to new york state law if the business included fraudulent entries in their bookkeeping about those payments. we are joined now by michael avenatti. we have this new york times report of a new criminal legal
investigation of donald trump and donald trump's business because of the payments to stormy daniels that you have helped make public. >> well, you know, lawrence, what would we do without all of, quote, "this thinking," to quote the president's interview. it is truly amazing. when i think about the great philosophers, i think about soretes and plato and obviously donald trump. there is no question he goes with the other two. what is amazing, lawrence, is, quote "this thinking" is ultimately going to be the down fall of this president. this is crumbling around him, this criminal enterprise that he led for so many years, the people that he surrounded himself with, the actions that they undertook.
all of this is unraveling at a breakneck pace, and it's only going to get quicker. it is only going to get faster in the coming weeks and months in my view. >> now, the discovery in your civil lawsuit against donald trump and michael cohen was stopped by the judge pending the outcome of the criminal case involved michael cohen. it's your position now that that case is complete and you are going to now ask the judge to go forward with your discovery, which is to say go forward with issuing a subpoena for a deposition to the president of the united states. what is going to happen next? >> you are absolutely right. on september 10th, we will have a hearing in los angeles, and i'm going to demand that the case be restarted or allowed to proceed. i want to take a deposition of michael cohen under oath. i then want to proceed forth with a deposition of donald trump under oath and i want to ask them the questions that all of us want to know the answers
to. namely, what was the flow of the money? what did the president know? what did he communicate with michael cohen about? how did they handle the funneling of the money? how was it decided it would be $430,000? the president will have a lot of explaining to do, lawrence, and i have taken a lot of depositions in my career, but i will tell you i am counting the days of this deposition. we might even use that air force one video and ask him to explain those comments in light of what we know how to be the facts. >> and based on the court's ruling in bill clinton's dealing with a similar civil subpoena in a civil lawsuit involving paula jones, the precedent is that the courts do require the president to submit to a deposition like this. >> you're absolutely right. we have solid precedent from the u.s. supreme court in the case of jones v. clinton.
we all know what that resulted in. i don't think -- i don't think the president is going to have a leg to stand on relating to attempting to avoid this deposition. i think there is little question we're going to get michael cohen's deposition in light of the plea that he entered two days ago in new york. and i think that we have only scratched the surface relating to the amount of evidence and the facts that are going to come to light as to what really happened here and what michael cohen, what information he conveyed to the president and what the president conveyed to michael cohen. >> michael, thank you very much for joining us tonight. appreciate it. >> thank you, lawrence. coming up, more republicans struggled today with what to say about what has happened this week involving the president and attorney general jeff sessions and everything else that donald trump has thrown their way. they are responding in ways they have never responded before. it is a very different response to the way they responded to the investigation of president bill clinton. dan rather covered the
investigation of bill clinton for cbs news. dan rather will join us. ♪ adults are just kids with much, much better toys. introducing the 2018 c-class sedan, coupe and cabriolet. the thrills keep getting better. lease the c300 sedan for $399 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing.
to put on our website? i mean i would have but i'm a commercial vehicle so i don't have hands... or a camera...or a website. should we franchise? is the market ready for that? can we franchise? how do you do that? meg! oh meg! we should do that thing where you put the business cards in the fishbowl and somebody wins something. -meg: hi. i'm here for... i'm here for the evans' wedding. -we've got the cake in the back, so, yeah. -meg: thank you. -progressive knows small business makes big demands. -you're not gonna make it, you're not gonna make it! ask her if we can do her next wedding too! -so we'll design the insurance solution that fits your business. -on second thought, don't...ask that. that fits your business. at at&t innovations, we give you more for your thing. here we're adding tv and movies from our unlimited plan to the powerful new samsung galaxy note9. the perfect device for entertainment & productivity. so, it's essentially the ed helms of devices? how so? well he's both very entertaining and very productive. you think? yeah, i do. and that's my completely unbiased opinion.
today in response to the president's later attack on his own attorney general, chuck grassley, who guided jeff sessions through his committee said this, i do have time for hearings on nominees that the president might send up here that i didn't have last year. so there is chuck grassley welcoming a new nomination for attorney general. chuck grassley, no problem with president trump getting rid of chuck grassley's dear friend jeff sessions and replacing him
with an attorney general who will protect the president and stop the mueller investigation over the president. senator chuck grassley is one of the current republican senators who voted to convict bill clinton in his impeachment trial in the senate and remove him from office. and here is what senator grassly said then about why president bill clinton had to be removed from office. >> i was brought up in an era and i hope we still have that era today that presidents tell the truth. george washington didn't lie. whether that's true or not, i don't know, but that's the way i was led to believe that public officials ought to set a standard, a high standard. and telling the truth obviously is the easiest thing a public official can do because if you tell the truth you never have to worry about what you told somebody else. >> joining our discussion now
dan rather, the current president of news and guts and host of axs tv's "the big interview". >> dan, what happened in the last 19 years to chuck grassley? >> interesting question. you could say the same about lindsey graham. lindsey graham during the time president clinton was being impeached said the american presidency has to be about honor and integrity, honor and integrity. i ask any reasonable person to consider whether what we're seeing and hearing out of the white house now have been hearing and seeing for quite some time meets the standard of honor and integrity. >> there is chuck grassley citing the idea that george washington never told a lie, and therefore there is the standard that presidents have to live by. there is not a single senator now in the senate who voted for the removal of bill clinton from
office, who has said one thing this week objecting to anything they learned about donald trump in federal court on tuesday when michael cohen pled guilty. >> and that's the reason we should not underest kate donald trump going forward. he's not a knock down these last 48 to 60 hours. we're now about to found out what kind of fighter he is. while it may be unpleasant for some people, i ask that they will reminded that some 89% of people who call themselves republican still stand behind donald trump. and as long as he has the senate in republican hands, my own opinion clearly labeled is, the republicans won't consider breaking away from donald trump until and unless he tries to fire robert mueller. that might be -- that might do it. but all this talk about impeachment, lawrence, which is
inevitable given what's been going on, i think it is very clear as long as the republicans have control of the senate and as long as in effect they have control of the supreme court, it is going to be very, very difficult to get impeachment. a lot is going on with mueller we don't know about. down the road things could change dramatically. but it is a little premature to bury the trump presidency. we have all made mistakes of underestimating him in the past. i don't intend to make that mistake again. >> the thing we don't know is what the state of the evidence will be next month or next week. >> or even tomorrow. >> yeah. we have evidence this week that we did not know about last week. >> a lot. >> and we don't know where it's going to come from. we knew eventually we were going to get something from michael cohen. but even in the michael cohen pleadings that the prosecutors put into court, it identified other unnamed members, members of the trump campaign who participated in those crimes. and so we don't know just how
many smoking guns the republicans might have to be juggling next year. >> or even next week. >> yeah. >> the way things are going. but here's where we are, i think, that what the country needs is a few, it will only take a few republican senators prepared to draw profiles and courage to break away from this see no evil, hear no evil, i don't want to talk about it kind of thing and speak up. as they did with richard nixon, they finally came to him and said we are going to vote him, we, republicans are going to vote you out of office if you don't resign. a question that hangs out there, lawrence, is what conversations, if any, donald trump has had or will have with members of his family, his sons, his daughters, his wife when this noose gets tighter and tighter. somewhere down the road, if he hasn't already, he's got to have that conversation with his
family. >> and the conversation conceivably to be had with mike pence. when we went through with with the nixon presidency, the vice president ascended to the presidency. the vice president delivered a pardon to the president of the united states that enabled richard nixon to go on and live life as a free, untroubled man. >> well, i wouldn't rule it out as a possibility in this case. >> and the stories that we're seeing tonight, this breaking news tonight that new york state prosecutors now are investigating what the federal prosecutors revealed in federal court on tuesday, this is the kind of thing that with your experience, you knew was coming, but it certainly seems like it's not the kind of thing that the trump white house understood was possible in the avalanche of investigation upon investigation. >> on the evidence available, i would say you're right.
if those inside the white house either were not aware or underestimated the movement of state courts and by the way, tonight the times has the story. but the manhattan district attorney is looking into this. important to note in those case it is idea that you can't indict a president may not apply. but the more important thing is that he can't pardon anybody. >> right. attorney is looking into this. important to note in those case it is idea that you can't indict a president may not apply. but the more important thing is that he can't pardon anybody. >> right. >> but this thing is opening up with the head of the "national enquirer," mr. pecker, turning against donald trump by saying that he's going to go states evidence. i wouldn't underestimate that because pecker knows a lot. >> thank you. really appreciate it. when we come back, jill wine-banks will join us and will consider what we learned from
from any one else. why accept it from an allergy pill? flonase relieves sneezing, itchy, watery eyes and a runny nose, plus nasal congestion, which most pills don't. it's more complete allergy relief. flonase. jushis local miracle ear t at helped andrew hear more of the joy in her voice. just one hearing test is all it took for him to hear more of her laugh... and less of the background noise around him. for helen, just one visit to her local miracle-ear is all it took to learn how she can share more moments with her daughter. just one free hearing test could help you hear more... laughter...music...life... call now for your free hearing test from an industry leader: miracle-ear.
now i know you're thinking, "i don't want to hear about insurance." cause let's be honest, nobody likes dealing with insurance, right? which is why esurance hired me, dennis quaid, as their spokesperson because apparently, i'm highly likable. i like dennis quaid. awww. and they want me to let you know that, cue overdramatic music,
they're on a mission to make insurance painless. excuse me, you dropped this. they know it's confusing. i literally have no idea what i'm getting, dennis quaid. that's why they're making it simple, man in cafe. and they know it's expensive. yeah. so they're making it affordable. thank you. you're welcome. that's a prop apple. now, you might not believe any of this since this is a television commercial, but that's why they're being so transparent. anyways. this is the end of the commercial where i walk off into a very dramatic sunset to reveal the new esurance tagline so that you'll remember it. esurance. it's surprisingly painless. you are a president trump supporter? >> i am, very much so. >> that is paula duncan, the first manafort juror to speak publically. she voted for trump for president and she voted guilty on all 18 counts against paul manafort. she obviously took her oath as a juror very seriously and she
considered the evidence very seriously. she explained why the jury could not come to an agreement on all 18 counts. >> how close, i want to know, did this jury come to convicting paul manafort on all 18 counts? >> by one. there was one hold-out. >> so you all agreed on the eight counts, the ten others, there was one person that kept you from making that next step. >> that is correct, yes. >> what is their reasoning, if they shared with you? >> reasonable doubt. the person, a female juror, was -- we all tried to convince her to look at the paper trail. we laid it out in front of her again and again and she still said that she had a reasonable doubt and that's the way the jury worked. we didn't want it to be hung. so we tried for an extended period of time to convince her, but in the end she held out and that's why we have ten counts
that did not get a verdict. >> after this break, jill wine-bank wills consider whether president trump's tweet about paul manafort during the trial might have affected that one hold-out juror and we'll consider what that interview we just heard with that juror means for paul manafort's next jury in his next trial. ♪ let your perfect drive come together during the final days of the lincoln summer invitation event get 0% apr on select 2018 lincoln models plus one thousand dollars bonus cash.
on the new sleep number 360 smart bed. it senses your movement and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. and now, all beds are on sale. save 50% on the new sleep number 360 limited edition smart bed. plus, free home delivery. ends saturday. of america, we use diagnostic tools that help us better understand what drives each person's cancer. like christine bray. after battling ovarian cancer for several years, her test results revealed a drug therapy that targeted her tumor. today, christine's metastatic cancer is in remission. we're not just fighting cancer. we're outsmarting it. visit cancercenter.com. appointments available now.
reagan, bob dole and many other highly prominent and respected political leaders. he worked for me for a very short time. why didn't government tell me that he was under investigation. these old charges have nothing to do with collusion, a hoax. we've never seen a president make comments like that during a criminal trial. when you listen to paula duncan tell us about that one hold out on the jury, you have a right to wonder whether that juror, other the other jurors, for example, were they exposed to this kind of tweet? did it make their deliberations more difficult? >> you may remember, lawrence, i said on your show i thought his tweet was jury tampering. so i definitely think it could have affected a nonsequestered jury. they may have been exposed to that not deliberately, but with social media being what it is it's hard to avoid.
i would think the judge's comments are equally devastating and could have caused a hung jury. the judge was so far beyond what is appropriate for a judge. if he had made the same kind of comments he made about the prosecution, if he had made that about the defense, it would have been reversible error for sure. his comment to rick gates mr. manafort couldn't have been paying attention if you were able to steal so much money from him, that's really devastating to the prosecution, and he made many other comments. and that worried me from the very first moment the judge started making comments against the prosecution. it could have been either one of those things that influenced the juror or it could have just been he -- she, i guess it was a female juror -- was very loyal. but mostly i have great faith in juries. they take very seriously their
obligation, pay attention to the evidence, they make decisions based on the evidence. you heard ms. duncan say she is a loyal trump voter and she will vote for him again, she said, but she saw the evidence and knew manafort was guilty. so 11 jurors would have convicted on 18 counts. that has to affect how mr. manafort is thinking. >> yeah, doesn't look like it's going to be easy for him in the d.c. prosecution. tonight's "last word" is next. ♪[upbeat music]
♪now i'm gonna tell my momma ♪that i'm a traveller ♪i'm gonna follow the sun♪ ♪now i'm gonna tell my momma transitions™ light under control™ visit your vision source doctor to ask about transitions™ brand lenses little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats moderate to severe plaque psoriasis differently.
with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla . it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with... ...an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts,... ...or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you.
hundred roads named "park" in the u.s. it's america's most popular street name. but allstate agents know that's where the similarity stops. if you're on park street in reno, nevada, the high winds of the washoe zephyr could damage your siding. and that's very different than living on park ave in sheboygan, wisconsin, where ice dams could cause water damage. but no matter what park you live on, one of 10,000 local allstate agents knows yours. now that you know the truth, are you in good hands?
time for tonight's "last word." >> yeah, that's what i've heard. he just watches "fox & friends," and that gave me an idea. i want to do just a quick experiment, okay? billy, do me a favor, could you roll the "fox & friends" graphic, please? okay, now maybe, maybe if he's flipping around and he just saw that, maybe president trump might watch our show. >> look, that's kind of pathetic. you think that showing a cheap graphic is enough to watch this show. >> hello. >> it's trump. >> conan o'brien gets tonight's "last word." "the 11th hour" starts right now.
breaking tonight from "the new york times," manhattan da eyes criminal charges against trump organization. also the head of the national enquirer, the man who knows donald trump's secrets gets immunity at the associated press reports the enquirer kept a safe full of buried trump stories. the president blasts his own attorney general. again goes after his very manhood, and jeff sessions answers with a rare brush back pitch. and the president uses the same language that veteran prosecutors have heard from mobsters, wondering if it shouldn't be illegal to flip to become a cooperating witness for the feds. all of it as "the 11th hour" gets under way on a thursday night. and good evening once again from our nbc news headquarters here in new york. day 581 of the trump administration, and just tonight a short time ago, in fact, new legal troubles potentially for the president on a new front. we'll let "the new york times" tell it. quote, the manhattan district attorney's office is conside