tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC September 10, 2018 9:00pm-10:00pm PDT
world every moment of every day. that is our broadcast for this monday night, september 10th, 2018. that you so very much for being here with us. good night from nbc news headquarters here in new york. thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. happy you're with us tonight. hurricane florence was upgraded to a category 3 hurricane earlier today and within an hour it was upgraded from a category 3 to a category 4 storm. this is a big one and it really does look like it is aimed right at the american east coast. the governor of south carolina, hennie mcmaster, has already ordered the evacuation of about 1 million people. in eight coastal counties in south carolina, everybody is under mandatory evacuation order as of noon tomorrow. state government announced two major highways will be open half
backwards tomorrow to facilitate that evacuation. starting tomorrow, if you're in one of those eight coastal counties in south carolina and following the advice you must get out, you will have a choice. you can get on the highway and get on the road heading away from the coast as you usually do or drive on the side of the road that is usually oncoming traffic will be turned around so all traffic, all lanes, both sides of the median will run one direction only, out of the way of the storm. the exact track of this storm at this point is still a little bit in flux, as it always is this far out, but we do know the basics about where it is headed. given the size of the storm and the expectations how long it's due to hang out there offshore, it looks like there is probably going to be a dual flooding risk of this storm. they're expecting a large storm surge on the coast. that's salt water coastal
flooding from the storm surge. they're also potentially damaging waves, right? inland away from the sea, the storm is expected to bring so much rain that there will also be fresh water flooding almost anywhere the storm lingers, overflowing lakes, rivers and ponds and also water in the street. again, 1 million people under mandatory evacuation orders already. this does look like a big one of potentially national consequences. so expect that storm as it continues churning toward the carolina coast. expect this to be dominating news and rightly so all week long this week. today in washington, republicans tried to set thursday, this thursday as the day for the judiciary committee to vote on the confirmation of brett kavanaugh to the u.s. supreme court. first of all, that day, thursday, is likely to be hurricane day. secondly, senators were still submitting additional questions
to brett kavanaugh as of today. expecting that process to be over and senators to be ready to vote by thursday seems fast, even for this rushed process. democrats, of course, only have so much power because they're in the minority in the senate, but we're told that democrats may be able to delay that announced vote by about a week or so using senate tactics. remember, the math here is that if all democratic senators stick together in opposition to brett kavanaugh's nomination, they only need two. it only takes two republicans to come to the same conclusion and kavanaugh's nomination will be blocked. it's not unthinkable. brett kavanaugh is a historically unpopular nominee. he has been nominated by a historically unpopular president using a process that has been rushed as fast as possible without senators or the public getting access to a vast majority of government documents that pertain to kavanaugh's time working in the george w. bush white house during some very
controversial stuff, including some stuff he appears not to have told the truth about under oath. so finding two republican no votes is certainly not going to be an easy task in these partisan times but it is not unimaginable either. and now one republican senator who is seen as a possible no vote on brett kavanaugh, she's telling her hometown paper that she may have a, quote, major problem with kavanaugh as a nominee. we've got much more on that story ahead tonight. you will want to hear that news. there was also an interesting and somewhat dramatic court proceeding today in washington where accused russian agent maria butina has been charged by federal prosecutors with essentially infiltrating the nra and other aspects of the american conservative movement to influence the u.s. election as a secret agent of the russian government. a judge today in washington rejected the lawyers' request, maria butina's lawyers' request that she be released from jail
pending trial. the judge somewhat angrily also imposed a gag order, both on the prosecutors in the case and the defense lawyers in that case. thus precluding either side from making any further public comments about the maria butina case until her trial is over and done with. just as we are getting on the air tonight, we just got in the transcript of the court hearing today in the maria butina case. you will want to hear the judge's angry tirade about the lip syncing video she was forced to watch in chambers for no reason. it's really good. we've got that coming up just a little bit later on. a whole bunch of stuff going on all at once. a lot to keep an eye on in the news tonight and the next couple of days. it seems like it's going to be a busy and important news week this week, but it does seem clear from watching the president's twitter feed, if nothing else, that at the white house right now they basically consider tonight to be woodward eve.
some excerpts and descriptions from bob woodward's new book leaked out in advance last week, but tomorrow is actually the publication date for this new book from bob woodward, "fear: trump in the white house." having read most of the book now myself and watching mr. woodward start to do his advanced publicity before the publication date tomorrow, it is clear, at least to me, i think it's clear that the title of the book, right? the book is called "fear." the title of the book, i think, is a little bit of a double entendre. fear is the word that woodward thinks best describes the atmosphere inside the white house. rational fear of what might be exposed and what might result from the special counsel's investigation led by robert mueller. so fear on the one hand is about the feeling of fear inside the white house. but i think it's also fair to
say that "fear" is also what bob woodward is suggesting we should all have about this person holding this office and how dangerous that could be both for us as a country and for the world. i say that i think that is a fair interpretation of woodward's book, not only because i'm reading that, in terms of the way he tells this story, but also now that he's talking about his book in advance of the publication tomorrow, that's pretty much what he's telling all his interviewers. he's basically saying, hey, listen, the main point here is i'm telling you you should be afraid. >> you look at the operation of this white house and you have to say let's hope to god we don't have a crisis. >> "fear: trump in the white house" is woodward's 19th book and he says reporting it took him deeper inside a working white house than he's ever been before.
>> this one was in the belly of the beast. >> and what did you conclude about the beast? >> that people better wake up to what's going on. >> well, i've never seen an instance when the president is so detached from the reality of what's going on. >> people who work for him are worried that he will sign things or give orders that threaten the national security or the financial security of the country or the world. >> what i want to do is focus on -- you know, this -- here's the problem, this has not been treated seriously enough and the things -- some of the things trump did and does jeopardize the real national security -- >> so bob woodward has started promoting this book ahead of its publication date tomorrow.
he is being very clear about what he's trying to do with this book and why he titled it "fear" is to try to wake up the american people as to what he sees as a serious danger that he is reporting about the president. i said that i have read most of the book. i did not do that because i enjoy being scared in that way. i did that because i've got bob woodward here tomorrow on the day the book is actually published. he's going to be my guest live in studio tomorrow night. eek. and as the bob woodward book launches, people can start to get their hands on it themselves instead of just getting advanced reported excerpts. his publisher announced they've preprinted something like 1 million copies of the book. they're expecting this to be a massive, massive rollout tomorrow. it does appear that the impending publication of this book and also probably that anonymous "new york times" op-ed last week as well, they've sort of shaken a few things loose from this president and his defenders in congress, and in particular i think there are a couple of things that we should
all we watching for tonight and over the course of this week that specifically relate to this existentially challenging investigation that has this president and this white house so worried. first thing to watch for has to do with this handsome fellow. you'll recognize him from recent news coverage because this past friday he was sentenced to prison. he has not reported to start his sentence. i don't actually know when he's doing that. after his sentencing before actually going to prison, he's been doing something close to a media blitz. most of it is trying to make sure he's known for something other than the first member of the trump campaign to go to prison for lying about colluding with the russians to help trump win the election. he's trying to give you other things to think when you hear the name george papadopoulos other than just that one blunt historic fact. but as we noted here on the show on friday night when we got the first excerpts from the first interview with him that was published after his sentencing,
an interview with "the new york times," this trump campaign adviser, george papadopoulos, is now sort of contesting what was previously an unconstantverted story about how he fits into the whole russia scandal and, in fact, why he was so important to the fbi starting their counterintelligence investigation into the president and his campaign in the first place. and you know this part of the story by heart by now, right? it was first reported in "the new york times" nearly nine months ago. george papadopoulos, spring of 2016, may of 2016, after he had been named a foreign policy adviser to the trump campaign, he was in london, he reportedly had a meeting over drinks with an australian diplomat at a london wine bar. at that meeting, papadopoulos told this australian diplomat that russia had stolen democratic e-mails and that those stolen e-mails ultimately would hurt the hillary clinton presidential campaign. the australian diplomat reportedly didn't think much of it at the time, but lo and behold a couple of months later
it was revealed that the russian government had, in fact, stolen hillary clinton e-mails. hey, you feds should know that the donald trump campaign had advanced notice of the russians doing this before anybody knew about it publicly. right? this guy george papadopoulos, who is advising the trump campaign, told our diplomat that this had taken place before any of this was ever public. y'all should look into it, right? so that's the story, again, which you know by heart by now, and the reporting -- the seminal reporting on this point is that that notification from the australian government about that conversation that george papadopoulos had had in the spring of 2016, that notification to the fbi was the catalyst for the fbi to start investigating, not just russia interfering in the presidential campaign, but crucially, whether or not the trump campaign was in on it, right? to the point where they had advanced knowledge of what the russians were doing before anybody knew about it publicly. i mean, that supposedly was the catalyst for the fbi starting its investigation of whether the
trump campaign colluded with russia. you know, if it hadn't been for that drunk kid in the bar flapping his jaws. well, that young guy is now on his way to prison, and on his way to prison he's now saying, no, actually, that didn't happen. or at least i don't remember that happening. so reconsider that story. "new york times" reporter released audio excerpts of his interview on this subject with george papadopoulos today at the website of "the new york times." we've got a clip from that here. what you're going to hear in this clip is the actual interview between mark mazzetti from "the times" and george papadopoulos. interspersed with that is mark mazzetti sort of narrativing it a little bit so you can follow what was happening in their conversation. >> shortly after that, you're in a upscale bar in london talking to australia's top diplomat in the uk. how did that come about? >> in may of 2016, so shortly afterwards -- >> mmm-hmm. >> he was in a meeting, the top
australian diplomat in the uk, a man named alexander downer. >> this meeting was supposedly about the u.s.-australia relationship, which, of course, i had no background in whatsoever. >> the australian wanted to meet him. the foreign diplomats were still trying to figure out who was on this trump campaign. who is george papadopoulos? so they meet in a bar. >> what were you guys drinking? >> i think i had a gin and tonic. >> they start drinking gin and tonics. >> mmm-hmm. >> in interviews, downer has said that you brought up the russian dirt on hillary clinton. >> we now know over the course of that meeting papadopoulos told alexander downeder what mifsud had told me, that the russians had all this dirt, damaging information, e-mails of hillary clinton, but -- >> i don't remember talking about that with him at all. >> so you don't remember at any point in that meeting talking
about russia dirt, hillary clinton? >> i don't have -- no, i don't remember that at all, actually. >> he says he does remember other aspects of that meeting but doesn't remember the part where he told downer about this information. >> it was quite shocking when i read it, actually, in "the new york times" for the first time. >> our own reporting first revealed this, that downer's information made its way to australia and then eventually to the australian embassy in washington and eventually to the fbi. that was the reason why the fbi launched its investigation into possible nexconnections betweene trump campaign and russia. >> he writes cables back to his government describing the meeting. in the cables he gives specific information that you guys discussed, not only that the russians have dirt on hillary, but that mifsud had actually offered help in coordinating the release of the e-mails. that this is what came up in the
meeting. that you told him everything mifsud had told you and that it was not just, hey, we've got some e-mails, it's, hey, let's work together to release some e-mails. is that an inaccurate description? >> i have no recollection of talking about that at all. >> i have no recollection of talking about that at all. it's a little weird, right? he's not saying, no, i remember, just one gin and tonic. he's not saying it didn't happen, he's just saying he can't remember that happening. did he previously remember that happening but he's since forgotten what he used to remember? did he never remember what happened that night at all? does he remember that night and know that didn't happen but for some reason saying he doesn't remember it instead of just denying that it happened? hmm? we knew this was coming because "the new york times" reported on friday that papadopoulos was not denying this whole story but at least forgetting this whole part of the story. now as of tonight we can hear him doing so. he is also, tonight, continuing
with this line of argument, or at least this weird dodge. online tonight, he said sarcastically, yeah, quote, i supposedly told that individual, meaning alexander downer, about e-mails. quote, something i have no recollection ever discussing. i can't make -- honestly, i can't make heads or tails of george papadopoulos. literally if i was strong enough to pick him up and throw him in the air, i don't know if he would land up or down. he's on his way to prison and now we don't necessarily understand why. on his way to prison he is trying to change the public perception of how the fbi started investigating whether the trump campaign was colluding with russia. we do not yet know why he is doing that. he's doing that with this weird i don't recall thing. we don't know why he's doing it, but here's a hunch as to how we are going to find out why he is
doing this. this is the other thing i said to watch for today and in coming days. axios.com is reporting that as early as this week the president is going to order the declassification about more documents about the start of the fbi russia investigation. quote, president trump is expected to declassify as early as this week documents of surveillance of carter page and the investigative activities of senior justice department lawyer bruce ohr. carter page, he was the subject of court-ordered surveillance after he left his role as an adviser to the trump campaign. carter page is really someone who was caught up in a russian spy ring. court records from a federal prosecution several years ago reveal his enthusiastic engagement with three dudes who were literally charged as russian spies operating out of new york city. two of them got away back to moscow. one of them got caught and went to prison for being a russian
spy. in this case, carter page had a starring role as a targeted asset for the russian spying ring in that criminal case. that's why it's always been a little hard to understand why republicans in the white house have tried to make carter page their poster child for how wrong-headed it is to expect that the trump campaign might have any ties to russia. dude, anybody who hired carter page. this guy really was caught up in a russian spy ring. he inexplicably ended up with a job on the trump campaign he appeared completely unqualified for. and then he kept taking trips to russia and meeting with russian officials thereafter. he is not the world's greatest argument for why it's crazy anybody would suspect any trump campaign involvement in a russian government effort to elect donald trump president. but the application for those surveillance orders against them, when it came to carter page, those applications did require the government, the fbi, to spell out the basis of their ongoing investigation.
so republicans in the trump white house apparently want to declassify and release that information that was used to get the surveillance warrant against him because they want to, i think, sort of further cloud the issue of why the fbi started investigating the trump campaign and russia in the first place. what was the basis for opening that investigation? and now this reporting at axios suggests that we should expect the president to order the declassification of those documents soon. and the other thing that trump is apparently going to declassify soon is documentation of the, quote, investigative activities of senior justice department lawyer bruce ohr. and if carter page being a good guy when it comes to the russia scandal is a weird peg to try to hang your hat on, bruce ohr being a bad guy when it comes to the russia scandal is an even weirder peg to try to hang your proverbial hat on. one of the top experts on
russian crime at the u.s. doping. the head of the organized crime for the whole doj, his specialty was organized international crime. bringing a u.s.-based criminal indictment against the godfather of all godfathers, the head of the russian mob. in 2006 figured out a way to ban a powerful putin-linked oligarch named oleg deripaska entering the united states. according to "the new york times" based on fears that deripas deripaska might be coming to the u.s. specifically to launder russian mob money into u.s. real estate. that was 2006. that's when they blocked him from coming to the u.s. 2006. around the time oleg deripaska was doing lots of business with paul manafort overseas, the a.p. reports that paul manafort
entered into a $10 million a year contract with deripaska to promote the influence of russian president vladimir putin and his government. we have since learned from "new york times" reporting that almost a decade after bruce ohr as the senior justice department official working on russian organized crime, nearly a decade after he participated in this u.s. effort to ban oleg deripaska coming to the united states by denying him a visa. nine years down the road, nine years after that in 2015, that same justice department official, bruce ohr, was actually instrumental in bringing deripaska to the united states on purpose. they'd been blocking him from sitting foot here in this country since 2006, but in 2015 they decided they would give him a visa and invite him over. why? according to dramatic reporting from ken vogel and matt rosenberg, the reason they allowed deripaska to come here after all those years of banning him is because they wanted to have a little talk with him.
they wanted to try to flip him. they wanted to try to persuade him to start working for u.s. intelligence and law enforcement. they wanted him to start informing against vladimir putin and russian organized crime. quote, u.s. justice department official bruce ohr attended the meeting with deripaska in 2015, during which time the americans pressed deripaska on connections between russian organized crime and mr. putin's government. they were trying to flip him. it did not work. deripaska refused another meeting and reportedly told the kremlin about that failed approach from u.s. law enforcement. that was in 2015. they apparently went back at him again in 2016, trying again and again. he gave them the hand. but now this president and his republican supporters in congress are apparently poised to try to destroy that justice department official by name. we are told to expect a leak of classified information or the declassification of information related to bruce ohr's work.
they will presumably use that declassified information selectively to try to make him look terrible somehow. all indications are they will try to use bruce ohr and whatever they're about to declassify about him as a means to call into question the origins of the fbi investigation. this top justice department official who is an expert on russian organized crime, pushing mob-linked, putin-linked russian oligarchs and all these uncomfortable questions about putin and organized crime and the russian government. imagine how happy they will be when trump declassifies all of bruce ohr's investigative activities and blow his sources in the process. imagine how happy they will be to blow up the career of the top russian organized crime expert at the u.s. justice department, who has been intensely and personally focused for years on the links between russian organized crime and the putin government. imagine how happy they will be to blow up that guy specifically. whose interests will that most
serve? more ahead. stay with us. friends, colleagues, gathered here are the world's finest insurance experts. rodney -- mastermind of discounts like safe driver, paperless. the list goes on. how about a discount for long lists? gold. mara, you save our customers hundreds for switching almost effortlessly. it's a gift. and jamie. -present. -together we are unstoppable. so, what are we gonna do? ♪ insurance. that's kind of what we do here. kayak compares hundreds of travel and airline sites so you can be confident you're getting the right flight at the best price. cheers! kayak. search one and done.
with new, more secure numbers. but con artists, they never change. they'll always try to steal your medical identity. so, what can you do? guard your card, just like a credit card. don't give your medicare number over the phone or email. and remember, medicare never calls unless you've asked them to. to find more ways to guard your card, go to medicare.gov/fraud. don't let your guard down. ♪ that make it easy for your uber driver to find you,atures taking the stress out of pickups. because leaving an event shouldn't be one. uber is moving in a new direction.
have been clamoring for it for awhile now. they reportedly are about to get their wish. axios.com is now reporting that president trump is about to order the declassification of a batch of documents, quote, covering the u.s. government's surveillance of trump campaign adviser carter page and the investigative activities of senior justice department lawyer bruce ohr. carter page is the trump campaign adviser who came under fbi surveillance for his repeated contacts with russian operatives. he was surveilled under fisa regulations that require the government to show that they believe the target of the surveillance is an active foreign agent. bruce ohr, on the other hand, is a justice department official whose work has made him one of the top experts in the u.s. government on russian organized crime and its ties to the kremlin, including one dramatic instance in which bruce ohr reportedly met with a russian oligarch named oleg deripaska and tried to convince him to
become a cooperator were u.s. law enforcement against the russian government. the president has been sending angry tweets about bruce ohr for weeks now. last month, house republicans summoned ohr for closed door testimony. but now we're told to expect the president to release classified information from ohr's, quote, investigative activities. joining us now is congressman jim himes who is a member of the house intelligence committee. congressman, thank you very much for being with us. >> hi, rachel. >> what is your reaction to this reporting from axios that the president is going to declassify these materials? first of all, i should mention that it's just axios reporting this. other people aren't matching this reporting. i don't know if that means that they're just ahead of the story or maybe they've caught on to something that isn't going to happen. do you have expectations about this? >> well, i'm certainly intrigued by it. i'm intrigued by it because of course they've declassified other stuff that had no business being out there in the public realm. you'll remember the fisa affidavits that they assured us
were going to show this all got started because of the steele dossier. the reason i'm intrigued by it, every time they have declassified documents, it turns out that the truth, the actual documents completely rebut their point. when we got a look at the fisa affidavit, it turns out that lo and behold, it was really all about george papadopoulos who you were talking about earlier, bragging about meeting russians who were talking about having e-mails. so i'm intrigued by it because documents and the truth are not the republicans' friends on this issue. so i worry, quite frankly, that if they do declassify, and when i say "they," it would be the president, of course, it would be done in a way that slams the truth. the truth is not their friend. >> who do you make of the targeting of bruce ohr in particular? obviously what axios is reporting is that there are two sets of documents coming out, one that relates to this surveillance application on carter page. we've already had a bunch of that declassified already. but also, the investigative work of bruce ohr. given bruce ohr's expertise and
his past work in the justice department, are you at all concerned? i certainly am intrigued myself as to why they're singling him out in way that i'm expecting to be designed to destroy his career. >> well, you know, a couple things. number one, there is a reason why police and public officials don't typically talk about what's happening inside an investigation, because inside an investigation, you have law enforcement people, policemen, fbi agents doing things like following hunches and getting to dead ends. until you're actually ready to go to court, nothing's ready so that's why if you just sort of start pell-mell releasing papers you could create an impression that is not true. but i got to tell you, rachel, this is infuriating, right? bruce ohr, by all accounts, and by the way, at some point i hope they release his testimony, because i heard that his testimony last week actually completely rebutted the notion that he was doing anything untoward. but bruce ohr is just the latest guy whose career the president is intent on ending.
this a 30-year professional, an expert on the russian mob. a guy that we could actually use having his career ended. and i say that tonight, rachel, with particular passion, because tomorrow morning between 8:00 and 9:00, we're going to remember 17 years to the minute of the attack on our country by terrorists on 9/11 and thousands of lives lost. why have we not had another event like 9/11 in this country? i speak with some authority with six years on the intelligence committee when i say the reason we have not had an attack like the one that struck us 17 years ago is because of bruce ohr and thousands and thousands of people like him in doj and fbi and cia and everywhere else, all of whom are fair game for this president to spin his lies and ultimately harm those organizations that have kept us more or less safe for 17 years. >> congressman jim himes of connecticut, thank you for being with us tonight, sir. much appreciate your time. >> thank you, rachel. >> all right. we've got a lot more to get to tonight. do stay with us. this is an insurance commercial.
but let's be honest, nobody likes dealing with insurance. which is why esurance hired me, dennis quaid, as their spokesperson because apparently, i'm highly likable. see, they know it's confusing. i literally have no idea what i'm getting, dennis quaid. that's why they're making it simple, man in cafe. and more affordable. thank you, dennis quaid. you're welcome. that's a prop apple. i'd tell you more, but i only have 30 seconds. so here's a dramatic shot of their tagline so you'll remember it. esurance. it's surprisingly painless. so you'll remember it. ahoy! gotcha! nooooo... noooooo... quick, the quicker picker upper! bounty picks up messes quicker and is 2x more absorbent. bounty, the quicker picker upper. the doctor's office just for a shot. but why go back there... when you can stay home with neulasta onpro? strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1%, a 94% decrease.
neulasta onpro is designed to deliver neulasta the day after chemo and is used by most patients today. neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to it or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away. in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache. if you'd rather be home ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card.
benjamin franklin capturedkey lightening in a bottle.. over 260 years later, with a little resourcefulness, ingenuity, and grit, we're not only capturing energy from the sun and wind, we're storing it. as the nation's leader in energy storage, we're ensuring americans have the energy they need, whenever they need it. this is our era. this is america's energy era. nextera energy. ♪ the kenya tea development agency is an organization that is owned by tea farmers. every week we sell this tea, we get paid in multiple accounts. we were looking for a bank to provide a safe and efficient technology platform to pay our farmers.
citi was the only one that was able to ensure that this was done seamlessly. and today, at the touch of a button, all the farmers are able to get their money, pay school fees and improve their standard of living. with citi, we see a bright future for our farmers and their families. ♪ senator lisa murkowski of alaska, senator susan collins of maine, together they're seen by democrats as two of the republican senators who might be persuaded to stop the supreme court nomination of brett kavanaugh. kavanaugh is a historically unpopular choice. his polling numbers are worse than harriet miers or robert bork, two nominees who were so unpopular they didn't even make it close to the court. kavanaugh's nomination has less
support than either of them. in addition, though, specifically senators murkowski and collins are both pro-choice and judge kavanaugh's staunch anti-abortion rights record will presumably give them both pause on roe versus wade alone. senators murkowski and collins may have some other specific issues with kavanaugh beyond that. you can see evidence of that in some of the questions directed at kavanaugh last week. mazie hirono calling out his hostility for programs for native hawaiians, and by extension, programs for native alaskans. that effort from mazie hirono was leading to a very key political consideration for lisa murkowski up in alaska, mainly that senator murkowski vouch owes her job in the senate right now to the support of the voters and the money of native alaskaens. in 2010, lisa murkowski, you might remember, she got
primaried from the right. she actually lost the republican primary in alaska for her own seat to a far-right challenger. in order to try to keep her seat in the senate, she had to run as a write-in, which is almost impossible to win, right? but her most stalwart allies in that political storm were native alaskans who stood by her with votes and not incidentally, a ton of last-minute money for ad buys. she told them at the time, "i will fight for you as long as i am able." she owes her seat in the senate to the native alaskan communities, and they are now reminding her of that in the local press in alaska, and also in the hallways of the senate where they are delivering the message that her vote to confirm kavanaugh could, quote, be a death knell for native alaskans. that's some of the pressure on senator murkowski from native alaskan voters who saved her bacon in 2010. do not vote to confirm brett kavanaugh. as for senator collins in maine, we've talked on this show about the voluminous and somewhat unnerving evidence that came out last week that brett kavanaugh may have lied under oath about a range of issues, including whether he received documents
that were stolen from senate democrats, and whether he used those documents to help bush nominees get through the senate. senator collins went home for the weekend, saying she remains undecided on the brett kavanaugh nomination, but she also told her local paper this, quote, if in fact judge kavanaugh was not truthful, then obviously that would be a major problem for me. our next guest is someone who was right there inside that fight at the time. she says some of her own work is what was stolen and given to brett kavanaugh, and tonight she is ready to talk. that's next.
how much more does congress need to see? donald trump has now been implicated in two felony crimes, and he's all but confessed to them on fox news. no one is above the law, so we have to make sure this president doesn't use pardons to cover up crimes. if you agree that a president should not be allowed to pardon himself or his associates, join us at needtoimpeach.com. the washington establishment doesn't have the courage to act,
but the american people can. each of us is different. and each cancer is different. how it reacts, how it evades and adapts. and how we attack it. that's why at cancer treatment centers of america, we use diagnostic tools that help us better understand what drives each person's cancer. this is what we mean by outsmarting cancer. and for some, it may uncover more effective treatment options. like christine bray. after battling ovarian cancer for several years, her test results revealed a potential treatment not considered previously a drug therapy that targeted her tumor. today, christine's metastatic cancer is in remission. this is precision cancer treatment. because at cancer treatment centers of america. we're not just fighting cancer. we're outsmarting it. visit cancercenter.com and schedule an appointment
with our cancer care specialists today. doespeninsula trail?he you won't find that on a map. i'll take you there. take this left. if you listen real hard you can hear the whales. oop. you hear that? (vo) our subaru outback lets us see the world. sometimes in ways we never imagined. on friday, just as the brett kavanaugh confirmation hearings were winding down, slate.com published this little tomahawk missile. the author argued that instead of debating whether or not to confirm brett kavanaugh to the supreme court, quote, the better question is whether he should be impeached from the federal judiciary. e-mails revealed in the confirmation process for
kavanaugh shows he appeared to have repeatedly lied under oath whether to have received letters memos and talking points that were, in fact, stolen from democratic staffers in a democratic scandal during the bush administration. judge kavanaugh said under oath he never was aware of anything like that, even though we now know one of the e-mails he received in the bush white house and forwarded to others literally had as its subject line the word "spying." and then the e-mail contained a whole raft of sensitive information from democrats about the nominees in the senate. back to the piece in slate. quote, even if kavanaugh can claim he didn't have any hint at the time he received these e-mails that these documents were of suspect provenance, which i personally find implausible. quote, there is no way for him to assert honestly that he had no way to assert what they were
after the revelation of the theft. quote, any reasonable person would have realized they had been stolen, and certainly someone as smart of kavanaugh would have too, but he lied under oath. he should not be confirmed. he should clearly be impeached. the author of that indictment is lisa graves. she is a former senate lawyer who wrote some of those stolen democratic documents, the ones that brett kavanaugh said he never suspected could have been stolen. joining us now is lisa graves. ms. graves, thank you very much for being with us tonight. it's nice to have you here. >> thank you so much. >> so this story, which you have detailed to a degree that i think makes it very understandable on slate.com as of last week, it has really started to catch on as maybe the key hang-up, the key problem that emerged during the kavanaugh confirmation hearings. so you feel like the public discussion about this now, the political discussion of this now accurately characterizes what kavanaugh did wrong? >> well, i think more and more people are learning about it. as you know, the hearings have been rushed forward. and so many documents have not
been seen. in fact, 100,000 pages or more have not been seen. but from the documents that have been provided, including documents that came out just last week, it's clear that manuel miranda provided documents, talking points, materials that were taken from, stolen from democratic staff, and he gave them to him during this incredibly intense fight over bush's judicial nominees. and so one of the memos i know personally contains page after page, paragraph after paragraph of my research, the research i prepared for senator patrick leahy, research on the most intense fight we were having a about the nomination which involved the legal precedents, the historical precedents for the memos that the senate democrats have requested. and what manuel miranda provided to brett kavanaugh alone in one of those e-mails is chapter and verse of those strategic pieces of research, many of which have never been published before until this past week in
connection with the senate judiciary committee hearing. and so i am convinced by that and some of the other documents provided that brett kavanaugh lied repeatedly under oath to the united states senate about these matters. and it's a very serious matter for the integrity of the courts and also for the integrity of the united states senate itself. >> now when questioned about these matter, particularly with particular aggression from senator leahy this past week, one of the defenses that brett kavanaugh raised was that he wouldn't have recognized these as stolen documents because there was an atmosphere on the judiciary committee and in the senate at the time of nonpartisan, bipartisan sharing of information. and so if he saw anything that was marked as or indicated that it had come from the democratic side, he would have assumed that it would have been voluntarily shared because it was a more bipartisan time. what's your reaction to that from him? >> that's utter falsehood when it came to judicial nominations. and in fact you see from the materials that have been provided that have escaped the
grasp, in essence, of the administration, which is trying to keep these documents secret, you can see that the information was provided by miranda to kavanaugh relate to the most controversial, most heated battles over these nominees, these very controversial nominees, including nominees who had records of being incredibly anti-choice nominees. but leaving aside the substance of, that what's quite clear is everyone who was in those battles, including brett kavanaugh himself, quite frankly, including the white house which was fighting tooth and nail to try to break the filibuster of the senate democrats, to try to force us to move forward with those nominees, this was not an atmosphere in which people were sharing their strategic research, their talking points, their whip counts, their letters, their strategies with manuel miranda or the other republicans in the senate. it was enormous battle throughout that year, and his statements only underscored how untruthful he's being in this
hearing and in his prior hearings. >> lisa graves, former senate lawyer who wrote some of the documents that were stolen from senate democrats during the george w. bush administration, some of these documents that brett kavanaugh does appear to have lied about under oath. thank you for helping us understand the story tonight, lisa. it's nice to meet you. thanks for being here. >> thank you so much. >> all right. we'll be right back. stay with us. in her latest movie "peppermint." in real life she's plays a mom helping other moms as founder of the baby food company once upon a farm. find out how she got involved and how her business as grown. don't forget that the past can speak to the future. ♪ ♪ i'm going to be your substitute teacher.
don't assume the substitute teacher has nothing to offer... same goes for a neighborhood. don't forget that friendships last longer than any broadway run. mr. president. (laughing) don't settle for your first draft. or your 10th draft. ♪ ♪ you get to create the room where it happens. ♪ ♪ just don't think you have to do it alone. ♪ ♪ the powerful backing of american express. don't live life without it. uhp. i didn't believe it. again. ♪ ooh, baby, do you know what that's worth? ♪ i want to believe it. [ claps hands ] ♪ ooh i'm not hearing the confidence. okay, hold the name your price tool. power of options based on your budget! and! ♪ we'll make heaven a place on earth ♪
yeah! oh, my angels! ♪ ooh, heaven is a place on earth ♪ [ sobs quietly ] ♪ ooh, heaven is a place on earth ♪ at&t provides edge-to-edge intelligence, covering virtually every part of your manufacturing business. & so this won't happen. because you've made sure this sensor and this machine are integrated. & she can talk to him, & yes... atta, boy. some people assign genders to machines. and you can be sure you won't have any problems. except for the daily theft of your danish. not cool! at&t provides edge to edge intelligence. it can do so much for your business, the list goes on and on. that's the power of &. & this shipment will be delivered... what if you had fewer headaches and migraines a month?
botox® prevents headaches and migraines before they even start. botox® is for adults with chronic migraine, 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting 4 hours or more. botox® injections take about 15 mins. in your doctor's office and are covered by most insurance. effects of botox® may spread hours to weeks after injection causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away, as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition. side effects may include allergic reactions, neck and injection site pain, fatigue, and headache. don't receive botox® if there's a skin infection. tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, and medications, including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. with the botox® savings program, most people with commercial insurance pay nothing out of pocket. talk to your doctor and visit botoxchronicmigraine.com to enroll. jail in washington, d.c. on
charges that the was the agent of a russian influence operation in the united states. she was in court today trying to convince a federal judge to release her on bond while she waits to be tried. turns out, though, the judge had something very specific she wanted to take up with butina's lawyer, robert driscoll, at the start of the hearing. we've got the transcript. i want to say at the outset that my chambers received videos they wanted to the court to see prior to the hearing this morning. mr. driscoll, there was a deadline in this case that, in fact, was very generous and in the future i will not be having a deadline of the night before a hearing for submissions, but there was a deadline in this case. i had a full calender this morning. i do not like and will not accept in the future submissions hours before a hearing where
there is a pending motion. i can tell you, having viewed them that i am not sure what on earth their relevance is to ms. butina's risk of flight, but i have reviewed them. for the record, the first one of the videotapes is a video of ms. butina and her boyfriend lip syncing, i believe, in what appears to be a recording studio to the theme song from "bout ea and the beast." is that correct. robert driscoll says, your description is correct, your honor. did you make me leave my very important judge meeting this morning to make me watch a video of your client lip syncing to "beauty and the beast?" yes, your honor. this is the video the judge felt was so urgent for the judge to watch. showed it to abc news, which is why we have it. maria butina has a very serious
relationship with that older american man and not, as prosecutors contend, simply using him for his political contacts to benefit the russian government. therefore, because she's so in love, she is not a flight risk if she's let out of jail. he wouldn't want to be apart from him. this is how the judge responded today, quote, well, the court does not find she's videos to be at all relevant on ms. butina's risk of flight and that is the court's primary concern with regard to her bond status. the judge denied ms. butina's motion. ordered she must remain locked up until her trial because despite her love of disney tunes, the judge told her and her lawyer today that she is, indeed, still considered to be a flight risk. both a little scared. ♪ neither one prepared
looking good! at booking.com, we can't guarantee you'll good at that water jet thingy... but we can guarantee the best price on this hotel. or any accommodation, from homes to yurts. booking.com booking.yeah ito take care of anyct messy situations.. and put irritation in its place. and if i can get comfortable keeping this tookus safe and protected... you can get comfortable doing the same with yours. preparation h. get comfortable with it.
if you're waiting patiently for a liver transplant, it could cost you your life. it's time to get out of line with upmc. at upmc, living-donor transplants put you first. so you don't die waiting. upmc does more living-donor liver transplants than any other center in the nation. find out more and get out of line today. we've had a burst of inexplicable activity in the last 72 hours or so in the stormy daniels case. at least it's inexplicable to me. stormy daniels and her lawyer michael avenatti have sued donald trump and his lawyer michael cohen over a nondisclosure agreement she signed just before the election in which she was paid $130,000 to keep quiet about an affair she claims to have had with donald trump. suing so she will no longer be
bound by it. well, late on friday night, michael cohen told the court he would agree to tear up the agreement. all stormy daniels has to do is pay back the 130 grand. the following day, on saturday, president trump's lawyer in this case also agreed to tear up the agreement. why? and what does that mean? why did all that just happen and why did it happen in quick secession like that? is this over and how does it relate to michael cohen saying that was actually a campaign finance felony that she was directed to commit by president trump? well, so far, stormy daniels' lawyer michael avenatti is rejecting the offer, tearing into trump on twitter over the -- him saying now he'll let the nda go away. i don't know. it sort of seems like maybe michael cohen and donald trump are working together, at least their lawyers are on this case, okay, stormy daniels, you win, you get what you want. it seems coordinated. it at least happened in quick
secession. we are not really sure what the implications of this are. if stormy daniels is, in fact, winning here, her lawyer actually seems not happy about it. why is that? well, the good news is you're about to find out straight from the good evening, lawrence. >> good evening, rachel. and i'm going to time this so you can get home in time to watch michael avenatti. he's not going to be on at the top of the show. those are all my questions this weekend, and because i had time today flying down from toronto i which he'll time to read michael avenatti's filing on this. i believe it's over. they just surrendered to michael avenatti so there's no case anymore, but it turns out there is. and a close reading of michael avenatti's pleading explained that to me. but it'll be even better to have him here as he will be to explain it to all of us. this case looks like it is going to continue.