tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC February 15, 2019 10:00pm-11:00pm PST
>> dahlia lithwick is senior editor and legal correspondent at "slate." i feel like this has been junior law school rachelle maddow show. happy to keep things straight here. >> a-plus. >> thank you. i paid for that. thought does it for us tonight. i feel like this has been junior law school rachelle maddow show. >> a-plus. >> thank you. i paid for that. thought does it for us tonight. >> i feel like the last two years has been junior law school. rachel, have yourself a great weekend. >> thanks, ali. just hours after the president declared it. the watchdog group public citizen filed a lawsuit in federal court in washington challenging the president's announcement today that he will redirect billions of dollars of federal funding to build a border wall because of his so-called national emergency. democrats in congress are also making plans to fight the president's declaration. and our first guest tonight is a member of the judiciary committee, which is now planning an investigation of the emergency declaration. even donald trump is having a hard time pretending that this
is an actual emergency. for one thing, he flew to mar-a-lago right after declaring the national emergency. and look at how he started his big speech, issuing the national emergency declaration. notice what he doesn't mention. >> before we begin, i'd like to just say that we have a large team of very talented people in china. we've had a negotiation going on for about two days. it's going extremely well. who knows what that means. you know all of the situation with respect to brexit. we have a very good trading relationship with uk. we have a lot of great announcements having to do with syria. we're working on a summit, and you know all about the summit. it will be in vietnam. hanoi. we've been working very closely with south korea, with japan, but china, russia, on the border, have really been at
least partially living up to what they're supposed to be doing. >> if there is a real emergency at the southern border, you'd think trump might have started his announcement by actually talking about it. instead, the first border he mentioned was the one in north korea. when he finally talked about the u.s. border, he announced his national emergency and made this strange prediction. >> we will have a national emergency and we will then be sued and they will sue us in the ninth circuit, even though it shouldn't be there, and we will possibly get a bad ruling, and then we'll get another bad ruling, and then we'll end up in the supreme court, and hopefully we'll get a fair shake and we'll win in the supreme court. >> today the aclu and the state of california said they also plan to challenge the president in court. if the president is hoping to win those court battles, his administration will probably need a better explanation for ignoring congress to build the
wall than the one that he gave to nbc's peter alexander. >> in the past when president obama tried to use executive action as it related to immigration, you said, the whole concept of executive order, it's not the way the country's supposed to be run. you said you're supposed to go through congress and make a deal. will you concede that you were unable to make the deal that you had promised in the past and that the deal you're ending up with now from congress is less than what you could have had before a 35-day shutdown. >> i went through congress. i made a deal but i want to do it faster. i could do the wall over a long period of time. i didn't need to do this, but i'd rather do it much faster. >> i didn't need to do this, said the president, who is ultimately going to have to justify why he declared a national emergency. house speaker nancy pelosi responded to that with this tweet. "clearest sign that real donald trump's fake emergency is not legitimate, the president himself says he didn't need to declare a national emergency. it's just a faster way to force
taxpayers to foot the bill after congress wouldn't let him have his way." another strange moment today was when the president explicitly tied his so-called national emergency to the 2020 election. >> i don't have to do it for the election. i've already done a lot of wall for the election. 2020. and the only reason we're up here talking about this is because of the election. because they want to try to win an election, which it looks like they're not going to be able to do. >> i don't know what i've already done a lot of wall actually means, but just to be clear, not a single mile of new wall construction has happened. trump also had a lot to say about conservative talk radio hosts, including ann coulter, who called him an idiot today. and today house democrats responded to the president. alexandria ocasio-cortez and joaquin castro said they will introduce a resolution to terminate the emergency declaration. and the house judiciary
committee chairman jerry nadler sent a letter to the president saying his committee, quote, is commencing an immediate investigation into this matter, which raises both serious constitutional and statutory issues. we ask that you make those individuals involved in this declaration available to us for a hearing in the coming days. all right. joining us now is democratic congressman of rhode island. he's on the policy and communications committee and he has visited the u.s.-mexico border multiple times. congressman, good to see you. thanks for joining us tonight. >> good to see you. my pleasure. >> the president was having trouble making a clear justification for why he declared this national emergency. he did mention ann coulter. he mentioned rush limbaugh. he mentioned sean hannity, but in the end he may be diverting funds that would otherwise be used for legitimate military purposes.
i want to just play for you quickly what donald trump said about why he would to that. >> we had certain funds that are being used at the discretion o generals, at the discretion of the military. some of them haven't been allocated yet, and some of the generals think that this is more important. i was speaking to a couple of them. they think this is far more important than what they were going to use it for. i said, what were you going to use it for? i won't go into details, but didn't sound too important to me. >> congressman, that sounds weird. you've been down to the border. i haven't spoken to any generals who suggest that the things that they're doing with their money would be less useful than spending it on a border wall. this is f-35 training. this is real construction work at bases. this is -- this is kind of hard to believe what the president just said. >> yeah, i mean, president is suggesting he's going to take money from critical military construction and counternarcotics work. it's kind of ironic when he's claiming he needs to build a wall for both of those purposes. but, look, there is no emergency at the border. i've been there two times in the
last year. illegal border crossings are down to a 40-year low. his own intelligence community when hey do the world threat assessment that identifies the greatest threats to the united states didn't even reference the southern border and certainly never said there was an emergency. so there is no emergency at the border and the president's statutory authorization that he's referring to relates to military construction to support the armed forces, which is clearly not immigration related. so there is no basis for this. this is the president attempting to circumvent the will of the american people, as reflected through decisions in congress. this is really disrespectful to the rule of law, to the separation of powers between the branches of government, and we have a democracy. the president, just because he's frustrated that he didn't get what he wants, isn't allowed to just circumvent the democratic process. he's not an imperial king where he can just issue an edict. we have a functioning democracy and he failed to convince the congress and the american people of the necessity of this wall
and he just can't do what he's purporting or proposing to do. >> you know, the president trying to get $8 billion for this. more than the $5.7 billion he was asking for in the first place. as we know, a red herring in the first place. each the most conservative estimates of the wall the president wants to build in 20 to 25. estimates close to double than that. as represents you have to deal with the fact that $8 billion is a lot of money. $8 billion for technology that is not deemed by the experts to say the thing that is going to keep our border more secure is a waste of american money, and as nancy pelosi said, this is one way or the other taxpayer money. >> no, absolutely. look, we have a responsibility to make certain that we secure the border in this country, but we need to do it in a way that actually achieves the objective, using the best technology, doing cargo inspections, using drones, using satellites, additional personnel. the things that the experts say will actually work, rather than this sort of monument to the
trump campaign promise that he said mexico was going to pay for. it's ineffective. it's wasteful. it will not achieve the objective he claims it will. and that's why a bipartisan group of congress negotiated a resolution of this issue and passed it overwhelmingly because we settled on smart, tough, effective border security and not this campaign promise that the president made. >> congressman, the chairman of your committee, jerry nadler, has sent this letter to the president saying make people who were involved in this decision available because you're going to investigate. on what basis are you going to investigate? what are you looking for? >> well, we're looking for the president to come forward and the president's team to make clear what is the basis of this determination? how do they come to the conclusion that there was a national emergency? which, of course, there is not. what advice he got with respect to whether or not that was appropriate. what authority he thinks he has to reallocate funds. we want to understand kind of how the president came to this decision, what influenced his
ultimate decision to do this. because what we really believe is that this part, as he mentioned in the press conference, this is about a campaign. this is about keeping this issue alive so that he can claim he's fighting to secure the border and nobody else will do it and no one else wants to get it done but him. he's going to continue with this narrative. he wants this fight because he thinks it's politically advantageous, but it's dangerous to allow the president of the united states to circumvent the will of congress, the rule of law in this country, the separation of powers and just decide that he thinks this is important, this policy disagreement, and he's going to go ahead without congressional authorization, undermines rule of law in this country, undermines democracy. the judiciary committee is going to have a full investigation of this so that we can let the american people see what's really happened here. >> congressman, thank you for joining me tonight. all right. let's bring in our panel. senior correspondent for vox.com. covering immigration. christina beltran is an associate professor in the department of social and cultural analysis at new york
university and she also the author of "the trouble with unity: latina politics and the creation of identity." welcome to both of you. thank you for being with us. dara, let me start with you. this was a fact checker's dream today, the president's rambling unscripted conversation, in which he talked about anything that kind of came into his mind. but the fact is he kept on going at journalists who were asking him fact-based questions about the truth about immigration, about the people who come across the border, about drugs. the president was creating and the kraing and discussing his own reality today. >> yes, that's absolutely true. it's also not the first time we've heard this. i mean, so much of what he said today he said during his prime time speech in january during the state of the union. the problem with talking about the border right now is that donald trump takes up so much oxygen talking about the kind of fever dream of this lawless environment that talking about the actually difficulties that there are with, you know,
unprecedented numbers of children and families coming in, with border patrol is equipped to handle that, you know, serious concerns about the conditions that people are being kept in aren't coming to the fore. >> right. >> because it's entirely determined by donald trump says there is a crisis and therefore that's all anyone can talk about. >> you're right. it takes all the oxygen. anybody who could be working on other things. i think you can get 100% agreement in this country that there are issues with immigration. but to different people those are different things. christina, this is the problem, right? donald trump has for better or worse created a narrative around bad people coming over the southern border and that's our immigration problem. >> right. right. i mean, there's actual realities we can have really important and interesting discussions around immigration. instead we're caught up in donald trump's sort of racist dystopian fever dream. and i think a lot of it that we really have to think about is that his base and the nativist portion of his base are really informed by that fantasy. so reality doesn't change it. it's a constant reference. i think one thing that is important to think about is this
has a long history. since the 19th century, there have been certain characterizations of mexicans as beastial, savage. there is a historical way -- almost at times a pornographic pleasure where he discusses lured descriptions of migrant women being tied up with duct tape and brutalized. there is a compulsion he has to tell this story. it's like misogyny disguised as compassion. >> let me just play that. in a weird thing, that was even weirder. i want to get to the bottom of this one. donald trump was describeing, as you say, human trafficking today. let's listen together. >> they can't see three women with tape on their mouth or three women whose hands are tied. they go through areas where you have no wall. everybody know that. nancy knows it. chuck knows it. they all know it. >> the danger here, cristina is that human trafficking is a real problem.
lots of women get brought into the country and are trafficked, most of them with passports through border crossings. to suggest that's how we're dealing with the problem of human trafficking is misleading and detrimental to our fight against human trafficking. >> it's completely unhelpful in every way and it's tied to this idea of migrant women being brutalized because mexican men or latin american men are monsters. it's always this story that -- we have real problems this country. we have problems with drug. we have real issues with economic inequality. rather than have conversations about the reality of economic inequality, lower wage, drug use, instead we have this conversation in which all the issues are displaced on to migrants as savage criminals. if we have walls, those problems will not be here. >> that's one problem. dara, the other problem is that it's not clear whether this is just a base or just nativist supporters of the donald trump. kelly o'donnell got into a conversation with the president
today about whether or not his policies being determined by right-wing media hosts. let's listen. >> mr. president, could you tell us to what degree some of the outside conservative voices help to shape your views on this national emergency? >> i will talk about it. look, sean hannity has been a terrific, terrific supporter of what i do. rush limbaugh, i think he's a great guy. he's a guy who can speak for three hours without a phone call. try doing that sometime. >> deciding policy, sir? >> they don't decide policy. ann coulter. i don't know her. i hardly know her. i haven't spoken to her in way over a year, but the press loves saying ann coulter. i like her. but she's off the reservation, but anybody that knows her understands that. >> dara, i mean, that was just weird. the president was asked about influences and he named the three people who most observers think he is building his immigration policy for. >> yeah, although it's always
hard to know with this president whether he's saying that because he actually does have relationships with them or whether he's saying that because he watches a whole lot of television. and so if those are the names that are coming up as influencers, he's going to interpret that. but it's definitely clear that trump is very afraid of any fight with people who he thinks of as mediating between him and his base. even to point where, you know, he's been saying for years at this point that any border barrier that is built needs to be steel poles or steel bollards or slats, but when he posted a sketch of a design in december and the right wing freaked out to a certain extent because they were expecting a concrete wall, he had to backtrack on that. even though his dhs has said that's exactly what they want to build. identical to the stuff they want to build with emergency money. the definition of a wall has gotten caught up in this dynamic between trump and the right-wing media. because it's not clear which one
of them, if there were a fight, would be the one to take the base. >> and the sad part is after throwing out the line about rush limbaugh and sean hannity and ann coulter, ann coulter responded today by saying, look, the only national emergency is that our president is an idiot. i hope that if i called somebody out, they'd be nice to me. thanks to both of you. dara lind and christina beltran. thank you. breaking news. special counsel robert mueller's team tells the court they have no objection to paul manafort spending two decades in jail. is that going to change manafort's mind on cooperating? we'll have that next. and later, many republican names have been bandied about as potential primary challengers to donald trump, but today a veteran republican finally took the first official step to challenge donald trump in the 2020 republican primary. i'm mildly obsessed with numbers.
so, i started with the stats regarding my moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. like how humira has been prescribed to over 300,000 patients. and how many patients saw clear or almost clear skin in just 4 months - the kind of clearance that can last. humira targets and blocks a specific source of inflammation that contributes to symptoms. numbers are great. and seeing clearer skin is pretty awesome, too. that's what i call a body of proof. humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions,
and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. want more proof? ask your dermatologist about humira. this is my body of proof. a business owner always goes beyond what people expect. that's why we built the nation's largest gig-speed network along with complete reliability. then went beyond. beyond clumsy dials-in's and pins.
to one-touch conference calls. beyond traditional tv. to tv on any device. beyond low-res surveillance video. to crystal clear hd video monitoring from anywhere. gig-fueled apps that exceed expectations. comcast business. beyond fast. breaking news. president trump's former campaign chairman paul manafort could be spending the rest of his life in jail. in a new court filing tonight in the eastern district of virginia, special counsel robert mueller's prosecutors note that sentencing guidelines call for manafort to spend 19 to 24 years in prison for his conviction on multiple financial fraud charges. quote, manafort acted for more than a decade as if he were above the law and deprived the federal government and various financial institutions of millions of dollars, mueller's prosecutors wrote. continuing. the sentence here should reflect the seriousness of these crimes and serve to both deter manafort and others from engaging in such
conduct, end quote. prosecutors also indicated that paul manafort should be held liable for restitution and forfeited profits totaling up to $30 million. manafort's sentencing has been on hold while prosecutors and his lawyers argued over whether he violated an agreement to assist in the russia investigation. manafort could have been eligible for a lesser sentence had he fulfilled his obligation to assist investigators. also breaking tonight, and separately, prosecutors have now said for the first time that they have evidence of trump associate roger stone communicating with wikileaks. in a separate court filing, mueller's team writes that as part of the investigation into the russians, who hacked the dnc and clinton campaign, quote, the
government obtained and executed dozens of search warrants on various accounts used to facilitate the transfer of stolen documents for release. several of those search warrants were executed on accounts that contained roger stone's communications with guccifer 2.0 and with organization one. this is important. organization one is widely believed to be wikileaks. in other words, search warrants uncovered communications connecting roger stone to russian hackers and the organization that disseminated those hacked materials. mueller's team said the evidence obtained from those warrants resulted in the hacking charges unsealed against 12 russian gru officers, intelligence officers. and later the charges against roger stone himself. and developing tonight, nbc news has confirmed that white house press secretary sarah sanders has been interviewed by mueller's office. sanders said she was, quote, happy to voluntarily sit down with them. a source familiar with the matter tells nbc news that the
interview took place late last year around the same time that then chief of staff john kelly met with mueller's team. okay. this is where we need a leg expert to interpret tonight's breaking news. we have former federal prosecutor nelson cunningham to do just that. he's got invaluable experience as the general counsel of the senate judiciary committee under then senator biden. here to tell us what this means politically for the president and his associates, "the washington post's" jennifer ruben. she is an msnbc contributor. welcome to both of you tonight. nelson, let's start with you. we've got a number of legal matters. the first one, that the prosecution is comfortable having the book thrown at paul manafort. let's start with that. >> this was paul manafort's no good, very bad, terrible week. he had two terrible things happen to him. first, earlier this week the judge in washington, d.c. ruled that, in fact, he had lied to the prosecutors after he -- after he said he would cooperate with them and agreed that the prosecutors could throw out his
cooperation agreement. that means that he loses his chance to have a reduced sentence because of his cooperation. the second terrible thing that happened to manafort is what happened today. and it's interesting, it's not so much that mueller argued that he should have a high sentence. the hidden story here is it's the probation office that argued this. the way we sentence criminaled in federal court, the probation office studies the matter, writes a report and then calculates how much time the defendant should do under the sentencing guidelines. here, the probation office report was devastating, asserting that because of the range of his actions and crimes he should be in jail for 20 years or more. what mueller did was simply say, yeah, i agree with that. so this not mueller -- >> right. >> -- arguing, stretching. it's the probation office saying this and mueller's saying
absolutely so. >> jennifer, what do you make of this politically? at some point the judge said several times, this guy's, you know, he's a bad apple. when he started to run out of money, he continued to defraud banks and just had to keep up his lifestyle. to the extent that the president continues to defend manafort. he's the one guy the president hasn't thrown under the bus. what do you think is going on here? >> well, what i think is significant, going back to the earlier ruling during the week, is what was it that manafort was telling the prosecutors that wasn't true? he was lying about his cooperation, meeting, coordination, exchange of information -- >> yep. >> with konstantin kilimnik. >> yep. >> who is a russian oligarch connected to russian intelligence. what we are talking about there is collusion. we are talking about the chief person on the trump campaign at that time, paul manafort, giving private polling data essentially to the russians.
it's funny, isn't it, that we now learn at the other end of the scale that we now have roger stone communicating with guccifer 2, communicating with wikileaks. again, collusion. we are beginning to see the knitted links in the chain between members of the trump organization and the russians. and the question will then be, the old watergate question, what did trump know and when did he know it? >> and this is important. you've put it together, jennifer. tom, what we're -- what we're looking at is -- nelson, i'm sorry. what we're looking at is two guys who have had longtime relationships with donald trump, as much as donald trump likes to say that manafort wasn't all that involved in the campaign. both separately having conversations with people about information that could be detrimental to hillary clinton's campaign or ultimately helpful to donald trump's campaign. who puts that all together? >> well, we're widely expecting that mueller will put this together in a report for us. we don't know that.
he hasn't confirmed that. he's been famously close-mouthed here. we do know now that we've got adam schiff, jerry nadler and others in the house who are beginning to put the pieces together themselves. whatever mueller does not give them, is not able to give them, they're going to be working to assemble into i think what will be by the end of this year a very coherent story that i think will be quite -- quite conclusive as to what was going on in this campaign. >> nelson, thank you for joining us tonight. nelson cunningham. jennifer ruben, stay with us. coming up, a veteran republican steps forward to challenge donald trump in the 2020 republican primary. that's next. in't easy.
12 hours? 20 dogs? where's your belly rubs? after a day of chasing dogs you shouldn't have to chase down payments. (vo) send invoices and accept payments to get paid twice as fast. (danny) it's time to get yours! (vo) quickbooks. backing you. uh uh - i deliverberty the news around here. ♪ sources say liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. over to you, logo. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪
guys go through a lot to deal with shave irritation. so, we built the new gillette skinguard with a specialized guard designed to reduce it. because we believe all men deserve a razor just for them. the best a man can get. gillette. and relief from symptoms caused feel the clarity of non-drowsy claritin by over 200 indoor and outdoor allergens. like those from buddy. because stuffed animals are clearly no substitute for real ones. feel the clarity. and live claritin clear. the one with the designer dog collar.(sashimi) psst. hey, you! wondering how i upgraded to this sweet pad? a 1,200-square-foot bathroom, and my very own spa. all i had to do was give my human "the look". with wells fargo's 3% down payment on a fixed-rate loan and a simpler online application, getting into my dream home was easier than ever.
get your human to visit wellsfargo.com/woof. what would she do without me? ed gets copays as lowlily go to as zero dollars on medicare part d prescriptions. ed gets labels clear as day. and, lily.... lily gets anything she wants. ed knows he could just have us deliver his prescriptions. but what's the fun in that? switch to cvs pharmacy.
our president is simply too unstable to carry out the duties of the highest executive office in the land. they say the president has captured the republican party in washington. as he himself might tweet, sad. it's even sadder that republicans in washington, many of them, exhibit all the symptoms of stockholm syndrome, identifying with their capturer. >> that was former massachusetts republican governor bill weld today, not holding back on trump or his republican allies in congress, but even that probably didn't make donald trump as angry as when governor weld said this. >> because of the many concerns i've talked about today, i have established an exploratory committee to pursue the possibility of my running for the presidency of the united states as a republican in the 2020 election. >> all right. that is a former republican
governor officially announcing that he is taking the first steps to primary donald trump in 2020. weld actually has run on a presidential ticket before. in 2016 he ran as the vice presidential candidate on the libertarian ticket alongside gary johnson. but this time around, weld is preparing to run as a republican for what could turn out to be the first viable primary challenge against an incumbent since pat buchanan challenged george h.w. bush back in 1992. the trump presidency has caused a major rift among many of the republican party's longtime stalwarts, some of whom have left the party all together in protest. that could be an opportunity for weld, but despite some high-profile dissenters, trump remains popular among self-identified republican voters right now. at least for now. joining me now, larry sabato, the director of the university of virginia center for politics and the founder of sabato's
crystal ball weekly political analyst. larry, good to see you again. thank you for joining me. >> thank you, ali. >> when we talk about a viable potential challenge, there have been names that have come up. larry hogan of maryland. john kasich gets talked about. a lot of people wondering whether mitt romney's re-entry into politics is about this. where does weld sit in that pantheon? >> where he sits is he's serious about it. the other ones, i haven't seen any real signs they're serious or making moves to do it. maybe they're all waiting for the mueller report, ali. that might be the trigger for some of them to get in or not. but, look, it's more significant than people think. since eisenhower, if an incumbent is challenged by someone who gets a decent percentage of the vote in new hampshire, it signals that incumbent is in trouble in the fall. on the other hand, if you're unopposed, if you have no serious challenger, all of them in modern history have in fact gotten the second term.
so it's a great signal. >> let's talk about the politics of it, though. because donald trump continues to maintain a base somewhere between 30% and 40%. some of those people are conservatives who like low taxes. some are people whose main concern is the second amendment. and some are people for whom their main concern is abortion. if a guy like weld or any other moderate republican comes into the race and siphons off some of those people and siphons off maybe some democrats, it still leaves donald trump with a solid base of people who tend to be the people who turn out for primaries. >> oh, absolutely. you wouldn't expect any challenger to win. no modern challenger has beaten an incumbent. although ronald reagan came awfully close to gerald ford in 1976, so it's possible, but i think it's very unlikely.
but, again, once you have that challenger in there making points -- and bill weld is a good public speaker. he's got a sharp tongue. he's experienced. two terms winning as governor in massachusetts. other losing races, but he's been out there on the trail. this guy's too liberal to be nominated by the republican party. but he's a good opponent for trump if in fact he runs. >> what happens for never trumpers? for republicans who have foresworn donald trump or who want some other solution but they'd like a republican, they'd like maybe a conservative candidate, what's the best scenario, a bunch of guys, a bunch of people like william weld getting into the race or one? >> well, it can happen. nixon in 1972 had a conservative congressman run against him, republican congressman josh ashbrook and a liberal republican congressman, who was anti-war. he had shots coming at him from both sides. it's possible that that will happen, but it's also possible that trump will end up with a minor opponent who will end up
doing surprisingly well in new hampshire. they love to stir the pot. they often give 20, 25, 30% or more to a challenger to an incumbent president, but then it tends to fade. >> larry, always good to talk to you. thank you, sir. larry sabato is the director of the university of virginia center for politics and the founder of sabato's crystal ball. coming up, more than a few people watched today's national emergency presser and concluded that trump is the national emergency. that's next. emergency. that's next. that's next. you still stressed about buying our first house, sweetie?
yeah, i thought doing some hibachi grilling would help take my mind off it all. maybe you could relieve some stress by calling geico for help with our homeowners insurance. geico helps with homeowners insurance? they sure do. and they could save us a bundle of money too. i'm calling geico right now. cell phone? it's ringing. get to know geico and see how much you could save on homeowners and condo insurance.
you know that look? that life of the party look. walk it off look. one more mile look. reply all look. own your look with fewer lines. there's only one botox® cosmetic. it's the only one fda approved to temporarily make frown lines, crow's feet and forehead lines look better. the effects of botox® cosmetic may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness may be a sign of a life-threatening condition. do not receive botox® cosmetic if you have a skin infection. side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain, headache, eyebrow, eyelid drooping and eyelid swelling. tell your doctor about your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, and medications including botulinum toxins as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. so, give that just saw a puppy look and whatever that look is. look like you with fewer lines.
own your look with the one and only botox® cosmetic. to be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing it's best to make you everybody else... ♪ ♪ means to fight the hardest battle, which any human being can fight and never stop. does this sound dismal? it isn't. ♪ ♪ it's the most wonderful life on earth. ♪ ♪
"the washington post" reported that efforts to get donald trump to sign the bipartisan bill -- spending bill last night went off the rails when he realized how much he was losing to house speaker nancy pelosi. today we saw donald trump go off the rails. donald trump undermining his own case for declaring a national emergency to fund his border wall in one of the most bizarre speeches to date from this president. listen. >> you know, i never did politics before. now i do politics. there's rarely been a problem. they sign it. nobody cares. i guess they weren't very exciting. i use many stats. >> can you share those stats with us. >> let me tell you, you have stats that are far worse than the ones that i use. we would make up for the cost of the wall just in the cost of the fact that i would be able to have fewer people -- i want to wish our new attorney general
great luck and speed and enjoy your life. we have all the records. my button is bigger than yours and my button works, remember that? people said trump is crazy. >> his puzzling stream of consciousness speech declaring a national emergency led many to one conclusion, that trump is the national emergency. congress at historian norm ornstein tweeted, quote, trump is providing the most powerful argument for invoking the 25th amendment that we have yet seen. republican strategist rick wilson tweeted, that was like a long visit to please apply the 25th amendment land. and former labor secretary robert reich tweeted, as i watched trump's bizarre performance this morning, his sing-song recitation about the courts, his pair need aleutians to media reporting about his ban. i didn't need to do this. watched trump's bizarre performance this morning, his sing-song recitation about the courts, his pair need aleutians to media reporting about his ban. i didn't need to do this. i kept thinking 25th amendment. after the break, we'll discuss what trump's speech reveals as the first republican announces
that he is willing to challenge his re-election from a national security perspective and a political perspective. that's next. 's next.haul. if i built a van, it would carry my entire business. i'd make it available in dozens, make that thousands of configurations. it would keep an eye on my fleet. [ beeping ] and an eye out for danger. with active brake assist. if i built a van, i'd make it available in diesel and gas. and i'd build it right here, in south carolina. introducing the all new sprinter starting at $33,790. built in the usa. mercedes-benz. vans. born to run.
otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines, and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ready to treat differently with a pill? otezla. show more of you.
recheck in from afarrently with remote access, ♪ and have professional monitoring backing you up with xfinity home. demo in an xfinity store. call, or go online today. we're going to do it one way or the other. we have to to it. not because it was a campaign promise, which it is. it was one of many, by the way, not my only one. if we had a wall, we don't need the military because we'd have a wall. nobody's done the job that we've done on the border. >> there is a crisis at the border, but he's done the best
job. joining us now with their reactions, tom nichols, a national security expert and former republican senate staffer who tweeted today that he is, quote, more worried about the emotional stability of the president than at any time before this. jennifer rubin is back with us as well. tom, talk to me about that because a number of people i've spoken to today since the speech said, oh, you know, trump gives crazy speeches all the time. this one had a different feel to it, for whatever reason. it was the confluence of nonsense and nonsense and incoherence, but it was dangerous because he's talking about using funds that are going to the military. he's talking about using the funds that were meant for drug interdiction. he's talking about using the military in a way that some argue is not even legal in this country. there was more to it than some of the speeches he normally gives. >> and even people that are normally a lot more forgiving of the president's unusual speeches and statements were scratching their heads at this one. there were people i think even normally more supportive of the
president who found this one unsettling. and mostly i would say not because of the things related to this fake emergency that we're all talking about all day. but the other stuff, things like, you know, president obama told me we were on the edge of a big war and, you know, the japanese prime minister was going to nominate me for a nobel. >> a nobel peace prize. what's that about? have you heard anything about this before? >> no, i haven't talked with the prime minister of japan as recently as the president has, and, you know, i just kind of stopped and said, wow, i hadn't -- couldn't figure that one out. it just kept going. it's like he was building up a momentum. i really did, i thought this is really, you know, i don't like the president's speeches in general because they're so extemporaneous and i think sometimes recklessly unstructured, but this one had me worried. i mean, this time i was really
concerned about president's, you know, where his head was at this morning. >> jennifer rubin, you know what was also -- there were so many if you have a list of things that were concerning about this morning's comments. one was just the image we showed on tv, the picture of the president walking out as he walked to the mike accompanied by mitch mcconnell. >> yes. you know, at least he didn't have him on a leash this time. but the behavior of mitch mcconnell i think will go down as one of the most shameful chapters in a very shameful book about the republican party. you'll recall that when this idea came up a few months ago, mitch mcconnell was saying, no, we shouldn't go there, bad idea. of course as soon as the president does it, mitch mcconnell is back on his team and cheering this along. he is cheering the destruction of his own branch of government, the legislative branch. he is destroying the united states senate. and he is setting up a huge battle within the republican party. the senate's going to have to take a vote, i would suspect, on this resolution.
it will pass the house to end the national emergency. there will be republicans who are going to be divided on this. i do not see that this is a shining moment for mitch mcconnell, and i think his game of simply buttering up the president and following him down every little rabbit hole is going to come back to haunt him. and you know what? perhaps there should be a real conservative in kentucky in 2020 to primary him, because after all mitch mcconnell was supposed to be the great defender of the constitution, was supposed to be a constitutional conservative. perhaps there is somebody in the great state of kentucky who will actually adopt that role. and, frankly, for a lot of other senators in a lot of other states. south carolina against lindsey graham. >> but that is -- that really is the story. i think that the thing -- the real story from today. because we've gotten used to the president, you know, being extemporaneously unsettling, but the fact that the senate and mcconnell and the republican party are basically saying we're good with this. then questioned he announces on the senate floor the president
will sign the bill and declare a national emergency and i support that national emergency. there's a number of republican senators who don't seem to be in line with this. grassley said i wish he wouldn't have done it. paul said i'm not really forit. collins said a mistake. blunt says i have some concerns. here is the worrisome part, jennifer. we have heard from so many of these people, so many times about where they are saying this is my line. trump is crossing it. that's against the constitution. that's against the responsibilities and obligations that congress has. somehow trump gets them in the
end. >> that's right. they are utterly spineless. they have decided for whatever reason it's easier to just to go along and keep their heads down. as a result they have lost all intellectual, moral authority. this is what tom and i predicted was going to happen if donald trump was elected. he would slowly corrode and have the party degenerate on his watch because he sucks people in to supporting this nonsense. he creates an atmosphere in which facts don't matter. the entire party is now going down the tubes, going down this frightful road with limb. >> here's the interesting part about that, tom. he is serving some master. possibly his base. possibly rush limbaugh and sean hannity but then ann coulter's tweet pops up talking about the president and national
emergency. she says no. the goal of an national merge is for trump to scam the stupidest people in his base for two more years. it's not working out for him on any level. how does the conservative movement reclaim itself? >> they are trying to goad him into doing the things he wants them to do. because he doesn't understand how the government works and he doesn't read the legislation, he keeps missing the target. they keep trying to push him toward the thing they want and he reacts instinctively and thinks what he's doing what they are telling them to do and he misses that one and they chew him out again. >> i would say that ann coulter was one of the rubes because she was supporting his presidency
and saying he would build the wall. i guess she was scammed like the rest of his base. >> we'll leave it there. i appreciate your spending the friday evening with us. tonight's last word is next. ne. (vo) only verizon was ranked #1 by rootmetrics... ne. #1 in 3 opensignal mobile experience awards... #1 in video streaming according to nielsen... ...and #1 in network quality according to j.d. power. we're proud to be the only network to win in all four major awards not because of what it says about us, but what it means for every one of our customers. choose america's most reliable network, and get apple music, on us, when you do.
(burke) parking splat. and we covered it. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ before discovering nexium 24hr to treat her frequent heartburn, marie could only imagine enjoying freshly squeezed orange juice. now no fruit is forbidden. nexium 24hr stops acid before it starts for all-day, all-night protection. can you imagine 24 hours without heartburn? when your flight gets in late, it's never too early for coffee. oh no no no. your new boss seems cool, but she might not be sweatpants cool. who is that ready this early? it's only 7 am. somebody help me.
close call. not quite ready to face the day? that's why we're here with free hot breakfast and a warm welcome. book at hampton.com for our price match guarantee. hampton by hilton. book at hampton.com for our our grandparents checked zero times a day. times change. eyes haven't. that's why there's ocuvite. screen light... sunlight... longer hours... eyes today are stressed. but ocuvite has vital nutrients... ...to help protect them. ocuvite. eye nutrition for today. ♪ ♪ your grace. your majesty. your king.
to cancelled its planned headquarters in new york. amazon spent over a year conducting a nation wide search before announcing it would land in new york city and northern virginia outside of d.c. the initial decision to expand into new york city fueled protests and a fierce debate between local and city and state leaders. they felt the incentives provided to amazon would be returned in high paying tech jobs and many jobs created indirectly. on the other side were powerful politicians who decried corporate welfare being given to one of the biggest and most powerful corporations. amazon said after much thought and deliberation we decided not to move forward with our plans to build a headquarters for amazon in queens. while polls show that 70% of new yorkers support our plan and investment, a number of state and local politicians made it clear they oppose our presence and will not work with us to build the types of relationships that are required to go forward with this project. freshman congresswoman alexandria ocasio-cortez who represents a neighboring district was a vocal opponent citing the $3 billion incentive
to lure the company to the city. here is how she reacted that amazon would no longer build hq2 in new york. americans still have the power to organize and fight for their communities and they can have more say in this country than the richest man in the world. >> congress alexandria ocasio-cortez is referring to jeff bezos, the ceo of amazon and the owner of the washington post. when he bought the washington post in 2013, he adopted the role of a hands off leader. trump blamed jeff bezos for the newspaper's negative coverage and continues to attack bezos to this day. here is look at the new documentary headliners that will air on msnbc this sunday afternoon.
>> the washington post, which i call a lobbying tool for amazon. >> the president has called the media the enemy of the people and it's not, but it's not the friend of any politician. if the media is doing its job, it's asking tough questions. >> donald trump believes that media exists to serve the interests of its owners. he doesn't believe this an owner can believe it's important to have a well funded free press. after particularly damaging article that was published about him many the washington post, he took to twitter and called out jeff bezos by name. >> bezos laughed off trump's tirade with a tweet of his own. a tongue and cheek offer to hopefully send him into orbit on one of his rockets. what bezos didn't know at the time was that this was only the beginning of a sustained attack.
>> you can watch headliners, jeff bezos this sunday on msnbc. that is tonight's last word. the 11th hour with brian williams starts now. paul manafort facing a quarter century in federal prison in one of the cases he's facing while another federal judge slams manafort for lying about his repeated dealings with a prominent russian. the roger stone case comes roaring back as the feds say they have his communications with wikileaks which is interesting because he said he never communicated with them. if judge limits his conversation on the case. we learn sarah sanders has been interviewed by the mueller team. back at the white house president trump in rambling and disconnected event declares his national emergency and undercuts his