tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC March 8, 2019 7:00pm-8:00pm PST
time period of more than two years. they're essential asking for any piece of paper or communication that might document donald trump's actions or directions surrounding the merger. they write, quote, even the appearance of white house interference in antitrust law enforcement matters, undermines public trust. the fact that actual interference would constitute a serious abuse of power. democrats are asking for those documents by march 20th, so hold on to your radar tubes, everybody, and watch this space. that does it for us tonight. rachel will be back on monday and i'll see you tomorrow morning on my show "a.m. joy." now it's time for "the last word" with the great ali velshi in for lawrence o'donnell. >> there are really valid reasons. >> totally. >> the one that donald trump picked is the wrong one. >> yeah. >> not liking how they cover you. right cause, wrong reason, once again. >> yeah, absolutely. can i just say, ali, just to give you a quick compliment. i was watching your show earlier today as i do every day.
the two of you had a conversation about the unemployment numbers that was so detailed and broken down and the fact that, you know, why you have that big bulge in unemployment numbers. >> yeah. >> employment numbers in january. it was so smart. >> thank you. >> i literally was writing down the name of that guest. >> diane, i have been talking to her for 15 years. as i told her today, every time i talk to her, i get a little bit smarter. >> as i always do watching you, a ali velshi, have a wonderful show. >> i'm ali velshi in for lawrence o'donnell. tonight let's begin with a little game. let's imagine the 2020 election is right around the corner. how does trump world spin the last 24 hours into a winning message? you have a resignation, a prison sentence, a weak jobs report. are those things even spinable? that's what the trump 2020 campaign is facing at the moment and no event may be roiling the white house more tonight than the exit of another senior staffer. president trump just lost his
fifth communications director in two years. bill shine, the former fox news executive turned senior white house official, is resigning after just eight months. believe it or not, eight months is the longest anyone has held that position under this president. the white house says that shine is moving to a role with trump's re-election effort. details on that are sparse. he did say he wants to spend more time with his family, which is always ominous. many saw bill shine's hiring as the foxification of the west wing, including one of our first guests tonight, "vanity fair's" gabe sherman. gabe sherman reports tonight that shine has been on the outs with trump for months. quote, as roger ailes right hand, he had virtually no direct contact with reporters and no involvement in fox's pr department. that lack of experience was evident last september when shine was caught flatfooted during the rollout of bob
woodward's book "fear." trump started complaining to people that there was no advanced prep on woodward's book, a republican close to the white house said. trump let shine know he wasn't happy. according to gabe sherman, one theory is, quote, that trump push shine out now because house democrats are looking to investigate the white house's ties to fox. tensions were likely especially high this week after "the new yorker's" jane maier rocked the white house with her deeply reported piece on the close ties between the fox -- between fox news and the white house. maier wrote that as a fox news executive, several lawsuits named bill shine as complicit in a workplace culture of cover-ups, payoffs and victim intimidation. and politico is reporting tonight that trump had complained to allies about shine being tangled up in those lawsuits. past trump staffers are also coming back to haunt the president. his former campaign chairman is a convicted felon, and today the
president actually says he feels bad for paul manafort. >> i feel very badly for paul manafort. i think it's been a very, very tough time for him. >> the president of the united states says he feels bad for a man who was sentenced to nearly four years in prison for tax and bank fraud. undeterred by the facts, the president also grossly distorted the words of the judge who sentenced paul manafort. in an effort to claim vindication on collusion, the president made this demonstrably false statement. >> the judge, i mean, for whatever reason, i was very honored by it, also made the statement that this had nothing to do with collusion with russia. so, you know, keep it going. let's go. keep the hoax going. just a hoax. >> okay. to be entirely clear, that's just not what happened. paul manafort was sentenced for charges unrelated to possible
russian collusion. judge t.s. ellis said manafort, quote, is not before the court for any allegation that he or anybody at his direction colluded with the russian government, end quote. and more bad news for the president came in the february jobs report tonight. the economy gained just 20,000 jobs in february, falling far short of analysts' expectations. it was the smallest gain in well over a year. expectations were for 180,000 new jobs. and that is what the president has to talk about. as his re-election campaign gets under way. that is what he is selling to the american people today. now, take all of that and contrast it with today's message on the democratic side. as house democrats passed sweeping anti-corruption and voting rights legislation. the vote for hr-1, 234-193 on party lines. makes good on democrats' campaign pledge to clean up
washington, a pledge that helped catapult them into the majority. that bill includes a requirement for presidential candidates to release their tax returns, an especially sore subject for donald trump as democratic investigative committees are working to get his personal and business tax returns. now, mitch mcconnell has vowed that he won't even bring hr-1 to the floor of the senate for a vote, but democrats were under no illusions that this bill would get a welcome reception from senate republicans or president trump. they hope, however, that the message they're sending, that money and corruption in politics should be eradicated, will win the day over the kind of message donald trump and his allies are presenting. >> this is a fight we are engaged in. we are not going to end it until we win, and we can save a lot of time by the senate just agreeing to the -- for the people agenda. >> all right. joining us now, rick wilson, republican strategist and
contributor to the daily beast. he's the author of the book "everything trump touches dies." gabe sherman, the aforementioned special correspondent for "vanity fair" and an msnbc contributor. he's out with a new piece tonight. "why roger ailes' former right hand is leaving the west wing" and msnbc legal analyst maya wiley. she served as chief legal adviser to new york city mayor, bill de blasio. welcome to all of you. thank you for being with us. gabe, you've been particularly busy because you and i talked earlier today. >> yeah. >> when this news first broke. you've done a lot of research since then. >> yeah. >> the question when somebody leaves the white house and joins the campaign is that, is that a good thing, is it a bad thing, is it good for them? what is this about? >> well, clearly this is not a good move for bill shine. you don't leave the communications director job in the white house, the highest profile perch in communications in american politics, to go become a, quote, senior adviser to the trump campaign. this is clearly a soft landing for him. as i reported today in "vanity fair," this was a relationship
that had really hit the skids over the last several months. donald trump was not happy with his communications department. he brought in bill shine to plug the leaks and improve his message and his image. clearly none of that had happened. now, in shine's defense, you got to look in, you know -- look in the mirror and the proverbial twitter feed, it's trump who is doing a lot of the damage but he blamed shine for those problems. he even would tell privately to friends the nickname he gave him was bill no shine. >> oh, my god. rick -- i love that. rick, jane maier's piece in "the new yorker" -- >> sure. >> about trump's anger with bill shine in which she writes, "a source close to trump says the president has been complaining that shine hasn't been aggressive enough. late last year, trump told the source shine promised me my press coverage would get better but it's gotten worse." the source says trump thought he was getting roger ailes but instead he got roger ailes' gopher. rick, can anybody be the director of communications for
donald trump? >> ali, of course not. and gabe, you know, has great sourcing on these stories about how the differential between what trump expected and what shine could deliver was vast. you know, look, he didn't need bill shine as an interlock tore between himself and sean hannity. he gets phone calls from sean hannity all the time. trump is his own program director. his own communications director. he comes up with this stuff on the fly. no exquisitely laid out plan will survive contact with donald trump's twitter feed. the entire thing is contingent what trump is going to do at any given moment, what impulses take him. so shine was doom from the beginning. in the future, all of us would be white house communications director for 15 minutes because this thing is just going to go on and on and on. nobody can survive in this job. it is impossible. it is completely, you know, completely fruitless position to
hold. >> it is riding the proverbial bull. maya, let's talk about the pardon. now 24 hours -- not the pardon, i'm sorry. the sentence. for paul manafort. now 24 hours old. the president was asked about pardoning manafort earlier today. here's what he said. >> i don't even discuss it. the only one discussing it is you. i haven't discussed it. >> the irony, of course, of that, maya, is that the president tweeted this morning that he had discussed a pardon with michael cohen and michael cohen had ask him specifically about this. where do you -- where do you stand on what paul manafort is thinking with respect to a pardon as we head into a week in which he is going to be stoi sentenced again for his crimes that he's being tried for in a d.c. court? >> well, i think two things. one, donald trump has been very explicit about calling manafort a stand up guy because he
didn't, quote, unquote, flip on the president. so, one, the president has made very explicitly clear that he will be very supportive, at least in the court of public opinion, with those from his inner circle who get his back, not withstanding what law enforcement wants or needs. secondly, paul manafort, you know, frankly, got off light with this sentence. let's be clear. >> sure. >> but he is facing judge jackson in the district of columbia, so he's got another sentencing round. but remember that even if donald trump were to pardon him, he'd have two issues. the one would be the question of why is the president pardoning him? is the president pardoning him because he is looking for some additional help and support in ongoing investigations? the second question is, why would paul manafort think he's off the hook? because the reality is that
given his -- the crimes he's been committed of -- convicted of, there are the potential for bank fraud claims, tax evasion claims from state attorneys general, and the president -- >> right. >> -- cannot pardon him from those crimes. >> rick wilson, let's go back to the first question, the idea of how do -- does the president spin this. tom steyer, i'm going to be talking about this later in the hour. tom steyer has released a couple of ads saying when history is written it will judge how, you know, there will be two buckets of politicians, those who decided to do the right thing and those who stuck with donald trump. what has to happen for this not to hurt republicans even more than it already is, given these things swirling around the president? >> sure. ali, i always told republicans, i want you to remember two numbers, 49 and 8. that's 1974 where richard nixon's numbers were in the 50s, right -- >> right. >> right up until they weren't.
at the end of 1974, 49 republicans lost their house seats and 8 republicans lost their senate races. so this can rekha pit late itself very easily and what they will never understand is that the fear of donald trump's mean tweets, the fear of what donald trump's crazed followers will do when he tweets about senator so and so or congressman such and such is vastly outweighed by the fact that when americans realize the depth of the corruption in this man, when they realize the depth of the behavior that he's engaged in across all these different domains, and if it gets to that sort of fight, they will pay a political price. they already paid a price in 2018 for it and 2020 is shaping up to be an equally terrible year for them across the same number of areas where they are associated with a man who is not trusted by americans, who americans believe is a liar, a majority -- plurality, excuse me, americans believe he is a criminal. this is not a good look on any political party and the people who mindlessly support him are
going to be dragged down with him. >> gabe, the great reporting by jane maier in "the new yorker" compliments some great reporting you've done over the years, including a great book about fox and its relationship -- >> yeah. >> the role that it has played. it's not surprising. there is a great depth and great sourcing in the reporting. but the overarching idea that donald trump is tied in with fox news these days, why is that worrying donald trump, that that's getting out there? >> well, this is not clearly just a matter of optics at this point, this is possibly a serious political problem for donald trump because now that the house democrats are emboldened to investigate these relationships and the idea that perhaps, as jane maier reported, that donald trump ordered the justice department to do a business favor for rupert murdoch by blocking the at&t/time warner merger, a business rival of the murdoch media empire, that is something they will dig into. also, we should point out that there was a southern district
investigation of the fox news of how roger ailes possibly used company money to cover up the sexual harassment claims after donald trump fired preet bharara, that investigation slowly went away. house democrats judiciary committee could presumably do an investigation to find out what happened. why did the sdny drop its investigation of fox news? >> it's not that president trump is worried about he's tied in. >> serious corruption issues that they could investigate. of course. >> maya, the democrats passed hr-1 today. it's a very comprehensive bill. it would make a particular day -- the voting day. it would make it a federal holiday so that people could vote. it would deal with registration issues. it would deal with gerrymandering issues. it will deal with tax returns. it was a good symbolic move to pass it in the house. it's not going to get through the senate. is that going to hurt republicans if it doesn't? >> it certainly will in certain parts of the country. i mean, remember, we're talking
about the question that is fundamental to our democracy, which is whether our citizens can vote. you know, we're one of the few powers in the world that doesn't have -- that has -- that has a pretty low participation rate in elections and doesn't have a federal holiday for our national elections. you know, the other thing is since 2010 what we've seen is largely on the part of the republican party significant efforts to make it much more difficult for those who are lawfully allowed to vote, to make it much more difficult for them to vote, and that's not good for our democracy, but it's also not good for the republican party, given that a lot of those folks are people of color, are the growing percentage of citizens in this country and are not going to be very happy with a party that has essentially said we'd rather win by
preventing you from voting than by getting and winning your vote. >> so, rick, i mean, i've spoken to african-american republicans who say this is their -- probably their biggest frustration with the party right now. >> sure. >> that there is just no way to be on the wrong side of efforts that should be made to get more people out to vote, to stop gerrymandering, to make it easier for people to vote. how do republicans get on the right side of this issue? >> well, the answer is, ali, they won't. for the most part, you know, the do-gooder is in parts of this. the national holiday. encourage people to vote. the transparency factor of getting the tax returns, et cetera. i think everyone pretty much agrees with those across the board. the redistricting problem is going to be the biggest nut to crack. the honest answer is an awful lot of democrats rely on redistricting practices that would make states like california less democratic than they are right now. i'm not sure you're going to see that actually get through, even with, you know, even democratic guys in the senate are going to look at the redistricting
equation and say, nonpartisan redistricting, you know, advantages them in a number of states. that's always a very tricky, you know, and sticky problem for folks. you know, if you ended up with pure redistricting that wasn't partisan in any way, you would have fewer african-american members of congress. you would have fewer hard progressives and fewer hard republicans and you would have a much different-looking, you know, body there. so right now there's been a lot of political cross pressure on that. so, you know, redistricting is the stickiest part of that. i think the transparency part is all good and meritus, though. >> gabe, i want to ask you going back to the white house and the director of communications. >> yeah. >> eight months is the longest anybody's been in this job. >> yeah, he didn't pull a mooch. >> 11 days or something, right? what's the problem? this can't be the worst job in america. stephanie ruhle always says that it's easier to get somebody to clean the toilets in times square on new year's eve than it is to get somebody to do the communication
communications job in the white house. >> well, i think the reality is the best course of action going forward for trump would not be to fill that job. there really doesn't need to be that job. someone just to do the nuts and bolts of, you know, planning the press conferences, getting the cameras in the right places, but the idea that you need a senior strategist mapping out communications is just irrelevant when the president himself -- >> he doesn't want to listen to anybody. it's the chief of staff problem. rick? >> it's all impulsive -- >> well, you can, you know -- >> it's all impulsive. >> right. go ahead maya. >> frankly, he needs someone to help stop him from putting himself in legal peril because he can't control his mouth. the other thing i would say is the problem with the job is you can make lemonade out of lemons, but if the lemons are rotten, then it doesn't matter what you do. so the problem for donald trump is, it's all of his positions. he also wants to be his own chief of staff. >> right. >> right. >> you know, fundamentally he
wants to be his own everything. and that's why he's in legal trouble. >> thank you to the three of you for kicking us off on a friday night. maya wiley, gabe sherman and rick wilson. coming up, two of the president's most loyal supporters in congress are facing new ads, we were just telling you about that, that are telling voters in their district that they are choosing the president over congressional responsibility. former democratic senator heidi heitkamp is here and more controversy for jared kushner involving another foreign government. reports that jared kushner shut the u.s. state department out of his secretive visit with saudi arabia's crown prince. and in tonight's last word, what does america's mass incarceration problem have to do with paul manafort's sentence? biopharmaceutical researchers.
driven each day to pursue life-changing cures... in a country built on fostering innovation. here, they find breakthroughs... like a way to fight cancer by arming a patient's own t-cells... and a new therapy that gives the blind a working gene so they can see again. because it's not just about the next breakthrough... it's all the ones after that.
i can customize each line for each family member? yup. and since it comes with your internet, you can switch wireless carriers and save hundreds of dollars a year. are you pullin' my leg? nope. you sure you're not pullin' my leg? i think it's your dog. oh it's him. good call. get the data options you need and still save hundreds of dollars. do you guys sell, other dogs? now that's simple, easy, awesome.
customize each line by paying for data by the gig or get unlimited. get $250 back when you pre-order a new samsung galaxy. click, call, or visit a store today. there is a new effort under way to bring accountability to some of donald trump's most fervent supporters in congress. here is the new ad running this week in two key republican districts. >> when the history of the trump presidency is written, members of congress will be sorted into two categories, the ones who let politics scare them out of holding trump accountable and those who had the courage to stand up and defend our democracy. republicans in congress should support impeachment hearings to uncover the truth. but first, they have a choice to make, which side of history do they want to be on? need to impeach is responsible
for the content of this advertising. >> all right. billionaire tom steyer is spending $75,000 to run that ad in districts. politico reports that steyer's pack, need to impeach, decided to target jordan and meadows after this comments at the michael cohen hearing. the effort apparently got the attention of the president who tweeted, weirdo tom steyer doesn't have the guts or money to run for president. he's all talk. tom steyer responded with this tweet. if you have the guts to meet with mr. mueller, i will stop running tv ads calling for your impeachment. i don't think you have the guts to come out from behind your lawyers. the latest effort raises important questions of how to hold republicans in congress accountable for ignoring the accusations of criminality against the president. while americans demand more investigation. a quinnipiac poll this week showed 58% of voters say
congress should do more to investigate michael cohen's claims about president trump's behavior, while just 35% say it should not. that 35% roughly correlates to donald trump's base of support. we're joined now by a former democratic senator who represented a state where most voters supported donald trump for president. heidi heitkamp is a former democratic senator from north dakota is is now a fellow at the harvard institute of politics. she was also the first woman elected to the u.s. senate from north dakota. senator, good to see you. thank you for being with us. >> thanks so much for having me on. >> tom steyer's ad is designed, it seems, to target republicans. it holds up john mccain as the example of somebody who stood up for congress and for americans versus those who seem to and certainly at the michael cohen hearing seemed to only be defending the president. you come from a state with a lot of republicans.
does that ad -- is that ad going to appeal to people? >> no, in fact, i think the ad will do exactly the opposite. it's being run in a district that is heavily supportive of donald trump. and my race, if that's any example, i made the argument that north dakota didn't want somebody who was 100% with the president. they elected somebody who was 100% with the president, and i think that that will further embolden two people in pretty safe congressional districts to continue to support the president. i don't think the audience is the congressional district. i think the audience is television. i think the audience is the president. and certainly at a $75,000 buy, it's not going to change any minds. this is designed to basically have people talk about the complicity that is in the republican party on many, many important issues, not just corruption, but when you talk about trade, when you talk about this horrible tax bill, when you talk about fighting to repeal
obamacare in the courts, you know, these are the things that we also need to be talking about that we're not, ali. >> so what's the -- do you -- do you agree with the premise then of the ad, that history will judge senators and members of congress as being in buckets that either did what they were supposed to do or sided with the president or is the debate more nuanced than that? >> i think that people are waiting, and until we know what the results are of these investigations, i think it -- to move too fast towards a process that is reserved for the most serious abuses is premature, but that's my opinion. and certainly mr. steyer is entitled to his opinion and he's entitled to spend his money under the first amendment however he wants to spend it, but my concern in all of this is that we're not talking about health care the way we need to talk about health care. we're not talking about trade. you talk a lot about trade because your basis is in
economics. >> right. >> you know and i know that this trade war is having a devastating effect -- >> correct. >> -- on workers and on farmers. we're not talking about other things that the republicans are complicit on that they should not be and they know better. like 232 tariffs. that's ridiculous. >> right. >> to impose them on canada. >> that's a national security issue, imposing tariffs because there is some threat to national securi security. from north dakota, you know most border states don't think of canada as a national security problem. >> well, i would hope not. they're our greatest and best ally, but yet the congress allows the president to have that power instead of taking it back. they basically have not had any oversight on this horrible tax bill, which has not achieved any result. we saw only 20,000 new jobs created. now that could be an anomaly. i don't know. but certainly if that's a trend, we're headed in the wrong direction economically. we should be talking about those
issues because that's where congress and republicans in congress are really failing as well. >> did you see some hope in the fact that there is some pushback against the president's emergency declaration amongst republicans in the senate? >> yeah, i think they're terrified of the president -- precedent that it's going to set and they know that for all of the yack yack that they had during the obama years ago usurping congressional authority, there is no greater step than what's been taken with this emergency declaration. they're hoping the courts bail them out and they're hoping that they won't be held accountable, but i think of all the things that are happening right now, this is the piece that has the worst result in terms of history and history looking back and judging that all-important balance of power. >> senator, i want to just ask you before we say good night. you were in an election that was affected by people's rights to vote. what do you think of the voting provisions in the -- in hr-1,
the bill that passed the house that hasn't gotten to the senate? >> i think it's terrific and i think these are exactly the issues we should be talking about. we have to get a higher right of participation in our democracy if we're actually going to preserve the democracy. i applaud the house for taking this step. the republicans, bring it to a vote, put it on the floor. if you've got a legitimate argument in the senate against it, mr. mcconnell, then make that argument, let people vote and let the public see that there is actually a meaningful debate on important issues going on in washington, d.c. >> when asked about that by a reporter today, mitch mcconnell -- when asked why it won't go to a vote he said, because i get to decide what we vote on. senator heidi heitkamp, good to see you. thank you. >> thank you so much. all right. coming up, criticism of jared kushner's questionable security clearance is going to get more intense after reports that kushner shut u.s. government officials out of his secretive meeting with saudi arabia's crown prince. bia's crown prince i can't believe it.
that we just hit the motherlode of soft-serve ice cream? i got cones, anybody wants one! oh, yeah! get ya some! no, i can't believe how easy it was to save hundreds of dollars on my car insurance with geico. ed! ed! we struck sprinkles! [cheers] believe it. geico could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. geach day justin you fat work... walk. and after work. he does it all with dr. scholl's. only dr. scholl's has massaging gel insoles that provide all-day comfort. to keep him feeling more energized. dr. scholl's. born to move. if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis,
every day can begin with flakes. it's a reminder of your struggles with psoriasis. but what if your psoriasis symptoms didn't follow you around? that's why there's ilumya. with just 2 doses, a majority of people were clear or almost clear. and over time, even more people were clear or almost clear. all with dosing 4 times a year... after 2 initial doses. plus, ilumya was shown to have similar risks of infections compared to placebo. don't use if you are allergic to ilumya or any of its ingredients. before starting treatment, your doctor should check for tuberculosis and infections. after checking there is no need for routine lab monitoring unless your doctor advises it. ilumya may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection or have symptoms, or if you plan to or have recently received a vaccine. this could be your chance to leave your psoriasis symptoms behind. ask your doctor for ilumya today, for a clearer tomorrow.
it's been one week since we first learned that president trump went against the wishes of his own intelligence community to grant his daughter ivanka and son-in-law jared kushner security clearances. since those reports first surfaced, the house oversight committee chairman elijah cummings has accused the white house of refusing to cooperate with their investigation of the matter, but today axios reported that a source within the white house leaked, quote, documents related to jared kushner and ivanka trump's security clearances that the trump administration refused to provide. in other words, white house staff have actually gone behind the president's back in order to
help congress with its investigation. just as that news broke today, we also learned that a group of four democratic senators have just sent a letter to the director of national intelligence dan coats, as well as the intelligence community's inspector general requesting that intelligence officials open their own investigation into whether or not the white house is complying with security clearance policies. now, this comes just after the daily beast reported that kushner shut u.s. embassy officials out of his meeting with assad crown prince mohammed bin salman last week. mohammed bin salman or mbs as he's sometimes referred to is believed by u.s. intelligence to have ordered the killing of "washington post" journalist jamal khashoggi. but mbs enjoys a close relationship with kushner. that relationship, according to the daily beast, has frustrated members of congress from both parties, who are actively trying to learn more about the
conversations taking place between the two of them. in the hearing to confirm trump's new ambassador to saudi arabia, republican senator marco rubio had this to say about the assad crosaudi crown prince. >> he is reckless. he's ruthless. confrontation in his foreign policy approach and i think increasingly willing to test the limits of what he can get away with with the united states. he's gone full gangster. it's difficult to work with a guy like that, no matter how important the relationship is. >> what does it mean for someone with access to top-level security information to be meeting with a world leader who has gone full gangster? i'll ask msnbc counterterrorism and intelligence analyst malcolm nance that question next.
you need insurance. but it's not really something you want to buy. it's not sexy. or delicious. or fun. but since you need both car and home insurance, why not bundle them with esurance and save up to 10%? which you can spend on things you really want to buy, like... well, i don't know what you'd wanna buy because i'm just a guy on your tv. esurance. it's surprisingly painless.
guys do whatever it takes to deal with shave irritation. so, we re-imagined the razor with the new gillette skinguard. it has a unique guard between the blades. that's designed to reduce irritation during the shave. because we believe all men deserve a razor just for them. the best a man can get. gillette.
look at what he's done in the last two years. it seems like something out of a james bond movie. he's kidnapped the prime minister of lebanon. kidnapped the prime minister of lebanon. he kicked out the ambassador of canada. cancelled flights to toronto. cut off investments. recalled all their students in canada over a tweet or a couple of tweets from the canadian form ministerer regarding human rights. all the evidence i believe strongly indicates he ordered or knew of efforts to murder jamal khashoggi and to do so in a third country in a diplomatic facility. >> that was republican senator marco rubio offering a laundry list of malfeasances committed by saudi crown prince mohammed bin salman, but none of that,
none of that has done anything to lessen the bond formed between the president's son-in-law and the saudi leader. i'm joined now by msnbc counterterrorism and intelligence analyst malcolm nance. malcolm, you spent 30 years in intelligence. it seems that jared kushner is a guy in the property business who is often in financial trouble or needs a bailout, and he is really enjoying hanging around with rich folks in other countries, including mohammed bin salman, who is one of the richest of the folks. >> yes. and this can be problematic when we're talking about your security clearance. you know, i not only spent 30 years in intelligence, i spent about 25 of those years in the middle east. and working in the united arab emirates and saudi arabia and all the rest of those countries. there are two classes of people over there. there is the leadership class who are really billionaires and technically trillionaires and
they unlimited resources all the access of the global rich. this is the class of person that jared kushner wants to be associated with, that mesmerized donald trump when he went on his first diplomatic trip to saudi arabia. it is almost an unlimited pot of money. the relationships that one would have with people who have this level of money and influence can be problematic when you're talking about the secrets of the united states. ivanka trump on the other hand has licenses in china -- >> right. >> and just recently in japan. so all of these relationships make the people who are doing investigations wonder why do they really need these security clearances? is it to do their job or will they sell their influence? >> is it to do business? on february 18th, "the washington post" published a story in which it says officials in at least four countries have privately discussed ways in
which they can manipulate jared kushner by taking advantage of his complex business arrangements, financial difficulties and lack of foreign policy experience, according to current and former u.s. officials familiar with intelligence reports on the matter. you know, on a constitutional side from the president's side, this is his son-in-law, there are emoluments prohibitions because we're not supposed to be getting money from foreign companies, but this is almost a separate issue. jared kushner has his own separate financial issues from the president of the united states, and it does seem that he is out there possibly, here's the danger, he's possibly promising american support or american willingness to look the other way to what the saudis do for something else. >> you know, i think it was joe scarborough who said that the trump foreign policy is not the foreign policy of the united states, as it has been run since the founding of the nation. all you have to do is follow the financial relationships between his organization and jared kushner to see how u.s. foreign
policy is executed. and i think that's right. jared kushner had almost $1 billion of debt on the 666 fifth avenue project. >> right. >> and just within the last year, the parent company that owns westinghouse, the nuclear reactor supplier that was supposed to be selling 50 nuclear reactors or so to the middle east, bought that debt and immediately eliminated that. another thing is, jared kushner had access to the very intelligence that would have warned him that he had four nations looking out to influence him. access to that information gives him a supreme advantage. it also helps him hide any of those relationships. we've seen that the use of classified information is generally kept within the realm of the benefits of the united states, but what i'm afraid of is that this family in particular are trading on the
secrets of the united states to enrich themselves. the emoluments clause really means you cannot enrich yourself at the benefit of the united states. and they seem to have a tenuous relationship with that. >> malcolm, i always love hearing from you, and i know that our viewers do. so i just want to remind everybody that you and i will be together sunday night at 9:00 p.m. to talk about the trump/putin relationship. thank you, my friend. >> my pleasure. coming up, america's sentencing guidelines are broken, according to a former federal judge, but that doesn't excuse paul manafort's sentence. that is tonight's "last word." to your goals and needs. some only call when they have something to sell. fisher calls regularly so you stay informed. and while some advisors are happy to earn commissions whether you do well or not. fisher investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management.
woman: this is your wake-up call. if you have moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis, month after month, the clock is ticking on irreversible joint damage. ongoing pain and stiffness are signs of joint erosion. humira can help stop the clock. prescribed for 15 years, humira targets and blocks a source of inflammation that contributes to joint pain and irreversible damage. vo: humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. woman: help stop the clock on further irreversible joint damage. talk to your rheumatologist. right here. right now.
humira. right here. right now. when it comes to reducing the evsugar in your family's diet,m. coke, dr pepper and pepsi hear you. we're working together to do just that. bringing you more great tasting beverages with less sugar or no sugar at all. smaller portion sizes, clear calorie labels and reminders to think balance. because we know mom wants what's best. more beverage choices, smaller portions, less sugar.
as special counsel robert mueller reportedly nears the end of his investigation into russian interference in the 2016 election, msnbc explores how we got here and what we know about the relationship between president trump and russian president vladimir putin. in a new documentary airing this sunday night. take a look. >> all we hear about is this phony russia witch hunt. >> the mueller russia report isn't ready yet. >> washington is now in eager anticipation mode. >> but our report is. >> this is really important. >> the unprecedented moments. >> those were lies, and i'm so sorry that the american people were told them. >> mr. trump knew of and directed the trump moscow negotiations throughout the campaign and lied about it. >> the infamous meeting.
>> when you tell someone "we have dirt," once you get a "yes," you have hooked your fish. >> because they lied, it makes it look more significant than it is. >> and look more significant than it is. >> fake news of the russian witch hunt. >> donald trump created a country where a third of the country does not believe anything that mueller says. >> how did we get here? >> i am concerned that donald trump is behaving like someone who may be compromised. what's next? >> the committee sending outl out letters to look at these things. it is hard to imagine the worst thing happening to donald trump is being elected president of the united states. >> russia, if you are listening, i hope you are able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing. >> you can watch "russia if you
we all make excuses for the things we don't want to do. but when it comes to colon cancer screening... i'm not doin' that. i eat plenty of kale. ahem, as i was saying... ...with cologuard, you don't need an excuse... all that prep? no thanks. that drink tastes horrible! but...there's no prep with cologuard... i can't take the time off work. who has two days? and i feel fine - no symptoms! everybody, listen! all you need is a trip to the bathroom. if you're 50 or older and at average risk, cologuard is the noninvasive option that finds 92% of colon cancers. you just get the kit in the mail, go to the bathroom, collect your sample, then ship it to the lab! this is your year! own it! cologuard is not right for everyone. it is not for high risk individuals, including those with a history of colon cancer
or precancer, ibd, certain hereditary cancer syndromes, or a family history of colon cancer. ask your doctor if cologuard is right for you. covered by medicare and most major insurers. ask your doctor if cologuard is right for you. (burke) at fso we know how ton almost evercover almost anything. even rooftop parking. strange forces at work?
only if you're referring to gravity-and we covered it. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ time for tonight's last word on the big news of the week. the shocking sentence for paul manafort. the headline today "in the new york times," 47 months. his sentence is comparing to crimes that are seemingly not as bad as manafort, decade long million dollars broad scheme. my client yesterday was offered 36 to 72 months in prison for stealing $100 worth of quarters from a residential laundry room.
47 months is only one or two of sentences coming to manafort. he'll be sentenced in a federal court on d.c. on wednesday. joining us now what paul manafort could face next week and how to understand the 47 months sentence is nancy gurtner, is currently a senior lecturer at harvard law school. >> good to be here. >> judge ellis, says "the court must take into account the characteristic of the defendant." here is how judge ellis expre expressed on manafort. the defendant has no criminal history. he's a graduate of a law school. he earned the add muir
muir -- admirations of a number of people. he has been a good father and husband and a good friend to others and a generous person. that can't erase his criminal activities. it is, they are factor that counts the court must take into account. what judge ellis did was illustrate the life of privilege of a man who has committed a decade's worth of serious crimes. >> the comment of he lived a blameless life is something that could apply to every single white collar defendants. one of the reasons why white collar crimes was dealt more severely in the sentencing guidelines since 1985 was precisely because someone could do bad things after a very good life. the best example is, ken lay,
famously of enron fraud who had houston named after him. a blameless life part of what a judge consider is not positive and does not distinguish him from other white collar defenders. if you don't have the money to be generous and you come into court disadvantaged. that's not the way it should be. >> or the money to have gone to a good school and a law school. >> it does seem the end results looking the same. poor people sentence for other things getting longer sentence and rich people doing things involving moving money around. >> this was a huge financial fraud a fraud on the banks that took more time, banks fraud on the government and taking money out of the government. what the judge essentially is to say in effect through his
sentence, there was no big deal. somehow it would be a bigger deal if manafort had distributed crack in quantities which makes no sense whatsoever. >> who fixes that? >> to some degree, it has to be the sentencing commission has to fix it to some degree. congress has to fix it. the guidelines, the ins sentencing guidelines are completely broken. no one paid attention to the range. sentencing guidelines of 19 to 20 years and everyone tn the sp counsel thought it was ridiculous. >> judge ellis said the government did not argue for a guideline sentence which i thought it was a good thing. clearly the guidelines were way out of whack on this as the history of sentence in this area. his argument is that he has sent similar people with similar crimes the same way. >> right, that's what he said. that's what he said in the transcript and it is hard to
know one way or the other. i doubt very much if there is a similar crime here to setting up offshore accounts over a period of time and then when you ran out of money to begin to defraud banks over a period of time and then to fail to cooperate with the special prosecutor, not only you did not cooperate but you lie. there is a host of conduct here which was unmentioned in the sentencing proceeding. he whines up with a sentence that's essentially the same sentence that anyone cooperating like, michael cohen, cooperating would have gotten. i am reluctant in general to criticize any judge for sentencing because it is really, really hard. i am also reluctant to criticize a judge for being more leenient
than they usually are. the sentencing of manafort is really troubling. >> nancy gertner gets tonight's last word. the 11th hour starts now. >> tonight donald trump says he feels bad for his campaign chairman manafort. today's distraction was the fight over pardon between trump and his former lawyer, michael cohen, nearly over shadowing the fact that the president called democrats antijewish and anti-israel. we are expecting updates on roger stone, rick gates while manafort learns his second prison sentence. all of it as "the 11th hour" gets underway on this friday night.