tv The Beat With Ari Melber MSNBC April 29, 2019 3:00pm-4:00pm PDT
and that's all from "meet the press daily." "the beat" starts right now. good evening. >> good evening, mr. karnaky. we have got a lot to cover. i am stephanie ruhle in tonight for my friend ari melber. get ready. we have a big show tonight. joe biden just delivered a speech attacking trump's lies at his first campaign rally in pittsburgh, pennsylvania. also, former department of justice insider neal katyal is here on the obstruction probe. and the nra in crisis. with the new york attorney general launching an investigation into the group's money. but we begin this evening -- i almost said this morning -- with this breaking news. mueller's former boss, deputy attorney general rod rosenstein officially resigning. he just sent his resignation letter and will leave the department of justice may 11th.
and this comes as a legal showdown is looming today. house democrats escalating the pressure on attorney general bill barr to testify this week. barr now threatening to skip thursday's testimony on the mueller report before the judiciary committee. barr now objecting to chairman nadler's plan to have committee lawyers question him. barr's office saying, quote, the attorney general appeared -- agreed to appear before congress. therefore members of congress should be the ones doing the question. chairman nadler speaking out today and getting blunt. they will subpoena barr if they have to. >> the attorney general is afraid to subject himself to questions where he can follow up that may indicate lack of confidence in his own position. and more to the point, we have to get to the bill of these issues. that's why we've called him in. and it's not up to the attorney general to tell the committee how to conduct his business. if he doesn't show up on thursday, we'll have to go to
subpoenas. >> chairman nadler telling barr he does not get to pick how the committee questions him, and there are growing questions about how specifically barr handled the mueller report, specifically clearing trump on obstruction of justice. a democratic member of the house judiciary committee calling barr, quote, a paid federal public defender for public trump. former deputy ag sally yates saying if trump was not president, he would likely be charged. >> i've been a prosecutor for nearly 30 years, and i can tell you i've personally prosecuted obstruction cases on far, far less evidence than this. and, yes, i believe if he were not the president of the united states, he would likely be indicted on obstruction. >> joining me now, nyu law professor melissa murray and former federal prosecutor, my dear friend joyce vance. melissa, to you first. it's not a surprise, but your thoughts specifically on rod rosenstein resigning today and sending that very complimentary letter to president trump. >> my first thought was whether
president trump had written this resignation letter himself. it was incredibly complimentary. but this is not unheard of. it's certainly not unheard november this administration where there has been a revolving door of people coming in or out. the real question is how was it rod rosenstein was able to last as long as he did, two years, a pretty long tenure in this administration. >> well, maybe he did because he was singing the tune president trump wanted him to. joyce, your thoughts. for rod rosenstein to sort of close the letter with a wink and a nod, thanks for always putting america first, we know that president trump's jam. >> you know, deputy attorney general rosenstein is certainly speaking the president's language in this letter, his close-out letter with the administration. often, federal officials when they're resigning are provided with some sort of a template or a form. and the expectation is they'll follow along with that. we don't know if that's the case here, and certainly rod rosenstein could have said whatever he wanted to say in his resignation letter. this makes it pretty clear that
he resigns as someone who is firmly in the president's camp during his service. >> well, someone else who appears to be firmly in president trump's camp is bill barr. that is why congress wants to talk to him specifically. the judiciary committee, what actually happens if barr stips a hearing? we can talk what he should do, what is precedent, but it's like "real world" mtv. he doesn't have to be polite. >> no, he doesn't have to be polite. he can refuse to attend. congress can use their enforcement powers contempt to enable to subpoena him to come in. this goes back and forth as a negotiation between congress and the doj. and that can be really protracted which dulls of the momentum the democrats are hoping to get out of this entire process. they want to use this to gear up for what might be an impeachment investigation. and barr basically can stonewall them on this by refusing to appear and make it a lot harder and eventually perhaps kick this
to the courts. >> back and forth is exactly what president trump, or maybe bill barr is looking for, running the clock. it's what the president did regard to releasing his taxes on the campaign trail. you'll get them. you'll see them, i promise. and then he wins and kellyanne conway is straight out the gate. nobody cares. president trump won. that seems to be the agenda here. is it going to work, joyce? >> you know, it's an interesting question, because this president really is a master of kicking the can down the road and hoping he won't face consequences until some point in the distant future, if ever. but the neutral arbiter here will be the federal court system. and one wonder franchise the federal courts might not reach a point where they say enough is enough. it's not as though bill barr has a legitimate reason here for not showing up to testify. he is just saying the executive branch objects to the way that the legislative branch is conducting its business. there is no constitutional basis for saying that. we may find a federal judge who
decides that this attorney general needs to show up in court. or show up in congress. >> the nonexperts out there have said well, listen, bill barr has said, he will sit down, he will answer congress' questions. but the issue is staff lawyers. jerry nadler explained why he thinks it's so important for staff counsel to do the follow-up questions. >> we will decide what the most effective way of asking questions are, and that's what our decision. we've seen many witnesses filibuster for four and a half minutes and then give a nonresponsive answer the last half minute, and then you can't follow up because a next question, they have a different question in mind. so enabling staff counsel to question the witness for half an hour makes it much more effective at getting the answers. >> your thoughts? >> well, i testified before the senate judiciary committee, and i think chairman nadler is exactly right. the oscillating five minutes
back and forth makes it really hard to develop a lynn of questioning and to follow up and really elicit the kind of information that would be helpful if you are trying to mount an impeachment investigation. sending this over to professional lawyers who can actually sit on this for about 30 minutes seems to be a more productive avenue, but that's exactly what the president does not want. >> so it seems to be more productive, joyce. we know that christine blasey ford under went that when she testified, and she has a lot less experience than bill barr does. but realistically speaking, could democrats be overplaying their hand here? >> you know, i don't think that they are overplaying their hand. i think what they're going to create is a picture of an attorney general who is, frankly, frightened to face professional questioning. everyone knows that congressman nadler has amassed a very competent, qualified experienced legal staff. any of those people would be well qualified to question the attorney general. and this is a sitting attorney general. this, as you point out, not
someone whose never faced questioning before. if he cannot defend his behavior and the administration's reaction to the mueller report for 30 minutes, then show be ashamed. it with his obligation to appear in front of congress and to answer the questions this committee poses in whatever form they choose to pose them. >> joyce, it's pretty tough to be ashamed at a time of shamelessness. i want to share a bit of hillary clinton herself reading the mueller report to me. if this doesn't turn into a podcast, i don't know what should. take a look at this. >> the investigation established that the russian government perceived it would benefit from a trump presidency. and worked to secure that outcome, and that the campaign expected it would benefit electorally. the president slumped back in his chair and said, "oh my god, this is terrible. this is the end of my presidency. i'm [ bleep ]."
>> that is better than celebrities reading mean tweets about them. that's amazing. but is it too soon to be joking about this, given the context of the mueller report and how so much of it has been mischaracterized and so-so many around the country don't know what's in there. >> hillary clinton is maybe the person who has benefitted the least from all of this. but it is interesting to have it read by one who was so invested in it. it takes on sort of the level of high drama. but this is what we're living in. i just spent the whole last week in spain. we went from site to site. they kept talking about the rise of franco and the rise of nationalism. ho honestly, it sounds like what we're seeing here in the united states there is a precedent here that we ought to be mindful of. >> it's also a reminder, though. everyone who said donald trump did this to us. how did we get here? the rise of populism saul over the world. >> yes. trump just one part of it.
melissa, joyce, thank you so much. you know i love kicking off any show with some smart women. let's continue on that trail. i want to bring in congresswoman karen bass, who is a member of the judiciary committee. congresswoman, i want to start with rod rosenstein's letter of resignation. >> yes. >> it says that he is grateful to trump for, quote, the opportunity to serve and for the courtesy and humor he displays in their personal conversations. what's your thoughts on that? >> well, it's very interesting. i think that he was very disappointing, especially the way that he handled things at the end with barr standing behind him as he had the press conference. so it will be interesting to see whether he comes before our committee and what he has to say now that he will not be an employee of the department of justice. >> all right. let's turn to bill barr. >> yes. >> he is not acting in good faith, if you are in a position where you're dependent on good faith and appropriate behavior, what can you possibly do about it? i mentioned before tongue and
cheek. >> right. >> but we are living in a time when there is no shame. >> exactly. there is no shame. this administration has conducted itself with a complete disregard to the rule of law. so what my concern is that we issue a subpoena. he ignores the subpoena. we go to court. he gets a court order and ignores that. i think that would really be a problem. but his refusal to come before our committee because he doesn't want to be questioned by outside attorneys, there is absolute precedent for that. so that is not the reason to refuse to come. i think it's going to be interesting to see whether or not this is going to be the general behavior of this administration. >> well, it seems at this point that that is going to be the general behavior. you clearly want the staff lawyers to be asking questions. >> yes. >> if that option is not available to you, if barr is saying my way or the highway or i'll see you with a subpoena, what are you going to do? >> well, i think it's going to be really important for us to
take this through the process completely, because we can't allow the precedent to be set that when we call someone before our committee, that they then want to define how their appearance is going on on those terms. so i think it's very important that we take a stand. but you know the other thing that i think is so important during this process is that we have to make sure that we educate the u.s. public as to what is going on. because the president's narrative, of course, is presidential harassment because there has been no oversight and investigation in the first two years of his presidency, it's important for the public to understand that this is our constitutional duty, our constitutional responsibility, the checks and balances on the administration is the way our government works. but we do know that the commander in chief has very little understanding and very little regard for the institution. >> but he's not alone there is a whole lot of republicans -- >> exactly.
>> -- as well who know all about the three separate and equal branches of government, but they're standing with the president here, are they not? >> well, not only that, i mean, they also spent the first two years not doing their constitutional duty. i think that's absolutely right. but at a certain point in time, when the u.s. public gets tired of this, and when it's actually compromising their ability to get elected, i won't be surprised at all if they abandon him. you know, we know that the reason why the attorney general held that press conference was so he could set the narrative, and really, to dissuade people from actually reading the report. >> okay, but the issue is, congresswoman. >> yes? >> he may have had bad intentions, but he was successful in getting the outcome that he want, wasn't he? >> well, i don't say he was successful just yet. i think time will tell. we are going to have these hearings with or without the witnesses. but i am hopeful that they will comply. and whether they are there or
not, it's really incumbent upon all of us in congress, all of the democrats and the republicans that are willing to take the american public through this process so they understand exactly what we're doing and why we're doing it. >> when people elect their lawmakers, they're certainly hoping they will do the right thing. congresswoman, thank you so much for joining me. >> absolutely. >> karen bass. see? i told you i like starting the show with strong, strong women. ari melber's team did me right. coming up, joe biden gives the kickoff speech to his 2020 campaign, offering his alternative to trump oh no, ma' ma'amomics. and subpoenas are flying at the nra with the gun's lobby finances now under investigation. all of that plus neal katyal. he is here to talk about bill barr, robert mueller, and what is really happening at the supreme court. i am stephanie ruhle in for ari melber, and you are watching "the beat" on msnbc.
and it really shows. with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. it was funny because when we would call another insurance company, hey would say "oh we can't beat usaa" we're the webber family. we're the tenney's we're the hayles, and we're usaa members for life. ♪ get your usaa auto insurance quote today. nueven if you try to eat well,. ♪
you might fall short in key nutrients. get more by adding one a day. it's the #1 multivitamin uniquely designed for men and women. one serving, once a day. one a day. and done. onmillionth order.r. ♪ there goes our first big order. ♪ 44, 45, 46... how many of these did they order? ooh, that's hot. ♪ you know, we could sell these. nah. ♪ we don't bake. ♪ opportunity. what we deliver by delivering.
your control. like bedhead. hmmmm. ♪ rub-a-dub ducky... and then...there's national car rental. at national, i'm in total control. i can just skip the counter and choose any car in the aisle i like. so i can rent fast without getting a hair out of place. heeeeey. hey! ah, control. (vo) go national. go like a pro.
first official campaign rally, speaking in pennsylvania, hitting trump for lies and making a large pitch on the economy, specifically aimed at the middle class. >> the country wasn't built by wall street bankers, ceos and hedge fund managers. it was built by you. the middle class is hurting. it's hurting now. it's well past time that the minimum wage actually be a minimum of $15. >> biden also getting the dormant of the country's largest firefighters union, and early primary polling has him at the head of the pack. yet check him out. the majority of democratic voters, 54% are still undecided. that might be a good thing. they have time to look at a whole lot of people. today i spoke to former rnc chair michael steele who said democratic voters have a simple choice in this primary. >> do you want to be win? >> joining me cristina beltran and former internet director for hillary clinton's 2008 campaign
peter dow, author the author of digital civil war, confronting the far right menace. cristina, when i look at joe biden and his message today, he went straight after trump where it hurts, the economy. president trump won on a populist economic message, saying to the country the economy doesn't work so many of you, i'm here to solve that. then he wins. now he has completely flipped the script. and with the same exact economy, even a more exaggerated one, he now calls it great every day of the week, and doesn't really get challenged on it. when he spoke in wisconsin, he didn't talk about the economy. he didn't talk about the foxconn plant, because all those big plans aren't working for those voters. joe biden hitting them in the right place? >> i think it's a pretty effective move at this point. certainly, and it's bothering trump which is interesting. it's fun to watch trump. what he always often does is he articulates this image well the stock market is doing great. but the stock market, there is such a dissonance now between
what the stock market is doing and what real regular americans are feeling. i think the interesting question for biden is going to be given his long history, people used to call him the senator from mbma. one of the interesting things about joe biden, he sort of embodies the last 40 years of the democratic party's politics. he is sort of a place holder for a whole set of debates about where does the party want to go? does it want to go in a more left direction? does it want to figure out how to keep and maintain white voters while growing its young electorate, the multiracial electorate. he's had really interesting, what he says and his own history are going to be in a dialogue with each other in a really interesting way. >> this takes you right back to what michael steele said today to democratic voters. do you want to be woke or do you want to win? if you watch fox news at night, they're not talking so much about joe biden. they're not talking so much about pete buttigieg. they are painting a picture that
the democrats are the far, far left. and the choice is capitalism as it stands or socialism. that is what joe biden's message is. when you look at the democratic electorate, what direction do you need to head? woke or win? >> see? i want to reject that entire false dichotomy. if you think of what it means to be far left, you want universal health care, you want fewer shootings in schools, you want people to be able to have a living wang, affordable college. if you talk about far right, it's bigotry, it's racism, it's neo-nazis marching. this whole notion we have to worry about whether democrats are moving to the left. let's ask why republicans are moving so far to the right, which they. >> but do you have to ask that question until you get to the general? while you're in the primary, how different. is it? when you look at what democrats are talking about with regard to joe biden's conduct, he did apologize to anita hill. clearly that's become a hot topic for democrats. but if joe biden or any other
candidate on the left makes their way to the general, no republican would ever bring the subject up given who president trump is and what he himself has done. >> right, right. i think we can't really have this argument on what the side of trump is. the right is going to pin whoever gets this nomination as a socialist, as far-left radical. the attack on whoever gets this gig is going to be fairly hostile and aggressive, and so i think at the end of the day, what there is happening right now, i think it's really healthy for the democratic party to have a real reckoning to where do we want to go? what is our relationship to democracy and capitalism? how are we thinking about these questions of racial justice? what is our history with the banks, with corporate power, with policing. those are -- we shouldn't be afraid to have real conversations about the -- i mean, that's what primaries are for. to have serious arguments about the direction of a political party. i don't think it should be framed in this sort of well, it's identity or the mainstream that isn't really what's happening. we're having a really serious
conversation about where have we been, where do we want to go. i think one of the questions for biden and trump is it going to become too much about biden and trump versus us? it's going to be about the future, about climate change. one of the things that's going to be interesting for bide done, because he literally does embody the last 40 years of the democratic party, are we going to talk about the plagiarism, are we going to talk about anita hill and the crime bill? or are we going to talk about where we want to go, and is he going to be able to turn the conversation to the future and remind people i was obama's wingman. how is he going to be able to forge that combination in conversation? >> if we go through that, everything joe biden or anyone else who is running who is an elected official, if we go through every decision, every vote, everything we said over the last 40 years, isn't that going to take us right back to the last election, where president trump didn't have to answer for any of that because people just said well, he was a private citizen, and we went through everything hillary clinton did. so if this happens again in the
next election, doesn't that say man, experience, that's a negative thing? >> the way i see it is we have so many false dichotomies throughout. one of them, for example, is going after trump is different than pushing issues. going after democrats for democrats, leftists is going to defend the rule of law. and that's just as important as promoting policies too. one other thing i want to say stephanie is leaders lead. moral leaders lead. they move the electorate with them. and one of the complaints i've had, i'm a democrat, but the complaints i've had against democrats is you poll and you pander, and that is not a way to lead. you can move the public toward democratic and progressive issues if you have courage. >> i don't have to expand the terrain of the sayable. once you actually start talking about issues, the public is a dynamic institution. the public is dynamic. it's not this static thing. and the polling and pandering and keeping your finger up for the win doesn't acknowledge the
way leadership always does shift the debate and expand the conversation. we also need to expand the electorate. we need the grow the voting. we shouldn't just be talking about the fish that we can catch. we have to grow the amount, we have to grow the fish. >> how do you address the poll and pander tendency at a time when we live in social media? when there was a "new york times" poll out this month that the actual democratic electorate, what they want, what they need is far different than what social media would tell you. >> i'll give you a perfect example is impeachment. i've argued very forcefully if any president should ever be impeached it's donald trump. but public polling is dicey. it's not 100%. my argument is look, you don't always lead by following polls. you don't lead by what the public wants, and you certainly don't lead by what happens on twitter. >> you do it ethically right and legally right. >> when we ask the public, we're not asking the right question. they're saying they don't want impeachment because they're given the option do you want him impeached or do you want people
to work on policies that will help you live a better life? >> thank you. the framing is so critically important. if you look about just about ever major debate, and i talk about it in my book coming out to tomorrow, and thank you for showing to it the audience, the problem here is we talk about issues that are all on the far right's turf. we talk about immigration. we talk about should we be caging babies? when we talk about teacherabout we be arming teachers? everybody wants clean air and water. nobody wants kids to be shot in schools. these progressive democratic issues are solid and strong and have large majorities that favor them. but democrats do not know how to too often. not all democrats. i don't want to paint with a sweeping brush. but they have to move ow to move that conversation back to common sense. >> there is a kind of consumer logic when we talk to voters. you wanted to engage in civic education. and i think the other thing, and this is why a really good healthy primary is important is
there is a debate in the party of whether or not we're about restoration and kind of getting back to normal, or whether there is something fundamentally broken in our politics and broken in our democracy. so we need to have a real conversation, what do we need to fix, what do we really need to repair? what do we really need to deal with? and those shift the debate. it's about whether or not what we have is actually broken, which led us to the election of donald trump. >> maybe it's time to create a new normal. thank you both very much. great conversation. cristina beltran and peter daou, whose book is. cog out tomorrow. ahead, bill barr's threat to cancel testimony and what it reve reveals. but first, donald trump even telling more lie, more often than ever. we have the numbers to prove it. we'll be back in 30 seconds. get ready for this big number. they guarantee your rates won't go up just because of an accident. smart kid. indeed. are you in good hands?
you wouldn't accept an incomplete job from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? flonase sensimist relieves all your worst symptoms, including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. and all from a gentle mist you can barely feel. flonase sensimist. leaders who feed fear typically are also ones who avoid facts. >> barack obama this weekend taking a thinly veiled jab at donald trump, twisting facts, perhaps thinking about things like this. according to "the washington post," donald trump has now made more than 10,000 false or misleading claims since taking office. and he looks to be lying more frequently than ever. between last thursday and sunday alone, across five different appearances, trump managed to
make 155 false or misleading claims, and look at this. during trump's first year in office, he averaged close to six or false or misleading claims every single day. that number rose to almost 17 in 2018 and so far this year he's at an average of 22. i want you to think about that. the false claim that trump makes the most is about his border wall. like the time he said he got funding, even though he did not. >> just so you know, we're building the wall anyway. we're doing whatever we have to do. the wall is being built. it will continue. it's going at a rapid pace. the rio grande, it's happening. go check it out. >> with me now, the root.com is jason johnson, who is also a political science professor. jason, you and i can talk all day long about the number of lies, it's absurd, it's obscene, but here is the real issue. the president is saying more and more things that are not true. >> right. >> it's them getting repeated by the conservative media, and that
then gets repeated by millions of people at home. so what can be done? >> well, the first thing is if you're not sort of right wing state media, we have to make sure that we don't panneder to the president's lies. no more of these headlines where president trump uses disputed facts, or president trump repeats debunk claim. no. just call the guy a liar. call him a liar every single time. that's what the media's responsibility is. we have to make sure that this sort of -- and i say this. i teach journalism. the idea of hearing both sides is not the pursuit of the truth. so pursuing the truth is the first way to stop trump. the second thing is democrats who run against him, politicians who run against him need to call him a liar at all times. do not give him an excuse for repeating things that aren't true because people are attempting to be polite. >> and the average person at home has listened to the president, who for the last two years while he has been lying 10,000 times has called us fake news, fake news, fake news. >> right. >> and those same people say well, politicians always lie. >> right. here is the catch. and stephanie, this is again the role that we play there is a
different level of lie. all of us lie. i can call my mom right now and say yeah, i'm coming home for mother's day. that may be a lie. >> is it? are you really not going home for mother's day? >> i'm going home for mother's day. >> it's more of your lying when she calls and you don't pick up, you tell her you were working and really watching tv. >> yeah, watching ga ining "gam thrones." there are lies that the public expects from politicians, and we need to distinguish what president trump does from a regular lie. when trump says you can keep your doctor, he may have not knew. we're done in iraq, he knew that was not the case. donald trump lies about things that can be easily confirmed. he lies about his crowd size. he says parents give them abortion pills when they're crossing the border because they expect them to be assaulted by coyotes. these are things that can be easily disproven. so it's our job to make sure that we say hey, look, this is not your run of the mill political lies. these are not normal and they're
dangerous and endanger people's lives. >> a good way to do it would be to show up on fox news. seeing the increase in the amount of lies the president is telling, should the democratic party revisit their decision not the host a primary debate on fox? >> you know, stephanie, there is a whole lot of mistakes that the dnc has made this year. >> they could change this one. >> exactly. change this right now. everybody should be willing to go everywhere. if you were a democrat, you're running for president in 2020, there are voters at fox. not a lot, but there are voters at fox. i think they should be willing to go there and speak truth to power. you have some fox pundits who have slowly but surely saying things like yeah, maybe the president obstructed justice, maybe the president is lying about the law. if you only the take the truth to the same crowd of believers, you're not changing anybody's mind. >> listen, you might have fox hosts who are terrible, but if you show up and you're speaking to them face-to-face, you can knock down their lies real tooirjs yes. >> jason johnson, thank you so much. i appreciate you joining me.
still to come, the nra reeling, rocked by power struggles, besieged by a new probe. now facing new criticism from the president himself. but first, neal katyal is here to talk about bill barr threatening to cancel his testimony before the house judiciary. like... a business borrowing solution to help get a little more space with a lot less mom. or home insight, to search for a new house within your budget. because, they really need their space. pnc - make today the day.
you wouldn't accept an incomplete job from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? flonase sensimist relieves all your worst symptoms, including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. and all from a gentle mist you can barely feel. flonase sensimist. you should be mad they gave this guy a promotion. you should be mad at forced camaraderie. and you should be mad at tech that makes things worse. but you're not mad, because you have e*trade, who's tech makes life easier by automatically adding technical patterns on charts and helping you understand what they mean. don't get mad. get e*trade's simplified technical analysis.
we have to get to the bottom of these issues. that's why we've called him in. and it's not up to the attorney general to tell the committee how to conduct its business. we will decide what the most effective way of asking questions are, and that's what our decision is. we've told them we expect them to show up on thursday, and we're going to conduct the inquiry, as we said we would. if he doesn't show up on thursday, we'll have to go to subpoenas. >> how judiciary chair jerry nadler on attorney general bill barr's threats to bail on his thursday hearing because democrats now want the committee's lawyers to ask him questions too. with me for opening arguments is former solicitor general neal
katyal, who actually wrote the special counsel rules, and he is now an msnbc analyst. all right, neal. if you're bill bar, risk management is the business that you are in. and while it might be the right thing to do to take questions from lawyers, if you don't have to, why put yourself at risk? >> stephanie, first of all, it's great to be here with you tonight in subbing for ari. >> thanks. >> it's awesome to see you. i think, look, you're the attorney general of the united states. your job is to uphold the rule of law, to provide information to congress. and it's like bill barr woke up today and he -- or a few days ago and he decided to not testify before congress and say like, you know, i'm jealous about president trump being the coward in chief. i want to wrestle that title away from him. this is not the way attorneys general behave. it's not the way cabinet members behave. it's not even the way private
citizens behave. just think about christine blasey ford's testimony last year before congress which she did for hour after hour answer questions from the committee staff and not from the members of congress. so, you know, what barr is doing here is cowardly and it's also deeply undemocratic. >> okay, but that's a subjective assessment. and while i might agree with you, democrats can't traffic in subjective. they have to demand that bill barr do what he's legally obligated to do. and if he is legally not obligated to do this, are democrats only other option is to subpoena him? because that's a game they don't want to play either. >> so two things. number one, i think he is legally obligated. >> oh, you do? >> we have cabinet secretary after cabinet secretary that testified. so you can go look at iran/contra where attorney general meece testified and where secretary schultz testified. you can look back at watergate where cia director schlesinger testified. you can look at the whitewater
hearings in which michael chertoff answered questions by committee staff, not by members of congress. and all of these circumstances, committees staff led these. i think if nadler goes to court, he will undoubtedly win. and i also think if congress wants, they have other options available to them. for example, the house of representatives can defund the office of the attorney general, cut barr's funding, cut his staff's funding. look, if these people are not going to play by the way that the justice department has traditionally operated in this country, if they're going to hide the truth from the american people, then i think all of these options should be on the table. i mean, bill barr is not acting like the attorney general of the united states. he's acting like the coward general of the united states. >> damn. all right. let's turn to the supreme court. last week president trump tweeted this. if the partisan dems ever tried to impeach, i would first head to the u.s. supreme court. help me understand this. why would the supreme court have
any role in impeachment? >> it doesn't. the supreme court has been very clear. there is a precedent called nixon versus the united states which says quite clearly we have the supreme court have no rule in impeachment. so president trump can try, i guess, and go to the supreme court. i think he would lose 9-0. but i think the deeper point is the way in which he is talking about the supreme court, as if it's his court and his justice department acts that way and tries to rush things to the supreme court, blows off the lower courts. there is a whole culture around this white house when it comes to the supreme court and lower courts, which we've never seen in our lifetimes. it's a very dangerous and corrosive thing. >> the president learned the hard way there are three separate but equal branchs of the government. the judges don't work for him. congress doesn't work for him. does he believe that the supreme court justices work for him, specifically, because two of them got their seats on his watch? >> i mean, the genius of our founders was to provide life tenure, precisely so the supreme
court justices could rule against the person who appointed them. i had the privilege of being elena kagan's deputy. and when the health care case came up before the obamacare case, she ruled against president obama on a key piece of it. so, you know, and that's a long tradition. it goes back to our founding of justices doing that. so i think it's absolutely wrong for the president to think that the supreme court is in his pocket, particularly on something like impeachment. i mean, there is no sitting justice who would even entertain these arguments that he is trying to advance in that tweet. >> i need a little supreme court education. i know you argued a case this month. what happens now? give me the technicals. how do the judges come to a decision? what goes on behind closed doors? >> the cool thing about the supreme court. >> everything? >> everything too. after you argue the case, the justices will meet in a conference. it's a very collegial group of people. they all shake each other's
hands, and that's a lot of handshakes. it's nike factorial or something. it's a lot of handshakes. and then afterwards, they go and discuss the case and do it in order of seniority. nobody can speak twice until everyone speaks once. and then they have a respectful debate and dialogue, and afterwards people are assigned to write opinions, a justice in the majority, if there is a dissent, a justice in the dissent. and then they go back and forth with the drafts. they share everything with each other. they're not trying to hide the ball or have any log rolling or anything like that. all nine are just simply going in and saying what's the best answer? how can i cast a vote that's the best reading of the constitution in our laws. >> respect, decency, civility, that's what we like. i wish that was contagious in washington. neal, thank you so much. neal katyal, i really appreciate you joining me tonight. >> thank you. >> and you can go to msnbc.com/openingarguments for
videos of all "the beat's" segments with neal. just ahead, the new york attorney general launched a probe into the nra's money. obe y ...caused liver damage. epclusa treats all main types of chronic hep c. whatever your type, ask your doctor if epclusa is your kind of cure. i had the common type. mine was rare. epclusa has a 98% overall cure rate. i just found out about my hepatitis c. i knew for years. epclusa is only one pill, once a day, taken with or without food for 12 weeks. before starting epclusa, your doctor will test if you have had hepatitis b, which may flare up and could cause serious liver problems during and after treatment. tell your doctor if you have had hepatitis b other liver or kidney problems, hiv or other medical conditions... ...and all medicines you take, including herbal supplements. taking amiodarone with epclusa may cause a serious slowing of your heart rate. common side effects include headache and tiredness
ask your doctor today, if epclusa is your kind of cure. but prevagen helps your brain with an ingredient originally discovered... in jellyfish. in clinical trials, prevagen has been shown to improve short-term memory. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. on table ten. ♪ he'd be proud of us. a family business should stay in the family. see how lincoln's insurance solutions can help protect your family, your business and everyone who counts on you, at lincolnfinancial.com
the nra is in crisis, and here's how you know it is bad. trump, trump of all people telling the gun organization to get its act together and get back to greatness fast. those are the president's words. the chaos emerging hours after trump's speech at the convention on friday. new york's attorney general
launching an investigation into the organization's finances and issuing subpoenas. the nra's chief executive, wayne lapierre accusing nra president oliver north of extortion after north reportedly tried to oust lapierre. now north will not seek a second term and will step down, warning members the financial investigation is a clear crisis for the nra. joining me now shanann watts, founder of mom's demand, action for gun sense in america and president of the brennan center for justice at new york university, michael waldman. michael, i start with you. what do you make of this chaos inside the nra? is this real chaos that could weaken the nra? or is this just infighting? >> it looks like real chaos, although of course they have real supporters who vote, but it's been said that every great movement starts as a cause and becomes a business and ends up as a racket. and it really does seem as if
there was huge amounts of money and scamming and $200,000 going to wayne lapierre's wardrobe. i could have gotten him a better deal on his wardrobe than that. and this is not going to lead to operational them. but we all know it's not their money, but the ferocity of their voters, but i think that even that is changing. the politics of the gun issue are really shifting in a way they have not in a long time. i think. >> so it's not just the money, it's the power of their voters. i don't know, 200 grand, maybe wayne lapierre shops with paul manafort. he was voted, shannon, unanimously re-elected today as the ceo. so if that is the case, how chaotic can things really be? >> well, you know, we've seen this time and again, which is when the nra should back down or come to the middle, instead they double down. they're in real trouble. the nra is no longer a gun rights organization. they are a faltering business led by unscrupulous executives with dwindling profits.
and the nra's days as a political powerhouse are dwindling and the fact that they're not able to change course and clean house just proves that point. >> even if their voters all vote a certain way, could they be in legal trouble? "the new york times" reporting the nra's affiliated charity, the nra foundation, transferred more than $100 million since 2012 to the nra. it also lent the nra 5 million bucks in 2017. donations to the nra foundation are tax deductible. we have to remember that. while the nra's are not. let's say they lose their tax exempt status in the state of new york. can they just move elsewhere to a more gun friendly state, let's say virginia? >> it's really hard. i mean, they're a national organization. we know that new york state, for example, shut down the trump foundation because of tax irregularities. you can't really do business nationwide if you're not able to do business in new york, where so much of the country's banking and other systems exist, and
it's not unheard of for something that looks completely impregnable, it looks completely strong, to just fall apart. but we don't know -- because it's so opaque, we don't actually know their finances. but they certainly look like they are scared of a real audit. that's even scarier than -- >> than president trump's audit? let's talk about other reporting from the nra. in 2017, their membership dues, shannon, plunged $35 million and it lost another $35 million in gifts and contributions. what does that tell you? and couple that with the changing views on common sense gun laws in this country. what does that tell you? >> well, for the long time the nra has been trying to sell guns, more guns to fewer people, to a demographic that, frankly, is aging out. so what we've seen them try to do is pass laws that force guns into schools or on to college campuses or into public spaces, and that was not a public service announcement, that was
actually a marketing ploy meant to put their agenda forward of guns anywhere for anyone any time, no questions asked. and they would have been successful had it not been for a grassroots army of women and mothers who said not in my community. you will not do this. we have given them a real run for their money, so to speak, and as a result we see that opinions around this issues are higher than ever for common sense gun laws, and because of that the gun lobby doesn't represent its members anymore. in fact, the leaders seem to think their membership is very dumb by misspending their money. the real value of gun owners is now represented by organizations like moms demand action, and not any longer the nra. >> shannon, do you worry that that success you've had could change? today we've spoken all day long about the funeral service that's going to happen in southern california after there was another shooting at a house of worship over the weekend, and a lot of organizations, houses of
worship, mosques, churches, temples are now talking about different security measures. >> well, you know, the security is different than the conversation we should also be having, which is how do we keep ar-15s out of the hands of 19-year-olds? and that's really part of this agenda, right? if more guns and fewer gun laws made us safer, we'd be the safest country on earth. yet we have 300 million guns in the hands of civilians, too few gun laws and the highest gun rates of any developed nation. so that's the issue we need to focus on as a country. we need to focus on how to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people. >> thank you both. a really important conversation. common sense gun laws. shannon watts and michael waldman. we'll be right back. you know what you're watching. it's "the beat." e beat." flonase sensimist relieves all your worst symptoms, including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. and all from a gentle mist you can barely feel. flonase sensimist.
[horn honks] man this is what i feel like when i wear regular shoes, cramped and uncomfortable. we can arrange a little upgrade. which is why i wear skechers... wide fit shoes. they have extra room throughout. they're like a luxury ride for my feet. try skechers wide fit shoes. they're like a luxury ride for my feet. got it.r pickup order? ran out of ink and i have a big meeting today. and 2 boxes of twizzlers... yeah, uh... for the team... the team? gooo team.... order online pickup in an hour. hurry and get an extra 20% off with coupon. at office depot officemax. who wanted to get away who used expedia to book the vacation rental which led to the discovery that sometimes a little down time can lift you right up. expedia. everything you need to go. plants capture co2. what if other kinds of plants captured it too? if these industrial plants had technology that captured carbon like trees we could help lower emissions.
carbon capture is important technology - and experts agree. that's why we're working on ways to improve it. so plants... can be a little more... like plants. ♪ nueven if you try to eat well,. you might fall short in key nutrients. get more by adding one a day. it's the #1 multivitamin uniquely designed for men and women. one serving, once a day. one a day. and done. we're finally back out in our yard, but so are they. the triple threat of dandelions, lurking crabgrass and weak, thin grass! scotts turf builder triple action. this single-step breakthrough changes everything. it kills weeds, prevents crabgrass for up to 4 months, and feeds so grass can thrive, all guaranteed. only from scotts. our backyard is back. this is a scotts yard.
when you rent from national... it's kind of like playing your own version of best ball. because here, you can choose any car in the aisle, even if it's a better car class than the one you reserved. so no matter what, you're guaranteed to have a perfect drive. [laughter] (vo) go national. go like a pro. see what i did there? introducing zero account fees for brokerage accounts. and zero minimums to open an account. at fidelity, those zeros really add up. ♪ maybe i'll win, saved by zero ♪
at fidelity, those zeros really add up. look limu. a civilian buying a new car.ug let's go. limu's right. liberty mutual can save you money by customizing your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. oh... yeah, i've been a customer for years. huh... only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪
finally before we go tonight, we have to end on quite a sad note. american director john singleton passed away today. at the age of just 51. two weeks after he suffered a massive stroke. singleton's debut film is well-known, 1991's "boyz n the hood," which he wrote and directed. this film made an immediate cultural splash, earning oscar nominations for both best original screenplay and best director for singleton himself. he then went on to make "poetic justice," "higher learning" and so many more. voices across the film and
entertainment world are offering words of condolences. ava del he made a huge impression and impact on so many of our lives. that does it for me this evening. i'll see you tomorrow morning bright and early at 9:00 a.m. and with my partner ali velshi at 1:00 p.m. i hand you off to my friend and colleague, chris matthews. "hardball" starts right now. why is the general so scared? let's play "hardball." good evening. i'm chris matthews up in new york. the latest clash over the mueller report has pitted congress against the department of justice over the attorney general's testimony. it comes after william barr threatened to cancel his scheduled appearance before the house judiciary committee just days before the hearing this thursday. barr is objecting to the proposed format of questioni