tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC May 24, 2019 10:00pm-11:00pm PDT
entry point to talk about representation. >> i like it, i am going to be spending tubman. >> dano wall. thank you for ubiquity has the power to spread ideas. never thought about that before your guest said that. >> there's almost nothing you've never thought of. dano gets a point tonight. >> i'm in amazement. thank you, joy, as always. look forward to seeing you this weekend. i'm ali velshi.
ahead this hour, the anatomy of a smear campaign. we'll look at the right's coordinated attack on nancy pelosi via a doctored video, a video that was even tweeted out by the president. also, debunking trump's treason claims. the president has thrown around the word treason a lot lately. but it's not entirely clear he knows what it means. first if the impeachment calls are growing. tonight, nbc news counts 38 house democrats who support at least opening an impeachment inquiry against president trump. of those, 38 house democrats, 10 are on the judiciary committee. of course, this week, one house republican michigan congressman justin amash joined the call for impeachment. that means a little less than 10% of the entire house currently supports impeaching the president. the dam has clearly started to break on the left as democrats grow increasingly outraged at the trump administration for thumbing its noses as congress's oversight efforts.
will that lone republican amash be the start of the dam breaking on the right? it seems former missouri congressman tom cole man wants to put more cracks in that dam. coleman a lifelong republican served in the house for nearly two decades, and in a new op-ed, he writes that the both president trump and vice president pence are illegitimate and calls for them to be impeached. coleman says "because doj regulations put a president above the law while in office, i believe the only viable option available is for the house of representatives under article 22 section 4 of the constitution to open its own investigation. hold public hearings and then determine if they should pursue removal of the president through impeachment. there's a trove of evidence in the mueller report indict indicating that trump has committed multiple impeachable offenses including abuse of power and lie together american public, both were part of the articles an of impeachment
brought against president richard nixon." that doesn't tip some republicans over the image, maybe the president giving his attorney general sweeping new powers to investigate his perceived political enemies might do the trick. that was the big news last night. when trump gave william barr "full and complete authority to declassify intelligence gathered as part of the russia investigation." trump made it quite clear why he gave barr this power. >> i declassified everything, everything they want. i put it under the auspices of the attorney general. he's going to be in charge of it. he's a great gentleman and a highly respected man. so everything that they need is declassified. and they'll be able to see how this hoax, how the hoax or witch hunt started and why it started. it was a an attempted coup or an attempted take-down of the
president of the united states. >> of course, the russia investigation was not an attempted coup to take down the president of the united states but trump wants you to think that. and he seems to have an idea where his attorney general should look to prove this false coup theory. >> i hope he looks at the uk and i hope he looks at australia, and i hope he looks at ukraine. i hope he looks at everything. because there was a hoax that was perpetrated on our country. >> now, there are big questions tonight about how this move will impact the intelligence community and whether it would have a chilling effect on classified sources who fear being exposed. we have one other question about this move from the president. trump has said he won't work with democrats while they continue their inquiries into the russia investigation so why is he allowing his attorney general to continue an inquiry into russia investigation? leading off our discussion tonight are democratic
congressman joe nagouse. margaret carlson and tom nickles a national security expert and former republican senate staff member. thank you for joining me on a friday night. congressman it, where do you stand on how democrats should proceed with respect to the president? >> thank you, ali, for having me on. i support opening an impeachment inquiry. i like many colleagues believe that the findings, detailed in the special counsel's report made clear that the president engaged in impeachable conduct and i think the findings coupled with the pattern of wholesale obstruction of congress that this administration has been engaged for better part of the last two the months, it's important oversight work. it made clear to me an inquiry and opening an inquiry is warranted. i've joined many of my colleagues earlier this week in stating the same. >> margaret, the president seems
to have moved forward. he's been carrying on about hoaxes and no collusion and we've learned that william barr seems to be conspiring with the president to make sure these messages get out first. this new call for the declassification and investigation into the investigators is going to having an effect that many intelligence officials tell me could be quite chilling and dangerous for democracy. >> well, indeed it will. it's going to be interesting to see how far william barr already go in supporting the president. i noticed that dni dan coats today produced his own hostage tape just as the aides in the white house did yesterday by saying that the president was completely calm, not a bit upset one after another in the oval office. so dan coats today said that it was fine that what william barr was about to embark on declassifying this information, revealing sources and methods opening up people abroad to being you know captured, killed,
you know, these are undercover people that rely on secrecy and they rely on us here keeping it that way. dan coats once spoke out against trump not exactly against him but you'll remember that aspen security forum where he found out that trump had invited putin to the white house. >> andrea mitchell was interviewing and mentioned that to him while he was on stage. >> he was shocked by it. this was after saying he had no idea what he had happened at the prior putin/trump meeting because there was no one present. so maybe coates will be and he said isn't that special. is he actually reacted. so maybe dan coats is the person who is going to stop of this at some point because it will go too far. >> let's talk about what dan coats said as part of his commentary that margaret was just talking about. he said as part of the process
i'm confident that the attorney general will work with the intelligence community in accordance with the long established standards tore protect highly sensitive classified information that if publicly released would put our national security at risk. the intelligence community will continue to faithfully execute its mission of providing timelies a political intelligence to the president and policymakers. to margaret's point, tom, that dan coats he had to say that suspects he doesn't actually believe that this is safe in the hands after the attorney general. >> yeah, when someone in washington says i trust that someone will do this, that's a way of saying do it this way. the coates' statement was interesting because it said long established practices. in other words, we're not going to go cowboy on this and not going to start throwing things out there because they happen to be politically advantageous. it tells you something where william barr's reputation is about now that people are worried he's going to do that, that someone who once had a great deal of credibility and
was regarded as somebody who had a great deal of probity is now the basically getting a shot across the bow from other parts of the executive branch saying don't go crazy with classified material just because you need to go to the wall for the president's political interests. >> congressman naguze, this is problematic when looking what happened between 2016 and now but james comey tweeted today investigate what you wish about the -- about 2016 but don't forget the people of the fbi must investigate and stop russian efforts in the 2020 election. what impact will loose talk about spying and disgraceful talk about treason have on fbi agents and analysts? i put that to you, congressman, because there's got to be a chilling effect of this kind you have investigation on anybody in the fbi, the cia or anyone else in american intelligence who is looking into or thinking of looking into any sort of
interference that might favor the president right now. i think that's right, ali. i think that former director comey articulated it well. i worry a great deal about the chilling effect it will have on folks in the intelligence community, on the civil servants protecting us each and every day. let's not forget a foreign adversary interfered in 2016 in our elections. they will do it again and what i would say is i don't think that the president's order is going to have a chilling effect on the congress. that i can assure you at least with respect to the democratic house. i think we're fully committed to defending the rule you have law and staking the steps we need to preserve the sanctity of our elections next year. i would say this is a dangerous time for our country. i worry a great deal when you watch the audio, the video clip yesterday confident president talking about treason and so forth, i think a lot of there can get lost in the noise and news of the day. the idea that that kind of language has been normalized now
should really trouble each and every american and, of course, now, the president going beyond just mere words and actually effectuating his plans and action in thames of issuing an unprecedented order providing his attorney general with unfettered discretion to declassify anything and everything sources and methods and so forth, it should trouble each and every american. it troubles me as a member of congress and i believe many colleagues. >> tom, it's very hard to watch this happen because you've got the president saying things and there are a lot of americans who believe that the institutions are there to protect them every this whether it's congress or the courts or intelligence agencies or law enforcement. or institutions like the department of justice and a number of people as you just commented are surprised to see that william barr was appeared to be a willing participant in the president's disinformation campaign about the mueller report and now seems to be willing to go down this road. congressman naguse seems committed to stand in the president's way on this one but
what can congress or anybody else do about it at this point? >> congress has its full range of article 1 powers to investigate and to engage in oversight but i think you're fighting against a narrative that is being pushed consistently and with great discipline which is unusual for this white house which usually has no messages discipline to use words like spying for things like counter intelligence investigations, barr, the president may not know the difference but the attorney general certainly knows the difference. the fact they're using this kind of language is intentional, meant to push a narrative and i agree with the congressman. it's destructive and it's dangerous and it's wrong to do it because it's misleading people and i think it's corroding trust in our institutions at a time when again, we're going to be under attack again in 2020. >> margaret, the president has said the remarkable meeting that
occurred ostensibly about infrastructure earlier this week in which the president sort of walked out and then held a press conference about how he cannot do anything with congress while they continue to investigate, at some point, tom's got a point. they've got messaging discipline at least this week in the white house. where does it lead? >> it's not a very good message. trump says he's on strike still he gets his way. it's like saying i want to own the government shutdown and he did. anytime he comes up against speaker pelosi, i don't think he comes out ahead on that message. you know, the danger here is haven't we been looking for someone in the senate who is not retiring, who is going to stand up to trump? we haven't found that person. but mostly, they go along. but what's happened now is that trump has found his fixer in william barr. he now has not just somebody who is going to let him do things. he's got at accomplice who is
bringing it about. so i sedan coates as the person who stands between us and you know, the fbi has already been injured by trump. now it will be the cia. and there's no one in the senate that i see coming forward now to do anything about it. and we have a rogue attorney general. >> the attorney general congressman, is doing the president's bidding on there one. we saw a few days ago, the treasury secretary steve mnuchin again disregarding a congressional request and subpoena for information. you said you'll do everything in your power at some point, your power seems to be coming up against what are going to end up being court challenges. >> well, first let me just say, ali, i agree with margaret's point and margaret wrote a really good article about a month and a half ago that warned about this precise point that you would have an attorney general untethered in terms of discharging his duties in an impartial way.
>> i'm so sorry i turned out to be right. >> no kidding. > as am i. but look, i mean we saw this a month and a half ago. let's not forget. this is the same attorney general that be engaged in gross misrepresentations with respect to the special counsel's findings which created i think a fog of confusion around what the special counsel concluded and did not. it was why the investigation of the judiciary committee was engaged is so critically important and why we believe that it's important for ultimately the committee and the american people to hear from the special counsel and another witnesses. but look, i don't disagree with you, ali. obviously a lot of these battles are going to be fought in the courts. i think opening a formal inquiry would be the appropriate next step given account gravity situation we find ourselves in. i think the congress still has many tools at its disposal. i haven't lost faith in the congress, nor should the american people. we're dedicated to defending the rule of law in this country. that's something the american people can have confidence in. >> congressman joe naguse, tom
nickles and margaret carl san. thank you for joining me on a friday night. >> happy weekend. >> donald trump has been making wild claims that the former head of the fbi and others committed treason as viewers of this program know, that is not au actually cannot be true. we're going to do a fact check on that and talk with pressure historian jon meacham about the grave accusations. later the attacks on nancy pelosi by a distorted video. how they're spreading and what it means for the future especially the presidential campaign. ♪ limu emu & doug look limu. a civilian buying a new car. let's go. limu's right. liberty mutual can save you money
by customizing your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. oh... yeah, i've been a customer for years. huh... only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ when crabe stronger...strong, with new nicorette coated ice mint. layered with flavor... it's the first and only coated nicotine lozenge. for an amazing taste... ...that outlasts your craving. new nicorette ice mint. on a john deere x300 series mower. because seasons change but true character doesn't. wow, you've outdone yourself this time. hey, what're neighbors for? it's beautiful. run with us. search "john deere x300" for more. who used expedia to book the vacation rental that led to the ride ♪ which took them to the place
where they discovered that sometimes a little down time can lift you right up. ♪ flights, hotels, cars, activities, vacation rentals. expedia. everything you need to go. expedia. the wifi that set just raised the bar again. introducing xfinity xfi advantage. it comes with everything you love about xfi. the best speed, coverage and control. but it doesn't stop there, you also get enhanced network security, safer browsing, and more. plus it helps to optimize your network's performance. giving you the best coverage from attic to basement. so you can focus on streaming your favorites. not finding a signal. make the best wifi even better,with xfi advantage. simple, easy, awesome.
campaign donald trump has been making accusations of treason for months but it appears the president is finally facing widespread criticism for saying that former fbi officials naming them specifically were involved with investigating his campaign and committed treason. he did it again on thursday. but it isn't clear that the president understands what treason actually is. or just how serious the accusation is especially when it comes from the president. here is the exchange the president had with nbc's peter alexander on thursday. >> sir, the constitution says treason is punishable by death. you've accused your adversaries of treason. who specifically are you accusing of treason.
>> i think a number of people. i think what you look is that they have unsuccessfully tried to take down the wrong person. if you look at comey, if you look at mccabe, if you look at probably people higher than that, if you look at strzok, they want an insurance policy so that should she for any reason lose, remember 100 millionton one, maybe he said 100 millionton nothing but should she lose we'll have an insurance policy and we'll get this guy out of office. that's what they said and that's what they meant. that's treason. that's treason. >> no, that's not treason. as viewers of this program know for months, lawrence o'donnell has challenged the president's accusations of treason. here's lawrence back in february. >> it is actually impossible to commit treason against the government of the united states today. because we do not have a
specified enemy in a declared war. the constitution specified "treason against the united states shall consist only in levying war against them or in adhering to their enemies giving them aid and comfort." the supreme court has interpreted that to mean that it is only possible to commit treason during a war that is authorized by a congressional declaration of war. the last time the united states fought a declared war, declared by congress was world war ii. and that is why the last time an american was charged with and convicted of treason was word war ii. >> this is a perfect night for a historian. jon meacham is one of the best, with tim mcgraw of "songs of america." to be published june 10th and
countless other books. notwithstanding, another night the discussion about the fact that america is not at war and has not been officially at war since world war ii. we get ourselves into a lot of fights in the world without having actually declared war. lawrence's point is well taken. conner freeders dorf wrote how the framers of the constitution were particularly worried about presidents falsely charging treason and in it he writes the framers were guarding against the possibility that americans would one day elect a man so morally weak and corrupt that he would falsely accuse political enemies of treason. congress and the judiciary have a constitutional duty to check his abuses of power and the public has a patriotic duty to oust him from office. the fact is, treason is not meant for your political opponents. >> no, and this is a case where once again, the founders for all
of their sins for all of their omissions for all of their derelictions, the journey they put us on toward a more perfect union is vindicated exactly by this particular moment. the reason treason is the only crime specifically defined in the constitution and the second part of that article of that leapt is that it requires witnesses to an overt act or a confession in open court. so why so spec? because they were afraid of kings or monarchs doing exactly what the president's doing because they had done it. it was based on experience. it was based on anxiety about the worst parts of the english experiment. the other thing to remember is all the folks who were doing the framing in philadelphia in 1787 and the debating most of them over the ratification, could have been accused of treason by exactly by the you know, king
donald iii if he had been around as a member of the house of hanover in the 1th century. so the legislative history, if you will, the thinking that led into this was precisely about this kind of moment. now, you sort of asked rhetorically does the president or maybe lawrence did, does the president know what he's talking about? no, he doesn't. he's using an the term very loosely. i've used the term loosely inaccurately. and i spend time thinking about this stuff. that's easy to do if you're just with a slip of the tongue. what donald trump has done this week and in many other cases is not a slip of the tongue. it's an attempt to stoke fear, it's an attempt to take his opponents and put them in the un-american category. and the last time we went through a system a moment where we put people in an un-american category was the mccarthy era.
we know how well that turned out. >> so it was un-american then and what the language the president is using in addition to treason is coup and attempted overthrow. so there's a language here that is meant to imply and suggest that people who either were doing their job as members of the fbi or even if you take the president at his word and were against him and political opponents he continues to say that, and others can debate that, but the fact is even if you took him at his word, the penalty in the united states code section 2381 for treason five years in prison up to the death penalty, $10,000 plus and a fine and disqualified from holding public office. the point is, the president is trying to make people think that political opponents are criminals who are attempting to overthrow the elected president of the united states in
something that feels like a coup. >> he's criminalizing dissent. and on one level. with the fbi folks, he's attempting rhetorically to criminalize the execution and the mechanics of the rule of law. it's not a heck of a lot more complicated than that. the folks he mentioned this week, comey and mccabe, these are fbi agents. these are sworn officers of the united states who we can debate whether they did the right thing or not. but what he's trying to do and it's fairly straightforward and it has worked so far, he is the president of the united states, is he's using a charged term to create a sense of anxiety and paranoia in order to get his supporters in a place where ascent for trump is a patriotic act. and by doing so, he is -- he's throwing 243 years or so of
constitutional history away. and that's a precious thing. and the framers had this right, the framers had this right. they were worried demagogues and exactly this kind of person. >> do you have examples, you mentioned when we made dissent un-american. do you have examples where presidents went this far in suggesting that thing that were political inherently political or investigative acts were potentially criminal or treasonous? there's always been president who have thought people are against them and in some cases they've been right. but do we have examples of how to deal with this? >> the best example i think is from the early reconstruction era. it was the impeachment of andrew johnson. i'm not trying to make this a neat package here, but in fact, the way the country handled it in 1867, '68 when you had a
president who was trying to undo the verdict of the civil war who was lashed out as congressional opponents, tracked in conspiracy theories. andrew johnson gave a speech i think it was on washington's birthday shortly after he became president where he just lashes out at everyone. it's eerily resonant with what we're seeing now. and the answer for the republicans then, the party of lincoln, remember johnson had gone on the ticket as a wartime active conciliation. he was really a democrat. the republicans in congress in the from 1865 to 1868 were trying to find a way to undo the work of johnson who opposed the civil rights bill, who retoted the friedmans bill, incredibly important legislation trying to apply the verdict of the civil war. he was trying to undo that. and what happened was congress decided that impeachment was in
fact the way to go forward. i suspect as mark twain is reputed to have said, history may not repeat itself but it does rhyme. i suspect that's where we're headed here. >> jon meacham, thank you. coming up "the washington post" tech reporter who broke the story about the distorted video of nancy pelosi that has been spreading on conservative social media is going to join us. what does this mean for the spread of fake news especially at the start of a presidential campaign. this is rick blomquist.
coordinated smear campaign against the speaker of the house, nancy pelosi. on thursday night, the trump supporting fox business show lou dobbs tonight aired a heavily edited video of pelosi appearing to stumble repeatedly during a press conference from the same day. president trump then tweeted that video to his $60 million twitter followers with the caption pelosi stammers through news conference. many public officials occasionally stutter while speaking extemporaneously, even cable news hosts including your yours truly. instead of showing you the edited video without context, here's a version of that vid coto show you the contempt of what pelosi was saying. listen. >> we had a little long on the floor. sorry for the delay. we had a little, is, took longer on the floor than had i anticipated. custody of the border patrol. it's important to note that in
the ten years before this not a single child died in the custody -- custody of the border. everyone -- started sending signals that the plan was as we agreed at the meetings a few weeks ago, the president was to present his proposals at yesterday's meeting. well, everyone -- he starred sending signals he might not be ready or interested. >> now, it would be one thing if the president of the united states had simply tweeted an out of context video clip of a cable news show. but that tweet came at the same time a broader social media campaign to misrepresent nancy pelosi was under way. as the "washington post" reports distorted videos of house speaker nancy pelosi altered to make her sound as if she's drunkenly slurring her words have been spreading rapidly across social media. one such video had been viewed over 2 million times by thursday
night and was shared by none other than the president's personal attorney rudy giuliani. here again is a side by side comparison of that video against pelosi's original comments. >> we want to give this president had the opportunity to have something historic for our country. we want to give this president the opportunity to do something hick for our country. >> unlike that. giuliani later deleted the post sharing that video but did not offer an apology. today the president furthered the effort to the smear pelosi in comments to reporters on the white house lawn. >> mr. president, what do you hope to accomplish with your personal attacks on the speaker? you're saying. >> excuse me. this just shows how fake you and the news are. when you say a personal attack, did you hear what she said about me long before i went after her?
did you hear? she made horrible statements. she knows they're not true. she made -- she said terrible things. so i just responded in kind. look, you think nancy's the same as she was? she's not. >> drew harwell of the "washington post" who first reported on the altered videos and columnist ana marie cox will join me to discuss how trump's campaign against pelosi mirrors the fake news attacks against former presidential candidate hillary clinton and what it could say about trump's tactics for the 2020 race. that's next. - the tech industry is supposed to be a leader in invention and progress. but only 11% of its executives are women, and the quit rate is twice as high for them. here's a hack: make sure there's bandwidth for everyone. the more you know.
with licensed agents available 24/7. it's not just easy. it's having-a-walrus-in-goal easy! roooaaaar! it's a walrus! ridiculous! yes! nice save, big guy! good job duncan! way to go! [chanting] it's not just easy. it's geico easy. oh, duncan. stay up. no sleepies. it's geico easy. ito take care of anyct messy situations.. and put irritation in its place. and if i can get comfortable keeping this tookus safe and protected... you can get comfortable doing the same with yours. preparation h. get comfortable with it.
i felt i couldn't be at my best wifor my family. c, in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured and left those doubts behind. i faced reminders of my hep c every day. but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured. even hanging with friends i worried about my hep c. but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured. mavyret is the only 8-week cure for all common types of hep c. before starting mavyret your doctor will test if you've had hepatitis b which may flare up and cause serious liver problems during and after treatment. tell your doctor if you've had hepatitis b, a liver or kidney transplant, other liver problems, hiv-1, or other medical conditions, and all medicines you take including herbal supplements. don't take mavyret with atazanavir or rifampin, or if you've had certain liver problems. common side effects include headache and tiredness. with hep c behind me, i feel free... ...fearless... ...and there's no looking back, because i am cured.
talk to your doctor about mavyret. stimulant laxatives forcefully stimulate i switched to miralax for my constipation. the nerves in your colon. miralax works with the water in your body to unblock your system naturally. and it doesn't cause bloating, cramping, gas, or sudden urgency. miralax. look for the pink cap. i'm workin♪ to make each day a little sweeter. to give every idea the perfect soundtrack. ♪ to fill your world with fun. ♪ to share my culture with my community. ♪ to make each journey more elegant. ♪ i'm working for all the adventure two wheels can bring. ♪ at adp we're designing a better way to work, so you can achieve what you're working for.
over the past 24 hours fake videos of house speaker nancy pelosi that have been altered to make her player impaired have been widely circulated on social media. the president and his favorite news channel have been all too willing to amplify that message. >> number one, when you cannot produce a coherent thought, maybe it's time to hang it up. yesterday pelosi seemed to struggle with the whole subject, verb, direct on the thing. >> she could not put a subject with a predicate in the same sentence. what's going on. >> do you think nancy's the same as she wases? she's not. joining me drew harwell who first reported the altered videos and anna marie cox, the host of the podcast with friends like these. drew, let me start with you on the technology of this. we have heard about deep fakes
for some time where you can completely concoct something that someone was say. that takes not a ton of know how but more than i have. these so-called cheap fakes take virtually none. i could probably have edited that nancy pelosi video on my phone to slow down her speech. how prevalent is this and how dangerous can it be? >> i think it's becoming more prevalent and i think its subtlety makes it that much more dangerous because it doesn't take a ton of labor to create a video that seems very convincing and can fool enough people and can maybe help your side when win political points. you're seeing this especially now with social media. it's just so easy for anyone to put something out there that is totally unsubstantiated, totally bogus and be able to potentially influence people, change their minds, change their perceptions about somebody like speaker pelosi just by slowing down the video and getting it out there on facebook.
>> anna marie, if somebody slow odd down video of me by two-thirds, might talk at a normal speed. there's something about this that's insidious. i want to play you a little bit more of what laura ingraham said last night about nancy pelosi. >> both joe biden, the 2020 front-runner and speaker pelosi are not just out of step with the american people on key issues. to watch them, to observe them, we see that they've kind of lost a step or two or three. period. i mean, they look like they belong in commercials or visiting angels. >> wow. but we saw the stuff with hillary clinton in the 2016 campaign. in fact, you can still find it on far right media. there are all of these theories and videos about how sick hillary clinton is and the diseases she's got and the fact that she's likely to last a couple of weeks all the way back
from 2016. >> yeah, i feel like we're living in a really horrible mashup of groundhog day, an black mirror and hand maids tale. all the worst of those things, misogynistic dystopia. i guess they're always au misogynistic and repetitive. you're seeing them go back to the same playbook for hillary clinton to definitely go against nancy pelosi if i were them, i would be careful about trying to say that someone being articulate or not is a qualification for president. like i know we should not do turn around is fair play but two can play at that game. in fact, that is the maybe the real problem here. something that giuliani said about his video his tweeting out that video that i don't think has gotten enough attention, he's saying it would be hypocritical to make a big deal out of this. after all, she was making a direct criticism of the president's competitive tense
and i don't think that's something good americans should do. that is the thing that i think is a really dangerous statement. it's not just that video. it's the idea we shouldn't question. that's a larger conversation. >> i wasn't going to bring it up. since you brought giuliani up, i'm going to put up a tweet that he put out after deleting the tweet about nancy pelosi suggesting that she was inebriated. i can't even really read it because it's kind of impossible to read. when you're tweeting about somebody being a little incapacitated or not using proper terminology or grammer, look at this tweet. it ends with the word are. we're not quite sure what that's about. let me ask you, drew, this stuff is still up there. in fact, if you go to facebook right now, you can find it. why? >> because facebook says they're not going to take it down. they have never wanted to be the
arbiter of truth. they say their policies allow false things to go on to facebook all the time. so they have declined to take down a video that is proven false by many people. and so millions of people are watching it, probably people are watching it right now. i think it's going to be an issue as we get closer to 2020. this is a platform that a ton of people in america get their news from. this is where people find their friends and family on. yet, there's no real interest from the company that runs it in insuring that the dialogue is healthy or at least based off the same set of facts. this video takes off and is fueled by facebook's technology, facebook's architecture. facebook allows videos like this to spread so quickly. the velocity of those and you know when we're talking about videos that are totally bogus, i think that's going to be something we're really questioning is this healthy for our democracy and something we really want to support.
>> drew harwell, thank you for your reporting on this. anna marie stay with us. the aclu and planned parenthood sued the state today. tonight a federal judge in mississippi said the so-called heart beat law in the state could not be enforced. that's next. don't tell your mother. dad, it's fine. we have allstate. and with claimrateguard they won't raise your rates just because of a claim. that's why you're my favorite... i know.
are you in good hands? after my ...i wondered,... is another one around the corner. or could it be different than i thought? i wanted to help protect myself. my doctor recommended eliquis. eliquis is proven to treat and help prevent another dvt or pe blood clot... almost 98 percent of patients on eliquis didn't experience another. ...and eliquis has significantly less major bleeding than the standard treatment. eliquis is fda-approved and has both. don't stop eliquis unless your doctor tells you to. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. if you had a spinal injection while on eliquis call your doctor right away if you have tingling, numbness, or muscle weakness. while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily... and it may take longer than usual for bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. what's around the corner could be surprising.
ask your doctor about eliquis. [horn honks] man this is what i feel like when i wear regular shoes, cramped and uncomfortable. we can arrange a little upgrade. which is why i wear skechers... wide fit shoes. they have extra room throughout. they're like a luxury ride for my feet. try skechers wide fit shoes.
thethe latesta luxury inisn't just a store.ty it's a save more with a new kind of wireless network store. it's a look what your wifi can do now store. a get your questions answered by awesome experts store. it's a now there's one store that connects your life like never before store. the xfinity store is here. and it's simple, easy, awesome. here we go again. that was the reaction today from a federal judge in mississippi who struck down the state's nut six-week abortion ban as as
unconstitutional. in november judge carlton reeves blocked an earlier attempt by mississippi lawmakers to ban abortion after 15 weeks because it infringed upon women's rights. today judge reeves ruled the new ban prevents a woman's free choice which is central to personal dignity and autonomy. this injury outweighs any interest the state might have in banning abortions after a did he teeks of a fetal heartbeat. in comes on the same day mike parsons signed in laud a bill making abortion after 8 weeks of pregnancy except in cases where there is serious health ryker to the prelgt women like the bill passed in alabama missouri's bill does not include exception force rape or incest. doctor could be kmarnld with a felony and face foup 15 years in prison. the aclu and planned parenthood for you vowed the stop the law from going into effect in august and the st. louis post dispatch
reports that conservative donor david humphreys is planning to bankroll a ballot initiate nef 2020 seeking to undo the changes. missouri is now the sixth state that this dsh dhsh year has passed legislation restricting abortion access. alabama's ban is the most restrictive in the nation outlawing apportion at every stage of pregnancy. this morning, the aclu and planned parenthood filed a lawsuit challenging alabama's law and these efforts are part of a broader assault on women's rights from republican state lawmakers who stated that their goal is to bring a new legal fight before a more conservative supreme court in an effort to overturn roe v wade. pu new cbs news poll shows 67 of americans want the supreme court to keep rope v wade as it is and thousands took to the streets in cities across the country on tuesday to protest the onslaught of extreme abortion bans by republicans.
after the break we'll discuss the fight to protect women's rights with anna marie cox working on a month long podcast series about abortion. when you shop for your home at wayfair, you'll find just what you need and so much more. you get to spend less time searching and more time loving every room, even the ones you never thought could look good. you get great deals on the things you need and actually want. you get fast and free shipping on thousands of items and finds for every home, and every style, at every price. that's what you get when you've got wayfair. so shop now! her saturdays are a never- ending montage of comfort. [tv sfx]: where have you been all my life?
but then anne laid on a serta perfect sleeper. and realized her life was only just sorta comfortable. not just sorta comfortable. serta comfortable. not just sorta comfortable. if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, every day can begin with flakes. it's a reminder of your struggles with psoriasis. but what if your psoriasis symptoms didn't follow you around? that's why there's ilumya. with just 2 doses, a majority of people were clear or almost clear. and over time, even more people were clear or almost clear. all with dosing 4 times a year... after 2 initial doses. plus, ilumya was shown to have similar risks of infections compared to placebo. don't use if you are allergic to ilumya or any of its ingredients. before starting treatment, your doctor should check for tuberculosis and infections. after checking there is no need for routine lab monitoring unless your doctor advises it. ilumya may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection or have symptoms, or if you plan to or have recently received a vaccine.
this could be your chance to leave your psoriasis symptoms behind. ask your doctor for ilumya today, for a clearer tomorrow. but i can tell you liberty mutual customized my car insurance so i only pay for what i need. oh no, no, no, no, no, no, no... only pay for what you need. liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ [horn honks] man this is what i feel like when i wear regular shoes, cramped and uncomfortable. we can arrange a little upgrade. which is why i wear skechers... wide fit shoes. they have extra room throughout. they're like a luxury ride for my feet. try skechers wide fit shoes. they're like a luxury ride for my feet. the matters.ar... introducing the all-new 2019 ford ranger, it's the right gear. with a terrain management system for... this. a bash plate for... that. an electronic locking rear differential for... yeah... this. heading to the supermarket? get any truck.
>> we are here to say enough is enough, we're going to fight you and we're going to win. >> at the stop the bans protest on tuesday democratic presidential candidates vowed to take on republicans and donald trump in 2020. to protect women's rights. anna marie cox is back with us working on a month long podcast series about aperfection. anna marie good to see you back here. vice news obtained documents of gop secret talking points to get national republicans to defend in particular the alabama law one that most people are calling the harshest of the laws let me just read an excerpt from the talking points. conservative leaders are urging members to defend the alabama law using the justification that an abortion would be committing more violence against a woman who was raped or survived incest. committing a second violent act with abortion to a whom who has been victimized by an act of rape or incest could physically or psychologically wound her
further, the document states. every single child smub aired the opportunity to live regardless of how they were conceived. the guidance divides that alabama's law is a bold new pro-life legislation. unfortunately the media is attempting to use new developments to create gotcha moments for republicans and divide within our party. it states. tell me what you think of that. >> well, i think first of all we should make clear that there is no scientific evidence to back up the fact that there are psychological damage incurred upon a woman getting an apportion of the studies we have most show that women tend to if not actually be grateful for the fact they got an abortion consider it something they did they don't have an one way or another it was something they did for in re health at some point in their life. one third of women in america will get an abortion as at some point during repruskt life that gets me to the larger point here which is that as much as i like
to see women who believe in reproductive justice standing up to these very draconian laws and as bad as a look i think it is to defend these laws, the freedom of choice has been under attack for decades in this state. and in mississippi in particular like over 90% of the women in mississippi live in a county a abortion provider there is only two abortion providers in the state. the abortion rate is a third of the national level. one third of the women of child bearing age in mississippi if they want an abortion nef to travel 25 miles each way. mississippi requires an ultrasound. requires counseling. it requires a waiting period. those are all things that if you care about a woman's right to choose you should be marching in the streets about knows as well. i mean, it's -- it's in some ways you know it's ka that is rightic to see the fight about the extreme bills but there is a part of me that feels like those
fiemts might not last very long. i don't think the supreme court is going to go in that direction. instead what i think is a longer term problem is the chipping away at roe. as i'm sure you know there is no affirmative right to reproductive justice. it's just implied. and so it's hard to protect. >> and it's happening in state after state. there are upward of 30 states that have imposed restrictions they don't look like alabama or mississippi or missouri. >> right. and again, i think that if you want to put on marching shoes you probably should put on marching shoes and go to your state capitol most states enacted these trap laws designed to limit the opportunities the women has to do reproductive health not just abortions by the way, reproductive health in general gets hurt when the laws are enacted. >> that's right. anna marie cox good to see you again thank you for joining us. and tonight's last word.
the 11th hour with brian williams starts right now. tonight trump says it's about transparency. but this new power he has given to his new friend the attorney general to declassify documents about the start of the russia investigation, it has sparked legitimateware about our national intelligence, not to mention the president has already prejudged the outcome. plus dissecting the fight between the president and the speaker, now that donald trump has set out a doctored video of nancy pelosi the before departing for japan. and with our usual warning it's early yet. new numbers show where democrats stand in the race for 2020 as the 11th hour gets underway on this preholiday weekend friday night 3 and good evening once again from our nbc news headquarters here in new york day 85 a of the trump administration, the end of a week that saw a public fight