Skip to main content

tv   Hardball With Chris Matthews  MSNBC  July 19, 2019 4:00pm-5:00pm PDT

4:00 pm
unamerican activities committee. that's what johnson did, giving us all food for thought about how he handled dissent in this country. again, my thanks to all our guests that does it for "the beat." i'll be back here 6:00 p.m. monday. "hardball" is up next. trump's latest about face. let's play "hardball." good evening. i'm steve kornacki in for chris matthews. another day, another president trump. just one day after claiming he was not happy with his supporters chanting "send her back" at that rally in greenville, north carolina on wednesday. president trump today seems to be walking back that attempt to disavow. now yesterday he said he, quote, felt badly about the chant that was directed at minnesota congresswoman ilhan omar, a
4:01 pm
somali born u.s. citizen. today, though, the president came to the defense of the crowd. >> president trump, the chants, however, the chant was just repeated -- >> no, you know what i'm happy -- you know what i'm unhappy with? i'm unhappy with the fact that a congresswoman can hate our country. i'm unhappy with the fact that a congresswoman can say anti-semitic things. that's what i'm unhappy with. those people in north carolina, that stadium was packed. it was a record crowd. i could have filled it ten times, as you know. those are incredible people. those are incredible patriots, but i'm unhappy when a congresswoman goes and said i'm going to be the president's nightmare. he's going the president's nightmare. she is lucky to be where she is. let me tell you. >> the president was referring to comments congresswoman omar made last night after returning home to minneapolis where she got a hero's welcome from supporters.
4:02 pm
>> welcome home, ilhan! welcome home, ilhan! welcome home, ilhan! welcome home, ilhan! welcome home, ilhan! >> and when i said i was the president's nightmare, well, you're watching it now. because his nightmare is seeing a somali immigrant refugee rise to congress. >> in tweets this morning, the president blasted the media for its coverage of omar's homecoming in the ongoing dispute he wrote this, quote, it is amazing how the fake news media became crazed over the phrase "send her back" by a packed arena. they even covered a tiny staged crowd as they greeted foul-mouthed omar in minnesota. meanwhile, "the new york times" nervous republicans from senior members of congress, to his own daughter ivanka urged to
4:03 pm
repudiate the "send her back" chant amid widespread fears that the rally had veered into territory that could hurt their party in 2020. late today, the president was asked if the fight was good or bad politics. >> i don't know if it's good or bad politically. i don't care. but when people are speaking so badly, when they call our country garbage, think of that. that's worse than deplorable. many people say it's good. i don't know if it's good or bad. i can tell you this. you can't talk that way about our country. not when i'm the president. >> these women have said horrible things about our country and the people of our country. nobody should be able to do that, and if they want to do that, that's up to them. >> and for more i'm joined by ibrahim kendy, at the racist research and policy center in america. also author of "how to be an
4:04 pm
anti-racist." jonathan lemire for the associated press and joy reid, host of a.m. joy and author of "the man who sold america: trump and the unraveling of the american story. joy, let me start with you. we were talking 24 hours ago about trump, and he had this chant in 2016 when he was a candidate, "lock her up." there was one point in the campaign where he told the crowd to stop. he said the next day to the press, see, i don't want this. and two days later he was back in front of another crowd and he basically said yeah, have at it. i didn't really mean it. it seems like we might be having a repeat. >> donald trump you can see in his response envy that he saw ilhan omar get greeted as a champion, greeted with cheers, greeted with the love that he craves, this sort of black hole inside of him reared back up again. he is actually just from seeing in the coverage, he is able to restrain himself and do what his advisers say for 30, 40 minutes.
4:05 pm
he'll say what they tell him to say. but then he sees her get that hero's welcome, the hero's welcome he wants, that he crave, the love he cannot get, and he just responds and he guess back to what he really wants to say which is the same thing he did with charlottesville. those are my people. they're my fans. all he cares about is his fans love him, and he needs it so badly, that he can't stand to see her get it. so he is going to go back to what he really wants. you saw him do a sort of mussolini face when the crowd started to do the chant. it's what he wanted. it's what he is looking for. it's filling that black hole of need, and he cannot stay to any talking points that say otherwise. >> jonathan, all the talk this time yesterday was about republicans who were very nervous, very upset, got to mike pence. mike pence got trump to walk it back a little bit yesterday. what now? if he is lurching back towards just doing this all over again towards potentially making this a staple of future rallies, what are those republicans going to do now? anything? >> they'll probably quietly offer their disapproval, and
4:06 pm
nothing will change. the president -- we've seen this pattern before, that "lock her up moment" as you mentioned. but also charlottesville. i was with the press the day it happened and he spoke at the golf club. that's when he said the first time there was blame on both sides. a day or two later he cleaned it up with a statement at the white house. and then the day after that, he went back to his original position. he reversed himself again. he had that trump tower conference and reiterated that both sides are to blame. yes, there are moments where he'll listen to republican lawmakers, there are moments where he'll listen to staff, and that includes the ivanka trump thing that is a beltway trope that she'll leap to the press if she disapproves of something he said. he really listens to two things, what his base wants, and he very -- you can tell very upset the idea that he was perceived as chastising his own base, those fans in the rally in north carolina. and the second thing is the media coverage. and he watched in the last 24 hours. the coverage of the reversal of
4:07 pm
this about-face. he didn't like it. so today he chose to double down. >> so noel, for republicans, again the folks who were getting in touch with pence and saying make trump stop doing this, do they have to be ready now for the possibility trump's going to keep doing these rallies? he wants to run against these four congresswomen in particular, make them the face of the democratic party. if the crowd start chanting again, "send her back," "send them back," is this going to be a feature of trump rallies from here through 2020? >> nobody can get a handle on trump. i think you guys have been watching trump long enough, along with the republican party. this is what trump is. we are continually having to, as pundits, as people who represent the rnc, as people that have candidates that work in the business, we are constantly having to tiptoe around what donald trump says and separate it from the gop.
4:08 pm
we've never been involved in anything like this. we sure have had presidents that have done things, presidents that have said things. but this is a continual wheel. last week it is something else. a month ago it is little rocket man. >> this one has the potential to repeat itself. >> sure. >> he is going to be doing these rallies. >> sure. >> he is going to be going after these four congresswomen. what is your response from the type of republican you're describing here? is it going to look any different from what we've seen the last few years, or is it going to be some form of acquiescence? >> it's going to be rallies, rallies, rallies. this is all about that base. it is about the base for donald trump. so pundits can say shame on you, donald trump you shouldn't have said that. nothing's going to change. >> right. >> when you said your points, this is business as usual. this is donald trump-style republican party. donald trump has taken the republican party over. he has branded the republican party. it has not been opposite.
4:09 pm
the republican party has not changed donald trump. he's changed the republican party. so this is business as usual. this is why every week we have a breaking news on his -- >> it sounds like you're saying then if trump decides, and maybe if the crowds decide for trump that this is going to be a thing to say at rallies, that's what republicans have to live with. >> i don't think this is going to be a norm every rally with send her back, sender back. lock her up was against hillary clinton and they were involved in a race. he is not rung against all four of these. >> oh, yes, he is. he absolutely is. the problem is hillary clinton was 40-year branded character. the republicans spent 40 plus years demonizing and turning her into the devil. so they were able to easily click in and have the rest of the republican party join in, right? people who now are never trumpers were hating on hillary clinton as much as donald trump was. so it was easy for them to kick in. donald trump has decided to brand these four women as the enemy, because they are immigrants.
4:10 pm
they are brown. donald trump is racist. it's an easy trope for him. he is not going to stop. and what the republican party now has the face is donald trump is going to run an openly white nationalist reelection campaign, full stop that is the plan. he is going to run on essentially saying this is a white country. these four women represent the thing i hate, the thing that we all want gone, right? want it gone. he is going to run against them, and he has now made the huge mistake politically of making whatever it is these women believe secondary. he is trying to rebrand it. he is trying to backpedal into what they believe. but it's too late. he has already made their race, their nationality, their color the point. and so the republican party has no choice because there is not a lot of courage out there. you own it all now. y'all own it. this is going to be a white nationalist reelection campaign, full stop. donald trump has said we're doing it. i don't know of anyone but justin amash who has the courage and the guts to say hell no to that. maybe a couple.
4:11 pm
maybe three or four of them have the courage to say i'm not doing that. but the majority of them will call us on background, call reporters and murmur they didn't do it. ivanka trump will try to save her later brand by trying to pretend that she said something about it. they'll try to save their long-term brand by saying anything. no one will stop him. he is going to make them all do it. >> noelle, i see you shaking your head. i want to come back to you. we have another guest here. unfortunately not another table. the president's latest attacks, the supporters reaction, they have led some democratic candidates to compare the rhetoric to a potential candidate from 1968. >> i felt like i was watching what my parented watched in black and white. literally, the same language of governor wallace, of people who believe that they could use and bigotry as a sword to try to not only cut down their political enemies, butlso a sword to advance their political agendas.
4:12 pm
>> when the crowd started ye yelling "send them back, send them back, send them back," when has that ever happened other than george wallace? >> he was the former alabama governor at that point. he had been a segregationist. he ran as a law and order independent candidate that year. he won five southern states. >> you know, the biggest bigots in the world, they are the folks that call other folks bigots. you remember that. they are the biggest bigots in the world. >> oh, yeah, you know what you are? you're a little punk. that's all you are. >> ibrahim kendy, i brow you in on this. for folks, george wallace's name, some folks are very familiar with, lived the story very well. some folks it's just a name in the history books. i'm curious if you could flesh
4:13 pm
out that comparison, what you make of it. trump, george wallace. there is the george wallace we mentioned, '68 and in the '70s who wasn't necessarily at that point running on segregation, but he was running on a form of cultural politics that people are saying has a lot of parallels with trump today. what do you make of it. >> i think the parallels are apt. by 1968, george wallace had presented himself as the face, as the leader of the resistance. the resistance against civil rights activism, the resistance against black power activism, the resistance against all form of activism that were essentially trying to create equality, trying to create equal opportunity in this country, trying to create a nation of immigrants, trying to create an inclusive place. and i think trump, of course, has presented himself as the leader, as the face of the resistance, the resistance against changing demographics,
4:14 pm
the resistance against those who are challenging racist policies at the highest levels of the government, as these four women of color truly are. so he's of course in many ways tapping into george wallace, that no, the problem are these people of color, no, the problem is not policies. and i think, you know, there is a truly direct parallel between these two politicians. >> and we showed that clip there from '68. those wallace rallies, you had that one protester who would show up, and wallace would turn the crowd on the protester. there is something thee atrical we've seen. in terms of the republican response, you're not expecting too much from this. if there is going to be any public movement against, where would it come from? there. >> have been a few senators that have spoken out. mitt romney was not particularly strong on this issue, but there have been other times where he
4:15 pm
has. but i think we've seen time and time again, the republicans in congress, we speak out against president trump tend not to be in congress much longer. they are republicans who are either on the way out the door already because they decided to retire, or those who are going to get primaried, or those who have chose not to run for whatever reason. i think there is still a fear in this party that it is trump -- president trump's party and there is a fear the twitter attack or he's throwing his support to a primary opponent, or he holds up and throws a rally in your backyard, and there is a real reluck dance to do that. his approval ratings are sky-high. they're in the 80s. there is a real reluctance for republicans to speak out against him, even if they do find this personally distasteful. and there was a little bit here. let's be clear. there was basically silence from the tweets on sunday. there were some republicans who pushed back in the last 48 hours, but very few. and i haven't seen any tonight.
4:16 pm
>> and that's why i think the question is let's see the next rally. >> right. >> let's see if his chants start again. let's see if the president reacts at all, and let's see if republicans react if he does. ibram kendi, noelle. coming up, maintaining his lead in the democratic race, although perhaps a bit of a tenuous lead. i'll head to the big board and explain how one critically important demographic group right now is the reason joe biden can still call himself the front-runner. plus, the stage is set for round two of the democratic debates. what can we expect in the rematch of joe biden and kamala harris? the first head to head matchup as well between elizabeth warren and bernie sanders. we are also now just five days away from robert mueller's testimony before congress. one democrat said the hearings are for people who, quote, didn't read the book, but will watch the movie. a look inside their strategy. much more ahead. please stay with us. your car insurance, with s so you only pay for what you need. nice. but, uh...
4:17 pm
what's up with your... partner? not again. limu that's your reflection. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ as a doctor, i agree with cdc guidance. i recommend topical pain relievers first... like salonpas patch large. it's powerful, fda-approved to relieve moderate pain, yet non-addictive and gentle on the body. salonpas. it's good medicine. hisamitsu. there's brushing and there's oral-b power brushing. oral-b just cleans better. it's the one inspired by dentists... with the round brush head. oral-b's gentle rounded brush head removes more plaque along the gumline... for cleaner teeth and healthier gums. oral-b. brush like a pro.
4:18 pm
but i can tell you liberty mutual customized my car insurance so i only pay for what i need. oh no, no, no, no, no, no, no... only pay for what you need. liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ hey! i live on my own now! i've got xfinity, because i like to live life in the fast lane.
4:19 pm
unlike my parents. you rambling about xfinity again? you're so cute when you get excited... anyways... i've got their app right here, i can troubleshoot. i can schedule a time for them to call me back, it's great! you have our number programmed in? ya i don't even know your phone anymore... excuse me?! what? i don't know your phone number. aw well. he doesn't know our phone number! you have our fax number, obviously... today's xfinity service. simple. easy. awesome. i'll pass.
4:20 pm
welcome back to "hardball." we are bracing for a heatwave this weekend. spring feels like it's a long time ago. spring also feels like a long time ago because of the polls in the democratic race and how they have changed. remember when joe biden got in the democratic race in the spring and he pulled ahead? high 30s, even into the low 40s. he was doubling up his nearest rival. he looked like a strong front-runner at this point. he has been on the trail for a few months. they had that first debate, nbc debate a couple of weeks ago. and now state of the democratic race in the middle of the summer, we got a brand-new nbc news/survey monkey poll. joe biden is still ahead. joe biden is still in first place. you can still call on the front-runner, but his lead is single digits. his support again, there were days when you had polls with biden in the 40s. now it's 25. 16 for sanders. 16 for warren. kamala harris right there as well, 14%. that's the state of the
4:21 pm
democratic race nationally. biden a front-runner, but he is a reduced front-runner compared to what he was in the spring. sets the stage for that debate coming up less than two weeks from now. can he regain his footing and perhaps reinforce that position he has. why joe biden is still the front-runner and why he hasn't fallen farther? one particular group of voters he has to thank for that. let me show you. if you break this down, among white voter, joe biden right now has fallen into second place in the democratic race. elizabeth warren is actually in first, 22, 21. among african american voters, however, it is a different story. joe biden in first place. in first place by far. 37%. nearest competitor sanders, harris tied 14%. more than 20 points behind him. remember, one out of four votes next year cast in democratic primaries across the country are going to come from african american voters. right now biden enjoying. you see in the national poll. strong support from black voters. also a regional poll. we took a look at the south.
4:22 pm
some of these are going to vote in super tuesday early march next year, some of these states. again, biden with a very, very slight statistically insignificant lead among white voters. but among black voters, there it is again. a 20-plus-point lead. you can look at his support among black voters in some of the big southern states. in georgia 40%. in alabama, that's a super tuesday state, over 40% for biden among black voters in mississippi. over 50% among black voters for joe biden. so that right now is strong support from black voters. the reason joe biden can still call himself the front-runner in the democratic race. let's see if he can still call himself the front-runner after the next debate. that's the next big event on the horizon. we will see. up next, the lineups are set for that second presidential debate. we are looking at one rematch of a pairing that generated sparks and plenty of headlines the last time around, and a potentially winner take all face-off of progressives. more details straight ahead on "hardball." ok everyone!
4:23 pm
our mission is to provide complete, balanced nutrition for strength and energy! whoo-hoo! great-tasting ensure. with nine grams of protein and twenty-six vitamins and minerals. ensure, for strength and energy.
4:24 pm
and twenty-six vitamins and minerals. ♪
4:25 pm
sleep this amazing? that's a zzzquilpure zzzs sleep. our liquid has a unique botanical blend, while an optimal melatonin level means no next-day grogginess. zzzquil pure zzzs. naturally superior sleep. but allstate actually helps you drive safely... with drivewise. it lets you know when you go too fast... ...and brake too hard. with feedback to help you drive safer. giving you the power to actually lower your cost. unfortunately, it can't do anything about that. now that you know the truth... are you in good hands?
4:26 pm
it was hurtful to hear you talk about the reputations of two united states senators who built their reputations and career on the segregation of race in this country. and it was not only that, but you also worked with them to oppose bussing.
4:27 pm
and, you know, there was a little girl in california who was part of the second class to integrate her public schools, and she was bussed to school every day, and that little girl was me. >> remember that moment. welcome back to "hardball." the lineup for the democrats' second debate was announced last night. it features a rematch between vice president joe biden and senator kamala harris. their face-off will come on the second night of the debate. the first night will pit two top progressive contenders against each other, senators bernie sanders and elizabeth warren, and a new face is going to join them, montana governor steve bullock. he did not make the first debate. he said he is trying to pull the party back toward the center. he will be in the second debate. for mao i'm joined by commentary magazine and basil schmeichel, crack strategist. basel, biden's strength with black voters right now, that exchange with kamala harris, i do notice her support with black
4:28 pm
voters has tipped up somewhat since that first debate, but still, there is biden 3-1 leading her in the polls still among black voters. what's the source of that strength? >> part of it is the history african american voters have had with the democratic party. his relationship with barack obama which after the debate he started to touch on a lot more i think reminds african american voters about the relationship that joe biden did defend barack obama when he was often attacked while in office. so i think that in itself is appreciated. >> can that last through the primary? or is there a date on that? >> my gut feeling is there is an expiration date on it, particularly as we get closer to iowa and new hampshire, because if somebody else wins any one of those states and kind of rewrites that narrative. i would also say if you're an older voter with good memory of the party, you've seen this as a vehicle for political, economic power. so you're not going to be so quick to sort of runaway from
4:29 pm
that and take a chance on somebody else. there is still time. but i do think this lasts a little longer. >> john we showed also bidens a support overall. it has been ticking down. i think it's about five or six points down from that debate. it was not a good debater them. the reason it wasn't a good debate for them is debated itself, but there is the question i think, his performance. did he have a bad night? was this a guy who hadn't debated in seven years, he is a little rusty and he'll be ready for the next one? or is this the new normal with biden? what's your sense there? >> clearly, he had a bad night. i wasn't sure he had a bad night that night. so you have to take what i'm about to say with a grain of salt. but since that you can see his numbers are down. harris' numbers are up. that's the ball game, right? so here is the issue. clearly that's the matchup that everyone's going to be watching, right? does he get aggressive or does he remain -- try to remain above the fray, congenial, friendly, doesn't want to attack other
4:30 pm
democrats. and the key there is the name bob filner, right? that's kamala harris as attorney general in california. a lot of stories this week about how she gave a sweetheart deal to the democratic mayor of san diego who was -- who had a plea deal for battery and kidnapping kind of. >> the congressman. >> while he was congressman. and he could have gone to jail, but he was allowed sort of house arrest and stuff like that. if biden goes there, if biden says look, you know, you're standing here, going after me about issues 40 years ago, well, i'm here to ask you what the hell happened. why did you let this mayor, this white democratic mayor skate, that's when you'll know if biden wants to go in for the kill or doesn't. >> and thinks he needs it. >> which is an interesting point, because when you look at maybe some of the softness among her african american support, it's because of her time as attorney general. so it is a touchy point for her
4:31 pm
and it will be interesting to see if that happens, how she responds. >> what about the other candidates? we're here to focus on harris versus biden for obvious reasons. but cory booker, he needs some kind of breakout moment. he saw what harris was able to pull off last time around. julian castro had sort of a breakout moment trying to take down beto o'rourke. seems to have hurt beto. is it open season on biden? >> here's what i think is interesting. julian castro has been good on immigration but also on policing. what is going to be interesting is bill de blasio is on the stage that night as well. i'm curious to see if bill de blasio, with his breakout moment talking about history on policing, is he going to get involved in the charging of eric garner's death? because he has not so far fired. >> this is the news there is not going to be charges pressed. >> not going to be federal charges. >> right there. >> have been activists and many others who have been saying the mayor should fire this police officer. i'll be curious to see if he
4:32 pm
gets that question, and if others, particularly cory booker actually challenge him on the debate stage. >> there is a larger issue here which is are the democrats -- they're running, one of them to win, right? but do the democrats really want to go here? do they want to spend six months ripping each other's threats out while trump -- they had a unifying moment this week against trump. do they stick with that? biden clearly wants to be a unifying figure. doesn't want to tear. wants to be the second choice of everybody who he is not the first choice of. but the logic of this could force him into getting aggressive. if they get overly aggressive, if they start attacking each on who's more progressive on policing and who is more progressive on health care and all of that, i don't know. maybe it's a good strategy. maybe that's what you have to do to break out. it's going to make the party look like it is struggling, not like it is on a triumphant
4:33 pm
course to beating trump in 2020. >> though i would argue, because there was a report that jonathan martin was saying in his report that democratic governors are questioning how far candidates are going and whether the party is going too far to the left. i would say a lot of those governors use progressive policy to actually defend against the policies of donald trump. and when you look back at the fact that those progressive policies have also motivated our base. so we're actually flipping congressional seats in some of these states. we're flipping legislatures in some of these states because of that kind of law making and policy. even if some want to run away from that, it's actually a mobilizing force for the party. >> and also if they can back it. i'm thinking back to 2016 as well, and some of those republican candidates who wanted to be the second choice of trump's voters when he faded. and guess what? didn't fade. john podhoretz, basil schmeichel, thanks for joining us.
4:34 pm
we'll take a look to next week's highly anticipated mueller testimony. perhaps the democrats' last chance if they're ever going to build a case for president trump's impeachment. what is their strategy? stick around. you're watching "hardball." dbal. hilda, i like the new do. got some layers in there, huh? the more, the merrier. got to have this stuff in the morning. oh, that's too hot. act your age. get your own insurance company. carlo, why don't you start us with a little bit of cereal? you can spread it all around the table. and we're gonna split the warm hot dog. and i'll have a glass of grape juice to spill on the carpet. oh, uh, do you want some to spill? act your age. get your own insurance company. oh, uh, do you want some to spill? cake in the conference room! showing 'em you're ready... to be your own boss. that's the beauty of your smile. crest's three dimensional whitening... ...removes stains,... ...whitens in-between teeth... ...and protects from future stains. crest. healthy, beautiful smiles for life.
4:35 pm
prpharmacist recommendedne memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. hi. maria ramirez! mom! maria! maria ramirez... mcdonald's is committing 150 million dollars in tuition assistance,
4:36 pm
education, and career advising programs... prof: maria ramirez mom and dad: maria ramirez!!! to help more employees achieve their dreams.
4:37 pm
we chose those words carefully, and the work speaks for itself. and the report is my testimony. i would not provide information beyond that which is already public in any appearance before congress. >> welcome back to "hardball." well, former special counsel robert mueller has made clear his apprehension about testifying before congress, he is set to appear before the house judiciary and intelligence committees next wednesday. nbc news reports that democrats on those committees intend to showcase evidence of trump's misconduct for those who haven't read mueller's report. as one aide said, they are betting that, quote, not everybody is reading the book, but people will watch the movie.
4:38 pm
according to a democratic staffer, quote we have never prepared from a hearing the way that we have prepared for this. last night judiciary committee chairman jerry nadler was asked how his committee is going to make the most of its time with mueller, considering his reluctance to testify. >> how do you approach it, given your knowledge that he doesn't want to be there? >> we will ask questions designed to elicit the information, designed to get the information out there that we want, designed to show what his report found that is at odds with the administration and the attorney general have been saying. >> so you want him to tell you the report in front of the cameras and the american people? >> to large extent. hopefully we'll go a little further, but yes. >> i'm joined now by natasha bertrand, national security reporter at politico, and barbara mcquade, a former federal prosecutor. barbara, let me just start with you. we played what i think everybody heard. everybody watching this certainly heard robert mueller say at his only public statement
4:39 pm
there now a number of weeks ago, is there any reason to think this committee will get anything further out of him? >> well, i do think that there are some opportunities. but even if all they get is for him to summarize some of the things that's in that report, it could be really explosive. there is a lot of detail in there that i think has escaped the attention of the american people, like sharing polling data with russia and communicating directly with wikileaks. i think there is a lot of information there that could be interesting to elicit. but in addition, i think they could go a little further and ask about how russia attacked our elections and what we should do to protect ourselves in 2020. >> so natasha, we have that line from a democratic staffer saying they have prepared for this, in the staffer's words, this mueller testimony, more aggressively than they prepared for anything else that they've done up there. what's that going to look like? what is the democratic approach going to look like in these hearings? >> yeah, it's really interesting, steve.
4:40 pm
so what we're seeing is they've done mock questioning, and so have the republicans, actually, and they've really meticulously prepared for any possibility that might come up. to the extent that even certain staffers on the committee are pretending to be mueller himself and preparing for the possible answers that he might give and how democrats can actually then rebut those or press him further or elicit more information out of that. but it's important to remember that mueller is also going to be very prepared, and he has kind of a sherpa who is guiding him through this process named jonathan urowski. and he is a very experienced hand on the hill and this kind of liaison between the hill and doj. he was top counsel on the judiciary committee for a long time. he knows everyone in congress. he has been in negotiations with the hill for a number of weeks now, if not months about kind of the limits of mueller's testimony. depending on what has been agreed upon, we could see kind of a limited, a more limited line of questioning coming from the democrats, especially because the democrats also
4:41 pm
cautioned reporters yesterday during a briefing that we might not have any bombshells here. but also, the republicans are going to be coming out swinging and focusing on things that don't even necessarily have to do with the report. so democrats will have to contend with pushing back on that as well. >> barbara, what's your sense of how mueller himself -- obviously this is a veteran of the ways of washington, not going to be his first time in a situation before congress like this certainly. what's your sense of how he's going to approach this? >> well, he is somebody who has testified more than 50 times before. he is very experienced. i think he will answer factually what's in his report. i think he will decline to engage in hypotheticals, and i think to the extent that republicans try to paint him as some sort of conflicted hatchet man engaged in a witch hunt, i don't think peel hahe'll have a tolerance for that. it might be a good opportunity for any pushback about that
4:42 pm
narrative. i would like to see him defend the honor of the fbi. i would even like to see the democrats go on the proactive approach there and ask him if he saw anything to indicate that there was anything improper about the predication of the investigation so that maybe he could shut down some of that speculation. >> natasha, there has been so much speculation and talk, just outright talk of impeachment, if democrats ultimately pursuing impeachment. the latest polling on that abc/"washington post" poll asking americans do you think the president should be impeached? 37% saying yes. 59% saying no. so you can see where public opinion is there. if this doesn't move it, if this mueller testimony -- i know congress is due for its big august recess, almost as soon as it's over. if mueller's testimony next week doesn't move the needle on that number, does that realistically end impeachment as a prospect for democrats? >> well, that was one of the big complaints about delaying this testimony for a week, because
4:43 pm
some of the democrats want in order time to question him, even more by experienced counsel on the committee probably would have been more helpful is when mueller testifies, they're going right off to august recess. a lot of the momentum, a lot of the headlines that might be generated from that will kind of fade into the background as they go back to their districts and as these things aren't really talked about much over the month of august when everyone goes on vacation. so if there is nothing massive that might move the needle on impeachment, then at least the thinking is it could help them at least going into 2020, right, by outlining all of the examples of the president's alleged obstruction of justice, the ties between the campaign and russia, then at least then the american public will be more informed about, you know, the president's alleged illicit congress in 2016. and that i think is the minimum they're hoping for at this point. >> okay, natasha bertrand, barbara mcquade, thank you both for joining us. i appreciate that. first, which came first. is donald trump dragging the republican party into dark, divisive spaces, or was the
4:44 pm
party -- or was it the party's deterioration, the deterioration of its establishment that led to the rise of trump? the author of a fascinating new book with a ton of answers to the question everybody is asking, how did we get here. the book is "american carnage." the author joins us next on "hardball." "hardball. lick fast like a cookie dough ninja. apply that same speed to the ford hurry up and save sales event. for the first time ever get 20% estimated savings on select ford models, plus earn complimentary maintenance through fordpass rewards. it all adds up. don't you love math? so get here asap because tasty deals and summer go fast. get in or lose out on 20% estimated savings on select ford models, plus earn complimentary maintenance through fordpass rewards. plus earn complimentary i swibecause they let metual, customize my insurance. and as a fitness junkie, i customize everything, like my bike, and my calves. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪
4:45 pm
♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ (announcer) important message for women and men ages 50 to 85. right now, in areas like yours, people have already called about life insurance through the colonial penn program and received their free beneficiary planner. have you received your free planner? if not, i encourage you to pick up the phone and take advantage of this free offer. in addition to your free beneficiary planner, you'll also receive free information on affordable whole life insurance that has a lifetime rate lock that guarantees your rate can never increase for any reason. if you did not receive your free beneficiary planner, call this number now. please stand by to learn more. i'm alex trebek, here to tell you about a popular life insurance plan with a rate lock
4:46 pm
that locks in your rate for life so it can never increase. did you get your free information kit? if not, please call this number now. this affordable plan through the colonial penn program has coverage options for just $9.95 a month. your rate is locked in and can never go up, and your acceptance is guaranteed with no health questions. see how much coverage you can get for just $9.95 a month. call now for your free information kit. ♪ sleep this amazing? that's a zzzquilpure zzzs sleep. our liquid has a unique botanical blend, while an optimal melatonin level means no next-day grogginess. zzzquil pure zzzs. naturally superior sleep.
4:47 pm
it's how we care for our cancer patients- like job. when he was diagnosed with cancer, his team at ctca created a personalized care plan to treat his cancer and side effects. so job could continue to work and stay strong for his family. this is how we inspire hope. this is how we heal. we love you, daddy. good night. i love you guys. cancer treatment centers of america. appointments available now. were the president's tweets that said go back racist?
4:48 pm
>> no. i don't think the president is a racist. i don't think he is a xenophobe. i think he is frustrated with people shifting the question away from real problems. >> we're having a big debate now and next year about what we want america to be like. >> welcome back to "hardball." president trump's transformation of the republican party was on full display this week as most republicans either defended the president or remained silent in the aftermath of his continued attacks on those four democratic congresswomen. in his new book "american carnage," tim alberta describes trump's ascension to the white house as a result of a decade long deterioration of the republican party that included a rise in anger and discontent among republican voters at what they saw as the party establishment. alberta writes, quote, the country was hurting. people were scared. what they wanted, trump realized, was someone to channel their indignation, to hear their grievances, to fight for their way of life.
4:49 pm
what they got instead was george w. bush bailing out banks, john mccain vouching for barack obama's character, and mitt romney teaching graduate seminars on macroeconomics. joining me now is tim alberta. he is the author of "american carnage" and the chief political correspondent for politico. tim, thank you for joining us. i've really been looking forward to this one. everybody has been asking, and many have been trying to attempt to answer the question how did we get here. you have an answer that has a lot to do with what was happening in the republican party for the decade before trump. tell us about it. >> yeah, that's right, steve. thanks for having me. you know, obviously we have an instinct, many of us i believe these days to think that donald trump just materialized out of thin air, that everything we're seeing in today's republican party is a revelation, and that none of us could have possibly predicted that this was coming, when in fact if you were to good back ten years, and obviously some would argue go back even farther. you could go back to wallace.
4:50 pm
you go back to pablo taking on george h.w. bush. i chose to focus on this ten-year period specifically starting in 2008 because i think what you had then, in that year, george w. bush leaving office with record unpopularity. john mccain picking sarah palin as his vice presidential running mate, and obviously palin exposing this enormous gulf between the republican governing class and many of the conservative voters around the country who felt that they had been ignored and sort of trampled under and taken for granted. and then you the economic collapse, that fall in 2008 and the bank bailout which only exacerbated that divide and obviously made many americans of all political sfritrive believe that the system was rigged against them, that washington and wall street were playing by one set of rules and everybody else was playing by a different set of rules. and then you had the election of barack obama, the first black president, and all the cultural implications therein when you
4:51 pm
lay all this on top, the cultural displeasure, the political disruption and you move it forward and you connect the dots to the 2010 election, '12, '14, i think we saw, steve, that there was a powder keg here and this was all building towards something. when you look back with hindsight and connect the dots, donald trump's ascendancy makes all the sense in trld would. >> here is the moment you're talking about. with the benefit of hindsight it looks huge now. this is shortly after trump launched his campaign in 2015. at the time many predicted this was going to quickly end trump's campaign. it was his criticism of john mccain's status as a war hero. remember this? >> he is not a war hero hi, see a war hero. >> he is a war hero because he was captured. i like people who weren't captured, okay? i hate to tell you. >> that's almost exactly four years ago today, despite president trump refusing to apologize, his standing in the polls continued to rise. tim, listening to you talk about that deterioration of the republican party, a lot of people reacted in that moment
4:52 pm
and said john mccain is a war hero. obviously trump's going to pay a price. but to the republican base, that was trump standing up to their enemy. >> not only that, steve, which is right, because mccain, of course, had really been sort of persona non grata to the conservative movement. remember, he picked sarah palin because his campaign needed a shot in the arm. they need to mobilize the base. they knew that to even have a prayer against barack obama, they needed conservatives to turn out in big numbers. and so that's why he chose sarah palin ultimately. but you just said something, steve. you said that despite trump not apologizing, his poll numbers kept rising after that mccain comment. and i think it's actually because he didn't apologize that his poll numbers kept on rising. what trump tapped into, and it's very intangible. it's really difficult to quantify, obviously, but trump saw in the republican party this sort of inherent weakness. he saw it in mccain in '08, who as you read in that clip a moment ago spent critical moments in the campaign vouching
4:53 pm
for obama's character rather than getting in the mud with him. romney in 2012 who had been brutally defined by the obama reelection campaign. romney never really swung back. and trump accurately felt as though a lot of republican voters felt like why are we represented by all of these pansies? why don't we have anybody who wants to treat politics as a blood sport? and when trump surveyed the 2016 field, steve, he sees jeb bush, and he says this guy, he's got poor posture. he can't even stand up straight. he is a wimp. he looks at marco rubio. this guy is 5'8" and he sweats all the time on tv. i can't take him seriously. up and down the line, trump respects strength. and there is really only one person in the field he did respect and that was ted cruz who was willing to take shots and throw some hey makers. but now as we know now nobody in that republican field in 2016 was willing to do and say the types of things that donald trump was willing to do and say. and more importantly, i think, trump never barked down from any of them. even when people disagreed with some of those things, voters did not like some of those things, a
4:54 pm
lot of them really respected the fact that he never bowed to the pressure from the political establishment and from the media to back off of them. >> all right. tim alberta, great insight there. great insight, great reporting in this book, "american carnage." thanks for taking a few minutes. really appreciate it. >> thanks, steve. all right. up next, why the next democratic debate could be the last chance for a lot of the candidates on that stage. stick around. you're watching "hardball." ing . [music playing] ing . across the country, we walk. carrying flowers that signify why we want to end alzheimer's disease.
4:55 pm
but what if, one day, there was a white flower for alzheimer's first survivor? what if there were millions of them? join us for the alzheimer's association walk to end alzheimer's. register today at liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, hmm. exactly. so you only pay for what you need. nice. but, uh... what's up with your... partner? not again. limu that's your reflection. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ that's ensure max protein, with high protein and 1 gram sugar. it's a sit-up, banana! bend at the waist! i'm tryin'! keep it up. you'll get there. whoa-hoa-hoa! 30 grams of protein, and one gram of sugar. ensure max protein. my teeth have been feeling really sensitive lately. well 80% of sensitivity starts at the gum line, so treat sensitivity at the source. new crest gum and sensitivity starts treating sensitivity immediately,
4:56 pm
at the gum line, for relief within days and wraps your teeth in sensitivity protection. crest. age-related macular i've degeneration, with which could lead to vision loss. so today i made a plan with my doctor, which includes preservision. because it's my vision, my morning walk, my sunday drive, my grandson's beautiful face. only preservision areds 2 contains the exact nutrient formula recommended by the national eye institute to help reduce the risk of moderate to advanced amd progression. because it's my sunset, it's how i see my life. it's my vision. preservision we like drip coffee, layovers- -and waiting on hold. what we don't like is relying on fancy technology for help.
4:57 pm
snail mail! we were invited to a y2k party... uh, didn't that happen, like, 20 years ago? oh, look, karolyn, we've got a mathematician on our hands! check it out! now you can schedule a callback or reschedule an appointment, even on nights and weekends. today's xfinity service. simple. easy. awesome. i'd rather not.
4:58 pm
welcome back to "hardball." we are now less than two weeks away from the next mega debate event. 20 democratic presidential candidates, two nights, ten candidates per night. we have never had debates like these before. and guess what? we might not have debates like them after this next one. that is because the bar is about to be raised. after this next debate, the democratic national committee is changing the qualifying criteria. in order to qualify for the debates that are going to take place this fall, candidates will need to hit 2% in at least four officially recognized polls. and that sounds easy enough, didn't it? 2%. actually, though, it's not. our new nbc surveymonkey poll i was showing you earlier, it's actually gad example why. remember, there are two dozen democratic candidates for president right now. and out of those two dozen democratic presidential candidates, a grand total of nine of them actually hit 2% in our new poll. in other words, the vast
4:59 pm
majority of democratic candidates failed to hit the bare minimum they need to be hitting in the poll to make the next debate, the fall debate. and 13 of them in our new poll are actually at 0%. in other words, more than half the democratic field is registering absolutely no support in our new poll. so by our back of the envelope math, right now only six of the democratic candidates are already qualified for the fall round of debates. that means 18 aren't. obviously, there are going to be many more polls to come this summer. there are going to be many more chances for the candidates to hit the threshold and to make the stage in the fall. and this next debate in less than two weeks is an obvious opportunity for all of them to somehow get noticed and to somehow break through. but this may also be their last opportunity. as we know, those stages are crowded. they are chaotic. the time passes quickly. everyone is going to show up with a plan to get noticed. few, though, will actually succeed. so enjoy this giant two-night,
5:00 pm
20-candidate debate, because the next one after it may end up looking like -- well, it may end up looking like a normal debate. that's "hardball" for now. thanks for being with us. chris matthews will be back on monday, and "all in with chris hayes" starts right now. tonight on "all in" -- >> if we had had confidence that the president clearly did commit a crime, we would have said so. >> if you're the president, they let you do it. >> can you say whether the olc memo that the president cannot be indicted played a role in this as well? >> tonight new reporting that suggests donald trump escaped criminal charges because he's the president for the second time. then -- >> when i said i was the president's nightmare, well, you're watching it now. >> michelle goldberg on the bizarre republican defense of donald trump's bigotry. and this weekend oversight on the trump administration. >> did you see the


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on