Skip to main content

tv   The 11th Hour With Brian Williams  MSNBC  November 19, 2019 8:00pm-9:00pm PST

8:00 pm
him in this. if he doesn't come clean, then all the statements get used against him. >> and we'll have a line by line analysis of the famous cell phone call from the restaurant in ukraine with russia listening, with every intelligence agency possibly in europe listening to that. thank you very much for joining us. that is tonight's "last word." "the 11th hour" starts now. a long day's journey into night after an almost 12-hour day in the newsroom. it is about four public servants, all of whom swore an oath to the constitution, describing their effort to get a foreign leader to go after the bsful plus, one of today's witnesses adjusts his story in the face of a flood of other testimony. as the white house attacks their own employee and the president again bashes the proceedings. meanwhile, the questions continue about the story john bolten could tell and the
8:01 pm
likelihood we might ever hear and it the anticipation for tomorrow. gordon sondland, the lead witness, a man with a lot of explaining to do as "the 11th hour" gets underway this tuesday night. good evening from our headquarters in new york. the latest round of republican impeachment hearings wrap up a short time ago. it was a marathon day. the questioning was relentless again today. it will be again tomorrow. four witnesses testified for nearly ten hours before the house intel committee about what they knew about president trump's request to ukraine's president to investigate democratic political rivals. the day was divided into two sessions. the first set of witnesses saw jennifer williams, a state department employee detail to vice president pence's office on
8:02 pm
you're a eurasia matters. the afternoon session heard from two officials the republican side called as witnesses. kurt volker, the former u.s. special envoy for ukraine and the peace talks there, and tim morrison, a senior official overseeing russia and europe policy. morrison was on that july 25th call with ukraine's president. he resigned in october. volker provided one of the hearings big unexpected moments when he amended his closed door testimony and acknowledged others had laid out conditions to ukraine for releasing military aid. >> at no time was i aware of or knowingly took part in an effort to urge ukraine to investigate former vice president biden. i was not on the july 25th phone call between president trump and president zelensky. i was know made aware of any reference to vice president biden or his son by president
8:03 pm
trump. until the transcript of that call was released, i did not know that president trump or others had raised vice president with ukrainians, or could not flatd the possibility of corruption. in hindsight i now understand that others saw the idea of investigating possible corruption involving the ukrainian company as equivalent to investigating former vice president biden. >> not long after that moment, tim morrison gave what may be the clearest outline of quid pro quo heard so far. it came during this exchange when morrison was asked to recall a september 1st conversation between u.s. ambassador to the e.u., gordon sondland, and ukraine government official andrei yermak. >> what did ambassador sondland tell you that he told mr. yermak? >> that the ukrainians would have to have the prosecutor general make a statement with
8:04 pm
respect to the investigations as a condition of having the aid lifted. >> as you may know, this scandal has been branded missiles for misinformation. the president's personal lawyer and his influence on trump's thinking on ukraine was also discussed. here's what ambassador volker said trump told him. >> he said that ukraine was a corrupt country, full of terrible people. he said they tried to take me down. president trump had a deeply rooted negative view on ukraine rooted in the past. he was receiving other information from other sources including mayor giuliani that was more negative, causing him to retain this negative view. >> the day began with testimony from those two other white house officials, jennifer williams and national security official u.s. army lieutenant colonel vindman. both of whom libertied in on the july 25th trump-ukraine call.
8:05 pm
both testified about their concerns. >> i found the phone call unusual because in contrast to other presidential calls i had observed, it involved discussion of what appeared to be a domestic political matter. >> it was inappropriate. it was improper for the president to request, to demand an investigation. >> the references to specific individuals and investigations such as former vice president biden and his son struck me as political in nature given that the former vice president is a political possibly of the president. >> the witnesses were also asked about what was and what was not mentioned in that white house summary of the phone call. >> both of you recall president zelensky in that conversation raising the issue or mentioning burisma. do you not? >> that's correct. >> correct. >> and yet the word burisma
8:06 pm
appears, doesn't appear in the call record. >> correct. >> we have be seen a transcript. what has been released is a summary of the phone call. house republicans tried to refocus the morning session by pressing vindman on his conversations that followed the call with a line of questioning the committee chairman quickly shut down. >> lieutenant colonel vindman, do you describe the july 25th phone call with anyone outside the white house on july 25th or the 26th? if so, with whom? >> i spoke to two individuals with regard to providing a some sort of read out of the call. cleared u.s. government officials with appropriate need to know. >> what agencies were these officials with? >> department of state, department of state, deputy assistant george kent who is
8:07 pm
responsible for the portfolio, eastern europe including ukraine, and an individual from the office of, an individual in the intelligence community. >> what agency was this individual from? >> if i could interject here, we don't want to use these proceedings -- >> it is our time but we need to protect the whistleblower. please stop. >> that exchange, that interruption was followed by a rather tense correction. >> mr. vindman, you testified in your deposition that you did not know the whistleblower. >> ranking member exlieutenant colonel vinldman, please. >> there were also attempts to call lieutenant colonel vindman's loyalty into question. the purple heart recipient came to the u.s. after a young boy after his family fled the soviet union. during the hearing he was asked about repeated job offers he had received from the director of
8:08 pm
ukraine's national security council. >> did he offered you a position of defense minute stwer the ukrainian government? >> he did. >> how many times did he do that? >> i believe it was three times. >> do you have any reason why he asked you to do that? >> i don't know, but every single time i dismissed it. upon returning, i notified my chain of command and the appropriate counter intelligence folks about the offer. >> multiple right wing conspiracy theorists including rudolph giuliani have accused you of harboring loyalty toward ukraine. they've accused of you espionage and dual loyalties. we've seen that this morning. the three minutes asking you about the offer made to make you the minister of defense that may have come clothed in a brooks brother suit but that was designed exclusively to give the right wing media an opening to question your loyalties.
8:09 pm
>> we should note in light of lieutenant colonel vindman now being in the public eye and under criticism, the u.s. army tells nbc news, it is working with civilian authorities to ensure that he and his family are properly protected. that could include moving them from their home if need be. as he was testifying, the president was holding a cabinet meeting and complaining about this inquiry. >> i just got to watch and the republicans are absolutely killing it. they are doing so well. because it is a scam. a big scam. >> one more thing here, the house did act on a piece of business today. lawmakers passed a short term funding bill today to try to avert a government shutdown and keep our government open until december 20th. that would be five days before christmas. what could go wrong? the bill now moves on to the u.s. senate. but back to our lead story. let's bring in our guests to start us off this tuesday night.
8:10 pm
jeremy bash, former chief of staff at the cia and the pentagon, notably former chief counsel tomorrow very committee we've been watching, house tension. the washington bureau chief for the "new york times" and jonathan, the white house reporter for the associated press. good evening and welcome to all of you. jeremy bash, i would like to begin with you. what was it we witnessed today? what have we learned after today? >> well, the record is building. here you have four trump appointees who bucked the official directive of the administration which is to stonewall congress and they came forward and they confirmed the essential facts as we know, that the president of the united states demanded that a foreign leader try to help him rig the 2020 election. and although the state of the republican defense is a little bit in disarray as they grope around for what the right theory of the case is. where they're most going is we're a year out from an election so let's let the voters
8:11 pm
decide. except the very heart of the case that the president was trying to rig that election and trying to undermine national security in so doing. so i think today was the day that it advanced the narrative and the factual record and tomorrow, of course, we'll hear from a very important witness who is really at the center of this quid pro quo, the deal to require the investigation in exchange for the military aid. >> and quickly, what about these attacks? glancing and direct on an active duty u.s. army lieutenant colonel general. >> it was quite frankly disgusting. here is a guy who was wound in the combat, served his country for 20 plus years, all of his brothers have served, his dad took the family out of the soviet union so they could be free. so they could speak truth to power. so they could speak openbly truth and facts. and here we have some people on the dais and some in the media
8:12 pm
saying he is a soviet traitor, not really in the army. i think all military families and the entire chain of commands should stand up and say who are not you agree with him or not, get off his back and let the guy live and testify in safety. >> elizabeth, at the ends of each day your job is to decide the package of coverage your newspaper runs from your bureau in washington, nothing could be more important right about now. how did you begin that task late today? how do you possibly headline what we witness all day long? >> i think the main news today was that two white house officials said in open testimony that they found the call that president trump had with the president of ukraine on july 25th, as inappropriate and improper. we had heard that before from their closed door testimony. this we heard in public. secondly, the most important story, is that the white house
8:13 pm
turned on its own of we have seen president trump and the trump administration, president trump turn on his attorney general, turn on the fed chair, turn on people who have left the white house like john bolton. we have never seen the president turn on current white house officials who are going to go to work in the white house complex tomorrow morning. that was the first. and again, he did it in real-time. and thirdly, i think we saw that colonel vindman was very, he wore his uniform. it evoked images of oliver north from three deck eights ago and the iran-contra hearings. it was a symbol and a bit of a protector for colonel vinldsman to show i'm an american citizen. i serve my country. and yet, he was still open to criticism from the republicans. >> we have a gentleman who used to wear four stars on his uniform who is standing by to talk to us on that very topic
8:14 pm
later in this broadcast. jonathan, about the republicans, did they get what they were looking to get out of today, do you think? >> for the most part, i would say the answer is no. voguer and morrison were republican witnesses. and both made down what the white house and trump allies have been defending. he was a good guy, a public servant, that he had known him for decades. he said, we heard a little at the top of the show where he outlined the false information the president had been fed on ukraine. others believe some of that originates from vladimir putin who has very negative opinions about ukraine and then closer to home, some of the conspiracy theorists which includes juju and he really to know some swipes at him. everyone who testified today, they're unanimous in the idea that no one in the national
8:15 pm
security community thought the united states should have withheld the aid from ukraine. sort of isolated the president and his wishes there, making it clear this was being done for political purposes. it was not to advance the national interests of that part of the word. this is also highlighted two people on the call itself which is an important step, as the democrats build the narrative of this impeachment. in fact, lieutenant colonel vinldsman who was the subject of most of the attacks, they tried to suggest that his loyalties are laid elsewhere. his family took him out of the soviet union when he was a child. and he mentioned that at the top of his remarks today. the ends of his prepared opening statement, he said his father expressed some worry for him. this is the kind of thing if you were in russia and you spoke truth to power, you could be in trouble. you could be killed. and pretty emotional moment that, in the capital, dad, we're in america now. i'm paraphrasing but dad, we're in america.
8:16 pm
i'll be safe. at the same time we're learning that the military is hook to perhaps move him and his family to a safe location because he's not safe. that's heart breaking for us all. >> i don't know if mr. sondland ever made competitive sports, he might indeed be getting the heisman late in his career. the distance started to begin today in the hearing. in your view, he already had a lot of explaining to do starting tomorrow morning. did his job get tougher today in. >> i think so. multiple witnesses have come forward and say they heard him say explicitly that ukraine would not get the aid unless they conducted the investigations of the bidens. that was the testimony of colonel vindman who said he was in a meeting in the white house during which gordon sondland said that. that's what caused colonel vindman to go to the counsel's office, to go to the lawyer and
8:17 pm
say something is really wrong here. and tim morrison, a republican, a republican congressional staffer who worked in the trump white house, he also said that sondland was tying those two things exclusively together. maybe he will claim tomorrow that he was freelancing. we know the president directed him to do it this way. as everybody in that famous restaurant in ukraine heard. >> i want to pick up on something numbered your last answer about the president in social media. yes, we heard from him in full in the cabinet room. but i actually heard someone today express pride mixed with surprise that he didn't live tweet the event. however, you view a tweet that affected the the white house staffer from the white house twitter account as at least equal to that, correct? >> this is the official taxpayer
8:18 pm
funded white house twitter account going out to, i don't know how many people. this is again another first in the trump administration. we've never seen something like this before. i think his testimony will be very crucial. he will have to explain why he forgot that phone call with the president in that kiev restaurant last summer. it is unusual that somebody would forget a phone qual the president. i don't care how many times you talk to the president. so this will be a pretty dramatic hearing tomorrow. >> jonathan, we have seconds left. i wanted to hit you on this final topic. a graceful exit from washington, go them to kansas, run for senate. what do you think the chances are of mr. pompeo doing that? >> he has done very little to
8:19 pm
try to tamp down the speculation that he might want to do this. this comes amid reports of some real increased tension between pompeo and president the. he's been the favorite cabinet member for the most part in reason months but according to some reporting, the president is blaming him. the state department officials have come up and testified in the impeachment probe. he thinks pompeo should have effectively stopped that or hired different people. most of these are pompeo hires. >> at least he hasn't defended them. >> you're right. he had that opportunity. the state department has put out a note saying there is nothing to this. the secretary of state stayed on the job. i believe he is in brussels right now ahead of some meetings tomorrow but this story is not going away any time soon. >> i reckon we'll find out what the people of kansas feel about it too long. our thanks to the three of you at the end of a long day for
8:20 pm
joining us at this late hour. coming up, on the eve of another round of critical witness testimony. what is the chance that tomorrow morning a live television audience gets to see a key witness take the fifth? and later, the decorated iraq war veteran, serving the country he loves. "the 11th hour" is just getting started on this consequential tuesday night. ted on this conse tuesday night. with advil liqui-gels, you have fast-acting power over pain, so the whole world looks different. the unbeatable strength and speed of advil liqui-gels. what pain? but allstate helps you. with drivewise. feedback that helps you drive safer. and that can lower your cost now that you know the truth...
8:21 pm
are you in good hands? ♪ oh, ho! oh, ho, ho, ho! you... you got me. uh, what do you want? i've got uh, ai robots, i've got vr goggles. i want your sled, please. no. [ chuckles ] timmy. it'd be a shame if this went viral. for those who never compromise. the mercedes-benz winter event. whoa. he was pretty good this year. i am totally blind. and non-24 can make me show up too early... or too late. or make me feel like i'm not really "there." talk to your doctor, and call 844-234-2424. doprevagen is the number oneild mempharmacist-recommendeding? memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.
8:22 pm
♪ ♪ applebee's new sizzlin' entrées. now starting at $9.99. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood. what are you doing back there, junior? since we're obviously lost, i'm rescheduling my xfinity customer service appointment. ah, relax. i got this. which gps are you using anyway? a little something called instinct. been using it for years. yeah, that's what i'm afraid of. he knows exactly where we're going. my whole body is a compass. oh boy... the my account app makes today's xfinity customer service simple, easy, awesome.
8:23 pm
not my thing. . this morning lieutenant colonel vindman offered more details about a meeting this
8:24 pm
past summer that included two key figures in this impeachment inquiry. national security adviser john bolton and e.u. ambassador gordon sondland who is scheduled to testify hours from now. >> on july 10, 2019, alexander, the then ukraine security adviser visited national d.c. was in a meeting. others attended the meeting i attended with dr. hi. we fully anticipated the ukrainians would raise the issue of a meeting between presidents. ambassador bolton cut the meeting short when ambassador sondland started to speak with the requirement that ukraine deliver specific investigations to secure the meeting with president trump. >> let's talk about all of this. back with us tonight is barbara mcquaid, veteran prosecutor, thanks for never throwing your phone into lake michigan when we
8:25 pm
call. we call you a lot and we depend on you on nights like this. i would like to start with sondland and then go to bolton. and i'm afraid i have a three-parter for you. what is the chance he takes the fifth tomorrow morning? remind our audience why people take fifth, and is imimmunity the work around when people take the fifth? >> so i think there is a very high probability that gordon sondland is thinking about taking the fifth amendment. the fifth amendment is a provision, has a provision in it that says, witnesses are not, may not be compelled to be witnesses against themselves. so to avoid self-incrimination, they may invoke that right under the fifth amendment and refuse to anxious questions that could incriminate them. gordon sondland having given contradictory statements now, statements that contradict the testimony of other witnesses, could very well be exposing
8:26 pm
himself to criminal charges for perjury, or even for the substantive crimes here of conspiracy to defraud the united states in the fair administration of elections, even conspiracy to commit bribery. so he has some very real potential criminal exposure here in a very strong likelihood, i think, of invoeking his fifth amendment right not to answer those questions. but immunity is the work-around. if he were to invoke his fifth amendment rights, the trump card that the house has in this instance as prosecutors have in a criminal investigation, is to immunize him. to say, we agree not to use against you any statements that you might make in your testimony here. and what could be a reason they might do that is, gordon sondland is far more valuable as a witness to president trump than he is as any sort of defendant in a criminal case against himself. >> what happens to a identify like sondland if he comes before that committee and says, i've
8:27 pm
been in business all my life i run a chain of hotels in the pacific northwest. i'm not a lawyer and i didn't understand contemporaneously that what i was flaring the president was illegal. >> i think that it has to be plausible, about whether he understands it is illegal. and understands that it is illegal is typically not an element of the defense. today we heard people, congressman radcliffe criticizing some of the witnesses for not characterizing things as bribery or using legal conclusions. that's not a witness's job. a witness's job is to state what the facts are. if you were to come in tomorrow and correct his testimony and say, here's what happened, i will leave it to the lawyers to characterize whether this is illegal, whether it is a quid pro quo, or whether an abuse of presidential power, his job is to say this is what happened. and he can do that and even protect himself if he gets immunity in exchange for testimony. >> and finally, in your view,
8:28 pm
bolton's status as the big fish potential witness, only increased today? >> i think so. the testimony we heard today that the july 10th meeting makes him a very valuable witness. he is the one who cut the meeting short. as lieutenant colonel vindman testified, it wasn't that the meeting was over. they had additional items to discuss and they had more time left before the meeting was over and he stopped it abruptly with gordon sondland raised this issue of investigations in exchange for military aid. he has said he will not testify unless there is a court order to do that. i think the democrats are waiting to see what order they get. if that goes well, i think you will see the subpoena and a court order directing bolton to testify. if he does, i think he will do the right thing. i think he'll tell truth and it will be explosive. >> thank you so much for always answering the bell and adding to our broadcast and our
8:29 pm
understanding tonight. coming up for us, young immigrant grows up in this country, fights overseas, gets on work for the president and the white house, is a decorated veteran. a decorated veteran. drivers just wont put their phones down. we need a solution. introducing... smartdogs. the first dogs trained to train humans. stopping drivers from: liking. selfie-ing. and whatever this is. available to the public... never. smartdogs are not the answer. but geico has a simple tip. turn on "do not disturb while driving" mode. brought to you by geico.
8:30 pm
there's a company that's talked than me: jd power.people 448,134 to be exact. they answered 410 questions in 8 categories about vehicle quality. and when they were done, chevy earned more j.d. power quality awards across cars, trucks and suvs than any other brand over the last four years. so on behalf of chevrolet, i want to say "thank you, real people." you're welcome. we're gonna need a bigger room. the unitedllaxin'. explorer card makes things easy. traveling lighter. taking a shortcut. woooo! taking a breather. rewarded! learn more at the explorer card dot com. if ylittle thingsate tcan be a big deal., that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla.
8:31 pm
it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you. dana-farber cancer institute discovered the pd-l1 pathway. pd-l1. they changed how the world fights cancer. blocking the pd-l1 protein, lets the immune system attack, attack, attack cancer. pd-l1 transformed, revolutionized, immunotherapy.
8:32 pm
pd-l1 saved my life. saved my life. saved my life. what we do here at dana-faber, changes lives everywhere. everywhere. everywhere. everywhere. everywhere.
8:33 pm
>> i speak russian and ukrainian and a little bit of english. >> next month marks 40 years since lieutenant colonel alexander vindman and his family came to the united states as jewish refugees fleeing the soviet union. while children living in brighton beach, brooklyn, he and his twin brother made an appearance in a 1985 ken burns documentary about the statue of liberty and immigrants in our country. >> we came from kiev. and then we went to -- >> our mother died so we went to italy. then we came here. >> when reached by news day, ken burns said he doesn't know which brother is which. lieutenant colonel vindman's twin brother is also now an active duty u.s. army lieutenant colonel, if you can believe it. the brothers work together in the white house. besides becoming a decorated officer in the u.s. army,
8:34 pm
lieutenant colonel vindman, today's witness, earned a master's degree from harvard and served in the u.s. embassies in ukraine and russia. when asked what vindman represents today, ken burns told news day, i think he just represents the continuation of the american dream. in today's hearing, new york congressman sean patrick maloney asked the lieutenant colonel to reread a portion of his opening statement. >> dad, my sitting here today in the u.s. capitol talking to our elected officials is proof that you made the right decision 40 years ago to leave the soviet union and come here to the united states of america in search of a better life for our family. do not worry. i'll be fine for telling the truth. >> you realize when you came forward out of sense of duty, that you were putting yourself in direct opposition to the most powerful person in the world. do you realize that, sir? >> i knew i was assuming a lot
8:35 pm
of risk. >> and i'm struck by the words, do not worry, that you addressed to your dad. was your dad a warrior? >> he did serve. a different military though. >> and he would worry if you were putting yourself up against the president of the united states, is that right? >> he deeply worried about it. in his context, there was the ultimate risk. >> why do you have confidence that you can do that? tell your dad not to worry? >> congressman, because this is america. this is the country i've served and defended, that all my brothers have served and here, right matters. >> thank you, sir. yield back. >> on that note, we'll take another break. coming up, what lieutenant colonel vindman chose to wear to the hearing today. that became a topic of conversation and even glancing ridicule.
8:36 pm
we'll ask a retired four star army general what he made of it all. t all. ♪ ♪ experience the power of sanctuary at the lincoln wish list sales event. sign and drive off in a new lincoln with zero down, zero due at signing, and a complimentary first month's payment. i need all the breaks, that i can get. at liberty butchumal- cut. liberty biberty- cut. we'll dub it. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ when i needed to create a better visitor experience. improve our workflow. attract new customers. that's when fastsigns recommended fleet graphics. yeah, and now business is rolling in.
8:37 pm
get started at my body is truly powerful. i have the power to lower my blood sugar and a1c. because i can still make my own insulin. and trulicity activates my body to release it like it's supposed to. trulicity is for people with type 2 diabetes. it's not insulin. i take it once a week. it starts acting in my body from the first dose. trulicity isn't for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't take trulicity if you're allergic to it, you or your family have medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have an allergic reaction, a lump or swelling in your neck, or severe stomach pain. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, belly pain, and decreased appetite, which lead to dehydration and may worsen kidney problems. i have it within me to lower my a1c.
8:38 pm
ask your doctor about trulicity. man 1 vo: proof of less joint pain woman 1 oc: this is my body of proof. and clearer skin. man 2 vo: proof that i can fight psoriatic arthritis... woman 2 vo: ...with humira. woman 3 vo: humira targets and blocks a specific source of inflammation that contributes to both joint and skin symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain, stop further irreversible joint damage, and clear skin in many adults. humira is the number one prescribed biologic for psoriatic arthritis. avo: humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. man 3 vo: ask your rheumatologist about humira. woman 4 vo: go to to see proof in action.
8:39 pm
mr. vindman, you testified in your deposition that you did not know the whistleblower. >> during today's hearing, republican congressman and air force veteran chris stewart of utah went on to ask lieutenant colonel vindman about that exchange with congressman nunes. >> lieutenant colonel vindman, i see you're wearing your dress uniform. knowing that's not the uniform of the day, do you normally wear a suit to the white house? i think it is a great reminder of your military service. i too come from my military family. five of my father's sons served in the military. as one military family to another, thank you to you and your brothers for your service. your example here, very quickly, i'm curious when ranking member
8:40 pm
nunes referred to you as mr. vindman, you corrected him do you always insist on civilians calling you by your rank? >> mr. stewart, recommendive stewart, i am in uniform wearing my military rank. i just thought it was appropriate to stick with that. >> i'm sure -- >> i don't believe you did. but the attacks that i've had in the press in twitter, have kind of eliminated the fact that, even marginalized me as a military officer or -- >> listen. i'm just telling you that the ranking member meant no disrespect to you. >> i believe that. >> with us to talk about all this tonight, general barry mccaffrey, four star general, heavily decorated combat veteran of vietnam and one of the commanders in the gulf war. general mccaffrey, i wanted to hear you out on this topic. wearing his dress uniform into a
8:41 pm
hearing today. though civilian garb when he works in the west wing. >> look, it was very moving testimony. an immigrant family, patriotic, contributing their boisterous defense of the nation. this man is not only a combat entry officer, 1:00ed in action, parachutist badge, he's also one of our elite foreign area officers specialists. it takes around five years to produce them. they have to be very bright, harvard graduate school, multilingual. he is a real asset. he worked for joe dunford and helped write the russian strategy in the pentagon. he was then seconded to the nse staff which is a collection of the brightest people in our government. so i think when he saw something wrong going on, he said to himself, look.
8:42 pm
brian, every soldier who sees something illegal or unethical can go to the inspector general, can go to the staff judge advocate, can write their congressman, they can demand open door hearings with the commander one above the problem level, and they can't be accused of disloyalty for doing that. they're upholding army values. and that's what lieutenant colonel vindman was doing. i thought he is an honorable, impressive guy. what congressman nunes was doing deliberately was being, trying to isolate him from appearing as a member of the armed forces. the most respected institution in american society. so nunes did it deliberately. and then i think they sent chris stewart out there, very impressive, air force officer, author, successful businessman, they said send stewart out there to try to knock him back.
8:43 pm
i was very proud of this officer for responding the way he did. >> general, i correctly remembered today, you came on this broadcast when h.r. mcmaster was named national security adviser and publicly advised him not to wear his uniform on the job in the west wing. tell our viewers why you felt that way. >> well, i went beyond that. i felt it was inappropriate for him to stay in the military. i finished the same kind of question when i became the director for the clinton administration. some argued about me staying in uniform. i said don't do that. by and large, congress deals with and views active members of the arm forces in a very different light. you have sort of a limit ability to act in a political manner. so i thought h.r. made a mistake. he was then a sub servient officer to the secretary of defense. he was subject to ucmj. it didn't make a lot of sense. but the active staff in the
8:44 pm
white house, a couple thousand people work over there. and many are military. communications officers, medical, transportation, but the nse staff itself in many cases are the brightest foreign service cia and military officers we have. and by and large, they work in civilian clothes but make no mistake, they're still active duty military officers. >> i also wanted to get you on record. the president gave out pardons this past weekend to three members of the u.s. navy. the navy going against his wishes has decided to remove one of them as a navy s.e.a.l. which means taking away their trident pin. that's what you're struggling to earn at the end of navy s.e.a.l. buds training. they want to kick out three senior officers who were over him in management. they've taken away 154 tridents
8:45 pm
since about the last ten-year period. what do you make of this? >> well, look, the armed forces award for 15 years. we've had 60,000 killed and wounded. the special ops community, including air force, army, navy and marines has been out and alone in the face of constant danger. i think they're out of control. the navy put a two star admiral collins in to try to unscrew this mess and get them back under navy discipline. so i'm not surprised they're doing it. it will be a very difficult situation. the president of the united states gave legal orders to reverse uniform code of military justice actions. that's a law passed by the congress. we didn't make it up in the pentagon. the president doesn't get a chance to change it at will. so we've never seen anything like this in the history of the
8:46 pm
country, to have a commander in chief directly intervene at a granular level on individual cases. in the case of one of these officers, he hadn't even gone to court-martial trial yet. so again, it is preposterous what's going on. the navy is under great pressure right now to maintain that superb service and their vls which include don't kill prisoners. >> from the pacific northwest tonight. our thanks to general barry mccaffrey as always for coming on the broadcast. and coming up for us, one of the congressional reporters covering these hearings from inside the committee room. that made for a long day today. and again tomorrow. but he's here with us tonight. but he's here with us tonight. things happen. and sometimes you can find yourself heading in a new direction. but at fidelity, we help you prepare for the unexpected with retirement planning and advice for what you need today
8:47 pm
and tomorrow. because when you're with fidelity, a partner who makes sure every step is clear, there's nothing to stop you from moving forward. only pay for what youure need with liberty mutual.r, any comments doug? yeah. only pay for what you need with liberty mutual. con liberty mutual solo pagas lo que necesitas. only pay for what you need... only pay for what you need. liberty. liberty. liberty. liber♪y i am totally blind. and non-24 can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424. his haircut is "nice." this is the most-awarded minivan three years in a row. the van just talked. sales guy, give 'em the employee price, then gimme your foot. hands-free sliding doors, stow 'n go® seats. can your car do this? man, y'all getting a hook up and you don't even work here.
8:48 pm
don't act like i'm not doing y'all a favor. y'all should be singing my praises. pacificaaaaa! purchase and get $5,361 below msrp plus 0% financing for 60 months on the 2019 pacifica limited.
8:49 pm
among the discussions i had with dr. hill were about ambassador sondland.
8:50 pm
i think she might have coined it the gordon problem. and i decided to keep track of what ambassador sondland was doing. i didn't necessarily always act on things gordon suggested he believed were important. >> so that was a senior nsc official casting doubt ahead of the testimony. they stood out for their tone. republicans will wanted to curr favor with trump." andrew dechlt siderio, congressional reporter for politico, was in the hearing room again today and is with us again tonight. andrew, is this a setup? because it seems to me sondland already had a tough job going in there tomorrow morning. it got tougher today.
8:51 pm
>> that's absolutely right. sondland is a crucial yet a flawed witness at the same time. he's crucial because he's essentially the connective tissue running through all of this witness testimony that we have heard ever since he came in for his closed-door deposition. but he's a flawed witness in that both sides, democrats and republicans, have pointed out that he has serious credibility issues. he already had to amend his testimony and disclose that conversation he had with a senior ukrainian official about what he told them about what it would take for them to get the military aid finally delivered to them. and of course, you know, other witnesses have testified to details of that july 10th meeting at the white house with another senior ukrainian national security official that gordon sondland omitted, namely the fact that he brought up the bidens and burisma as conditions for getting that military aid and a white house meeting between president trump and president zelensky. he's going to have a lot to confront tomorrow and both democrats and republicans are going to hammer him over it. >> and of course he is not the
8:52 pm
only witness. can you preview for us the afternoon session? >> that's right. so laura cooper, who is a senior pentagon official, will testify alongside david hale, who is essentially the number 3 official at the state department. republicans wanted david hale to testify. his deposition transcript was released last night. it had a lot of interesting details in it. but i think what democrats are going to want to draw out from his testimony is essentially the efforts within the state department to defend or not defend ambassador yovanovitch from the smear campaign that rudy giuliani was running against her. obviously, that was a subject of the testimony last week but i think chairman schiff felt like he needed to throw another bone to the republicans to give them one of their witnesses that they requested. laura cooper will be able to speak directly to this military aid holdup, when she found out about it, how she found out about it, and how she worked with other officials across the government to convince the white house to essentially release the
8:53 pm
hold on aid and allow it to flow to ukraine. >> final question. there is a seating section i note in the hearing room for members of congress not on the committee. you were in there all day. how many of them at any given time are stopping by to take in all or part of the testimony? >> yeah, very few, brian. there are actually three rows right behind the press section that are reserved for members of congress. they have signs on them explicitly stating that. but only really -- i see the president's most vociferous defenders like mark meadows and lee zeldin and andy biggs the chairman of the house freedom caucus. they're there for every minute of the hearing. i barely see any democrats showing up. and you know, a lot of them have excuses. obviously, it's a busy day on capitol hill all the time. a lot of them sit on other committees that have hearings and meetings and obviously there's votes going on. all throughout the day as well. but i've been struck throughout this entire process, brian, to see so few members of congress actually show up and attend the hearings. it's usually been the president's defenders like the ones i just mentioned that have
8:54 pm
been in there for essentially every minute of the hearing. >> well, these are long days. we really appreciate you joining us late at night. andrew december derio, our thanks. and when we come back, the president talks about his health and blames the media for worrying his family about it over the weekend. amily about it erov the weekend mom, why do we always come here for the holidays? how did you find great-grandma's recipe? we're related to them? we're portuguese? i thought we were hungarian? grandpa, can you tell me the story again? behind every question is a story waiting to be discovered.
8:55 pm
they're america's biopharmaceutical researchers. pursuing life-changing cures in a country that fosters innovation here, they find breakthroughs... like a way to fight cancer by arming a patient's own t-cells... because it's not just about the next breakthrough... it's all the ones after that.
8:56 pm
hi. maria ramirez! mom! maria! maria ramirez... mcdonald's is committing 150 million dollars in tuition assistance, education, and career advising programs... prof: maria ramirez mom and dad: maria ramirez!!! to help more employees achieve their dreams.
8:57 pm
when youyou spend lessfair, momand get way more.amirez!!! so you can bring your vision to life and save in more ways than one. for small prices, you can build big dreams, spend less, get way more. shop everything home at last thing before we go here tonight is the president's health. it was surprising to hear that mr. trump took an unscheduled
8:58 pm
trip to walter reed by motorcade on a saturday afternoon. when he tweeted later that it was the first phase of his annual physical, to be completed in 2020, that didn't sound at all familiar or even plausible to most of the doctors consulted by the news media. the president's annual physical usually takes most of the day. it's usually posted on his schedule far in advance for starters. so it's also true that rumors started almost immediate ly including some brand name news outlets, saying that the president had perhaps suffered some sort of discomfort, perhaps even heart trouble. then last night came the letter from his white house navy doctor saying in effect nothing to see here, the guy's cholesterol is 165 and so on. and then today the president brought it up. >> one other thing i thought i'd bring it up while we're here. i went for a physical on saturday. my wife said oh, darling, that's
8:59 pm
wonderful, because i had some extra time. and i came back, my wife said, darling, are you okay? what's wrong? they're reporting you may have had a heart attack. i said, why did i have a heart attack? because you went to walter reed medical center. that's where we go when we get the physicals. i said i was only there for a very short period of time. i went, did a very routine, just a piece of it. the rest of it takes place in january. did a very routine physical. got back home. and i get greeted with the news that we understand you had a heart attack. i was called by people in public relations. sir, are you okay? i said okay from what? the word is you had a heart attack. cnn said you may have had a heart attack, you had massive chest pains. you went to the hospital. these people are sick. they're sick. >> but again and for the record, the president says he was not the person who was sick. and now we've heard from him. that is our broadcast on this tuesday night.
9:00 pm
look at the time. we'll be back here first thing tomorrow morning for day four of the public hearings and the start of the sondland testimony in the morning. thank you for being here with us tonight and good night from our nbc news headquarters here in new york. we are coming to you tonight from atlanta, georgia, the site of tomorrow night's democratic presidential candidates debate. we'll have more on that later in this hour. very excited for the debate, by which i mean i'm very nervous to have anything to do with it. but here we are. it's unavoidable now. the impeachment proceedings against president trump were a doubleheader today with hearings both this morning starting at 9:00 a.m. eastern and another marathon hearing this afternoon starting at 3:00 eastern extending well into the evening tonight, ending less than a half an hour ago now. the second hearing today that afternoon and evening session that just ended was t


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on