Skip to main content

tv   Aging and Adult Services Commission 11216  SFGTV  November 24, 2016 12:30pm-2:31pm PST

12:30 pm
opposed? the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> the next item, b the department request authorization to modify the grant agreement with next ability san francisco for provision of the village model program during t period of july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the amount of $50,000 plus a 10% contingency for a revised total amount not to exceed $283,250. >> denied a motion to discuss? b was moved and seconded. >> good morning. executive director of [inaudible] this item for you today is board of supervisors one-time only at back funding to support village model services in district 3. the contractor next village is a -provides a village service in district 3. they have been around since about 2010. we've seen significant growth from them over their short existence. they are now approaching 300 members total
12:31 pm
in their bills. this funding today will be used towards going towards increasing the program capacity to meet the increased service demands of high membership. largest chunk is going to be going towards an increase in staff time. we will see about an equivalent of .5 fte increased. as well as an increase in hours for to have a contractor who's providing chinese language translation services. we will see more of her time helping with the program as well's expanding role just beyond translation we also will see some funding towards operating expenses such as production of their monthly newsletter database costs and other program expenses such as space rental for e vents. with the increasing were also busy in the scope of service increased course funding increases in service units including client serves new memberships and volunteers.
12:32 pm
with that happy to answer any questions the commission might have on this item. >> any questions? is there any public comment at this time? please. >> good morning madam or madam chairman emeritus of the committee. i'm the executive director of next village san francisco. michael did the highlights present i'm here to answer the questions you might have. did you mention we were part of the most diverse village in the [inaudible] >> i don't think i did >> we are somewhat proud of. we just attended the national village to village conference in columbus alive. we are one of the bigger villages in the country but we also discovered we are the most diverse. we have the highest concentration of ethnic diversity, income
12:33 pm
diverse city, and by the way the highest concentration of seniors in the city are in our district. so we work very hard to make sure that our membership reflects our neighborhood and that we don't turn anyone away because of income. so we are pretty proud of that. thank you. >> thank you. any other public comment? hearing none, i will call for the vote. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the ayes have it. the motion is carried. >>[gavel] >> item c request authorize asian to enter into new grant agreement with south stone sound family ymca writer many services programs to seniors and adults with disabilities in the neighborhood of san
12:34 pm
francisco the time. beginning november 1, 2016 and ending june 30 27 and in the amount of $75,000 plus a 10% contingency of 75,000 7500 per total not to exceed an amount of $82,500. can either motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> you are on. >> thank you president james. i'm linda-office on aging. commissioners, i seek your approval for the grant award to [inaudible] to facilitate committee services in the park merced area of district 7. park merced housing is on 19th ave. near where 19th and [inaudible] cross. there are it's about 115 acres and there are 3000 units of housing there. the department park merced management estimates in those 3000 units of housing about 2500 older adults who live there. this is a great location
12:35 pm
to start some community services in district 7. the grant will fund a 30 hour a week on site activity coordinator at park merced will correlate services to a minimum of 110 new consumers. 375 hours of activity and 100 hours of social services. park merced management plans to have a shuttle service driving around the property. this is going to happen within the next few months. the ymca is also going to buy something in service to its stone town facility to take individuals from park merced to activities that stones down. the lunch program there for example. as a great drumming class. there's also sf connected computer lab. the director of the family and senior programming at the y has been doing her job at the y for about 14 years. she has been overseeing senior programs for
12:36 pm
about eight years. she's going to oversee ultimately this program. in partnership with park merced. can i answer any questions? >> since i know that area, it's in my area i was just wondering, are there where they'll be a site within park merced. are you transferring-it's a small center over there at stones down. are they going to use both to establish one? >> the goal is to have actual services at park merced. there are i believe 11 towers of their in the community meeting rooms in each of the tower areas. so there is space. we also want some services are there. we don't want to transport everybody down the street to the why. we want something happening at park merced. >> okay. commissioners? >> i know there's some budget for the driver. i don't see any cost for the vehicle. is there an existing vehicle of their extending service? is an handicapped enables? yes. i
12:37 pm
would expect it is, yes, circuit i don't know that for sure but to be compliant it would have to be. >> any other comments? we can always look at muni for the transportation, right? we do have a transportation to take them shopping. we hope that- >>[inaudible] [off mic] thank you. public comment at this time? any public comment? hearing none, i call for the vote. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the ayes have it. the motion is carried. >>[gavel] >> next item requested d requesting authorization to enter it into a new grant agreement with san francisco in-home supportive services public authority for independent provider mode in-home support services during the period of july 1, 2016
12:38 pm
through june 30, 2020. for years, okay. in the amount of winner and $50,000 plus an annual 5% contingency for a total of amount not to exceed two winner and $63,220. could either motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> okay. megan? >> good morning commissioners. megan cannot here be today so i'll be presented. my name is [inaudible] i'm a manager in the home support service services program. so i'm here to ask your approval for the public authority administrative budget. which runs from july 1,
12:39 pm
2016 through june 30 2020. it's a four-year budget. public authority performs a wide range of services. among them they maintain a registry. when clients are not able to find someone to hire the registry dispatches a list of potential providers from which our recipients interview and select and then they notify the county. so that is one key service that the ihss public authority provides. in 2009 the state of california required all providers to go through the enrollment process which includes fingerprinting. this is a criminal background check. so the public authority receives the results of the fingerprinting and when people are cleared they share that
12:40 pm
with the county. so then the provider become eligible for employment. also the public authority maintains the health benefits of all providers and any provider who works 25 hours in two successive months of which in one month if they were 25 hours, they qualify for health coverage and that is provided through san francisco healthy workers. so that is maintained by the public authority as well. one of the key services that the public authority provides is the mentorship program. this is when clients returned from long-term settings such as laguna honda. they assist them in successfully transitioning into the community. so that is
12:41 pm
all i have. if you have any questions i will be happy to answer. >> commissioners? >> my only question is i don't see a lot of capital costs. most of this is salary. so do we have another way of equipping these people with computers and various costs but it appreciated somehow? >> i would have to the assistance of the budget people. >> commissioners, there are not very many capital cost. this all passed through funding
12:42 pm
from the state. it was chartered by the state that we have this program and there are few items. possessing three computers, a couple of laptops, minor things. they don't really require that. >> great. thank you. >> i had one regarding training because for these in-home support services workers. what kind of training do you have for them in case there is abuse or something like that? is there training program for them around that? >> basically the public authority coordinates with home bridge. are other contractor. they provide basic personal care service training which includes cpr and it's around 40 hours of training. >> okay. what happens if
12:43 pm
there's abuse with the provider? because i am hearing that in the community. what kind of training do you have in case there is a case of abuse? do you dismiss them or how is that happen? do they go to train because i asked about that before. one of the items >> one of the items the enrollment [inaudible] talks about his abuse of clients or clients with disabilities. basically we come to know about this through aps reports. when that happens it's investigated and then as you know, i hss the employer is the clients. if the client doesn't agree with us to terminate the provider because of these allegations we are really-we are not empowered to just tell them we can terminate
12:44 pm
this provider because usually they have the right to go to a hearing and the administrative judges sometimes amuck most times, agree with them. basically. >> okay. well we will talk about that. sometimes they feel dependent on that person and so you need to really look at that and see what happens because as a dependency there. right but that is my concern regarding that. >> president james? president
12:45 pm
james i was can add to what he said good basically say the adult protective services workers are really knowledgeable about that very issue. i think there is some pros and cons to the way that in-home supportive services is set up and i think most people feel it's really a pro that people can choose their own worker and manage that worker. when we run into situations like you are talking about with the person is dependent upon the other person and at the same time abused at the hands of that person then aps is really trained on working with a person to try to working with a person in potentially working with a family member to change the situation. but as he mentioned, we don't-in ultimate because were working with adults would have the ability to make their own decisions,
12:46 pm
it's very tough. you know we are doing with essentially state laws and peoples rights to make their own decisions. so what we do, though then his work with them and continually try to support them as much as we can. >> okay. there's a little thing called dementia and their >> there is and there is also and with that comes in that creates a different scenario. >> it does. it does did i just want to make sure this training regarding that. any other questions? public comment at this time? any public comment? if not all called for the question. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the ayes have it. the motion is carried >>[gavel] >> next item, e requesting authorize agent to enter a new grant agreement with san francisco in-home support
12:47 pm
services public authority for on-call in-home support service during the period july 1, 2016 through june 30 2020 in the amount of $1.1 million plus an annual 10% contingency for a total grant amount not to exceed $1.2 million. could i have a motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> okay. >> i will be presenting this one as. when of the key services that public authority provides is the emergency on-call program. the emergency on-call program assists clients who providers are not able to be in the home to continue providing services due to illness or family problems. in those cases, we make referrals to the public authority and
12:48 pm
they dispatch an emergency on-call person. it's not unusual for hospitals to discharge people on fridays and we get calls to send someone and this is when we use the emergency on-call program as well. >> any questions from commissioners? public comment. any public comment? hearing none, i will call for the question. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? so the motion is carried. hearing the motion is carried. >>[gavel] >> with item f i'm going to turn it over to my vice president seriiñà >> they can. item f requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with bayview hunters point of the purpose
12:49 pm
center senior services for the provision of elderly nutrition program congregate meals during the period of july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of ticket 1007 or $76 plus a 10% contingency for a revised total grant amount not to exceed $503,638. >> good morning president james commissioners and executive director mcspadden. before sarah actually prevents present bayview, we wanted to give very quick and brief overview of the nutrition presentation. this morning. so again my name is tiffany kearney and i am one of the nutritionist at the office on aging. today my colleagues sarah chan and i will be requesting authorization to modify 29 nutrition grant agreements with multiple
12:50 pm
community and nonprofit providers. for the provision of nutrition services. the modification total over $3 million and these funds will be allocated among several types of nutrition service programs both for seniors and adults with disabilities. all of these original nutrition grant agreements were presented and approved for this fiscal year by the commission, most in june of 2016. all but one requested modification is for july 1 2016 through june 30 these contract modifications will have positive and by enabling nutrition contractorsmeaningful impactsof 201to collectively provideclose to 400,000 more needed meals for seniors and adults with disabilities get the contract modifications whilst on hands food pantry home delivered groceries and food outreach programs. thank
12:51 pm
you. >> sarah chan, thank you. >> good morning commissioners. executive director mcspadden should my name is sarah chan nutritionist from dos. today a man up present the bayview hunters point elderly nutrition grant modification. bayview-hunters point as you know in june this year actually opened a new facility and for their senior ctr., doctor george davis senior center which has three times the bigand a lot of new seniors an adult with disabilities. so with the continuous [inaudible] in district 5 which western addition senior center is, we are recommending ad back sums to additional amount,, to
12:52 pm
additionally proximally 9000 meals to this site. so we ask pending your questions we ask for your approval of this grant modification. >> thank you. any questions from the commission? any public comment? hearing none, i will call the question. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries >>[gavel] >> item g requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with centro latino san francisco for the provision of elderly nutrition program congregate meals for the period july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in addition amount of $46,100 plus a 10% contingency for revised total grant amount not to exceed $383,000. thank you, sarah. to have a motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> sarah >> centro latino provides
12:53 pm
american with keynote food cuisine for seniors. we see a very strong demand continuous in district 5 and district 9 and the recommended ad back sums were adding additional 7000 meals to help the agency do continue to meet the needs and to also help to start a saturday meal program starting in spring 2017. at veterans common and centro latino [inaudible]. site. still pending your questions, i will ask seeking your approval for modifying this grant >> thank you. any comment or questions from commissioners? any comments or questions from the public? thank you. >> good morning commission.
12:54 pm
correa-executive director of center centro letting good i just want to express my appreciation to staff for doing such a great job in supporting me centro latino in doing the-doing are in preparing our requests. to you and i want to express my recognition for the -the recognition that the staff , for the status recognition that centro latino program are growing by leaps and bounds and that the caliber of services that we are providing our exceptional and just would like
12:55 pm
to ask for your support. thank you. >> thank you. any other public comment? hearing none, i will call the question. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? thank you. the motion carries. item h. requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with-for the provision of elderly nutrition program congregate meals during the period july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of $64,561 plus a 10% contingency for revised total grant amount not to exceed 547 $589,000. sarah? motion to discuss >> moved and seconded. >> the elderly nutrition congregate meal grant.. part of this ad back money is one time only and basically it is
12:56 pm
district supervisor allocated for district 5 nutrition program. as we know-is facing a rent increase crisis for their senior center sites. so part of the one time only money the-choose to use to help with the relief. another part of this ad back is he will be able to add additional 6000 meals to the site. as we know the site is a very popular site for district 5 and so we pending for your questions, we will seek your approval. >> thank you. any, sore questions of commissioners? >> staff question may be good i'm surprised there's rent world into a nutrition program. is that a common thing for us to do? >> normally the event is been calculated into the meal rate and both for this is the case
12:57 pm
the-their rent lease actually expired and that during the negotiation with our landlord and on a month-to-month and basically every month they pay an additional $6300 approximately in their rent to compensate that gap. so it's additional. we hope the lease agreement will be negotiated successfully and if that is the case-they will use these funds to build out their capacity or other infrastructure. >> okay. >> any other, sore questions? any, sore questions from the public? >> one question. otherwise it would interrupted the program very much >> correct. because it's very significant increase. the staff is working really hard trying to negotiate a better rate with the lease. >> any other comments or questions commissioners? any
12:58 pm
comets or questions of the public? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item i requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with the episcopal community services of san francisco for the provision of elderly nutrition program congregate meals during the period july 1, 2016 to june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of 56,004 $96 plus a 10% contingency for a revised total grant amount not to exceed two and her $55,220. leave a motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. spews just note on the record i living episcopal services community property not affected by this and so i will recuse myself if there's any need to both. thank you, tiffany >> hello again. this call community services first-quarter the old numbers indicate there continues to be a high demand for senior meals at senior center located south
12:59 pm
of market district 6. the additional requested funding to provide 8400 more meals will result in episcopal community services being able to meet this high demand noted. pending any questions i seek your approval for approving this agenda item. >> think. any comets or questions from the commission? any comments or questions of the public? hearing none, i call the question. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? >>[gavel] >> the motion carries. j requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with glide foundation for the provision of elderly nutrition program congregate meals during the period of july 1, 2016 to june 30, 2017 in addition amount of 39,006 seven $31 plus
1:00 pm
a 10% coingency for revised total grant amount not to exceed 206,006 and $74. once again, tiffany. whether motion to discuss >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. tiffany. he was glide is one of the nutrition contractors that provides a congregate wreck test meal program. like most of our other providers, their first-quarter meal numbers confirmed the need and seniors desire for a practice meal. adding funding for nearly 12,000 more meals will allow glide to serve at the same capacity as last year and provide more meals to meet the consistent and you are outgrown the need for seniors in the tenderloin neighborhood district 6. pending any questions come i seek your approval. for this agenda item. >> thank you. any comets or questions from the commission? any comets or questions for the public? hearing none, i call
1:01 pm
the question. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item k. requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with jewish community center of san francisco for the provision of the elderly nutrition program congregate meals during the period july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the amount in the addition amount of $14,562 plus a 10% contingency for revised total grant amount not to exceed $145,590. tiffany kearney will present a motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. tiffany? the jewish community center of san francisco is the only kosher nutrition meal site in san francisco. jewish community centers first-quarter meal lovers demonstrate an ongoing demand for kosher senior meals. the additional funding for over 2100 meals will allow jcc to not only meet the demand but
1:02 pm
also provide the meals that are michael and concert of the cultural preferences of those seniors served by jcc senior meal program. pending any questions, i seek your approval for this agenda item. >> any comets or questions from the commission? any comets or questions of the public? hearing none, i call the questions it all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? thank you. the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item l requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with gay services for the provision elderly nutrition program congregate meals during the period of july 1, 2016 to june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of $21,938 plus a 10% contingency for revised total grant not to exceed $615,187.
1:03 pm
july the motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. tiffany >> they've 600 meal sites in several neighborhoods across multiple district. their first-quarter meal numbers revealed an increase in demand for senior meals the additional funding for a little over 3300 meals will enable-to continue to serve at the same capacity as last year and will allow them to meet the increased demand. pending any questions, i seek your approval for this agenda item. spews thank you. any comments or questions from the commission? any comets or questions from the public? hearing none, call the question. all those in favor say, aye the course opposed? thank you. the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item or mike requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with project open hand for the provision of elderly nutrition program congregate meals during the period of july 1, 2016 to june 30 wendy 17 in the addition amount of 197,008 at eight and
1:04 pm
$65 plus a 10% contingency for revised total grant amount not to exceed 1,000,007 or $48,000. whether motion to discuss >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. tiffany. >> project open hand is another one of our meal providers that serves a practice meals as well as traditional senior lunches. their first-quarter numbers for this fiscal year demonstrated an ongoing demand for their senior meal programs. trading well above their current monthly allocation. among other programs could the funding for 38,000 more meals will enable project open hand to serve at the same capacity as last year and further assist project open hand to meet the high demand in many of your mill sites that
1:05 pm
are located in multiple districts throughout the city. the contract modification also provides for additional $19,390 to cover additional costs that they will encourage this year at the john king senior center. pending any questions, i seek your approval for this agenda item. >> thank you. any comets or questions from the commission? any comets of questions from the public? hearing none, call the question. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? thank you. the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item n? reservation to modify the grant agreement for the russian american committee service for the provision of elderly nutrition program congregate meals during the period july 1 20 16th of june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of 2007 at $20 +10% contingency for revised total grant amount not to exceed two and 55 two and $59.832. motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded.
1:06 pm
>> thank you. tiffany. >> russian-american community services provides authentic russian meals at its meal sites located in the richmond neighborhood district 1. russian-american communities first-quarter numbers indicate they will meet their current contract and likely can serve more meals to meet consistent demand if funding were available. the additional funding for 1000 more meals will allow russian-american to meet the ongoing demand for congregate meals and also allow them to modestly expand mail service at their meal site now. pending any questions i seek your approval for this agenda item. >> thank you. any comments or questions of of the commission?, for questions from the public? hearing none, i will call the question. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? thank you. the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item o requesting
1:07 pm
authorization to modify the grand agreement for the self help for the elderly for the provision of elderly nutrition program congregate meals during that period of july 1 22nd to june 30, 2079 $593,000 plus a 10% contingency for rise total grant amount not to exceed $2.1 million to have a motion to discuss >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. tiffany. >> the additional funding for nearly 75,000 moore's will enable self-help for the elderly to me in these demand especially for chinese style food that is served at many meal sites located in multiple districts throughout the city. including to camp meal sites. the sites will have be allocated over 40,000
1:08 pm
additional meals with the additional funding in the grant modification and also with the intended goal of opening one more meal site. the additional funding also enables self-help to continue to serve at the same capacity as last year and further assist self-help to meet the high demand of their observed at many of the meal sites while accommodating the cultural preferences of those they serve. the contract modification provides for an additional $20,000 to cover the startup costs that were involved in opening a new meal site in visitation valley. so pending any questions, i seek your approval >> thank you. any comments or questions from the commissioners? >> only this looks to be the most significant increase by percentage of the budgets proposed it is that largely because of the additional site? >> no. i think it has to do more a lot of the meals are
1:09 pm
going towards champs meal program. about 65% did so out of the six ashley six percent of the funding is for the champs meal site. >> any other comments or questions bequest, took questions from the public? i will call the question. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item p requesting authorization to modify grant agreement for the jewish family and children's services for the provision of elderly nutrition program in the addition amount of one point 714+ a 10% contingency for revised total
1:10 pm
grant not to exceed $89,652. motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> tiffany. >> jewish family and children's services provides home delivered meals to seniors who have a preference for kosher style food. jewish family community services first quarter meal numbers not only confirmed the need for home delivered kosher style meals for real higher demand, a higher demand than anticipated. the additional funding for 200 meals will allow jewish family children services to meet demand for kosher meals kosher style meals. pending any questions, i seek your approval. >> thank you. any, so questions from the commission?, for questions from the public? hearing none, out call the question. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? thank you. the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item q. requesting
1:11 pm
authorization to modify the grant agreement with russian-american community services for the provision of elderly nutrition program home delivered meals during the period of july 1, 2016 to june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of $1041 plus a 10% contingency for revised total grant not to exceed two and a 66,000 interval $51. by the motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> tiffany. >> there continues to be a strong demand for russian style home delivered meals and russian-american community services first quarter meal numbers confirm that. the addition of nearly 200 more meals will ensure russian-american ability to meet that demand. pending any questions i seek your approval for this agenda item. >> thank you. any, took questions from the commission? >> i just have one. because
1:12 pm
the african-american partnership meets at one of the centers and they have a large russian population. i am just wondering, to look into that for connecting. they don't have meals served there so that may be a site. i'm just asking you. the was i will pass that information. that is in bayview? >> no. western addition >> okay. >> they had requested some of the clients while we were meeting their were requesting. >> i will pass that along to neck. >> right would you? >> yes. thank you. >> any other, so questions from the commission?, took questions from the public? hearing none i will call the question all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries
1:13 pm
>>[gavel] >> item r requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with central latino san francisco for the provision of elderly nutrition programs during the period of july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of $85,000 plus a 10% contingency provides total grant amount not to exceed two and $81,000. motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> sarah >> for central latino we see a very strong demand in the district 6, nine, and 10 and 11 for the home delivered meals. almost 40% of the waiting list is in this district and last year central latino serves up over 24,000 home delivered american-style latino meals to
1:14 pm
clients. with-but they are actually at their capacity. so with this recommended a back fund we are recommending 30,000 one-time only funds to help the agency to build up capacity. they'll be able to build up one additional route to inner and outer mission single residence occupancy locations. and to provide additional about seven 800 mealsseven 800 meals to clients. so pending any questions i seek your approval. >> thank you. any, so questions of the commission? any, so questions of the public? hearing none, i will call the question. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries >>[gavel] >> it seems we have a duplicate of the letters for the next items while referred to the necks one as q-one request authorization to modify the grant agreement with-for
1:15 pm
the provision of elderly nutrition program home delivered meals during the period of july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the additional amount of $37,000 plus a 10% contingency for revised total grant amount not to exceed two and at $77,000. motion to discuss bequest >> moved and seconded. width thank you. sarah. >> again this is a one-time only add back and to help to relieve the rent increase prices for the agency. with the successful pending successful lease negotiation they will be able to use this one-time only fund to building their capacity. as we know last year they served over 31,000 meals and also they are so high demand for the cuisine on the waiting list. so pending your
1:16 pm
questions, we will seek your approval. >> thank you. any, so questions from the commissioners bequest >> i am confused but we divided this one-time increase >> one of the reasons we do this is to maintain the flexibility that the-building up their capacity for their congregating meal sites and also building up capacity for the home delivered meals. they are looking for funding to building up a additional route for their home delivered meals. so we think this is will be the best way to divide the funds and if they need to use it unfortunately, if that is the case, but if they would be able to negotiate a successful lease and those funds will be released to building up capacity for both programs. >> thank you. any other, so questions? any, so questions for the public? hearing none, call the question all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion
1:17 pm
carries. >>[gavel] >> item for the purpose of discussion will be r-one requests and authorizes you to modify the grant agreement with meals on wheels for the provision of elderly nutrition program home delivered meals during the period of july 1, 2016 to june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of excedrin $2000 plus a 10% contingency for a revised total grant amount not to exceed $6 million . motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. sarah. >> meals on wheels home delivered meals provides two meals a day with various diet and low-salt diets. sold last year they actually served 1 million, over 1 million meals.
1:18 pm
that is over served their contract by 10%. so with the recommended at that funds we will be able to add additional --about 147,000 meals to this program to serve additional clients and also provide additional units and pending your questions, we seek your approval to modify this grant. >> thank you. i have one question. you said over served. how do they fund those over served meals. was it private donations? >> yes. meals on wheels every year they have a grant fund raising event and is successfully fundraising for a lot of the meals funds. >> meals on wheels for steve and thanks for asking the question i was cannot remind us that we match every government dollar practically. so last year but 46% of private dollars
1:19 pm
went to conflict this program in order to do the two meals a day in the commentary volunteer services that we add on to the program. >> thank you. and it of, took questions commissioners the quest when he comes of questions of the public? hearing none, i will call the question. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item s, requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with bayview hunters point multipurpose senior services for the provision of adults with disabilities congregate meals during the period of july 1 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of $7308 plus a 10% contingency per a revised total grant of not to exceed 101 eight of $85,000.
1:20 pm
sarah chan. motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> thank you, sarah. >> bayview hunters point with a new center opened in june and attracted a lot more people and adults with disabilities as well. so with this recommended at back fund we are adding additional 1100 meals and to meet the service demands and the needs. last year they served about 12,000 meals for adults with disabilities pending your questions, all seek your approval to modify this grant >> thank you. any comments or questions bequest mission or james >> they operated two centers out there, they viewed the george david and still operating about multipurpose center? >> note. they basically relocated to the new site. that's doctor george see this site is at the new location at the new complex. there is a rosa park and there is some other site. western addition.
1:21 pm
>> president james we switch from senior meals two meals for adults with disabilities could maybe you're wondering why we've seen bayview again but that is why. >> okay. thank you. >> thank you. any other comments or questions for the commissioners bequest comments or questions from the public speakers hearing none, all call the question. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? thank you. the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item t requesting authorization to modify the grant percent of latino san francisco for provisions with adults with disabilities cognitive meals of july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of 6003 at $85 plus a 10% contingency for a revised total grant amount not to exceed $40,540. motion to
1:22 pm
discuss bequest >> moved and seconded. >> thank you, sergeant >> again this is adult with disabilities congregate meal site in central latino. we recommended the at that funds to add additional about 1000 meals to this site and pending your questions all seek your approval to modify this grant could >> thank you. any, took questions from the commissioners bequest >> yet. your population, is it younger more younger or older adults were combinations bequest do you know? >> it's a combination but it depends on the site central latino because they do have a veterans, and site and that attracts additional adults with disabilities who are not living in that contract. i would say maybe younger there but i can definitely if you need to see the demographic profile. >> because i am wondering with
1:23 pm
the type of meals maybe with older people it may be more softer,, different kind.. is it more [inaudible] something like that where the younger adults with disabilities may not need that or no problems with that combination? >> central latino serves latin american style food and regular food. not substituting because [inaudible] so it's a regular cuisine. >> okay. he was to add to that what we see in the congregate meals sites where traditionally they've served over older adults they tend to serve younger adults who are getting close to the quote seniors. they tend to be an older population of younger adults with disabilities. i think one of the things we are looking at that we might serve a much younger population but right now that's what we see in the sites we currently have.
1:24 pm
>> so it's not younger late 20s >> right. generally seen that's what we are seeing. >> okay. okay. >> thank you. any other, took questions from the commission?, so questions from the public? hearing none, >>[chorus all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? thank you get the motion carries >> >>[gavel] >> item u requesting the authorization to modify the grant agreement for project open hand for provision of adults and disabilities congregate meals during the period july 1, 2016 through june 30 27 in the addition amount of 41,000+ a 10% contingency for eyes total grant amount not to exceed $176,000. motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. tiffany. >> there is a great demand for
1:25 pm
adults with disability meals in the various districts where project open hand provides meals and their first-quarter numbers this this courier confirmed that. each month of the first quarter project opening exceeded the target number of meals. the addition of over 6500 meals in naples project open hand to meet the demonstrated demand and serve the adults with disability population. pending any questions i seek your approval for this agenda item. >> thank you. same question i had with meals on wheels. is this excess from the contract being funded through private donations to project (? >> yes. at this point in time i mean they still there funding per month is not blocked off. so they will get all the money in their contract until it is gone. >> i see. think of and intercoms of questions bequest hearing none, and he comes of questions from the public? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of
1:26 pm
ayes] opposed? thank you. the motion carries >>[gavel] >> item v requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with russian-american community services for the provision of adults with disabilities congregate meals during the period of july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of work thousand $674 plus a 10% contingency for revised total grant amount not to exceed 10,000 hundred $68. motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. tiffany >> russian-american community services also serves the adult with disability population at their congregate meals site get the additional funding for 750 meals will aid russian-american community services in meeting the est. demand for adult with disability congregate meals. their first-quarter numbers are consistent with this request.
1:27 pm
pending any questions, i seek your approval for this agenda item. >> think. any comments or questions from the commission?, took questions from the public? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? thank you. the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item w question the authorization to modify the grant agreement with self-help for the elderly for the provision of a adult with disabilities congregate meals during the period of july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 name out of $17,509 plus a 10% contingency for a revised total grant amount not to exceed 37,503 and $55. motion to discuss >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. tiffany. >> self help for the elderly reported first-quarter adult disability numbers also confirmed the ongoing demand and need to provide meals to the adult with disability
1:28 pm
population. that may also have a preference for chinese style meal. over half of self help for the elderly scholar. neil site serves this population adding additional funding and meals to this contract will allow self-help for the elderly to continue to serve and meet the increased neil needs for this population. and expand its service to include a new meal site recently opened in visitation valley. pending any questions, i seek your approval for this agenda item. disputes thank you. any, took questions from the commissioners bequest and he comes of questions from the public? seeing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? thank you. the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item x requesting
1:29 pm
authorization to modify the grant agreement with russian-american community services for the provision of adults with disabilities home delivered meals during the period of july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of 20,000 hundred $81 plus a 10% contingency for a revised total grant amount not to exceed two and $28,000. motion to discuss >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. tiffany. >> russian-american community services first-quarter meal numbers for home delivered meals to the adult with disability population confirms the need to provide meals in
1:30 pm
the service area covered by russian-american community services. the addition of a little over 3400 meals will enable russian-american community services to meet the known demand for meals in the district they serve which includes one, four, five, and seven. pending any questions, i seek your approval for this agenda item. >> thank you. any comments or questions from the commissioners bequest hearing none, any, took questions from the public? again seeing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries >>[gavel] >> item y requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with inst. on aging for the provision of adults with disabilities home delivered meals assessment services during the period july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of 118,001 at $13 plus a kid 10% contingency for revised total grant amount not to exceed three and $22,000. motion to discuss >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. sarah >> inst. on aging a disability assessment. this piece basically they provide citywide adult with disabilities outreach to the citywide adult with disabilities waiting list for
1:31 pm
the home delivered meal monitoring to manager the waitlist and they also do intake the assessment and coordination with the home delivered meals with adults with disability clients and providers. so with the recommended ad back funds we actually will be able to add additional 313 additional units to allow to address the strong increase and the demands for this program. pending any questions, i will seek your approval to modify this grant >> thank you. and he comes of questions of the commission? commissioner sims >> only an observation this is a sizable increase to the original budget >> correct. what we experience with the past three months there is a very significant increase for referrals. so the agency not only needs to do
1:32 pm
referrals. they do annual reassessment for clients. that's why we see the need to increase the units. >> thank you. any other, took questions from the commission?, took questions of the from the public? seeing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item z, requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with meals on wheels for the provision of adults with disabilities on delivered meals during the period of july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the additional amount of two under $69,209 plus a 10% contingency provides total grant amount not to exceed $888,000. motion to discuss >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. sarah chan >> again this is meals on wheels adult with disabilities on delivered meals and witty increase for the referrals and
1:33 pm
we see an increase for enrollment for the meals on wheels adult with disability meals they serve citywide and with this fund we will be able to add additional 62,000 meals and to this program. so pending any questions i seek your approval to modify this grant >> thank you. any comfortable questions from the commission? and he comes of questions from the public? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries >>[gavel] >> item aa requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with meals on wheels for the provision of emergency home delivered meal services delivered meals during the period of july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of 31,006 and earned $85 plus a 10% contingency fee for revised total grant amount not to
1:34 pm
exceed $153,000. motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> sarah >> meals on wheels emergency meal services service citywide and provides consumers with within 2-5 days after the home emergency delivered meal eligibility been approved by dos intake. with this recommended ad that will be able to add additional 8000 proximally 8000 meals to this program to meet the increasing demand. pending your questions about seek your approval. >> thank you commissioner james >> this emergency, how many approximately how many meals are for people with disabilities and how many how can you separate that from senior? and for how many days? what are we talking about? >> for the emergency meals in general it's up to 60 days and in dos we actually have the
1:35 pm
transitional care program which allows 14 days. so normally if clients are admitted into the hospital or a facility in being discharged and there is a transitional care program with ihss working together to provide 14 days meals. for the clients in the emergency meal we see both adults with disabilities, younger ones, under 60. we also see over 60. so it is a compounded for both. after the emergency meal, if there's a continued need and there will be enrolled into separate programs. >> thank you. mister james >> further, what is the emergency? i mean they get admitted to the hospital and they have to have a discharge plan?
1:36 pm
>> the transitional care program is specific 14 days after discharge but in general the emergency meal home to home delivered meal can be referred by aps. could be referred by other resources that the client acting identified as an urgent need for that meal. though the service is well connected quickly within 2-5 days. that's how it goes. >> okay. >> thank you. any other comets or questions? and eight, sore questions from the public? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries >>[gavel] >> item bb requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with chinatown community development center
1:37 pm
for the provision of chinatown single room occupancy sro food outreach program during the period of july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2020 in the addition amount of $21,600 plus a 10% contingency for a revised total grant amount not to exceed one or 26,000 seven or $64. motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. sarah. >> chinatown community development center food outreach program actually is a four-year contract starting this fiscal year just presented a few months ago. original contract was approved in august commission meeting and since the original budget if they pass through super subcontractor presbyterian church. so with this ad back funds we recommend about 5400 annually to the contractor to do important administrative work including
1:38 pm
client intakes moment and data entry. so this is for years contract. pending any questions from icq or approval to modify this grant. >> thank you. any consequences from the commission? >> to be clear this is for administrators were not for meals? >> this is actually a home delivered grocery program and food outreach. so it's food bank dropping off the food bags at the site. the provider of this grant actually distributes the bags to eligible clients. so the modification of this grant will be able to capture the client information to have the staff being able to do the assessment and enrollment and put data in our system. >> so it's an administrative >> administrator. >> thank you. any other comets or questions? any comets or
1:39 pm
questions for the public? earwig all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item cc requesting opposition to modify the grant with community living campaign for provision of food pantry and home delivered grocery for the period july 1, 2014 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of $66,039 less than 10% contingency revised total grant amount not to exceed four and 22,006 or $50. is that correct is a july 1, 2014? >> correct. >> it is, okay. motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> 80. sarah >> community living campaign food pantry on delivered grocery program actually is a three-year contract starting 2014 and this is the last fiscal year for this contract.
1:40 pm
so we be at that fund it will enable dos to add additional 2000 at fax into her store the service level. also be able to expand the program to a weekly on delivered grocery delivery. right now there are deliver biweekly. so the back funds also help the agency to fill a shortfall in the budget amount existing for their existing services. pending four questions i will seek your approval to modify this grant. >> thank you. any, so questions of the commission? any comments or questions- >> yes. because that program is in my community. seniors do appreciate the home delivered
1:41 pm
meals. they put them in the basket and their volunteers to put them together. then they deliver them to the homes good so it's really very much needed and they are very vocal when the quality is not good. so i approve. >>[laughing] >> thank you. again, i will call the question is did i ask for public comment? is there any? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion passes >>[gavel] >> item dd requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement golden gate senior services or the provision of food pantry and home delivered grocery during the period of july 1, 2016 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of 153,003 and $60 plus a 10% contingency revised total grant amount not to exceed 237,009 or $66. motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. sarah >>: gate senior services home delivered grocery and food
1:42 pm
pantry program actually one year expansion. we have 416-17 in having resented and proved in this commission meeting and the ad back recommendation is to supported by the district supervisor specifically for district 1 for security to improve and to outreach the needs. the food pantry-fiscally in this monthly grant this to peace. there's a food pantry piece and there's a home delivered grocery. the food pantry program is a target eligible ambulatory seniors and adults with disabilities who can pick up weekly supplemental foods. the home delivered grocery program serves low income and frail in unable to access healthy food choices and unable to come to the pantry
1:43 pm
site. so for this ad back funds we are allowing golden gate senior services to expand their program and to serve additional seniors and adults with disabilities. be able to add additional service scope for volunteers and recruitment and development. as we know volunteers have been a critical important piece in this program. for the in the presented budget you can also see that there is a 138,000 actually goes to the subcontractor,, richmond district neighborhood center who actually operated a home delivered grocery program and food pantry program. so with this additional ad back actually for the home delivered grocery we will be able to increase from 3500 250 5200
1:44 pm
bags. for the new pantry bags we will be able to add in around 17,000 bags distribution to the eligible target populations. so pending your questions i seek your approval to modify this grant. >> thank you good any comets or questions from the commission? and he comes of questions from the public? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item ee. requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with san francisco marin the food bank for the provision of food pantry program are in the period of july 1, 2012 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of 589,007 or two dollars for revised total grant of $1.2 million less a trend 10% contingency for revised total grant amount not to exceed $1.3 million. what a motion to
1:45 pm
discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. sarah >> san francisco marin food bank pantry program as it provides food bags to the above mentioned home delivery rose 3 programs. and other partners. also, with this ad back expansion we will be will to serve additional clients. you can see the program actually increased a lot increased a lot increased a lotabout roadcrew a lot. so the program actually was calledbrownback program but it was a five-year contract and this year is actually the last year. so we only ask to modify this year. the ad back funds will enable us to add additional 82,000 food bags to restore the service level 215-16 and also significantly
1:46 pm
expand our services to meet the growing needs to the target population which are seniors and adults with disabilities. the contractor is able to expand the participating pantry sites to up to 21 sites and we were able to see that across the town and basically every district will at least have one pantry site that we can reach our target population and will be easier accessible to our target population. so the revised above budget in front of you will include both pantry food bags and home delivered grocery food bags. pending your questions, i will seek your approval to modify this grant. >> thank you. any come to questions of the commission? comments or questions of the public? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye
1:47 pm
>>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item ff requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with the san francisco marine food bank for the provision of home delivered groceries during the period of july 1, 2012 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of one or $43,000 to revised total of $612,000 plus a 10% contingency for revised total grant amount not to exceed $673,000. motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> san francisco marine food bank partnership with home delivered meals providers to deliver those bags this grant is actually five years of agreement and until the end of this fiscal year again this is the last piece and the ad that will enable dos to add an
1:48 pm
additional 11,000 bags to restore the services up to the 15-16 service level and enabled to expand the services to include one additional undeliverable deal partner and to meet the growing needs in our community. the budget presented in front of you actually shows there is around 120,000 it is a pass through to the home delivered meal providers who deliver those bags. you see it is both the food cost, the food bag cost and the past through with the partners. so pending any questions my secure approval to modify this grant. >> thank you. and he comes of questions? >> on this last food preparation. i just have a comment because i been attending meetings regarding emergency preparedness,
1:49 pm
earthquake and what have you. i just want to the nutrition people to think about that because they expect that san francisco a lot of elderly will be affected. so not only the people who are not getting deals here but we may have an additional people who have their own separation of doing their own meal. so we might want to think of that. the library is on board with looking at earthquake and recreation and parks. i think what they are saying is that the population of the elderly and the handicapped particularly, the elderly will be affected in san francisco. so i just want you to think about that >> thank you. that's a very good point >> for looking up preparation what were doing about that. >> right. that's a good point. the cities already in conversations with home delivered meal providers and
1:50 pm
congregate meal providers around emergency preparedness and has been for actually many years. so we have been talking and thinking about that and planning for that. >> okay. >> okay, thank you >> any other comments or questions commissioners? any, so questions of the public? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> just an observation a suggestion i don't know if it's possible but at least 10 of these contact one of occasions for less than $25,000. couldn't put on a consent agenda? >> again this is john-ages 800 this answer a lot of debate between program and contacts whether we put on the consent agenda where we show it individual. this represents a whole set of ad backs and where distributing the funds that were we sought needs trying to meet the needs of the population in terms of delivered foods and congregate
1:51 pm
meals. though the question really was, in terms of transparency and showing the public as was the commission we are we are distributing the funds and how much, to put it all on the agenda were to section off a part the 10 items into do it as consent, depending on the preference of this commission we can do it either way. in the future good enough to be good for us to know how you want to proceed with that. >> thank you. it's up to the chairman but my suggestion would we have this many contracts as many as we can put on the consent agenda is transparent and of any commissioners have questions they can raise and it would expedite the process. just a suggestion >> yes. the only thing all of the reports,, i know we just was just so much. so we don't want to do this too often to our advisory council and all the other committees that want
1:52 pm
to report. so i think it would be a wise to put this >> i would say myself on a contract that was kind of pushing to have the information more out there. what program adjusted was to actually identify the items in the general memo that you received so you know these are items included but not to have them as separate agenda items that we can do that in the future. >> i would say that i am fine with that for most noncontroversial or very standard low-budget increase. the place where i would call exception of things like this to mosey centerlines negotiation where i think it's important for us to expose those fax in the public forum just because there's a contract for at least that's under negotiation apparently is unsettled. we are awarding money in at this patient will be. it's a little bit important
1:53 pm
for that to be publicly exposed. >> okay. >> thank you. >> final item, gg review and approval of revision 1 to the 2016-17 dda area plan budget. martha peterson present in. >> good morning executive director mcspadden president james and commission. my name is martha peterson i work with the human services agency budget unit them here before you this moment last for your review and approval for vision number one to the fiscal year 16-17 area plan budget. the net effect of these changes from the base plan budget this year six and-17 is an increase of 238,000 in the area plan budget for new total of $5,000,506,000 . i will of this total 150,000 or six and 46 is from reallocated or increase allocation from the federal
1:54 pm
government. additional one-time state funding of $66,593 specifically for the home delivered meals program and $21,309 from additional state funds for the state health facilities penalties account. attached to the commission memo details the area plan fluctuations in federal and state funding by title and dos program staff recommended actions. the program defendant include support services congregate a home delivered nutrition disease prevention family caregiver ombudsman and elder abuse prevention as well as administration funding for these programs. the local support is not included. an earlier version of this commission memo included an incorrect total for the ombudsman program. provides annual contract total is four and $76,000 when it $36. 621%
1:55 pm
of this increase in the area plan funding is a spike in the nutrition program with a total of 46,300 in the congregate meals program and $99,000 for the home delivered meals program. these one-time funds were included with the app back dollars overallocated earlier today. which with approval of this item staff will make the appropriate contract modifications please, let me know if you have questions. >> thank you. any constant questions from the commission? >> yes. on the combustion state health citation account. what is that about? >> those funds are actually, they are collected as a result of state and federal civil penalties imposed against health facilities for noncompliance with state and federal laws and those funds are broken out into a federal account and a state account. so when the state funds-when the
1:56 pm
state receives those funds they allocate those according to the and allocation limits abided by all of the counties within the states. so that we allocation of those funds back to the county. >> okay. >> thank you. any other comments or questions from the commission?, took questions from the public? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries >>[gavel] >> we are at the end of the agenda. >> any general public comment. >> we tabled everything did not push anything to the end. >> do we want to continue? the things we tabled you want to do them now would you want to - >>[inaudible] [off mic] we will table them thank you everyone. >> we have an announcement?
1:57 pm
>> any announcements? >> any announcements? i apologize to the people i have asked to table your viewport but we were afraid that we might not be held over and we want to make sure all these contracts get her good so i apologize. i have to buy some ice cream but anyway, thank you very much for your time. any public comment? no announcements can deny the motion to adjourn >> moved and seconded. >> it's been moved and second. we are to adjourn the meeting. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] the ayes have it. the motion carries. >>[gavel] >>[adjournment] >> >> >>
1:58 pm
1:59 pm
2:00 pm
2:01 pm
2:02 pm
2:03 pm
[horns honking] announcer: big dreams and good grades aren't enough to get into college.
2:04 pm
there are actual steps you need to take. finding someone who can help is the first and most important. for the next steps, go to knowhow2go.org. >> good morning and welcome to tuesday november 15, 2016 meeting of finance committee of san francisco county transportation authority. >> item 1, commissioner campos, present. cohen, present. kim, present. mar, here. yee, absent. we have quorum. >> thank you kb & i like to
2:05 pm
especially give props to sf gv tchb staff leo and mark bunch for televising this today >> item 2, 3 comprise consent calendar and considered routine. staff is not presented toprint on the item. if a member objects items may be removed and considered separately. >> i see so motion to sever items. anyone that would like to speak on the consent calendar? seeing no public comment on consent calendar, close public comment. motion? do we need a roll call? >> commissioner campos, aye. cohen, aye. kim, aye. mar, aye. yee is absent. the consent calendar is approved.
2:06 pm
>> thank you. now on to item number 4. >> item 4, recommended acceptancy of audit report. >> we have sintia fong. >> deputy director. excited to bring the item today. today we are look at transportation thoretd annual financial #125i789 audit includes fram audit which has emphasis on yerba buena ramp improvement today ewoo have vavrinek trin and day to present the results of the audit. >> good morning. my name is [inaudible] i am in charge of the audit for the authority. this is the annual financial report for the authority sfcta,
2:07 pm
the audit is insure the financial statements are fairly stated under the scope of the audit requires issue a opinion on whether the financial statements are fairly stated. what you have is financial results ended june 30, 2016. we audit the numbers and confirm the balance jz sales tax you received and perform all kinds of procedures including confirming cash, so the opinion on the financial statement is a [inaudible] meaning the financial statements are fairly stated. as part of the audit also, we issue opinions on the authorities compliance with federal requirements the authority receives for the grants. we also take a look at the expenses related to federal compliance, much is construction related. we take
2:08 pm
a look at the manner you process dispersement and the manner the authority processes its contract procurement procedure jz this is part the internal control we take a look at and pleased to let you know we noted no defifancies with respect to the federal control or compliance. with that more than happy to take any questions. >> colleagues, are there any questions? >> i will ask one that deputy director fong brought up to mystaff when we were prepping. on page 13 of attachment 2, there is the chart of the revenue and i know we projected for proposed budget $27 million in sales tax revenue which was about--and the actual numbers are about $5 million less than the projected and wonder if you can talk about how we do projections and if we are going
2:09 pm
to change anything in the future projections on sales tax revenue? >> as of june 30, 2016 we projected 4 percent inclees crease in sales tax revenue. what came in is approximately 1.9 percent increase. what we did smaeted the sales tax revenue we work with a economist beacon economics who look at projections going forward and also work wg controllers office very closely insureing our estimateerize accurate. right now at this point as of the most recent quarterly internal accounting report we are continuing to see that sales tax revenues are not coming at a 4 percent projection. we will monitor this heavily, closely and wait till the holiday season crosses to see how sales tax revenue land and from that point on a annual basis we come back in february or march to bring before the committee the budget
2:10 pm
amendment. at that time we can discuss more where sales tax revenues are and keep the number where it should be or perhaps decrease but give a outlook where sales tax rev mew is going forward. >> thank you. i want to congratulate on a slnt excellent audit and thank you for the great work. >> i like to extend to the staff. without my staff-i had cal and lily here for more than 5 years hemming to move this forward plus their great staff, henry, crista and leana, without them we wouldn't have a successful and clean ought audt and thank you to vavrinek trine and day. it is great working with them the last few years. >> great. >> thank you. >> thank you. so, i see no other questions open up for public comment. anyone from the public that would like to
2:11 pm
speak? seeing none, public comment is closed. this is a action item where we need a motion to recommend acceptance. >> same house same call? >> approve this with a positive recommendation same house same call? without objection. >> thank you. mr. stamose, the item that some have been waiting for on the hairball, please call item 5. >> item 5, base shore bullvert cheeseer sauvs street and potrero avenue intersection improvement update. this is action item. >> good morning commissions. [inaudible] i like to introduce stalia lang who will be giving a presentation. this is district 10 neighborhood transportation improvement program. one the capital projects that supervisor cohen supported the advanssment of and so this is a report out as the project is entering its
2:12 pm
draft final report stage squz report to the committee on the findings and recommendations. >> talia, i am a planner at livable and sustainable streelts at mta and here to talk about our work so far on this project. the hairball. to let you knewhat we have done and next steps. to give background before i run through the presentation, in 2012 the department of planning produces the cesar chavez community design plans which had safety recommendation for the hairball and map to separate the hairball in areas to sedge recommendations for improvement by segment. last year mta and public works were-received funding through district 10 and
2:13 pm
sfcta to study key segments and produce preliminary design jz do land surveys and also produce overall planning level lighting plan and cost estimate for the entire hairball area. as you can see in this birds eye view aerial-i want to mention really quick i handed out handouts of the presentation because i change thd order of the slides from the previous packet to be more cohesive so the new printouts in front reflect what while isle show today. this is a birds eye view of the area and where they come together with highway 101 interchange t. is a complex arrange of bridge and ramps and has high potential to
2:14 pm
provide connect evty between the three modes but there are conflict points which is what our improvements aim as assisting with. this is the segment map produced by the sf planning effort and cesar chavez community design plan and the segments that we studied in this effort were f and g on the western entrance and m, n and o on the southeastern entrance. so, this was a coordinated erftd between public work squz mta. public works did land surveys for the segment jz took lead on f and g. mta took leads on m, n and o. i will woke through f and g and probably familiar with it but good to get a picture of what the issues are.
2:15 pm
there is a plan view on the left side that shows segments f and g where cesar chavez meets the 101 onramp and pictures on the right hand side basically move east as you move towards the highway overpass. that first picture on the top right is where the bike pass comes off cesar chavez and on the sidewalk and bike ped path moves towards under the highway. the second picture is a further down the path and third picture is where the path moves under the overpass and see the clearance issue. so, key issues and constraints for f and g, the western entrance driveway is narrow and in bad condition. the clearance is not sufficient at the overpass. the lighting isn't sufficient and needs repair and there are drainage issues with the entire set of segments. this is a
2:16 pm
plan view of those existing conditions. again, you see cesar chavez as it runs eastbound and you see the bike ped path as it comes off cesar chavez and moves under the highway overpass. this is a our proposed project for segments f and g. i'll point out some of the improvements. i dont know-you probably have it on your screens, but a is pointing towards the widened entry so widen the driveway and resurface the entry way to make it easier to turn on the path. b is showing the path is widened from 6 to 10 feet. there is new green buffer, item c, that is placed between the pathway and the roadway. there will be new retaining walls, item d. item e, regraded path and that helps to start the
2:17 pm
slope earlier and help fix the drainage and clearance issues mpt >> question. mr. chair, may i? >> yes >> thank you. the retaining walls, these walls do not currently exists or reinforcing existing structures? >> replacing and reinforcing existing. >> replacing and what? >> doing a combination of both. replacing and reinforcing some of the existing walls. there are existing retaining walls there. when you have to redo the grading to assist with the clearance to start the slope down earlier you have to redo some of the retaining walls. this is segment m, n and o. you see a plan view on the left. bayshore 94thbound at gerold and marin and starts to move under the highway 101
2:18 pm
overpass. that picture on the top right and looking north right at marin and bayshore and at the sidewalk entry to had hairball and the second picture is actually looking south at the intersection of marin and bayshore at the current conditions which includes a sidewalk that is currently used for pedestrians and also for southbound bicyclist and then you see the northbound bike lane on the roadway ajais tonight the sidewalk. you can also see it has lot of ubinstructions with light poles and street lamps. sorry, street lamps and utility poles. the last picture is looking south from gerold and bayshore at that intersection and medium island and crossing there. some of our issues and constraints with segments m, n
2:19 pm
and o is shared use of the sidewalk. it is a very narrow sidewalk for pedestrians and bikes to share and lot of ubinstructions. there are a lot of users with the shopping carts and large items. there is no way finding. the ramps at the north corner at bayshore and huh rin are poorly placed. a lot of truck traffic and nearby recyclingsenters and industrial use and the lighting needs repair. >> question about the lighting. do you know if that is a puc asset or a pg & e asset? >> puc. so, i will say that as part of this effort as we moved into detail design and construction we tried to replace and upgrade lighting in the segments as we look at them but overall that requires coordination with public works
2:20 pm
and puc. this is plan view on m and o. you see bayshore running north interseblthing with gerold and marin. on gerold there is a free right turn lane, not signalized and there is one signalized right turn lane and traffic going the other way. the near term improvements-we would be leaving the southbound bayshore sidewalk as is and have it continued to use by southbound bicyclist and pedestrians but then we would be widening the northbound bike lane to allow for more flexible use. let me back up for a second. so, we
2:21 pm
are actually proposing improvements in two phases for segments mn and o. one is appellant only upgrades we think we can implement soon and second set are longer term improvements that require hardscape change jz would take a longer to implement and have more stalshz changes so the plan view here are near term improvements so they are just paint only, which is why we are not widening that sidewalk and let tg continue to be use frd southbound bicyclist and pedestrians but trying to do paint improvement troothe northbound bike lane oto capture what is needed which is shared flexible space for users. other improvements include new bike lanes on gerold, continental cros walks on gerold and marin and
2:22 pm
bayshore and [inaudible] further south. intersection improvements such as paint and tracking marks and green bake shareoes to guide likealist. that is it so i'll move to the longer term proposed projects which required more substantial changes. here we really are looking at widening the sidewalk to create a shared two way bike path sidewalk on north bound bayshore and redesigning the medium into a bulb- out at gerold and bayshore and signalize the right turn which is a big improvement for pedestrians trying to make the crossing. relocate utility pole squz streelt lamp tooz the outer edges making more room for everybody's using that space and we'll install intersection markings and green back shareoes as needed to
2:23 pm
guide cyclist and pedestrians. in addition to this as part of the effort but separate project weez are doing spot impruchb provements and want to talk about those. one includes some changes that already went on on the western driveway entrance. there use today be a one inch lift a lot of cyclist would catch tires. we resurfaced it . we will add stripejug posts to delineate that entrance and that will happen towards the end the year. and then the other set of improvementerize way findings. we already generated the signs are working on installment and installed the end of the year beginning of next year. where do we go
2:24 pm
from here? in the report and in front of you you see project cost for the two segments. segments f and g including design and construction have been estimated at $454, 019 and mno and $694, 192. those project cost include design and construction and for mn and o include near term and long term proposed changes. we do have smp funding identified in mta's cip that are earmarked towards mn and o. >> how did you determine that particular allocation for funding would go to segment mn and o opposed to f and g?
2:25 pm
>> that is in mta plan and because it is close to thumount needed for mn and o and ready to start moving on those segments we started the process move frgward with those segment squz looking for funding for segments f and g. >> my question is, i understand it is probably easier to go with mn and o because the funding matches the amount orphmoney from mta, but i'm unable to determine which is high priority. which of the two segments is higher priority than the other? >> they have relatively equal prioritys. mn and o that funding is coming out of mta, cit budget and it is road work so it makes sense to use that funding for improvements that we are able to manage.
2:26 pm
segments f and g are strithly for the bike and pedestrian path and less on the roadway so we are working with dpw to really look for funding for those segments. at this point segments mn and o are mta led project so use said mta funds- >> supervisor campos. >> thank you, commissioner cohen. what is the completion date for both segments? >> i will flip to the next slide. segment frz mn and o because we have the funding in place we have started that process. we are going to be finishing up preliminary engineering by spring of 2017 and hope to have the near term improvements, the paint only improvements in place by summer
2:27 pm
next year and detail design will happen same time and home to go into construction on mn and o in twnt 18. f and g we like to put together a schedule and move forward and based on funding needs and requests. >> i think it is good that you are moving for ward with segments mno, but dont think that is accept able on the other segment. i represent that district and think they are both important why are not not both moving at the same time? >> it is a matter of funding. i can go back to mta with that request- >> is there funding the ta is gibbing to this project because i think we should withhold the funding from had mta. it just isn't acceptable you have to make it happen at the same time and don't know if-i think this
2:28 pm
is important for supervisor cohen and that segment should go forward as quickly as possible but important for us too, so maybe can we call mr. reiskin and see if he can respond to that and cta? i think we need to have both segments move forward at the same time. >> i agree which is why my-it is like having two kids and having to make a selection which will get what and how to prioritize it. very uncomfortable situation so i wanted a better understanding how that was determined. but just way of background, item 5 is a update on just the hairball project and its entirety and about a year ago i directed approximately $100 thousand of the available $600 thousand in tip funds to go to capital improvements towards
2:29 pm
the hairball so this presentation is refreshing and just curious to know where it is going. the hairball has been a problem for very long time. >> we agree. >> a very long time and wub one of the things the presentation didn't touch on but will make assumptions is with improvements it will help relax the homeless crisis that you see that exists in the hairball which is also a incredibly dangerous element that the presentation didn't necessarily reflect. people as you are probably aware-it is cleaned up now but there was a period orphtime and supervisor campos can attest there were people living under the freeway right where cesar chavez-where everything merges. i know it is cesar chavez and bayshore
2:30 pm
heading to the mission. there was what raised my attention over a year ago is there was a homicide and a body was found right under that freeway overpass. i also get letters from constituents from potrero hill travel toog the bayview or going the dogpatch neighborhood and the bayview folks coming to northeast mission that ride the bike trail. also bike to work day, i have driven that route at least three times and it is truly-there is a reason they call it a hairball. it is scary and dangerous and have a lot of activity and trucks and cars and pedestrians and you have close to a park, the skate park and also have cyclist all traveling along this particular thoroughfair. a lot of work needs to be

13 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on