conference focused on and the house conference will focus on it tomorrow with a goal of getting a, wouldi working draftn a matter of days. the president outlined where the white house stands on this. the president supports an interstate product for states with expanded medicaid. they want an option for patients with preexisting conditions to access the plan and the use of tax credits to purchase the policies. that is seen as an olive branch to republicans who viewed that specific facet as mandatory for any deal getting done. then infrastructure, which is something the president put forth also last night, calling on congress to procure a trillion dollars in funding from legislation. where that comes in is unclear. i spoke to kevin brady, the chairman of the house ways and means committee this morning. he said the following to me. he said that i expect the administration will start engaging more seriously with congress on infrastructure. it's clear it's a priority. so are health care and tax reform, though. so it sounds like the ball is in the white house's court on that one. the ball is al

wouldy, this legislation make it harder for women to exercise their constitutionally protected abortion-rights by discouraging insurance companies from including that in their plan. this bill undermines women's access to health care and women's ability to make their own health care decisions in virtually every way a piece of legislation could. it is offensive and it is unacceptable. and it sends a deeply harmful message from house republicans to women everywhere, that their health and economic security that comes with it are a political football rather than a national priority. but i know and women across the country know that we are stronger as a nation when women are healthy and in control of their own futures. so we are going to fight this trumpcaremful legislation because of what it would mean for workers, for families and for all of us. i hope everyone who agrees with or republicans, will as well. >> i want to pick up on the leaders point. essentiallyl is reverse robin hood. what you have is hundreds of billions of dollars coming out of the pockets of working people and working families a

if you are taking away this from the balance sheet, you get the and they wouldy try to do it well. that is my view of how that will go. i think that i agree that the fed does not want the using qualitative easing. it was done boldly and with many central banks reluctant and want to get the balance sheets that to normal. was a big part of the lien and clean debate and it was a question of whether they should go back to the lien and clean balance sheets. certainly, before the crisis, the central banks had different aproaches and there was german approach to these things. seen as's sheet was optimal. was just cash on the live the liddy side. isthe asset side, it short-term treasury security and it gets you lean and clean. we are pretty far from that and they are starting to get your print debt and you are seeing things that are less green. lien is. the thing you would associate with this balance sheet. with is a strong desire much of the fed staff to get the balance sheet as clean as possible as could be as's and it is something our moderator could be interested in any you could see t

access to maternity services -- i would come if the republicans are taking away women's access -- i wouldy services comment republicans are taking away women's access to maternity services. i would like to yield to mr. doggett. thedoggett: i thank gentleman. it's a regretful you cannot get answers to questions with such far-reaching effect. , want to be sure, mr. barthold on this particular bill i understand as effect. currently, an insurance company can do. the first $500,000 of compensation to its chief executive. mr. barthold: chief executive and any other employee. mr. doggett: right. -- barthold: mr. barthold: notit will be able to did -- i think in etna -- aetna's be able to do.ll million if it is performance pay -- $17.3 million if it is performance pay instead of $500,000. mr. barthold: there are some requirement such as being approved by shareholders -- mr. doggett: i understand the requirements of that provision -- the answer is yes. basically taxpayers are now subsidizing the first $500,000 of insurance compensation. once this bill passes, the american taxpayer will be asked to

i wouldi would like the public to remain and let us know if they see anything suspicious. the commissioner is being treated. neil: all right. two dead and we have another injured suspect. british authorities are being cautious about this, treating it as a terrorist incident until proven otherwise. stick with us. we are back into this at crowne plaza we know business travel isn't just business. there's this. 'a bit of this. why not? your hotel should make it easy to do all the things you do. which is what we do. crowne plaza. we're all business, mostly. your insurance on time. tap one little bumper, and up go your rates. what good is having insurance if you get punished for using it? news flash: nobody's perfect. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. and if you do have an accident, our claims centers are available to assist you 24/7. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™ liberty mutual insurance . neil: all right, we are getting some updates and talks about coordinated attacks and whether i

>> maybe i gave you too much credit, maybe i thought you were too smart and thought you wouldy actually do your research and figure out what is clearly satire. what talks about an imaginary concept and an imaginary concept of white genocide, which is upheld by the likes of steve bannon in all these alt-right figureheads actually think white people in the united states are under existential threat. i do not believe that. >> tucker: i don't even understand the answer but i will pass on things that just a couple days ago, you said some guy gave up his first class seat for uniformed soldier. people are thinking him.rs i am trying not to vomit or yell about mosul. was that satire too? what does that mean? will you blame stephen bannon for that as well? >> i think it's really irresponsible to blindly support for example wars that send off young people into combat, kill many others as we have just seen and mose will come at 200 people incinerated by u.s. bonds and to not do that in a way that expands anyone's freedom, that makes anyone less secure. the iraq war -- >> tucker: you are blaming th

musk by bringing together one of the very first people to bring together blues, country, boogieing wouldy and all these styles into rock 'n' roll. and more porntdly, you know, you look back and people like little richard and jerry lee lewis were very kind of sexual and threatening. and chuck berry really wasn't that. but he did something much more important which is he wrote songs in the voice of the average teenager which really nobody was doing at that point. >> rose: so is his genius as a guitarist or songwriter. >> it's both. you know, that lick, the one finger, slippery little lick that we hear, you know, it lives on in the music, he invented that. and he played music, he played guitar on different down beats an things. so he kind of revolutionized the sound. that famous chuck berry lick we hear in every song, everybody still duplicates, nobody was doing that before him. oh maybe lean. ♪ why can't you be true. oh maybe lien. ♪ can can't you do be true. >> rose: so that is a real basic building block of modern rock 'n' roll. >> so he seasoning writers likeo bruce springsteen and g