i am queen of england, impress of india -- empress of india. abdul has risen on his on merits. now he is my friend. i haven't been as happy as this for years. >> a little surprise. what is it? a mango, your majesty. it's -- off. sir henry, this hang mango is o! >> rose: i am pleased to have dame judi dench and director stephen frears back at this table. wwelcome. >> thank you. >> rose: this sounds like you miffed an idea and said let's write a book about it. >> no, this story was uncovered recently. i'm innocent, they just turned rose: i asked you about queen victoria when we were waiting and said how would she feel about:queen elizabeth. you said she liked very few people principally john brown and abdul karim. >> yes. this film might prove the thing we say about her, we are not amused, i think she was amused a lot of the time. >> rose: you get that idea from the relationship. >> and that's the feeling she had for albert and john brown and she had it for other people and probably laughed a lot actually. >> rose: where does she stand in terms of the memorable characters up port

john: he is from what india has had before. he has a good side with economic reform, but the bad side is he is very nationalistic. the problem around that region in asia is, it is a cockpit of these nationalistic emotions. it is not something where you can play things out easily. it's all about what is taught in textbooks in the school, not just about where the lines on the maps are, but what the japanese and chinese did at different times in history. it is a nasty history, which people keep pushing forwards and backwards to each other. if you change that, it makes a big difference. charlie: beyond the obvious tension from north korea's dramatic attempt to exercise and show off its military might and how far it is in developing nuclear weapons that can sit on top of icbm's, what are the tension places under consideration this week? clearly, another is qatar and saudi arabia and the emirates. explain that one. nicholas: right now, you have four or five areas under close scrutiny by these leaders. you north korea, iran, we talked

i am queen of england, empress of india. abdul is here on his own merits, now he is my friend. >> i'm surprised. >> what is it? >> a mango, your magisty. it's off. >> this mango is off. charlie: welcome. i am pleased to have dame judy dench here with director stephen frears. stephen: i am innocent, they turned up with the script. charlie: i asked you about queen victoria, and i said how would she feel about queen elizabeth and you said she liked very few people. judy: yes, but in a funny way this film may prove that that thing we say about here that she said we are not amused, i guess she was amused quite a lot of the time, actually. >> yes, you get that impression from the relationship. judy: you certainly do. we laughed quite a lot, actually. charlie: where does she stand in terms of memorable characters you have for trade on screen, either fictional or real? judy: i don't know. i never know, really. i do it and he tells me how to do it and i get up and do it. and then i fear -- i want to change it. charlie: we will get to

india wants a strategic military partnership. not alliance but a partnership with the united states and japan. dnt want to fight china. but it understands that it needs weight, and japan and the united states especially the united states can give it weight. india has more military exercises per year with the united states in the air and sea than anybody else. and this is a dramatic departure because for almost all of india's existence its primary supporter has been russia and the soviet union before it. now it's the united states. and we have no-- no bipartisanship in washington except on i hadia where president bush and president obama and now president trump to his credit have recognized the strijic opportunity to the united states and are exercising it. it is very important for him. >> rose: also india is a country having border disputes with china. >> that's right, in the himalaya. >> a huge long border which they still dispute, some indian politicians can be still savage towards journalists who draw the map in the wrong way.

japan and india, japan and the philippines, you numb and india and india. all sorts of allied countries joining together in new types of security partnership to bolster the old u.s. alliance system, which is not as strong or dominant as it was. >> china once the u.s. there on their terms? richard: yeah. the fascinating thing about china is china has been a huge winner from pax americana. let's not forget that. the u.s. is the security guarantor in asia has provided a platform for the chinese economic miracle. that is not to say the chinese didn't do in themselves through good policy, hard work, and the like. but without a peaceful regional and international environment, which the u.s. provided, that was the platform, the runway, which china took off. , china didn't do anything in building that system, they plugged into it in 2000. u.s. helped built it. , unsurprisingly, once eventually to be the dominant power itself in asia. power, athey are a big big economy, maybe in 10 years the biggest in the world, they do not want to rely on the u.s. anymore for secu

so, if you think about china at 6%, india at 9%, 10%, that is really constructive. europe up .5% or so. and that is different than it was two years ago when europe was being carried by the u.s. now the u.s. at 2% is fine. to help contribute. charlie: what do you think for 2018? brian: 2.2% in the u.s. and 3.5% in the world. charlie: will we get to 3%? that seems to be the president's favorite number. brian: if there is fiscal stimulus and tax reform, if people are enthusiastic and confident, if unemployment is low, it will take a little kick to kick that enthusiasm into action. i think we can get in the 3% range. charlie: will that be monetary or fiscal? brian: tax reform is critical. you have to lower the corporate rate to make it competitive. you have to be territorial. hard to do, but simple to say. they have to get that done. charlie: what do you mean by territorial? brian: if i operate around the world, i do not have this problem where i cannot bring the money back to the u.s. and use it. by having one tax rate for u.s. earnings. 39%, whatever it is for the u.s

big difference in a year,ier and a half ago toog ago to where it was flattish, steina chaibl at 6%, india has come back and big enough to really help, almost double digits next year am if you think at china at six and india, 9, ten and europe one and a half or so, that is really constructive that is is different than it was two years ago where the world, the economies especially europe was being carried by the u.s. and now the u.s. can, at two percent is fine to help contribute. >> rose: what do you think for 2018. >> 2.2 in the u.s. and 3 in the world. >> rose: will we get to 3 three and a half. >> with stimulus and tax reform and people get-- people are enthusiastic, they are confident, they are doing stuff, the unemployment is low, it's going to take a little kick, to kick that enthusiasm into action. and so you know, i think we can get in the three. >> rose: will that be monetary or fiscal or. >> it will take a little tax reform, tax reform is critical. lower the corporate rate, make it competitive and be territory-- territorial. hard to do but simp toll say. they have to get that don

japan and the philippines, vietnam and india, japan and australia, so all sorts of u.s. allies or allied countries, joining together in new sorts of security partnerships to bolster the only u.s. alliance system which is, you know, not as strong, not as dominant as it was. >> glor: china wants the u.s. there just on their terms. >> yes, china, the great, the fascinating thing about china is that china has been a huge winner from pacs americana. let's not ever forget that. the u.s. is the security gawrn tor in asia has provided the platform for the chinese economic miracle that is not to say the chinese didn't do this themselves through their good policy, hard work and the like. but without a peaceful international and regional environment, which the u.s. provided, that was the sort of platform, the runway on which china took off. that's the first thing. of course the wto. china didn't do anything in building that system, they simply plugged into it in the year 2,000. the u.s. helped build that as well. once again china just took off. but china, you know, and i think quit

punching kim jong-un in this kind of eight-year-old taunting war going on, you listen to mattis in india this week, he has diplomacy eight or nine times in the paragraph. they are the calming influence. theylie: a key repeating -- keep repeating we do not want war with the north koreans. >> that is very important signal to the north koreans. >> the problem with the punching. one problem is he does fear, incorrectly, that the united states wants to get rid of him, his regime, and wants to reunite the north and south. he sees these weapons as the ultimate deterrence against us doing that. when the president uses the kind of late which he is using, it reinforces in kim the reason why he wants to have these weapons. and this is a strange thing about north korea, they use the trail -- the trail like no other country i know, but are incredibly sensitive to it. one thing you hear from the north koreans all the time is when south korea says something not nice about kim jong-un, the north koreans get their backup. this language not only reinforces their policy but it is dangerous because it force

india has come back and is big enough to help. we think it will be almost in double digits next year. that is really constructive. that is different than it was two years ago when europe was being carried by the u.s. now the u.s. at 2% is fine. charlie: what do you think for 2018? >> 2.2% in the u.s. and 3.5% in the world. charlie: will we get to 2.2%? >> if there is fiscal stimulus and tax reform, if people are enthusiastic and confident, if unemployment is low, it will take a little kick to kick that enthusiasm into action. i think we can get in the 3% raise in -- range. tax reform is critical. you have to lower the corporate rate to make it competitive. you have to be territorial. they have to get that done. charlie: territorial? >> if i operate around the world, i do not have this problem where i cannot bring the money back to the u.s. and use it. have one tax rate for u.s. earnings. charlie: what do companies want to see done by the government with the money overseas? >> i think there are two parts. they want it to be a terri

we have hundreds of thousands of --s from india and china hang on -- computer science schools, and you will not solve that until you open things up to american citizens. charlie: they come here and make huge contributions to our economy, technology, science, and you don't want them to stay? steve: i did not say that. have 1.2, should we million immigrants every year? we have done that every year since 1964. how was that number pulled out of a hat? what we want is a merit a system so those people that can contribute in a meaningful way we still come here, but still have citizens in this country that have to be taken care of, and that is the promise of donald trump. i'm looking out for you as a citizen. whether you are hispanic, black , evangelical christian, what ever your sexual preference is, you are un-american citizen and i will defend your right. charlie: let's go down the list of things donald trump wanted. he wanted to do away with replace., repeal and it didn't happen. steve: that is the original sin of this administration. here was the plan that was laid out. they would take ob

do you accept north korea as a way you'veer the accepted pakistan, india, or others that did not sign the npp ? wedo you continue to say will never tolerate you as a nuclear power. charlie: but we have come to that decision quickly. >> the moment is here. i would be interested to hear if ,avid is hearing the same thing that every time i talk to them, they say our goal is full denuclearization of the korean peninsula and we will not ignore it north korea as a nuclear state. >> that is the aspiration. the question is the timing. be the endpoint of a long negotiation. just coming back to what nick was saying. it has a key role here. they had a lot of this when i was in beijing for a few days, the americans -- you've got to do this. the one that has a leverage under this regime. questionable, by the way, about how much leverage they have. it and say,k at of regimeo the risk the population over the border into china, we would up -- have them bottles bottled up as a nuclear power. believe, u.s. officials that chinese officials are so fed up with kim jong-un. they have warned him repeatedly

fundamental decision, we is do you accept north korea as a nuclear power the way we've accepted pakistan or india or others who didn't sign the n.p.t. or do you say no we will never tolerate you as a nuclear power. i don't think they've come to that decision yet. >> rose: we've come to that desion pretty clear, have we ery time i talk to american officials and i would be interested if david or lionel are hearing the same thing, that every time i talk to them they say our goal is full denuclearization of thecine peninsula and we will not acknowledge north korea as a nuclear state. >> that is obviously the aspiration. the question is the timing. you can aspire to the denuclearization of thecine peninsula, but that may be at the end -- that may be the end point of a long negotiation. just coming back to what nick was saying and david alluded to, china does have a key role here, but i think the problem has been, and i heard a lot of this when i was in beijing for a few days earlier this year, is that the americans have just you've got to do this, you need to impose sanctions, you are the one that has

and for india, obviously, it represents the second-largest population. all these countries represent a very attractive travel destination for chinese tourists. tom: domestically, i know you strategy.d on the the online bookings only make up 10% of all travel bookings here in china. where do you see that growth and at what pace? >> it started in shanghai. concertedve put efforts in penetrating into the second year and -- second tier and third tier cities p for summit increase advertisements. second, we are targeting the 6500 off-line sources to couple with our online efforts. thirdly, we developed probably have the product to serve the customers in these areas, such as not only hotels and tickets, trains, buses, ferries, etc. theything, we offer to customers. with that strategy, i hope we can boost the volume from the second tier and third tier cities. tom: is it becoming a more competitive space? >> as long as you keep up with your focus on customer and make the right investment in ai, big data, cloud computing, you are extending your leadership in this

which means, do you accept north korea as a nuclear power the way you've accepted pakistan, india, or others that did not sign the npp? or do you continue to say we will never tolerate you as a nuclear power. i don't think they have made the fundamental decision yet. charlie: but we have come to that decision quickly now, have we not? david: the moment is here. i would be interested to hear if david is hearing the same thing, that every time i talk to them, they say our goal is full denuclearization of the korean peninsula and we will not ignore -- acknowledge north korea as a nuclear state. >> that is the aspiration. the question is the timing. you can aspire to the denuclearization of the korean peninsula, that maybe the endpoint of a long negotiation. just coming back to what nick was saying and david alluded to. china does have a key role here, but the problem has been, and i heard a lot of this when i was in beijing, is that the americans -- you've got to do this. you need to impose sanctions. you are the one that has a leverage under this regime. questionable, by the way, about

so, you have japan and india, japan and the philippines, vietnam and inda, japan and australia. all sorts of u.s. allies or allied countries, joining together in new source of security partnership. u.s.his will bolster the old alliance system. jeff: china wants the u.s. there, just on their terms. richard: yes, but the fascinating thing about china is they have been a huge winner from pax americana. the u.s., as the security guarantor in asia, has provided the platform for the chinese economic miracle. that is not to say the chinese did not do it themselves through good policy, hard work and the a peacefulithout international and regional environment, which the u.s. provided, that was the sort of platform, the runway on which china took off. of course, the wto. china did not do anything in building the system, they simply plugged into it in the year 2000. the u.s. helped build that as well. once again, china took off. i think quite naturally, china wants eventually to be the dominant power itself in asia. they don't want, now that they are a big power with a big economy, maybe i

we have hundreds of thousands of kids from india and china in our engineering and computer science schools and you won't solve that till you open those things up to american citizens. >> rose: people have come here and made huge contributions to our economy, technology and science, and you don't want them to stay? >> i didn't say that. i said we have to do this -- first off, should we have 1.1 or 1.2 million immigrants every year? how did that number get picked? we've done it every year since 1964 when it was passed. we want a merit obesed system so those people who can contribute in a meaningful way always will be able to come here. but we have citizens in this country that have to be taken care of and that's the promise of donald trump. i'm looking for you as a citizen, you're american citizen who you're hispanic, black, jewish, evangelical christian, whatever your sexual preference, you are an american citizen and i will defend your right to the job first. >> rose: let's go down the list of things donald trump wanted. he wanted to do away with obamacare. repeal an and replace. didn't ha

interested in the subjects, suddenly a man appeared from another part of the world which she was empress of india by then and this idea of learning urdu arrived. i'm only guessing. >> rose: what was it like? >> he was such a good looking man. >> rose: what was it like? they liked each other, they could talk to each other? here was somebody that was at ease around her. it's slum. what i liked about if book was the empire was so ridiculous. somebody who wasn't powerfully part of it. shoats ♪ ♪ ♪ >> rose: i want to let you know about our new digital series, called off the table. it is a place where our guesses are able to field one last question. you'll be able to see it on facebook, youtube and instagram. comedian samantha b off the table. >> how do you break into an all boy's country club club like late night? you have to demonstrate stick to itiveness, you have to kill everyone in your way, you have to suffer a tremendous amount of (bleep) along the way and somehow stick with it and someone has to believe in you. maybe more than just one person. maybe like a whole bunch of people have to de