the gift fund management committee, this consists of different areas at laguna honda. so i believe this is like the fourth year we are here in front of the health commission to is for your approval of the budget. so currently the total balance of the gift fund budget is about $2.7 million. this number is from our third quarter presented to jcc a couple of months ago. so just to give you some idea that the total balance and how much we are asking for you to approve. so there are three different columns in your budget proposal. the first column was the current year budget. we have requested $382,000 and then year to date we spent about $152,000. a little bit under spent because of the delay of some of the contracts due to the city nearly implementing. so we'll catch up. we still have some pending expenses. based on this information we'd like to is for your approve for next year to increase our gift fund budget to $474,000. the increase is mainly due to the change of our nonprofit charity -- basically, like a work fun foundation but it's friends of laguna honda. majority the donation

staff will be going to laguna honda in approximately 2022. and if necessary d.p.h. can provide more detail but generally d.p.h. will be providing training to over 1,000 staff clinicians and clerks and others per year in these nine various training rooms. there's also seven other training rooms, five located at sukkoberg general and two at laguna honda. prior to commencing negotiations with healthright 360, both the department and real estate attempted to search for training space within city-owned buildings within commercial space and just buildings to get on a short-term basis. we could find none for various reasons. the city-owned space is limited both in the time that they could use it in because other departments need those spaces and have already booked it. and including the timing during the day and on weekends they needed those times to be able to be using those spaces. and then the cost. the cost was much higher if we were going to go outside and try to actually rent training spaces, conference rooms and whatnot. about twice of the expense of this particular short-term lease

to review the video and materials for the appeal. commissioner honda, you wanted me to remind you. >> commissioner honda: oh. hold on one second here. i would like to disclose that i am a partner that hired rubin ju >>> . it will not have an effect on my opinion. >> clerk: president fung has indicateed that the parties have three minutes each and would like to begin. >> scott sanchez, planning department. this has been continued several times and lastly when the board heard this item was not ready to uphold the notice of violation and continued the item. i think one of the comments of the board was whether there would be the possibility of legalizing under the central soma plan. at that point we were expecting it to have been adopted in the early 2017 the central soma plan has not yet been adopted but before the board of supervisors now, so we do expect that option this year there would be possibility to legalize. to note there is a path to legalize under the existing zoning, and that is how this matter came about. it was the property own owners seeki ng to legalize the use on the

to document it, all right? >> mirror image honda commissioner honda can you clarify on what basis? >> commissioner honda: that makes sense. [laughter] is this an error in abuse. >> no. on the basis that the trees need to be replaced. >> more trees being planted than transplanted. >> let's start all over. the motion is made by commissioner honda to grant the appeal an overturn public works order on the condition that three and if possible four replacement trees be placed in 36-inch boxes subject to bureau of urban forestry approval as to species and other features feature, and the second condition is that the three will be replanted an area specified by the bureau of urban forestry on the basis that more trees are being planted, there is a net gain of trees. >> that is exactly what i meant to say. >> perfect. on that motion, president fung. [roll call] >> that motion passes. thank you. >> no further business? >> would you like to stay longer? >> no. >> the meeting is adjourned. p. >> >>[music] >> i came in with her impression of what i thought it was good >> what i knew about audit

limits, i'm not sure. >> could you, as the commissioner honda said, i think we're raising the intensity of our scrutiny on these permits because we're just getting them further and further and there seems to be a lot of shall we say space with regard to an interpretation and enforcement. could you come back with an answer or bring someone with you from the health department that can verify how they enforce, review, that in fact that the red sticker that they give at the beginning is actually valid and is enforced during the period of the permit, please? >> can i

honda hospital and rehabilitation center as well as primary care and specialty care. the remainder of our network will go live in subsequent waves of the implementation, but that is just the first wave that we're in right now with those five phases. phase zero, which was from january and ended in march of this year, included on boarding the team and epic training, it is also the start of third party systems, which are necessary to have a fully functional epic system. d.p.h. identified 85 contracts required to make epic fully functional. while some of these were for simple licensing, such as billing codes, others were for actually software applications. to date, 50 contracts have been completed, and the team continues to meet deadlines required for epic build. as you can imagine, it's very rapid for 50 contracts. phase one focused on the completion of the project plan as well as training and certification of the epic build team. this phase of the project involved holding 230 demonstration and work sessions with clinical and business staff who made over 1700 decisions that determined ho

commissioner honda's motion to continue the matter, and this would be to the next meeti meeting -- >> next meeting? >> which is july 11. >> that's fine. [roll call] >> this is on the continuance? >> if we continue it, we will get vice president swig to vote. >> i'm still voting no. >> well, thank you for voting on the record. this matter is continued to july 11 where we will get vice president swig's vote on the motion. thank you. this concludes the hearing. b) authorizing, pursuant to the agreement, a third amendment to the memorandum of understanding with the city and county of san francisco, acting through its department of public works to increase funding in an additional amount not to exceed $17,966,556 for an aggregate total not to exceed $19,079,347 for the transbay folsom street improvement project that is within the scope of the transit center district plan project approved under the final environmental impact report transit center district plan and transit tower ("feir"), a program eir, and is adequately described in the feir and its addendum for purposes of the california enviro

ann lazarus, commissioner dale honda, and vice president swig will be absent tonight. brad russy will provide the board with any needed legal advice this evening. at the controls is the board's legal assistant, gary cantara. we will also not joined by representatives from -- be joined by representatives by joseph duffy, patrick

add that it was my first opportunity to attend one of the j.c.c.'s at laguna honda and i was both surprised and pleased, i think, at the staff participation and what seems to be a very, i think, robust desire on the part of what i observed, a robust desire to really sort of bring the hospital into a more high performing and sort of, at the same time, maintain its orientation around a very sort of humanistic care facility for its patients. so to be able to move into something that requires much more efficiency at the same time, same if not better level of human touch is something that i observed as a sort of dual and laudable goal on the part of the management and the staff that i was able to interact with and observe while i was there. >> thank you. that concludes our j.c.c. report. >> great, we could move onto consideration of closed session item. there's no public comment request for this item. >> okay, a motion is in order to hold a closed session. so moved. second? all in favor say aye. all opposed.. >> a lot of water heater in san francisco look like this may be yours doesn't

commissioner honda to grant the appeal and issue the permit on the condition that it be revis revised. require the permit for 332 pine street location on the basis that it within 75 feet of an existing mobile food truck, and to grant the issuance of the permit with respect to 400 california street. on that motion,. [roll call] that motion passes 4-0. you understand you have the 400 california street location and you will have to reapply for the 250. >> the meeting is now adjourned. . b) authorizing, pursuant to the agreement, a third amendment to the memorandum of understanding with the city and county of san francisco, acting through its department of public works to increase funding in an additional amount not to exceed $17,966,556 for an aggregate total not to exceed $19,079,347 for the transbay folsom street improvement project that is within the scope of the transit center district plan project approved under the final environmental impact report transit center district plan and transit tower ("feir"), a program eir, and is adequately described in the feir and its addendu

issue the permit for 400 california? >> correct. >> so we have a motion from commissioner honda to grant the appeal and issue the permit on the condition that it be revis revised. require the permit for 332 pine street location on the basis that it within 75 feet of an existing mobile food truck, and to grant the issuance of the permit with respect to 400 california street. on that motion,. [roll call] that motion passes 4-0. you understand you have the 400 california street location and you will have to reapply for the 250. >> the meeting is now adjourned. . >> supervisor tang: good afternoon, everybody. welcome it our land use committee meeting monday, july 16, 2018. i'm katy tang, chair of this committee. we're joined by supervisor kim and supervisor safai. our clerk is erica major. madam clerk, any announcements? >> clerk: yes. make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices completed speaker cards and documents should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the july 24 board of supervisors meeting unless otherwise stated. >> supervisor tang

commissioner honda would like to make is a motion to deny the appeal and uphold the revocation of the permit. there's two mer mits that issue here -- permits that issue here, based on the evidence that was presented at the police department's hearing at the revocation hearing. >> i like the way you make my -- i did such a good job with that, didn't i? >> okay. so we have commissioner honda's motion to deny the appeal and uphold the revocation of the permit on the basis that the revocation was proper based on the evidence presented at the revocation hearing before the san francisco police department. so on that motion -- [roll call] >> okay. so that appeal is denied, and the revocation is upheld. thank you. okay. we are now moving onto item number 8, this is appeal number 18-058, connie mar versus san francisco public works bureau of urban forestry. the -- [inaudible] >> -- which was denying the request to remove two significant trees with replacement on private property, order number 187562, and we will hear from the appellant first. you have seven minutes. >> thank you. thank you. i

commissioner stands. >> correct. so on commissioner honda's motion to continue the matter, and this would be to the next meeti meeting -- >> next meeting? >> which is july 11. >> that's fine. [roll call] >> this is on the continuance? >> if we continue it, we will get vice president swig to vote. >> i'm still voting no. >> well, thank you for voting on the record. this matter is continued to july 11 where we will get vice president swig's vote on the motion. thank you. this concludes the hearing. >> president chow: the commission will come to order and the secretary will call the roll. >> [roll being called] >> second item on the agenda. before you for approval. a motion is in order. >> so moved. >> second. >> president chow: there's a motion and second. are there any corrections to the minutes? seeing none we'll vote on them. all in favor? opposed? the minutes have been approved. next item, please. >> item 3 is the director's report. >> president chow: great. >> good afternoon, commissioners. i have three important items to share with you and then any other items you would like on

date. we have the 8th or the 15th. >> commissioner honda is not here on the 8th. >> . >> president fung: is the 15th acceptable to both parties? >> there is a possibility commissioner wilson will not be present on the 15th. okay, so the 15th. >> president fung: let's continue this to august 15th and both parties will be allowed to present a three page brief supplying supply. >> do we want to specify for the record those specific questions? you did ask questions. the questions asked possibly at the hearing on the matter on june 6. >> i think you wanted the specific calculations according to the ab009, is that what it is? >> let's do it differently commissioner honda. let's say they can provide a brief and how they conform to ab-009. 009, san francisco building code equivalencyies, and how they are then exempt from cbc. >> okay, so we have 'motion from president fung to continue this matter to august 15th to allow inspector duffy to testify and also so that the providers can provide further information a three page brief with answers on how the plans conform to ab-009, the san franci

honda's motion to continue the matter, and this would be to the next meeti meeting -- >> next meeting? >> which is july 11. >> that's fine. [roll call] >> this is on the continuance? >> if we continue it, we will get vice president swig to vote. >> i'm still voting no. >> well, thank you for voting on the record. this matter is continued to july 11 where we will get vice president swig's vote on the motion. thank you. this concludes the hearing. >> self-planning works to preserve and enhance the city what kind hispanic the environment in a variety of ways overhead plans to fwied other departments to open space and land use an urban design and a variety of other matters related to the physical urban environment planning projects include implementing code change or designing plaza or parks projects can be broad as proipd on overhead neighborhood planning effort typically include public involvement depending on the subject a new lot or effect or be active in the final process lots of people are troubled by they're moving loss of they're of what we preserve to be they're moving mid block

we have a motion from commissioner honda to grant the appeal and issue the permit on the condition that it be revis revised. require the permit for 332 pine street location on the basis that it within 75 feet of an existing mobile food truck, and to grant the issuance of the permit with respect to 400 california street. on that motion,. [roll call] that motion passes 4-0. you understand you have the 400 california street location and you will have to reapply for the 250. >> the meeting is now adjourned. . >> motion to continue items 1, 2, and 7, 8 and b and 16 to the date specified. >> president hillis: okay, we have a motion from commissioner koppel and a second from johnson. we'll take roll. vice president melgar. and commissioner fong. commissioner johnson. commissioner koppel. commissioner moore and commissioner richards. great. that item passes. item number 2 on your calendar. i should say calendar three, comments and questions. >> commissioner richards. >> commissioner richards: two things first. on roosevelt way it was a section 3, 17 demo -- demolition in my neighborhood an

motorcycles as well as the honda unit, the dirt bikes, is very important and that's p2. so we do both p1 and p2. >> supervisor fewer: but i do think, commander, that this is a unit that actually is by senority, is that correct? >> no, not with the p2. >> supervisor fewer: but with the p 1s they are? >> yes. >> supervisor fewer: i think if we train them and they're fully trained on the motorcycles and they pass the training that it just seems as though we should keep them on the unit to grow the unit versus training new ones that come in and transition now five years. especially because if you don't have a class, you haven't had a class in three years, it seems as though you might waive that p2 whatever policy to allow them to stay longer until you staff up even. because -- the p1s don't normally leave unless they retire? or are you seeing them transfer out to other units? >> i'm not seeing them transfer to other units unless they are promoted. if they get promoted they go to a different unit. >> supervisor fewer: thank you very much. >> this is a high energy corridor network. one

the elevated 280 just honda. beyond. we introduced a layered landscape that we're calling the double ground to create a unified academic campus that features both a large flexible series of making and teaching spaces on the ground and elevated series of garden and gathering spaces one level above. all connected on both levels to the existing c.c.a. main building. our concept is less about a singular new building and more. extending a unified campus. zooming in on the double ground, it contains 90,000 square feet of indoor space and 50,000 square feet of outdoor space. three pavilions out of the upper ground provide an architectural presence along hooper and irwin streets. in addition that spans the width of the block, there will be language -- large windows within the campus. the existing c.c.a. building is being reprogrammed. this is actually a plan with the existing building on the left and the new on the right. across the campus yard, the ground floor at the new building is a large flexible grid of interdisciplinary maker paces that range -- spaces that range from the universal an

joined by commissioner ann lazarus, commissioner dale honda, and vice president swig will be absent tonight. brad russy will provide the board with any needed legal advice this evening. at the controls is the board's legal assistant, gary cantara. we will also not joined by representatives from -- be joined by representatives by joseph duffy, patrick fosdahl, chris buck, and brent cohen. the board meeting guidelines are as follows: the board requests that you turnoff or silence all cell phones and other electronic devices so they will be disturb the proceedings. please carrie on conversations in the hallway. for those people standing by the door, can you please move away for fire code reasons? we have to keep it open. appellants, permit holders and department respondents are each given seven minutes to present their case and three minutes for rebuttal. people affiliated with these parties must include their comments in the seven or three minute period. members of the public who are not affiliated with the parties have up to three minutes each to address the board and no rebuttal. yo

, i'm not sure. >> could you, as the commissioner honda said, i think we're raising the intensity of our scrutiny on these permits because we're just getting them further and further and there seems to be a lot of shall we say space with regard to an interpretation and enforcement. could you come back with an answer or bring someone with you from the health department that can verify how they enforce, review, that in fact that the red sticker that they give at the beginning is actually valid and is enforced during the period of the permit, please? >> can i ask if that was discussed because i believe i was out when it was a presentation on the mobile foods. was that discussed at that time? >> no, it wasn't. we talked about mostly the fire oriented rather than -- that question was not answered. >> ok, i'll ask him. >> thank you. >> ok. so commissioners, this matter is submitted. >> we're not going to solve these problems tonight. clearly there's recognition by all of us having heard a number of these lately that there are some major issues and legislation. i would be very happy next week,

, lazarus, wilson and honda. we're the under dog tonight. i've got my colleague, melanie sangupta to help me out this evening. you're here tonight to look at these findings and see if you can uphold the findings and deny this facility. as we said in our materials, we don't think there is evidence to support the finding, so is what the evidence? the testimony? the photographs we just saw? it's our photo simulations and the plans, and we think that there is no evidence to meet the findings that you have to make that was either presented tonight or previously presented. the department of public health, department of public works, and planning department concur in their brief, department of public works does not believe there's evidence to make the findings tonight. and so what are those findings? if you look at findings seven and eight, it's whether this is a planning protected district? why is it a plan being protected district? because it's eligible to be a historic district, and these are eligible buildings. they haven't been specifically designated. the standard is does our facility sign