there is a new ruth bader ginsburg biopic. >> you have your tickets? >> laura: i'm ready, ready, ready. it's called "on the basis of sex" ." is that the joke? >> that's not it. >> laura: is coming under fire for potential inaccuracies. what are they? >> first of all, portraying ruth bader ginsburg as an actress named felicity jones. i'll put up a picture of them side by side. you can compare. you think this evokes ruth bader ginsburg? i believe it it to the audience. [laughter] the bigger problem -- it's the doily -- >> laura: they are both beautiful and their own way. >> of felicity joines had the doily, it would be better. >> laura: she's super nice. i spent new year's eve with her 1986. >> they played a trailer of this movie, and legal scholars are going crazy. watch. >> you think you can change the country, you should look at her generation. they are taking to the streets. >> protests are important. changing the current dominant culture means nothing of the law doesn't change. >> what did you see your name was? >> ruth bader ginsburg. >> the word "

>> supreme court justices ruth bader ginsburg, stephen breyer and elena kagan took part in a the trial titled insurrection of camelot. other participants include the u.s. solicitor general noah francisco and the canadian supreme court justice suzanne coat. this is an hour. >> in a kingdom not so far away and long time ago, king arthur and queen guenevere have created a near utopian society.

bader ginsburg? she is this totally amazing person. she was a lawyeroing back to the 1970's who fought for women's rights in courts, including the u.s. supreme cours she hacome in recent years this mega celebrity who millennials treat like a rock star. >> the must be times when you do feel blue. i'm not feeling blue right now. >> me neither. tom: one theory on why the films about ruth bader ginsburg and fred rogers have been popular is the profile inspirational imfigures during troubling and they give mature, grown-up role models. >> i think both rbg and fred rogers are very adult figures, and that is something we don't currently have. we don't have someone who is delivering the truth, like authentic people on tv or in the film space. i think people are starved for that in some way. rbg and fred rogers deliver that. those films deliver that. tom: other documentaries doing well include "three identical strangers," the ultimately dark story of triplets separated at birth and reunited as adults, d a bio

. >>> how much longer does 85-year-old justice ruth bader ginsburg plan to serve on the u.s. supreme court? her answer just ahead. adua ow aognitive pence? as you'd probably guess, a lot. that's why a new brain health supplement called forebrain from the harvard-educated experts at force factor is flying off the shelves at gnc. forebrain's key ingredients have been clinically shown to help enhance sharpness and clarity, improve memory, and promote learning ability. and now every man and woman in america can claim a complimentary bottle. just use your smartphone to text the keyword on the screen to 20-20-20. scientific research on cognigrape, a sicilian red wine extract in forebrain's memorysafe blend, suggests not only sharper recall, but also improved executive function and faster information processing. your opportunity to get into harvard may be gone, but it's not too late to experience a brain boost formulated by some of their brightest minds. just text the keyword on the screen to 20-20-20 with your smartphone to claim your complimentary bottle of forebrain. do it now -

ruth bader ginsburg gives a major clue on when she plans to retire. >>> the secret government program tracking u.s. citizens when they fly, even those not suspected of a crime and not on a watch list. the tsa explains the so-called "quiet skies" program. >>> also, the young man from texas who finished in last place at the tour de france, but inspired millions. >>> plus, the homeless man giving out his resume on the road side instead of asking for money. this morning, the overwhelming response. >>> and what you need to know if your child is a fussy eater. the new research on what not to do. >>> and we do say good morning, everyone. >> i'm kendis gibson. >> and i'm romina puga, filling in for diane macedo. >>> we begin with the breaking news overnight from the wildfire emergency on the west coast. the death toll now rising with another firefighter losing his life. >> also overnight, a dramatic increase in the number of homes lost around redding, california, where more than 38,000 people have now been forced to flee their homes. with new flames igniting and little relief in sight, the ca

ruth bader ginsburg, how long she plans to stay on the high court? >> let's start with the twitter war of michael cohen and donald trump. what was already a shifting denial of collusion today has turned into a flat out that collusion even matters? >> i have been sitting here trying to find collusion as a crime. collusion is not a crime. i don't know if it is a crime collusioning of russians. >> you start analyzing the crime. the hacking ises t the crime. >> the president didn't hack. >> okay, again all this is just a day before jury selection begins on the trial of manafort's. we start with jeff bennett at the white house and ken delanian. >> fill us in. >> rudy giuliani was on fox news and he was explaining why he believes that michael cohen is saying that there is a premeeting a strategy session before the infamous june 2016 trump tower meeting where a bunch of senior trump officials met with the russians. rudy giuliani says michael cohen is now saying that some of the participants including donald trump jr. and jared kushner got together and talke

please welcome justice ruth bader ginsburg. >> good evening. before i introduce tonight's super lecturer, a few words about the new portrait recently hung in the back of the room. so if you turn -- [ applause ] and that is my official portrait. it's also shown on my own words, a collection of my writings. as an official portrait, it will not be transported back from here to the court until i am no longer a part of this world. and as i am trying very hard to stay fit -- [ applause ] i anticipate the city will possess that portrait for a fair number of years. the artist is kim badye, who some 15 years earlier painted the portrait of me on display at columbia law school. among other associations, kim was my daughter's classmate in elementary school. i was asked to choose among several celebrated artists, but i chose kim, appreciating what a fine artist she is. our speaker tonight is barbara babcock. a first in so many things, i can scarcely list them. in 1972 she became the first woman to be engaged in a tenured track from stanford, turning down o

. >>> coming up here on c-span3, supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg, followed by a discussion on mass incarceration and reforming the criminal justice system. and the senate special aging commission gets an update on the state of the alzheimer's research. >>> today a review of the supreme court's recent decision in wayfair v. south dakota, which ruled in favor of states that require online retailers to collect the sales tax even if they don't have a physical presence in the state. that's live at noon eastern on c-span. after that, the latino advocacy group unidos u.s. has its annual conference in washington to talk about civil liberties and human rights. speakers include mike morell and nira tanden. also live on c-span starting at 1:00 p.m. eastern. >>> president donald trump will anounls his nominee for the supreme court filling the vacancy left by retiring justice anthony kennedy. watch the announcement live tonight at 9:00 p.m. eastern on c-span and c-span.org, or listen on the free c-span radio app. >>> next, remarks from supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg and stanf

bader ginsburg as an actress por named felicity jones.aying ruth bader ginsburg as i'll put up a picture of themicm side by side side by side. you can compare. you think you can compare. do you think this evokes ruth th bader ginsburg? i believe it it t bader ginsburg?the i believe it it to the audience. [laughter] audience. [laugh the bigger problem -- it's thee doily --igger problem - >> laura: they are both it's t beautiful and their own way.y. >> laura: they are both beau >> of felicity joines had the doily, it would be better. >> of felicity >> laura: she's super nice.nes e doily, it would be better. >> laura: she's super nice. i spent new year's eve with her i spent new year's eve with 1986. her 1986. >> they played a trailer of this movie, and legal scholars are going crazy. watch. this movie, and legal scholars are going crazy. >> you think you can change the watch. country, you should look at heru generation. think can change the country, you they are taking to the streets.r gene >> protests are important.tion. they are taking to changing the current dominant culture means nothi

. >> supreme court justices ruth bader ginsburg, stephen breyer, and elena kagan took part in a mock trial, post of our regular series hosted by the shakespeare theatre company in washington. insurrection in camelot, based on the theater's production of camelot. this is just over an hour. [applause] >> good evening to everybody. as you know, tonight's argument is based on the text of the 1960 camelot, a low play beloved classical musical that is currently playing on this stage, directed by alan paul. in a kingdom not so very far a long, long time ago, riddled with corruption and violence, king arthur and queen guenevere created a near utopian society in camelot. over might,mpioned and the king sits with the knights of the round table, with no head, signifying equality and cooperation. by the way, the ninth of the round table, as you know, have often been compared to our own cabinet. that ours occurs over and oval, not a roundtable, i know it recently has been attorney general sessions arguing with prewitt over who could be lancelot. arthur'shen illegitimate son, mordred, returns seek

circuit court judge and current supreme court justice, ruth bader ginsburg. that was during her senate confirmation to the supreme court in 1993. i think we should all remember that standard. we would do well to remember when evaluating a judge not evaluating someone for political office. more regrettably, the number of our colleagues could not wait until the president's announcement before launching an attack on his nominee. in some cases this is quite literally a fill in the blank opposition. they wrote statements of opposition only to fill in the name later. sally, this is not a new approach. just like last year, just discourse sewage met before the ink was even dry on his nomination. sorry to say that judge kavanaugh has broken that record. democrats run record opposing him before he was even named. just fill in the name. whoever it is we are against. before the ink was even try on justice kennedy's resignation. this is a sign that some of our colleagues throwing judgment out the window. there are outsourcing their thinking to far left special interest gr

tom: another figureis daying civility is 85-year-old supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg, also the subject of a documentary that has been doing exceedingly well. >> how could you not want to make a documentary aboba ruth r ginsburg? she isin this totally am person. she was a lawyer going back t' the 1970's who fought for women's rights in courts, including the u.s. supreme court.me y e has becon recent years this mega celebro millennials treat like a rock star. >> there must be times when you do feel blue. i'm not feeling blue right now. >> me neither. tom: one theory on why the films about ruth bader ginsburg and fred rogers have been populars the profile inspirational figures during troubling times and they give mature, grown-up role models. >> i think both rbg and fred rogers are very adult figures, and that is something we don't currently have. we don't have someone who isri deliveng the truth, like authentic people on tv or in the film space. i ink people are starved f that in some way. rbg and fred rogers deliver that. those films deliver that. tom: other documentaries do

supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg. the 85-year-old court veteran says she's not ready to retire any time soon, at least not until she hits 90. her comments come after the fight over brett kavanaugh for the high court. democrats are demanding more information, specifically records from kavanaugh's time. steve cohn is joining us. he's a democrat and a member of the house judiciary committee. let me get your reaction to what ruth bader ginsburg said. she survived two cancers, she can survive anything. we need her for at least 2 1/2 years. i think she makes it and she serves america admirably. >> let me ask you about the president's attacks on the news media here in the united states calling the news media the enemy of the american people. as you know, the new publisher of t"the new york times" warned the president during a private off the record meeting that the president's attacks could lead to violence against members of the news media. do you believe that people could take the president ae's vitreols a call to arms? >>

by supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg. the event, in the supreme court chamber, was cohosted by the supreme court historical society and the john simon guggenheim memorial foundation. it is about an hour and 15 minutes. jus. ginsberg: let me begin by expressing the society's gratitude to justice ginsburg. you have always been a generous -- very generous in giving of your time in your efforts to the society, when we have called upon you. and thank you for taking time from your really enormous schedule at this particular time of year. this evening comes about because of my deep and abiding connection to our two hosting organizations, the supreme court historical society and the john simon guggenheim foundation. my history with the historical society goes back over 25 years. my history with the guggenheim goes back a little over 10 years. each of these organizations has become a touchstone for me, for our collective american history. what could possibly be the common thread? it would be the constitution itself. my late husban

circuit court judge and current supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg. during her senate confirmation to the supreme court in 1993. so look, i think we all should remember that standard. we'll do well to remember we're evaluating a judge, not debating ad candidate for political office. even more regrettably, a number of our democratic colleagues could not even wait until the president's announcement last night before launching attacks on his nominee. this was in some cases quite literally a fill-in-the-blank opposition. they wrote statements of opposition only to fill in the name later. sadly, this is not a new approach for the far-left special interest groups. just like last year, justice gorsuch met with partisan opposition before the ink was even dry on his nomination. look, i'm sorry to say that judge kavanaugh seems to have already broken that record because senate democrats were on record opposing him before he had even been named. just fill in the name. whoever it is we're against. before the ink was even dry on justice kennedy's resignation. now,

>> ruth bader ginsburg. >> actress felicity jones transforms into ruth bader jones. the movie looks at the early life of one of the most notable supreme court justices. the film is set to open on christmas day. >> leading the news, newly released body cam footage shows the las vegas police officer exchanging fire with a pair of suspected killers during abintense pursuit. for nearly four minutes the police were shot at 34 times as they tried to stop the suspected murderers. denise from our affiliate tells us more about the harrowing chase. >> shots fired. >> reporter: an intense pursuit seen from the front seat of a metro patrol car. >> it's charlie 4. i'm not injured. >> reporter: for roughly four minutes officer william trying to stop a pair of suspected killers. the pair firing at police 34 times. watch as he shoots back while driving, blowing holes through his own windshield. the pursuit eventually ends at howard hallings worth. miranda tries to reverse towards officers. he is shot and killed while munoz runs away trying to hide on school property where he is even

>> last month supreme court justices ruth bader ginsburg, stephen breyer and elena kagan took part in the shakespeare theatre company mock trial based on the theaters production of camelot. this runs about an hour. [applause] >> good eating to everybody. as you know tonight argument is based on the text of the 1961 and low play camelot, a beloved classical musical which is currently playing on this stage directed by associate artistic director alan paul. in a kingdom not so very far away, long, long time ago, riddled with corruption and violence, king arthur and queen when you grab created a new utopian society in camelot. write his jacket over might and the king sits with the knights of the round table with no head, signifying a quality and cooperation by the way, the knights of the round table as you know often been compared to her own cabinet, realizing that ours is occurred over an oval, not about you but i know that recently there's been attorney general sessions are doing with epa administrator pruitt as to who could be lancelot. [laughing] anyway, , when arthur's illegitimate s

ruth bader ginsburg says, "i'm now 85. justice john paul stevens stepped down when he was 90. so i think i have about at least five more years." as they say on the court, count 'em up. now, she certainly will be busy. justice ginsburg also having a bit of her own busy time in the culture. there's that documentary "rbg" which has made more than 13 million at the box office. she's also the subjective a film coming out this winter where she will be played by felicity jones. and her workout routines have led to moments in the culture like this in late night. >> why are you on your knees? >> what? i'm cramping. working out with an 85-year-old woman ♪ >> can i ask you a question? and i want you to give me an honest answer. are you juicing? >> no. >> always honest. you don't want to commit perjury. now, i have a quick programming note before we go. i am in for rachel maddow tonight, and i am deciding whether to bring back an old tie from off the rack. so if you tune in tonight at 9:00 p.m. eastern, you can see what happens. plus we have a lot more news kicking off what's been a ver

better matchf no to this evening's program than justice ruth bader ginsburg, who will now present this evening's panelists. justice ginsburg. [applause] justice ginsburg: dorothy goldman has been one of my favorite people for many years. thanks, dorothy, for that fine introduction, and appreciation to your many contributions to the well-being of the supreme court historical society. and good evening to all gathered here. a hearty welcome to my workplace, the supreme court of the united states. the the conversation you are about to hear, on modes of constitutional interpretation, is sponsored by the supreme court historical society and the john simon guggenheim foundation. dorothy goldman was the catalyst in bringing the two organizations together. my colleagues and i applaud her initiative. the society, as many of you know, was founded by chief justice warren burger in 1974 to advance public understanding of the court and its role in our nation's democracy. the society pursues its mission in many ways, including programs publicationss, and . here it is. but publications and one of my f

at least if it's ruth bader ginsburg. she says she's in no rush to hang up her robe. in fact, she says she hopes to stay on the bench for another five years at least. she's 85 and remarkably fit. we can't get enough of this video of her planking. it's from cnn films' documentary about her life. >> i've heard she does 20 push-ups three times a week or something. i mean, we can't even get off the floor. we can't even get down to the floor. >> that's true. >> and after sitting on the fence, senator rand paul says he'll support the man hoping to fill justice anthony kennedy's seat on the supreme court. the kentucky republican tweeted after meeting judge kavanaugh and reviewing his record, i've decided to support his nomination. no one will ever completely agree with the nominee unless, of course, you are the nominee. each nominee, however, must be judged on the totality of their views, character, and opinions. meanwhile, an undecided red state democrat meets brett kavanaugh today. senator joe manchin says he's hearing from hundreds of west virginians concerned about the n

ruth bader ginsburg won 95 to single digits. the democrats just have a different role when it comes to republican nominees and gorsuch should have won overwhelmingly, but it was, what, ten vote margin? >> martha: 54-45. kennedy was 97-0. you can see that number getting tighter and tighter and it's very easy to imagine that this person could win or lose by one vote. >> particularly if rand paul -- i like him, but that just befuddles me why you would play into the democrat playbook by already announcing who you are going to vote against. >> martha: he voted against her in the last round, just to clarify. he voted against her when she was for the circuit court. >> hopefully something has changed. but what it really does when it's this tight, when it's 51-49 or 50-49 if someone is in poor health, it makes every one of those senators the decision-maker and that is just -- can you imagine a more miserable existence than having those 100 bosses get to dictate what you do? i feel sorry for the president, although, this is the most impor

i could not disagree with anyone in the bottom line with ruth bader ginsburg. kennedy the same. no one can i believe's way that man off hisar

president clinton and the ruth bader ginsburg appointment. was i don't agree with her, but she is highly qualified, she's a good finger, she's a good judge. that had been the standard i think there's a sense among conservatives at what happened to justice bork had nothing to do with whether or not he was qualified or how the right temperament already huge scandal that might make him drivable or something. it was about his philosophy and that's the difference. host: matt lewis with the daily beast. how often do you publish and what are you writing on? guest: 203 times a week at the daily beast. -- two or three times a week at the daily beast. life's moving very fast right now i try to bring some historical context and some additional wisdom to really whatever is happening at the moment. my last two pieces have been about the supreme court. carolyn from washington, d.c., democrats line. a little know this is water into the bridge, but could you explain a little more about judge kennedy's son and relationship to president trump and some of that

goldman: and now, it is my absolute pleasure to introduce the audience to justice ruth bader ginsburg. truly a privilege. as -- the justice is both a cultural and legal icon and many details of her life are well known to all of us. what i would like to do is provide you with a few highlights that i found very interesting. justice ginsburg's well-known emphasis on legal issues of gender equality got its start at the beginning of her academic career as a professor at rutgers law school. because she was previously denied a clerkship because she was a woman and then being paid less than her male law school faculty colleagues, justice ginsburg was motivated to cofound the first law journal in the united states to focus exclusively on women's rights. -- rights and to cofound the women's rights project with the aclu. from that beginning, she went on to argue gender-discrimination cases before the supreme court and participate in hundreds of cases in many different jurisdictions. justice ginsburg continued to focus on gender discrimination and equality issues during her academic career, movin

i could not disagree with anyone in the bottom line with ruth bader ginsburg. kennedy the same. no one can i believe's way that man off his mark. he was ready to retire and so he did. if we want to look for difficulties and division -- i feel it too. .t is a tough place to live certainly in the swamp but across the nation. and i do think getting back to this abortion issue is there a more divisive issue? more rancor or difficulty involving any issue you can think of? the reason for that, we as citizens were disenfranchised from our ability to enact laws into the register that would reflect our view of what this means. host: let's hear from mike in virginia. republican line. caller: i think people are getting wound up over roe versus wade for nothing. the odds on thing getting .verturned are miniscule if it were to be overturned, it would be from a case coming before the court where the justices were having to reconsider whether or not roe versus wade was decided properly in the first place. decision back over the , i see that the whole idea of the constitutional right was create

supreme court justices ruth bader ginsburg, stephen breyer and elaine that cake and took part in a mock trial. part of the regular series posted by the shakespeare theatre company in washington dc and the featured case is based on the theater's production of camelot. [applause]. >> could he mean to everyone. as you tell-- no tonight's argument is based on the text of the 1960 play camelot's, a beloved classical musical which is currently playing on this stage erected by associate artistic director alan paul. in a kingdom not so very far away, long, long time ago riddled with corruption and violence king arthur and queen of one of their creed a utopian society and camelot. right is championed over might end the king sits with the knights of the round table with no head signifying the policy incorporation. by the way, the knights of the round table, as you know have often been compared to our own cabinet realizing that courage over an oval, not a roundtable. i know recently it's been attorney general sessions arguing with epa administrator pruitt as to who could be lancelot. [laughter] an

bader ginsburg. the event, in the supreme court chamber, was cohosted by the supreme court historical society and the john simon guggenheim memorial foundation. it is about an hour and 15 minutes. jus. ginsberg: let me begin by expressing the society's gratitude to justice ginsburg. you have always been a generous -- very generous in giving of your time in your efforts to the society, when we have called upon you. and thank you for taking time from your really enormous schedule at this particular time of year. this evening comes about because of my deep and abiding connection to our two hosting organizations, the supreme court historical society and the john simon guggenheim foundation.

it's with ruth bader ginsburg aa current member of the court did after her, , actually during the confirmation process in 1993. she said a a judge swore to dee impartially can offer no forecasts, no hints, no hints, no forecasts, no previews. she said that this would quote display disdain for the entire judicial process, and she was confirmed.ar that's begin. >> standard. every nominee since then have followed that standard. democrats will complain that judge kavanaugh follows the ginsburg standard and i have heard already. they're going to complain that he won't promise to take their side in cases of my come upth before the court. they're going to complain and have already that some of the cases he decide in the past didn't work out t the way that they wanted them toat work out, not what the law said, not what was right but what they wanted. some democrats in the judiciary committee did what neil gorsuch was dominant in the supreme court last year. we've seen this movie before. we know the playbook. they criticized him for some of his rulings that they didn't like even though the, rulings fol

it's what ruth bader ginsburg did during her confirmation process in 1993. she said a judge sworn to decide impartially can offer no forecasts, no hints. no hints, no forecasts, no previews. she said that this would, quote, display disdain for the entire judicial process and she was confirmed. that's the ginsburg standard. every nominee since then has followed that standard. the second thing i expect to happen is that democrats are going to complain that judge kavanaugh follows the ginsburg standard. we've heard it already. they're going to complain that we won't -- that he won't promise to take their side in cases that might come up before the court. they're going to complain and have already that some of the cases he's decided in the past didn't work out the way that they wanted them to work out, not what the law said, not what was right but what they wanted. it's what democrats and the judiciary committee did when neil gorsuch was nominated to the supreme court last year. we've seen this movie before. we know the playbook. they've criticized him for some

that's the goal and we know how close ruth bader ginsburg was with justice scalia. to elena kagan's point, while i would agree, they went through all of her obama your documents. republicans were fine with that now there is resistance going through judge kavanaugh's bush-era documents. a little bit of a double standard. i think democrats are only asking for what republicans have asked for in the past, consider what happened with merrick garland. i don't think that's unfair. >> shannon: what i'm hearing from folks who are dealing with these document requests is justice kagan head no trail from the bench. she was never a judge. there was little to go through. she was a solicitor general under the obama administration. there was a little bit of a trail there. you have to turn over whatever's relevant but there's a much bigger document pool apparently come up to a million pages on judge kavanaugh. do they need to see everything? is it fair to say they need to see everything there is on him before they can vote or is it a delay tactic? >> i think it's a delay tactic. jud

bader ginsburg complain about that a lot before she was joined by the other two women. when you get four, that's a big tipping point. again, let me underline, it doesn't matter what your leanings are, whether you're conservative or liberal. but having four women on the court does begin to change the dynamics of the court. that means that you start to see the court deliberate very differently. you see the court take into consideration different kinds of cases. this is, again, based on studies that have seen these courts come to the critical mass and tip over that gender there sharesho. and they were influentialinfluet would be interesting if donald trump did nominate a woman to the court. because just in deliberations and discussions, having those opinions there would change the court dynamic with the other five men. >> let's look at what the president has been doing this weekend. he's called -- he's reacted to other calls by democrats to abolish i.c.e. here's what he said about it. take a listen. >> a socialist just beat out congressman crowley, and says afw abolish i.c

ruth bader ginsburg famously said that. so i ask you, your confidence in him, and what i read to you about regionalism, constitutionalism, separation of powers, coequal branches. how confident on a scale of 1-100 are you that this is his real judicial philosophy. >> i've known brett for 17 or 18 years, almost 20 years now. i know his judicial philosophy. any judge is -- if they are doing their job correctly will not prejudge the outcome of a case that is likely to come before them. and judge ginsburg was right when she said, he shouldn't be answering those questions. what they want to know as a nominee is where they stand on the constitution and in their role as judge and he understands what role he has under article three of the united states constitution. justice scalia said, a good judge will sometimes comes to a conclusion although he doesn't agree with the result, understands the application and is required to follow the law. what's the role of the judge? follow the law. >> he actually added to that, what the law deman

you are looking at a potential 6-3 conservative court with ruth bader ginsburg and stephen breyer. they could retire in coming years. i love that analysis. come back soon with your white board too. thank you. we are awaiting for the trump supreme court nominee picked. it's coming in a few hours. "fox business" is all over that one. 9:00 p.m. eastern time. stay with us. we have the expert analysis and also this campus reform is a group to look at that. they have college students saying what you think about president trump's nominee? pso made a choice yet. my panel will react after the break. stay right there. retail. under pressure like never before. and it's connected technology that's moving companies forward fast. e-commerce. real time inventory. virtual changing rooms. that's why retailers rely on comcast business to deliver consistent network speed across multiple locations. every corporate office, warehouse and store near or far covered. leaving every competitor, threat and challenge outmaneuvered. comcast business outmaneuver. >> what's your ration to the justice being nomina

. >> if you do not think ruth bader ginsburg answered questions, watch the movie. >> brett kavanaugh of the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia's president trumps nominee for the supreme court. follow the confirmation process c-span as he meets with key senators on capitol hill followed by senate confirmation hearings and the boat. watch and c-span.org or listen with the free c-span radio app. >> wednesday in the c-span networks, the house returns at 10:00 a.m. eastern for morning our life on c-span. i knew they take up legislation sponsored by don young. on c-span two they continue work on a number of judicial and executive nominations on the schedule this week. at 10:00 a.m. officials briefed lawmakers on the u.s. interest in latin america and the caribbean. that's five on c-span three. in the afternoon, the acting administrator, andrew wheeler addresses agency staff at the washington headquarters in the senate finance committee looks at page leave. c-span's "washington journal", live every day with news and policy issues that impact too. coming up on wednes

. >> supreme court justices ruth bader ginsburg, stephen breyer and elena kagan took part in a the trial titled insurrection of camelot. other participants include the u.s. solicitor general noah francisco and the canadian supreme court justice suzanne coat. this is an hour. >> in a kingdom not so far away and long time ago, king arthur and queen guenevere have created a near utopian society. the king sits with the knights of the round table with no head signifying equality and cooperation. the knights of the round table have often been compared to our own cabinet realizing that ours occurs over an oval. recently it has been attorney general sessions arguing with epa administrator pruitt over who can be lancelot. [laughter] son arthur's illegitimate returns to camelot seeking revenge, king arthur's camelot begins to crumble. the sun is indicted and convicted of inciting rebellion but does this violate his first amendment rights to free speech and association, or was he unlawfully advocating the overthrow of camelot beyond reasonable doubt? i give you the ordinary and common caveat to all

ruth bader ginsburg, or the two days. the average wait for these democratic nominees was 65 days. neil gorsuch took 66. barring some major revelation, this is a fair time for nomination. your reaction? guest: setting a date at this point whether it is october 1 or september 27, that is an artificial just -- deadline. they are the swing vote in key cases involving fundamental rights and protections. , anotherother month six weeks for whatever it is, you have to provide the time for an exhaustive review. if he has not issued any speeches, or articles, there is less to review and you can expedite it. today with the critical fit seat, his voluminous record and a far right agenda attempted to be unlimited here, you take the time you need. the court has had eight justices before. the world is not going to come to an end. host: back to calls. we have some pictures of the vice president. >> good morning. -- [inaudible] this is why america is the object of indie and hate. because of our government decisions, we want to fill our gas tank. host: we are talking about the supreme court nominat

. >>> supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg hopes to stay on the supreme court for at least five more years. now she is 85 yearsold, meaning rlr thaer 9th birthdaynch no she's already hired law clerks for at least two more years. >>> the high-speed rail between san francisco and los angeles may not attain thepeed it's legally mandated to reach. the train is supposed to get passengers from the city to l.a. in two hours and 40 minutes. according to the "l.a. times" computer sim lagsz of the train show it's 3 minutes and 10 seconds under the threshold. the rail authority has track bu it can still meet its trip time commitment. >>> shopping on-line after pouring yourself a glass of wine, might end up costing you more than you planned for. >> according to a new report people who hit amazon after having a few drinks ended up spending more than $40 each time. cnbc obtained the survey conducted by arch stone recovery center. it shows gin drinkers spend the most, about $82 on average, whiskey drinkers are the cheapest buzz buyers that spent nearly $39 and boozy purchases often end in buye

that is why -- >> ruth bader ginsburg agrees with leon. he had would have preferred it was left to the states. but we also have 45 years of precedent and people who have organized their lives around legal abortion and we also have conservatives on the supreme court who have voted to uphold federal bans. so the notion that this is about states' rights is pretty disingenuous when you have republicans introducing a nationwide 20-week ban just this year. >> nancy, you're a former federal jurnlgs you're a district court judge, and i wonder how you think about this. there seems like this crazy ball hiding with every sort of judicial confirmation battle where extremely smart sophisticated people who've spent lots of time thinking about issue pretend that none of it's ever occurred to them and they're all blank slates and it drives me insane. >> well, i think it's a complicated -- it's a more complicated situation. first of all, it didn't begin with bork. louis brandeis was seriously attacked way back when. bork was almost recent memory of that. b

. >> dana: even ruth bader ginsburg said in her hearing that she would never answer them because it's a hypothetical that she wouldn't answer. >> ilyse: she actually did answer that. she held affirmatively that she believes it should be upheld. speculation on super dull my future cases that have not yet come before the court. we believe that actually what ruth bader ginsburg, and we have the clips that is in fact perfect, which is that women should be afforded this right to privacy, to make their own decision. it was decided and it is absolutely what most americans want. >> dana: i will have people take a look at the ad you have created. a full-page ad running in many of the cities all across maine because of pressure you want to put on senator susan collins. what other strategies and tactics are you going to try to use? and at the end of the day, there will probably be a vote, how do you think it will go? >> ilyse: we are really trying to channel the flood of calls we are getting into our office from people who aren't even our members into the senator 's ear, which is basically to ta

that said, ruth bader ginsburg was quoted off broadway. we've confirmed the quote that she spoke out in new york following a production. a production of an off-broadway play. we see her sitting there being interviewed. and she said something about i'm now -- i'm now 85. my senior colleague justice john paul stevens, he stepped down when he was 90 so think i have about at least five more years. jonathan, rbg, five more years? we've seen the workouts. we've seen her work ethic, which is extraordinary. >> right. >> she's twice a cancer survivor, but, obviously, someone who is determined to stay as long as she feels she can work effectively as associate justice of the supreme court. >> there are all those cheers you hear, it's coming from the democratic party and progressives who desperately want rbg to stay. one, because she is held in such high regard but, two, if she leaves, that would cement president trump's hold and conservatives' hold on the supreme court for generations far into the future. i always joke that i sometimes envision or ho

he's served in the same court that produced supreme court justices ruth bader ginsburg, antonin scalia, clarence thomas, warren burger, and john roberts. kavanaugh has been reliably conservative throughout most of his career dating back to 1989 when he was a student writing for the yale law journal. >> he ultimately was one of the authors of the starr report to congress that recommended a number of grounds for impeaching president clinton including, you know, a number of misstatements, obstruction of justice, things of that nature. >> reporter: kavanaugh went on to serve as counsel under the bush administration and is considered an establishment choice for the nomination. >> you'll find him to be a very calm and thoughtful man. >> reporter: tom bossert, former homeland security adviser under president trump, knows brett kavanaugh well from his time at the bush white house. >> what people will be most surprised about over the coming days and weeks will probably be the human side of judge kavanaugh. he is a very soft, very kind, very smart individual. >> reporter: despite overwhelming su

bader ginsburg, who was my neighbor at the watergate. i thought what would old been -- ben think of this? in some ways it showed how far our country had come. i always felt when i was out there that i could speak about the hard road to democracy, about the importance of institutions becoming more inclusive over time, to people having those challenges, because i had personally experienced them. david: let's talk about today's situation. we face the north korean problem. you have negotiated with the north koreans. what are the chances north korea, the u.s., and south korea can come to agreement? condoleezza: when i heard the president had on the spot accepted kim jong-un's invitation, i thought what is he doing? then i thought, nothing else has worked, so why not? i actually think they set the table pretty well. one of the conditions that is different is that once kim jong-un's programs got to the place where they threatened the united states, i think it got china's attention that the united states might actually go to war to prevent a nor

it's the court that produced ruth bader ginsburg, antonin scalia, clarence thomas. it has been a supreme court farm team. he has written serious opinions. so the issue of competence, i think, will be off the table. the challenge will be to discuss the substance of what he will rule. i think it's all well and good to talk about conservative and liberal, but the question that i think, you know, the people are going to answer is what is it going to be like for a gay person to go to a restaurant and have the owner say, well, you know, it's my first amendment right not to serve you here? that's the kind of cases that are going to be so different in front of the supreme court. what happens when the first physician and nurse in texas is prosecuted and goes to prison for performing an abortion? those are the kinds of questions that i think democrats are going to want to have answered. but as long as the issue is competence and integrity and intelligence, kavanaugh is in perfect shape. >> but those aren't the questions that are going to be answered. >> that's right. >> by th

for that justice ruth bader ginsburg women in justice and the law. [applause] roger: soon after the city bar announced that i would be introducing justice ginsburg, one of my colleagues from work, who of course is in attendance tonight, politely suggested that