we have a unit, we have two personnel unit. i ooze -- i like to be little pitt mor -- bit more concrete wt we're talking about. what kind of cases and how many numbers. i know we've had presentations to that. i don't have a problem changing the name. 1.3, even peer support member as you identify it, peer support member what that means. it's a new definition or reinforced definition in terms of 1.5 as a reference to a clinical psychologist. chief of department is there designated for purpose of resolution as peer support clinical director. i can follow that. for me in terms of a medical director or anything close to this, i have to examine what we have at this present time. which is one full time medical staff person. there's a lot of definitions as to differentiation of that. to be honest with you, you made a statement in terms that may have minimal budget impact. it sound like there might be potential budget impact in term of this position. that's just one position. again, as we move off and we look into it, i'm looking for th

but we also have to be fair to the people of the united states and the taxpayers of the united states. youprime minister, thank again for joining me for these important discussions. we are both outsiders to politics. can you believe it? to politics.ers i look at all these wonderful politicians. we are determined to protect the rights and needs and interests of our citizens. i look forward to partnering with you to build on the incredible it from -- incredible friendship between our countries and to creating a brighter future for both the people of italy and the people of the united states. and with that, i want to thank you very much for coming to the white house. it is my great honor. prime minister conte: good afternoon, i want to thank you for your hospitality is it -- hospitality. it is a sign of the special attention to italy and me as well. forgive me, but i don't want to renounce the privilege for speaking in my wonderful language now. translator: i wish -- for all of families of the victims the fires at the place in california. i wish to say a very affectionate hello to all ou

states, to the united and by the way, italy has a $31 billion surplus with the united states. meaning we have a $31 billion trade deficit. and we discussed that and we are going to work something out. prime minister conte's translator: as far as i'm concerned, i'm very envious of the records and the growth of the american economy. we discussed that before with donald. somehow these are systems which cannot be compared because of the magnitude of orders of magnitude -- i'm in this but ambitious at the same time. i'm ambitious for my economy to do a lot, much more than what was done in the past. we are preparing structural reforms that we will be submitting to our european partners, too. i do not want the tax reform to be set aside. it was a leverage in this country. it represents a leverage for economic growth. it represents a leverage for economic growth. we are also working on streamlining and simplifying red tape and registration and regulation to eliminate corruption pockets. we are trying to speed up the civil trials, the procedures and the proceedings for all sectors toge

they were transferred to the united states. they sent huge amount of money, $400 million as a contribution to the campaign of hillary clinton. well, that's the personal case. it might have been legal, the contribution itself, but the way the money was earned was illegal. so we have a solid reason to believe that some intelligence officers accompanied and guided these transactions. so we have a -- an interest of questioning them. we can all -- that -- that could be a first step, and we can also extend it. options abound, and they all can be found in an appropriate legal framework. and did you direct any of your officials to help him do that? president putin's translator: yes, i did. yes, i did. because he talked about bringing the u.s.-russia relationship back to normal. >> i think there can be three questions from the russian pool. russia today, you have the floor. reporter: thank you so much. good evening to everyone. my name is ilya petrenko, rt tv channel. in english. mr. president, would you please go into the details of po

work that the united states wants to have. is that consideration is extremely important so i personally still think that the united states we need to find a way around delay the solution. on the margins of me getting back to it but it cannot be implemented in a way that is seriously actually makes the ability of india to be a part of this defense bill what the united states wants to have now i personally see it as a bit of a paradox of the american power structure when the defense policy of the world's second most populous country reaches india is being held hostage to some senators you know in new jersey or a club i wonder how is it perceived in india the fact that any given country would . attempt at least to tell you who to do business with and who not to do business with you know is as countries grow bigger. they see that. the orly's a quid pro quo kind of place and certainly prime minister more they has built many many bridges in his forty years. you know he has gone to some fifty five different countries to build his bri

the united nations and the yew -- the united kingdom and the united states are also strengthening cooperation between our armed forces who serve together on battlefields all around the world. today the prime minister and i viewed several u.s.-u.k. special forces demonstrations. we saw some demonstrations today, frankly, that were incredible. the talent of these young, brave, strong people. we saw it at the royal military academy. seamless cooperation between our militaries is really just vital to addressing the many shared security threats. we have threats far different than we've ever had before. they've always been out there, but these are different. and they're severe. and we will handle them well. we also recognize the vital importance of border security and immigration control in order to prevent foreign acts of terrorism within our shores. we must prevent terrorists and their supporters from gaining admission in the first place. order security is a national security problem. and in the united states we are working very hard to get the democrats to give us a couple of votes so we can pas

between mexico and the united states. it is a personal story for me because i lived there for almost six years in the 1990s. i went back and forth frequently. it was hard to believe that these were similar in sized cities close to each other. because they were so distant and some new ways. it was a rough-and-tumble city. piecework low value added manufacturing. san diego was a beautiful but isolated beach town. i was hard to imagine that they would ever get together. something started to happen in the early 2000 began to evolve. its own research and department operations. you saw the growth of some state capacity. and the cultural scene coming out of there. has anyone gone to tijuana not to tijuana for lunch or dinner. they have some of the best food scenes anywhere in mexico. anywhere on the west coast as well. great success this to goes from electronic to classical music and opera. i say this in my peril. i know it was a little bit of competition here. san diego was once the quiet little town. a nice place to go visit.

that is what we do with the united states. can do more and we can work with our central american friends. there is sufficient common ground in that respect. theer: a question from audience of that leads into our concern about the drug cartels and wondering how change vis-a-vis the narco trafficking with the new administration, what the state of clay is, how effective have we been in limiting the rise of these cartels? amb. gutierrez fernandez: if you look at what most people think, we have not been successful enough. insecurity, has gravitated in mexico's election. think that the last haveistrations in mexico confronted as best as possible, organized crime. methods, where not doing a good enough job. it would not be appropriate not to recognize that. i think, we need to take into account that this is an issue that takes a long time to address. experience in other areas of the world would point to the fact that there are no silver bullets to address this. number two, we need to do a better job in the conversations we've had wit

the united states produces him if i percent of the steel we consume. our defense needs consume 3% of the total steel consumption. how could one possibly make the case that we do not have plentiful abundance of domestically produced steel to satisfy defense needs? that it is not only that, for the other 25%, where are the biggest sources for that steel? that would be mexico and canada. those are the two countries that provide the most steel. with both of those countries we have a surplus of trade in steel. the canadians by more steel from us than we buy from them. so to the mexicans. where's the security threat to america when my constituents .hoose to take the steel >> that was pat toomey talking about steel in the u.s.. there is been a dispute concerning subsidies that the canadian government gives to the this has been, litigated multiple times under the north american free trade agreement. we have the construction industry in the u.s. but the london producing side has been .ssued >> our guess this morning josh -- -- and daniel griswold. , forlcome yo

they were transferred to the united states. they sent huge amount of money, $400 million as a contribution to the campaign of hillary clinton. that's their personal case. it might have been legal, the contribution itself. the way the money was earned was illegal. we have solid reason to believe that some intelligence officers, guided these transactions. we have an interest of questioning them. that could be a first step. we can extend it. options abound. they all can be found in an appropriate legal framework. >> did you direct any of your officials to help him do that? >> translator: yes, i did. yes, i did. because he talked about bringing the u.s./russia relationship back to normal. >> translator: i think there can be three questions from the russian pool. you have the floor. >> translator: thank you so much. good evening in everyone. >> mr. president, would you please go into the details of possibly any specific arrangements for the u.s. to work together with russia in syria, if any of these arrangements were made today or d

first official visit to the united kingdom. no two countries do more together than ours to keep their people safe and prosperous. and we want to deepen that cooperation even further. to meet the shared challenges we face now and in years ahead. this morning, president trump and i visited sandhurst, where we saw a demonstration of joint working between british and american special forces. just one example of what is today the broadest, deepest and most advanced security cooperation of any two countries in the world. whether it is our pilots deterring the use of chemical weapons in syria or defeating daesh, our soldiers at the owe forefront of nato's preparation in eastern europe. our navys in the pacific, or our unparalleled intelligence sharing partnership thwarting attacks, our security cooperation is saving lives here in britain, in america and right across the world. that partnership is set to grow. with our armies integrating to a level unmatched anywhere. and the uk set to spend $24 billion pounds on u.s. equipment and sup

how many units -- >> 80 units. 81 units. >> director richardson: that is stunning. for project two, how many? >> i don't have all the project information. i think those are really listed to give a sum. >> director richardson: it's very important. we're going to produce the next amount of housing unit every year. which is nothing compare -- i spent some time reading mohcd, your 2018-2019 consolidated plan. extremely sum of money there. how are you going to spend it in a year when you have 81 unites here. >> we can have a conversation about the revenue side. we'll engaging with board of supervisors and the mayor and certainly looking at new revenue measures to help support it. there's that component of it. >> director richardson: it's a must to have. even with the revenue projections you will still be talking about them to us. you'll have a serious shortfall here. the other question is, i haven't been able to find out even how all the projects and the pine line. our project here, we are trying to get it out of silos. it's a must. we have to march to your department. w

to the united kingdom. no two countries do more together than ours their people and prosperous and we want to deepen cooperation even further to meet the shared challenges we face now years ahead. this morning president, and i visited planter where he saw a demonstration of joint workings between british and american special forces. of what is today, the most advanced securitycooperation of a few countries in the world . whether it is our plan determining the use of chemical weapons or defeating ^ our soldiers the forefront of nato's presence in eastern europe our navies and forcing sections for our unparalleled intelligence sharing partnership forcing, our security cooperation is saving lives here and in britain and america and across the world. is set to grow without is integrated to a level anywhere. and the uk to spend 4 billion pounds on us equipment over the next decade. today we also discussed how we candeepen our together to respond to the state activity , terrorism and serious crime and in particul

the intelligence agencies of the united states but also the people of the united states. he took a kgb officer, a known liar's word for it. why he did so if it had to do with the desire to not be seen as illegitimate, i don't know. i can't really get into that. i'm not a doctor. but i can tell you, on the facts the united states was attacked. and president trump today sided with the enemy. >> how unprecedented is that, especially here on foreign soil? >> it's -- i mean, first of all, we say this about president trump every week i think. doing something unprecedented. it's incredibly unprecedented. also, when's really shocking is there used to be a thing in the country where if a poll sirn didn't try to understand what was special about the united states of america, and the ideals to which we strive, the fact that we don't think of ourselves as brutal, we think of ourselves as at least trying to spread democracy throughout the world, and with the foreign aid we offer, et cetera, president trump -- used to be if you didn't express belief for that in politics you were dead i

lend lease did, indeed, rescue britain but also rescued the united states. it mobilized the nation's industrial might from coast to coast. factories that had produced lawn mowers, vacuum cleaners, textiles started making gas masks, automatic pistols and high-precision instruments. the automobile factories began to build cars and labor force was booming, millions of men and women of all ages streamed into factories and worked on assembly lines, vocational high schools were on overtime, training and retraining american men and women for new roles in the workforce. the manager of the state employment service in the small city of york, pennsylvania, said in january 1941 a year ago our task was to define jobs for men, now our task is to find men for jobs. and what about housing? all the new workers needed places to live near the factories and so roosevelt set up an agency called the division of defense housing that supervised the construction of 2 and a half million new homes along with schools and recreational facilities. all this powerful activity and energy pr

without this uniter it's very -- unit it's very difficult to tie them together. we're looking at 38 ftes. one the things a we did when going back to the foot patrol issue, we had patrol bureau task force. we decommissioned it to staff up our units. we like to start this unit back because there's a need for it. they will investigate high profile and serial cases with sophisticated networks. the idea is to have plain clothes and undercover personnel on serial burglars, serial offenders and build prosecutable cases across wide range of charges. this would be in partnership with the district attorney's office. again, that 38 fte that we believe it will take to sustain that unit. i want to reemphasize that we did have a smaller version of this unit that we basically decommissioned last year to get it going. that was a tough cut to make. it was something that we felt was necessary. we do really believe that we need to reinstitute this unit and address our crime issues. the next thing on the list is the station investigations team. as i mentioned, when we decentralize i

unit. i do share the concern that the building department is not as up to speed as planning on what it means to have no path to legalization. so i wanted to be sure that your legislation includes a pre-op indication not just with the neighbors, but with the fire department and planning department. finally, i support the idea that there will be waivers for open space. i had an a.d.u. case where the a.d.u. process was not useful to a client because in addition to going through the a.d.u. process, he had to get a variance because there was insufficient open space and that is a very good amendment. thank you very much. >> good afternoon. teresa flanders, disability action. i'm happy to hear of some of the amendments, supervisor tang, and i'm glad that you also, obviously, read the letter from the tenants unit. the difference in single-family homes, usually it's the owner that's there, so they're very aware of -- they don't want delays and they would be the ones inconvenienced and they can be on

it could be ten units? that is a nine unit equation? >> we filter things out based on the existing policies that are established in the city and we have very strong demolition controls generally. we heavily discount the capacity of any properties that have existing residential units on them. generally, we would not count that net nine units. >> so you filled -- filtered it out. but on commercial corridors where there is a single, you know, one story commercial building, that could go up four stories. >> we use a rule of thumb to calculate data. typically, our rule of thumb has been 30% threshold. it is an as built condition and not more than 30% of the building envelope. we would consider that a soft sight. it is a rule of thumb. qc projects at the commission where the project is built down to 50% of the zoning. and if somebody wants to come in and add on or tear down, some sites have almost nothing on them and they never turn over. it is a general rule of thumb that that is kind of the median of what you will see over time. >> presiden

maybe he won't squeeze the president of the united states either in the next election. the thing that is that. is the perception right now that trump is the united states look or see this because he is the president but he is the united states fully the full use of research so there really be people in. the year in japan in canada says yes flipping to react and we're going to deal with whatever he's shows it does but let's not go all the way let's take a look you know in another couple of years what's going to happen are the americans still going to be gung ho after an american america first america alone president or they can just say chickie was recorded all wrong so i think that right now while all different various governments state the trying to whether it's the. the canadians or the e.u. or japan they're likely to be very grown up about this and say yes we're going to react to specific cities said the trumpet ministration it certainly does but let's not go sort of let's not hyperventilate just. go but. do you agree with that or does it matter if the rest of the wo

the united states president throwing our own the united states president throwing our own intelligence agency under the bus and says he believes putin first. >> it's so interesting when you think of past statements that bolton has made about russia, about russia's meddling as an attack, as an act of war against the united states. what must he be thinking? how does he move forward on this -- in this white house administration? >> well, anderson, what we worried about john bolton is at the end of the day he would be a yes man to president trump. he got rid of his earlier national security adviser who was willing to provide him with independent advice. president trump doesn't like independent advice. he wants people to do what he says. and that's what we've seen out of john bolton. i will say, anderson, this lends urgency to a piece of legislation that senator rubio and i have introduced called the deter act, which would establish automatic, very severe sanctions on russia if they get caught interfering in our 2018 elections or any future elections. it has bipartisan support, and since th

today no country does more two-way trade in the indo-pacific than the united states. in southeast asia, the u.s. is the single largest form of investment larger than china, japan and the european union. open amount of the indo-pacific today and it's dotted with u.s. and efforts to build self-reliant business institutions and promote private sector growth. the philippines, there was a business that helped the country return into a crucial part of the semiconductor semi chain. in malaysia general electric invested in a sales and service center, and today, 1300 employees in the country from kuala lumpur. i want them and their leaders to know that america stands ready as we always do for partners around the region, to deepen government, people to people ties based on our shared democratic values, i'll travel there in the week ahead. chevron was the first company ever branded oil expiration rights in thailand and in 1973, they discovered the first hydrocarbons in thai waters. this gave birth to a major local industry. today chevron is thailand's top natural gas and crude o

i would between the uk and the united states. iwould imagine between the uk and the united states. i would imagine the prime minister will be hoping canadian press on the president how important free trade is and what damage these ta riffs free trade is and what damage these tariffs he is doing could do to the global economy. let's bring ron back m, global economy. let's bring ron back in, this will play well with people backin in, this will play well with people back in the united states?” in, this will play well with people back in the united states? i think it well, there are a lot of people who are very much concerned about ta riffs who are very much concerned about tariffs and the impact on american businesses across the united states, why is the president doing it at this time, why is he going to verbal wa rfa re this time, why is he going to verbal warfare with our closest allies and i think it's an opportunity for the president and the prime minister to reassure a very nervous president and the prime minister to reassure a very nervous american business sector. i imagine,

we also have to be fair to the people of the united states and the taxpayers of the united states. mr. prime minister, thank you for joining me for these important discussions. we're both outsiders to politics. can you believe it? we're outsiders to politics. look at all of these wonderful politicians. we're both determined to protect the rights and needs and interests and dreams of our citizens. we will do that. i look forward to partnering with you to build on the incredible friendship between our countries and to creating a brighter future for both the people of italy and the people of the united states and with that, i just want to again thank you very much for coming to the white house. it's my great honor. thank you. >> i wish to thank you, president trump, for this kind invitation for the warm hospitality. only two months after the formation of my government. i take it as a sign of the special attention to italy and to me as well. forgive me but i don't want to renounce the privilege for speaking in my wonderful language now. [speaking italian]. >> before all, i'd like to re

demented the united states. if it. created this system its oil huge benefit not just for the rest of the world but also for itself i mean in the end remember that you know from a post second world war the united states gave the. kind of created this very video when one trading system which we. saw it's going to be you know lose lose proposition now when president trump talks about trade he doesn't only talk about it being free and fair he talks about it being reciprocal in searching this bilateral symmetrical calculus to what has been a multilayered and highly asymmetrical system of global trade do you think a free and reciprocal can really core exist when it comes to you know trading around the planet you know. super also be has been a part of our system trading system. since the beginning of the get in nineteen forty seven and afterwards but reciprocity was always used in the sense of that look in ivan liberalism a trade if you liberal lazio's and sorious a process he was used to liberal a strain and this is a proces

what if they make a deal as reported in the united states that the united states agrees to allow assad to stay where he is and pulls out troops and hoping that russia can move iran back and then abandon the field to russia and iran. it is really serious. these things and putin comes in well prepared. we were talking to jake the last time and president kennedy when he met with his russian leader in '61 was unprepared a. >> there is certainly plenty to be on the table. what will be on the table and how is it discussed? we will see and see together. christiane amanpour and jake tapper, thank you. we will go back to new york. we will keep you aware of the schedule as people are showing up. good to see you both. >> you, too, chris. great to have out the ground for us. we are mention away from putin and trump meeting. our analysts are here next. lilly. she pretty much lives in her favorite princess dress. but once a week i let her play sheriff so i can wash it. i use tide to get out those week old stains and downy to get it fresh and soft. you are free to go. tide and downy together. send yo

gdp growth in the united states was? negative 11.6%. so we're talking massive recessionary conditions. not surprisingly by the way. visit all been predicted because government spending but after the war. we had slightly negative growth again in 1947 when marshall made his speech here in the context this was truly an extraordinary act of statesmanship, but we considered it to be fundamental to our own economic future. stalin always insisted that we were doing this for ourselves. we were, but not in the way that he saw it. one thing i talk about in the book that is truly remarkable is the mindset of the business community, the commercial lobbying firms in washington changed dramatically after the second world war. they were traditionally mercantilist and protectionists but they were brought around to the thinking that their own prosperity depended on rebalancing the global economy so that our allies could sell to us. that was the only way we were going to make a permanent revival of the global economy. the immediate day de

that meant united states was embarking on the road to global leadership. but from then on. with the election of 2016 america has sought to play the leading political military and moral role in the world. so in conclusion, i would like to express my deep gratitude to franklin roosevelt and admiral stark, george marshall, henry stimson and frank knox for their commitment to the democratic values and their spirit of internationalism and global responsibility. i think all of you for listening to me today he 17. [applause] >> and fortunately we are running a little late we'll go right to the book signing we will not take questions right now but thank you for coming and we will remind you on june 30 we will have the family fun festival here with free entertainment it will be a great day please calm down. thank you very much spee5 microp. yes, sir, sorry. >> can you hear me? change of focus. you described the hierarchy of the kennedy brothers. what was their relationship of john and bobby to teddy? >> so in the

we are not just people united for israel or americans united for israel but christians. everything i do i implement some part of my pro israel activism in it even though were only 18 or 24, five years old there is there seen that were young people putting ourselves out there and thousands and thousands of students across the nation that are going to be educated on israel and going to be spreading the message to parents and families. the donors make a big difference in our lives and we cannot thank them enough. i love this country and are israel and feel that we need more strong questions in the united states congress that are fighting for righteousness and fighting for liberty. that is my dream and my passion and i feel god has placed on my heart and i will keep doing that for the rest of my life. >> good evening. my name is brooke and i'm from san antonio, texas. [applause] i have the great privilege of going up at cornerstone church and cornerstone christian schools where he learned from a young age the importance of our support for israel. as a christian under pastor'

united states. the problem today is not the russian people. the problem that needed to be .amed today was vladimir putin instead, our president decided to advance a fake moral equivalency the place right into the hands of vladimir putin's bloody hands. everybody in this body should be disgusted by what happened in helsinki today. i yield the floor. announcer: democrat chris murphy also spoke out against the summit on the senate floor. murphy:: madam president, in my lifetime, no american president has ever had more disastrous overseas trip than the one that was just concluded by president trump. five days of disaster after disaster, insult after insult, capitulation after capitulation. today, donald has america weaker in the world the end at any time in recent memory. let's start with what happened today that has the whole world reeling. to the shock and horror of the american public, president trump stood on stage with vladimir putin and told the world that he believes putin when putin insists russia did not try to interfere in the american e

bush, the president of the united states. at this moment, the regime of saddam hussein is being removed from power. and a long era of fear and cruelty is ending. the government of iraq and the future of your country will soon belong to you. >> things, however, very quickly started to turn dicey. >> the city of baghdad has now experienced five days of looting. government ministries, hospitals, museums, the homes of the wealthy and even the palaces of saddam hussein have been stripped bare. >> we saw the looting and the total disorder in the streets and frankly, the indifference on the part of american authorities to what was happening. >> the pentagon says coalition forces will indeed get that unrest under control. but that has not yet happened. >> it wasn't just that there was disorder. the society is being torn apart and there's nobody in control. and that was our fault. >> mr. bush declared an end to the military phase of the war in iraq and called the battle a victory in the war against terrorism. >> the administration's v

he said i think the united states has been foolish. insulting and blaming the united states, saying i think we're all to blame. those are his real feelings. he shared his real feelings in helsinki, so now what? >> when i talk to the folks that are still doing the heavy lifting, they continue to do their duty. they expect to tell the truth in a way best suited to communicate to this president to get it in his head. that is a challenge that we have with all of our chief exec tiffs. >> how do they phrase things to get in his head. how do you do it with this president who seems to reflexively revert. and in this particular case. they say it had no influence on the election, and occasionally you can get him to say something like the russians meddle. i thought it was striking when he said i agree with the agreement that the russians meddled, but he didn't say who or why. i would have been struck and impressed if they said that yesterday. >> it's worse than we know because your friend has said that the warning signs, the warning lights, are b

it has as many people now as the united states. it is lfrd an immigrant society. this is not something that can get reversed at some point can it? >> of course not. it is number one completely stupid and crazy. an american citizen knows what immigration means and how society can be if it is well regulated and reached by immigration. and number two, these sort of speeches increase the fire, the flame and it put -- it does put more fire and in the brains of the citizens. to so donald trump is playing with the match box. this is another way to destabilize europe. >> this seemed -- even though you didn't mention him by name he has describe wlad was done with regard to talking refugees in as a disaster and horrible mistake. they have been paying for that decision. again, this must not have come as a welcomed surprise donald trump is talking about spending enough which is partly true. of course germany is tackling due to the refugee crisis. the system was flawed for at least a decade. the whole unrest that was within the population only sort of came to the surface durin

there's six units and four unit buildings. it's very mixed. the building next to us is a massive building with 16 units. it is a unique site. as you can see from this diagram, the yards are pretty grand. the shortest one is 34 feet away which is the apartment building. some of these other yards are 8. there's a lot of greenery. there's lot of openness there. also, we're building units that are 800 square feet, 1400 square feet and 1600 square feet in 2000 square feet apartment at the top. one of our d.r. has a 3000 square foot house three stories. we're trying to figure out how to put family homes in these flats and not try to create builds that are too big but just the right size for the site. [please stand by] >> that was all asked by the -- by the planning department. and also, the -- another thing that came up is the planning department asked us to change the character of the architecture to make it more in keeping with what the neighborhood is, so we changed from a much more monolithic building to a much more carved out textured building,

frankly, in the mid-term elections here in the united states. >> there used to be a point in the united states that we had an immigration system and a culture of immigration that assimilated people who came to the country, who knit themselves into the fabric of american society. europe, which has had the immigration itself, was always very problematic. countries like france did a very bad job and did not consider immigrants to france as frenchmen or as french people, and treated them quite badly. we always said, if you come to america and you ascribe to the ideas of america, you subscribe to them, you become an american. one of the great tragedies of what's going on now is that donald trump, our president, is now subscribing, really, to the idea that unless you were born on our soil, you are not really an american. that is a violation and betrayal of the american ideal that brought my parents here. my grandparents here. and so many other people's. that's another cultural tragedy. he is saying that immigration weakens a country's cultural fabric. it has always been the american creed tha

states is no longer -- the united states is no longer a reliable ally. but to top all of this off, if there is a new low, and it may be debased even further tomorrow, the president's performance of standing next to vladimir putin, whose aggression against other nations, including the united states, has put troops like my son on the russian border to work with allies halfway around the world far from their, far from their homes, that he would stand next to vladimir putin and take his side over patriotic americans who are working at our national security establishment, who have unanimously concluded that russia attacked our 2016 election, and for him to say, well, my people said they did, his people said they didn't, i can't see why russia would. what an abomination that all of the hardworking americans with agencies like the f.b.i., the c.i.a. and national agencies who reached an opinion that russia cyberattacked the integrity of our elections to watch this president stand on the stage publicly and say that he believes vladimir putin over patriotic americ

the 2% does not go to the united states, it does not allow the united states, it does not allow the united states to spend less, because he is promising to spend more. what is really going on here is that he does not believe in the notion of an alliance with another country. that has been consistent with him over 30 years. he believes the united states should not be providing security or alliance to any other countries for that matter. this is a pretext. what he is saying and why he is raising its to 4% is it as and why he is raising its to 4% is itasa and why he is raising its to 4% is it as a pretext so that he can lay the conditions, lady support amongst the conditions, lady support amongst the american people for a future state to 70 wants to pull out. so he is not willing to take yes for an answer. when he says, i'm just doing what president obama or president w bush said, i'm doing it any more forceful way, it is entirely disingenuous. it is his own and not so hidden agenda, and i think we know that because he has not said any progress on the 2%, he has immediately raised its to four

of the united states. that is what concerned me. julie: wide to you think president trump is doing this? if you look at the reaction, it has been nearly uniformly negative from both sides of the aisle. what would motivate him to repudiate our allies and draw vladimir putin closer? is the issuethat that i think bothers a lot of people. takeresident would in fact the russian viewpoint over the viewpoint of our own country. even putin himself said he supported trump over hillary clinton, which feeds into the issue. the fact that the russians engage in a major attack on our election system largely that benefited president trump. i think the president rejects that issue because it undermines the validity of his own election. he was elected president of the united states. as president of the united states's first responsibility is to defend the united states of america. i think what he is doing is in his own emotional reaction to what is happened here, i think it has clouded his judgment as president to recogniz

the united states goes to war, they send their armies to the united states. we pay with blood and sweat and tears. you need to explain this to people. is moreher country likely to go to war? nobody. guest: it is worth explaining the funding of nato. there is obviously the goal of inting 2%, which was around 2006 and it has formalized since 2015. everyone is supposed to pay 2% of gdp. as pointed out, the u.s. is the global power. if youough it does -- add up and look at different countries budgets, you see the overall cost of nato, the u.s. pays 600 something of that. however, the money that the u.s. pays isn't just for the defense of europe, it is for u.s. interests around the world. so on that basis there is a disagreement over how much the u.s. has graduated to nato. yes, if you compare each country budget but as was pointed out, that is a global military operation. criticized directly a business deal between germany and russia during the nato summit. here is a little bit. when germany makes a massive deal and germany pays billions of dollars a year to russ

the united states looks pretty unstable. bullying could get you, you know, some investment, but, you know, lots of firms have nnounced that they are moving their investment out of the united states, letting people go. i said lots, it's not lots but it's starting to happen. for industries that need immigrants, they are hostile message. sit happening with tons of disinvestment? not yet. to be misleading and say, but i see lots of vidence happening in the most competitive sectors, and that out.ks me >> there is -- >> if i could just jump in here, i was in london big week, and there was a anti-brexit demonstration at the time, and one of the things that quite striking is this is not just an american phenomena. he british are going through exactly the same thing, and are erhaps a bit ahead of us in facing the challenges of how you an ve yourself from international system of trade and replace it, and what's increasingly clear in heir case is that, there are plenty of companies, rolls-royce, airbus and so on, their e moving a lot o

they're accessory dwelling units. we don't want this -- i think it would be bad for the housing world to say, hey, we're going to try to figure out a work-around and add more density, especially when a.d.u.s are supposed to be smaller and affordable by design. so having a maximum size and minimum size, and maybe based on a percentage of the main house, with a maximum, you know, all that stuff makes sense, but i also do want to reiterate what kristie wine said from spur. i'm missing the reasoning behind not allowing a.d.u.s in brand-new construction. there's a lot of different ways -- the concerns that are out there can be addressed simply through a strong definition of what a.d.u.s are, size and suitable by design and things like that. so i do think it's a missed opportunity to not be adding immediately additional housing that would be affordable simply by its shape and size and that seems to be -- that seems to be a solution looking for a problem. i'm not sure why we're removing the a.d.u.s from new construction. tha

the united states is trying to be in a region. when there are. the only job thier doing and they have shown that they do is creation of interest groups who are risking turn during the time his tenure in the foreign ministry he. has so. many to. she. has dissipated in the creation of the terrorist group in syria and iraq if you recall in the. states. doesn't trump. choose into the you or the people who are these series who you're ultimately agree with mr trump in the in these coalition he wanted to in a gesture in to then he change you follow the same policy that we don't create do you think you may have other things in common with mr trump and at least in the way how he conceptualizes there is no newcomer in purple common policy between us and the sitra and that there could be no more overlap of views on how the region develops we're not. because we know that. he. has your only policy you know or the war you're against any kind o. expansionism and any kind of. or any other country now as the americans keep on insisting on the. removal of the iran

back in the united states. the fbi has obtained a recording in which donald trump discussed how to suppress the story of karen mcdougal, a former playboy model who alleges she had a year-long extramarital affair with trump in 2006. in the tape, made before the 2016 election, trump reportedly discussed with his former attorney and fixer michael cohen whether to buy the exclusive rights to the story of karen mcdougal, who alleges she had an affair with trump. at the time, mcdougal had sold her story for $150,000 to the national enquirer, a tabloid published by trump's close friend david pecker. the paper ultimately kept the rights to the story and refused to publish it, in a process known as catch and kill. the tape will now be available to prosecutors in any future criminal investigation of michael cohen, after trump's legal team reportedly waived attorney-client privilege on the recording. on sunday, the lawyer for another woman trump allegedly had an affair with, but don't film start stephanie clifford, also k

to see the president of the united states, mr. trump, shrink -- shrink -- next to vladimir putin, to drop his oath of office, to drop his duty on a world stage to protect and defend the constitution of the united states, and then to have so many here in this country on -- on tv programs like this one say, what a surprise. no. this was not a surprise. this was mr. trump in full view of the world. this is who he is. ignorant, narcissistic, all involved with himself. his priority is himself. not the country. not the presidency. he is unaware of histories. he was unaware certainly yesterday of anything that this republic has stood for through the ages. the only thing he was aware of clearly was that he was in putin's pocket. >> i don't know if ignorant is so much the word as scared. you look at the visuals. you listen to every interview donald trump has ever given, and he is clearly scared of vladimir putin. he is clearly afraid to ever cross the russian leader. he is clearly -- clearly -- in his pocket. who else -- and we talked abou

he was which was bigger than the united states doesn't affect national security so the reason behind that of cause has no grounds where you see this all heading bit not tonight. is it going to turn into a full blown trouble what happens at midnight is that we have an ongoing trade conflict between the u.s. and china and the tears that are coming of course they will affect directly companies in the u.s. and china also jam companies in both countries but also indirectly affect the whole interconnected in very complicated supply chains all over the water. thank you very much for coming in today. and let's get some breaking news now the boss of german still johnson corp is stepping down german media is reporting that hina he's inger is jumping before he's pushed or is already an activist singer recently for a stake in the company with the aim of forcing easing out according to the news magazine dish. the move comes shortly of the tewson seal the deal to jointly run its european still making on indian rival tata. internet entrepreneur kim dot com has pretty much won himself a free flight

trash although the election of the united states. doesn't trump. choose into the you or the people who are these terrorist groups or if you're ultimately agree with mr trump in the in these coalition he wanted to in a gesture into the only chamber you follow the same policy that we still don't create do you think you may have other things in common with mr trump and placed in the way how he conceptualizes there is no newcomer in purposes of common policy between us and the sutra and that there could be no more overlap of of us on how the region develops we're not. because we know the. video any policy you know or the war you're against any kind o. expansionism and any kind of a unit where you notice it or any other country now as the americans keep on insisting on the. removal of the iranian presence as they put it in syria they and their allies seem to be in trenching and the history you're freydis and i'm sure you know that mr trump's current national security advisor mr bolton wants advocated for the creation of the so-called sunni stand a quasi