. hillary clinton's misconduct was alarming and appalling. baker said this and it's key, he believed that clinton should have been indicted with crimes and the espionage act. all of these liberals concerned about obstruction of justice. hillary clinton deleted emails and we have the testimony of the james baker the exact date they bleached it. he was talked out of it by his boss jim comey and others. this testimony released on baker is revealing what is rampant anti-trump bias inside the highest levels of the fbi. not rank-and-file. we have been right all along. the chosen candidate hillary clinton got a free pass. a dual system of justice. no equal justice under the law. trump was persecuted. they wanted him to lose and had an insurance policy when he won. baker was alarmed and freaked out when he saw the anti-trump text between fbi investigator strzok and lisa page. strzok interviewed hillary clinton. and james baker revealed that hillary clinton's phoney russian dossier played into the investigation of trump. clinton paid for. it it was not verified and the author. he doesn't stand by

talk about blackmail and keeping witnesses silent? >> william jefferson clinton. >> i did not have sexual relations with that woman. >> the impeachment effort against him failed by a single vote in the senate. >> president nixon -- >> as a fallen leader. >> there it is. >> the ayes have it, impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors. >> i have impeached myself. ♪ when i ruled the world >>> good evening, i'm fareed zakaria. the constitution's impeachment clause was written by men who fought a revolution to escape the tyranny of kings and now they're wanted to keep the president from becoming a monarch. in one version the grounds for impeachment were treason and bribery. also proposed, maladministration. but james madison said that was too vague. what if he asked a president would cook up a scheme of speculation, in other words what if the president were a crook? so george mason of virginia came up with the additional phrase. high crimes and misdemeanors. and that is article ii, section 4 of the constitution. there was a moment in our history when it saved american democracy. but a

in television on race relations in politics in the 1990s. we will talk about bill clinton's relationships with the african-american community and the 1999 seattle wto protests. >> good afternoon and welcome to this session of american historical association recasting recent american history through video on the politics and race in a televisual age. i am robert browning. i am the executive director of the c- span archives, the faculty director of the center for c- span's scholarship and engagement at purdue university , and i am also a professor of political science and communications. that is a big mouthful, but they all kinda fit together in this panel as a political scientist, it is exciting for me to see and learn more about modern american history, because it overlaps so closely with what we study in political science. this is an exciting panel for me personally. it is also a little different panel than a normal panel. as i look through the program earlier, i thought panels on archives and how they could be used, and i saw many panels on traditional papers. this panel i

. e-mails the reason why you freddy krueger is dressed up as an i.t. guy in hillary clinton's nightmares the f.b.i. found almost fifteen thousand and released e-mails into a year long investigation of her private server the head of the f.b.i. called you out for careless handling of classified documents said she believed the seaver confidential and some documents actually stood for the order of paragraphs some three years on when everyone thought it was all over and gone new f.b.i. documents reveal more juicy details like what happened to our half of the e-mails that were raised clean by the clinton team we're not talking just a few dozen or hundred or even a thousand e-mails here we're talking some thirty thousand all private according to clinton she did provide a detailed and meticulous explanation of how she picked which e-mails to delete how and who exactly wiped her server that potentially stored top state secrets except clinton did none of that instead she felt like joking about it. to do what the service well like with a cloth or something that i know you do but i don't

hillary clinton or a judge that met him once and labeled him a narcissist gets much dirtier uglier out. outlets that have historically supported and cheered america's wars such as the atlantic put out the seas pact hate mails or the equivalent of musingly enough the hack behind this story first calls out assad just permissibility with facts and almost immediately after says this artist tagline his question more and indeed one might inquire how it came to pass that the spin off of a kremlin propaganda organ and now registered foreign agent in the united states first arrived on the scene i stand ready to answer your inquiry unlike other networks and publications who all learned at the same time that assigns might be leaving the embassy we could leaks told everyone unlike them we took it seriously we went and documented what happened this is called journalism journalism like what i songe did when he exposed various war crimes he's a publisher buz he's a journalist he. and the material that he leaked we know from the pedestrian mails from the logs is real and credible and was published by

getting that warrant by committing a fraud, using clinton's bought bawt and paid for russian lies, they never told the judges that. the bulk of information were unverified, uncoobraitd, paid. for information by hillary. and denied an american it is sts to his constitutional rights th and got their back door right throughout trump campaign. for carter page. we know 2016, the obama officials, they just indentally spy bod trump officials after rice, she reportedly unmasked the names of steve banon, jared kushner, lieutenant general, 3 year vet michael flynn. yeah, they were spying, many, many times. sadly, that's only one small part of this abuse of power and corruption. you now, throughout the night we're going to show you the full time line. we have reported everything. but guess what, after months and months of waiting, truth and justice and facts, in spite of all of them are now beginning to come cascading down and will drown the proper people. referrals. the horno wits report, the hoover report, the release of more closed-door testimony. yeah, we'll get those fieza applications, gang

would be hoping to discount mrs clinton were let's let's be down to hours of this you have two people running for the presidency and. one mrs clinton has called mr putin the new hitler the other is making considered dettori noises of his ability to cooperate or at least to engage with with mr putin for whatever reason it wasn't based in on mr trump sort of serious systematic assessment but who many case that's what he was say so if that's the choice is. that it's evident the do whatever profer and any reasonable rational person would have. for folks what you do about it or don't do and what effect you might lose a surfer questions well i think there's also a very specific russian context here because for the russians the clintons have come to you a pizza mob actually interference i mean it's not a secret that bill clinton worked very hard to get boris yeltsin elected as russian president in ninety nine to six sending his aides to moscow pressuring the i'm asked for a ten billion dollar loan hillary clinton also made her preferences known they had of the two thousand and twelve

investigation into then candidate hillary clinton, thanks to john solomon, we also know and i expect we will have confirmed tomorrow, that baker later testified in a different closed-door hearing. hillary clinton's misconduct was alarming and appalling. and baker said this, and its key: he believed that clinton should have been indicted with crimes, the espionage act, all of these liberals concerned spabout obstruction of justice. there was intent when hillary deleted emails and acid washed her hard drive, and we have the testimony of james baker today, the exact date that they used bleach pit. but of course, he was talked out of it by his boss, jim comey and a few others. that is not all. at this testimony released on baker today is revealing what is rampant is rampant anti-trumpet bias inside the highest levels of the fbi. not rank-and-file. it's what we have been saying all along, we've been right all along, the chosen candidate,il hillary clinton, got a free pass. we have a dual system of justice. and no equal justice under the law, no equal application of our laws. trump, he was

a leaked e-mails from the hillary clinton campaign that proved that the democratic primary was rigged in favor of hillary clinton and against bernie sanders but it also shows what many have argued that this charge is a thin veil for in the words of a guardian op ed to punish those who expose and various things secrets about its actions about the united states action on top of that assad has not yet been extradited if he even will let alone tried in the united states and there are two amendments in the u.s. constitution to talk about due process and there was a concept called innocent until proven guilty so the house foreign affairs committee has declared a sunday is guilty for a crime. he's not even being tried for so this i think many would argue that this really review was the true nature of his prosecution and we've seen many american politicians celebrating his arrest senator joe manchin even went as far as saying he's our property the property of united states though a few like democratic presidential candidates tulsi gabbert have come out in his defense. the american civi

go after -- who knows, hillary clinton, so the other side isn't going to play the same way. >> i'm really deeply disappointed in my republican colleagues. barely a handful, if that many, have spoken out in criticism, let alone outrage, and outrage is what they and we ought to feel because russia attacked our country. they literally committed an act of war against the united states of america, and the president, then candidate, accepted happily. >> should he be impeached for that then? >> that is a step that we need to take, if we take it, after being very deliberative. nothing wrong with being deliberative. there is no deadline for reaching that decision. there should be hearings. and we need mueller and his team, along with don mcgahn and others, and the unredacted report and the evidence and the facts underlying that report in presenting our case to the american people. ultimately they need to hear this case and be educated because very few are going to read this whole report. and here's the really important point that i think ought to be bipartisan. we need to protect america ag

clinton. and remember this -- >> to be clear, mr. trump has no financial relationships with any russian oligarchs? >> if that's what he said, i -- that's what -- that's obviously what our position is. >> reporter: in fact, there were many contacts. arranged at the highest levels including a meeting between the head of russia's sovereign wealth fund and trump ally eric prince. on obstruction, mueller lays out ten possible episodes including the firing of fbi director james comey. the president's attempt to get attorney general jeff sessions to unrecuse himself. >> he took the job, and then he said "i'm going to recuse myself." i said, "what kind of a man is this?" >> reporter: and telling white house counsel don mcghan to fire mueller. he threatened to resign. the day mueller was appointed, may 17th, 2017, president trump, quote, slumped back and said, "oh, my god. this is terrible, this is end of my presidency. i'm f'd." adding, "this is the worst thing that ever happened to me." though the term attorney general -- the attorney general claims -- >> the white house fully cooperated with

donald trump jr., jared kushner, and paul manafort met with russians to get dirt on hillary clinton. >> mr. trump has no financial relationships with russian oligarchs. >> that's what he said. that's what i said, that's obvious our position. >> in fact there were many contacts arranged at the highest levels including a meeting in the islands between the head of russia's sovereign wealth fund. on obstruction mueller lays out ten possible episodes including the firing of james comey. the president's attempt to get jeff sessions to unrecuse himself. >> he took the job and then said i'm going to recuse myself. what kind of man is this. >> and telling white house counsel don mcgahn to fire mueller. mcgahn refused telling chief of staff that the president asked him to do crazy asks. the day mueller was appointed, president trump slumped back in his chair and said oh my god, this is terrible, this is the end of my presidency, i'm f-ed adding later this is the worst thing that ever happened to me. >> the white house fully cooperated with the special counsel's investigation. >> in fact the r

took to the clinton investigation and the one they've taken to the trump investigation. maria: you joined us four weeks ago on this program. at that time you said you wanted to get the electronic communication from the department of justice and the fbi, you wanted electronic communications to understand exactly how the trump investigation into collusion even began. you've now seen the electronic communication, yes? >> that's correct. so it took us a long time to actually get this, what's called the electronic communication. as we now know, for your viewers, it's the original intelligence, the original reasons that the counterintelligence investigation was started. now, this is really important to us because the counterintelligence investigation uses the tools of our intelligence services that are not supposed to be used on american citizens. so we've long wanted to know, well, what intelligence did you have that actually led to this investigation? so what we found now, after the investors or have reviewed it, is that, in fact, there was no intelligence. >> if you ask the fbi today

the clintons, the democrats and all deep state actors that abused power. spotlight shines brighter on bought and paid for russian lies along with major new developments tonight surrounding notorious email server yes involving barack obama and anthony weiner. we will give you all the details. we start with an even bigger development of the tin foil hat conspiracy media mob what they haven't telling you about because we are learning from "the washington examiner" tonight robert mueller's report contains a claim that russians recorded then president bill clinton having phone sex with monica lewenski back in the 1990s. wow. the explosion allegedly reportedly is in the redacted report released to the public, not there but it's in the redacted section. according to sources talking to examiner, the redaction comes on page 109 of mueller's report and references a meeting between jared kushner and a russian publisher where he detailed this claim. remember, ken starr in his 1998 report identified at least 17 phone sex calls conversations between 1996 and '97. and wrote that president clinton, q

presidential candidate hillary clinton, she has surfaced again to claim the only thing preventing an indictment against president trump is that he's in the office. the president's attorney rudy giuliani says hillary should, well, think before she talks. >> there's a woman who really obstructed justice. the president didn't delete 33,000 e-mails, he didn't have somebody smash up telephones and he didn't have someone wipe out a server and bleach bit it. there used to be a standing policy you cannot indict a clinton no matter how much they obstruct justice, no matter how much evidence they destroy and no matter how often they lie and no matter how often they commit perjury. you can't indict a clinton. lou: that's going to be tested, it may appear. joining us tonight, judicial watch president, tom fitton. great to have you with us. let's start with you dish watch's discovery of clinton e-mails in the white house. how could that be? >> it's amazing. we forced this disclosure out of the fbi. look, a federal court ran a you dish watch discovery in the clinton e-mail scandal late last year.

you're scarred. >> i'm wise. >> she's also speaking from experience. i covered the clinton campaign, you were there for the clinton campaign, and one of the criticisms was whenever hillary was, you know, facing a moment of stress, she would go back to the temperament argument and go back to defining trump versus talking about her policy ideas. i understand the frustration that she talked at length and in great detail, more detail than any candidate about policy ideas and couldn't garner the same media attention. so that is why i think it's smart this is the way he started out. why? because in talking to democratic voters over the past two years, they are shaken. this speaks to their deepers anxieties about what they witnessed over the past two years to joe biden's point, is this who we are or is this an aberration? and if you talk to these democratic voters, they say they realize the things they've seen, like charlottesville, the pittsburgh shooting, they didn't realize we had this in our bloodstream. that is an open question to them, is this who we are or is this an aberration? so

clinton, she has surface thed again to claim the only thing preventing an indictment against president trump is that he's this office. the president's attorney, rudy giuliani, says hillary should, well, think before she talk it is. >> there's a woman who really obstruct thed justice. the president didn't delete 33,000 e-mails. he didn't have somebody smash up telephones and wipe out a server and bleach bit it. it used to be a doj standing policy you cannot indict a clinton no matter how much evidence they destroy, no matter how often they lie and no matter that they committed perjury. you can't indict a clinton. lou: that's going to be tested, it may now appear. joining us tonight to take up that question and others, judicial watch president tom fitton. tom, great to have you with us. >> hi, lou. lou: let's start with judicial watch's discovery of clinton e-mails in the white house. how could that be? >> it's amazing. we forced this disclosure out of the fbi. look, a federal court granted judicial watch discovery in the e-mail scandal last year. one of the greatest modern off

hillary clinton. the president didn't destroy subpoenaed e-mails or any other evidence in this case. he did not invoke executive privilege. instead, according to independent counsel, ken starr, the president's cooperation in this case was unprecedented and that's because presumptuous had nothing to hide. thousands and thousands of documents were turned over, almost 1.4 million, unfettered access given to trump campaign, officials, administration employees. mueller's team completed 30 hours of interviews with the white house counsel. how does that happen? no executive privilege was used to hide anything in mueller's report. by contrast, the obama administration, they used executive privilege to withhold 20 e-mails from then attorney general eric holder surrounding his involvement in the fast and furious gun-running scandal. well, that was a real scandal. whereas trump, russia, collusion, was a farce. tonight, thankfully for the sake of this country, truth has prevailed. as the president's attorneys put it, quote, this vindication of the president is an important step forward for the coun

we're talking some thirty thousand all private according to clinton she did provide a detailed and meticulous explanation of how she picked which e-mails to delete how and who exactly wiped her server that potentially stored top state secrets except clinton did none of that instead she felt like joking about it to do what the surface like with a cloth or something that well no you do i don't know how it works digitally at all . it's because you know wipe has two meanings delete or cleaning of the wine stain from last week and it's funny because it's called ever but ok now that you're all done laughing hundreds of newly revealed f.b.i. documents shed light on how that server was wiped a company called plot river networks did all the dirty works and these conversations between two of its employees leave no questions as to why they think they did it it's all part of the hill recover our poor peroration i'll have to tell you about it of the party. thanks for the heads up. but even with only half of the e-mails available the new have b i papers reveal that from the get go key people had

clinton." do you and the preside accept the idea that the ruian interference was designed to help president trump? >> i believe it wa i can't tell you for sure. i haven't examined all the evidence.is no reason to dte it. >> does the president accept that? >> i have no reason to dispute it. i think so does. obviously that wasn't part of defending him. >> no, but a lot of the report seems to indicate that he feared that the idea the russians helped him was going to delegitimize his presincy. >> whether he did or didn't, there are a lot of factors that go into any election. the reality is he was elected president. there are a lot of good reasons that he was elted president and she wasn't elected that have nothing to do with this. it's harli to beeve this was a decisive factor. they don't find that. >> let me say this -- >> did all that happen? i imagine it did. i can't dispute it. >> okay. let me put this up. "russian intelligence service conducted computer intrusion operations against entities, employees, and volunteers working on the clinton campalen and the ree of the stolen docum

. we'll see. jordan kelper at comedy central this weekend did a gag with bill and hillary clinton in which the premise was there was an online fund-raiser to raise money to get hillary clinton to voice the audio book version of mueller's report. which is something -- it's sort of like, what do i want to hear now that the mueller report is out? i want to hear from mueller -- no, wait to hear from mueller and all of his prosecutors and investigators, then, after that, i want to hear from mueller. then, after that, i think i would want to hear hillary clinton read the mueller report as an audio book. the gag's premise was they were helping jordan kelper out trying to figure out what kind of online fund-raisers he should support, and then they got to this supposed online fund-raiser about hillary clinton reading mueller's report outloud. >> the investigation established that the russian government perceived it would benefit from a trump presidency. >> a couple notes. >> yeah. >> like you mean it. >> the investigation established that the -- >> feel it. secretary clinton, feel it. feel it

order time. and the great claims of how it went down for clinton have been overly learned by the political class. >> the clinton lesson. absolutely does not want impeachment in any form. she hand for more than a 84. she's made that very cheer privately to all hf membership. she continues to do that. she has to balance, do this public balancing act. if you kept going with what she said, she went into an extensive recitation of the polling. the truth about impeachment polling is it changes over the course of the process. it always has. what the democrats think they learned from the clinton impeachment was, it is bad for republicans. the mistake they're making is the polling information they're using to say it was bad for the republicans is that bill clinton, a second term president who would not run for election. his personal favorability ratings went up during impeachment. the only person involved who could not run for re-election. so what happened in the next election? the republicans impeached bill clinton won the house of representatives. >> you're saying in 2000. >> yes. the r

because he thought that hillary clinton would end up winning the election. obama didn't do anything about it until president trump won the election, then he ordered of the intel report and put sanctions on russia, in my opinion come at the time president trump's hands politically. so democrats don't care about russia. this is about harming and tarring president trump. >> melissa: one point that i'm a challenge, lisa, i think they care about russia now. because it cost them an election. don't you think they care now? >> elizabeth: president trump has been extremely tough on moscow. really tough on them with sanctions of all sorts of military and intelligence officials, over ukraine stopping arms shipments there. the democrats want a 1973 john dean televised senate hearing to embarrass the president. the american people, the polls show, by politico and cnn, they are saying to move on. this is done. that president trump is protesting his innocence and it's far different from the bill clinton impeachment hearings, when there was an attempted cover up. trying to get monica lewinsky to sw

point, 20 years ago, 21 years ago to be exact, 1998, bill clinton, republicans in congress were moving to impeach clinton. jerry nadler warned against that impeachment trial. he said the effect of impeachment is overturn popular will of the voters, we must not remove a president from office to defend our system of government or constitutional liberties against a dire threat and must not do so without overwhelming consensus of the american people. he said it couldn't be one party pushing for it, one party pushing against it, or the consequences, paraphrasing, would be catastrophic for political institutions. democrats go forward, that's the keen. >> i make a distinction between the american people and elected republicans. those are two different things. if the american people are reading the mueller report, they can go and read it for themselves are reading that and are troubled by the behavior described to be clear is very troubling, it is not as if the mueller report was a dud. this is something that has a lot in it that implicates the president in actual crimes. if you are a c

investigated the clintons, he takes on hillary clinton for saying that mueller report is a road map to watergate style hearings and comparing it to 9/11. we'll ask him about why hillary even admits she is not best messenger on this. >> top democrat want to throw this jail white house workers who -- who is right who is wrong. bernie sanders getting heckled at a conference, he is doubling down on lets convicted fill opens vote while in prison before completing their sentences, bernie compares voting rights of felons in prison to votes rights of women and minority, i am elizabeth macdonald, the evening edit starts right now. elizabeth: welcome to show you are watching fox business network, north korea kim jong-un meeting with russia president vladimir putin. in first ever face-to-face meeting. vladimir putin saying kim jong-un ready to denuclearize, putin said only if north korea gets certain guarantees, after outrage, as north korea sends to u.s. a bill for care of comatose auto -- otto warmbier. reporter: north korea released warmbier in a coma and handed u.s. a 2 million dollar medical

hard left. kennedy: these people in clintons tries to sell themselves as progressives we'll have more on them later. >> i think that ned wants reality to be that is what you have to do to win democratic primary. kennedy: we don't know yet. >> we don't know. >> and -- >> we got so many. >> look at all people we elected to congress. wexton a moderate. kennedy: true. but difference is, those candidates won on local issues. >> apple and oranges. kennedy: they are not national campaigns. >> public education,. kennedy: and level that will be required from progressives will be impossible. >> not going to do it. >> i think they will be, we'll see. >> i am, thinking is not doing good we to do living. thank you. ned richard. >> thank you. >> woo. kennedy: coming up president has doubles down -- his threet to close the mexican border, he admits if he does there will be an economic price t to pay. how do you balance trade versus security. our grandparents checked their smartphones zero times a day. times change. eyes haven't. that's why there's ocuvite. screen light... sunlight... longer hours...