policy to leave the european union as soon as possible and i regret the fact it has not been possible, i tried three times to do it and we have not built a majority in the house. and everybody knows the house has also rejected no deal and other actions, including the people's vote, and by the legislation that was passed in -- it compelled us to seek an extension. and as you know, i saw that extension for the 30th of june but the council, after deliberations, gave it until the 31st of october. so we can leave at any point up until that time. and we will leave at the end of the month in which parliament ratifies the withdrawal agreement. it is important, because i want that to happen before the october deadline. and once that is reached, members should look to pass legislation and i assume this is practically possible. we have been making efforts to build on that consensus. we have talked about workers parliamenthe role of we have worked on the agreement itself, which the house chose not to do, but the right thing for us to do is reach out to the opposition. >> there are differ

no deal? prime minister may: we want to leave the european union with a deal. that's what we continue to work for. but of course it is not entirely in the hands of the government as to what happens there. first of all, parliament has to ratify an agreement that enables us to leave with a deal. and so far parliament has not been willing to do that. they have not been willing to accept no deal. but the extension and decision at the end of that were we to get to that is it of october date, and without having left the european union, i sincerely hope we don't come to that position, it would not simply be tea significance for the government as to what happened, because obviously at that point were there to be request for further extension that would be in the hands of the 27 members of the european union. >> you referred to the talks of the opposition. if they can can reach agreement, as you said, are you going to put a number of options to the house, will that include an option for the customs union? prime minister may: what we intend to do to discuss with the opposition, we would want th

without an agreement? government's policy is that we want to leave the european union with a deal. that is what we continue to work for. it is not entirely in the hands of the government as to what happens. parliament has to ratify an agreement that enables us to leave with a deal. so far parliament has not been able to do that or except no deal. decision wouldnd be to get to that october date without a deal ratified, and without having left the european union. i sincerely hope we don't come to that position. it would not be the decision of the government as to what happened. at that point, where there to be a request for further extension, that would be in the hands of 27 members of the european union. >> you referred to the tops of the opposition. if they can't reach agreements you will put a number of oppositions to the house here it will that include options for the customs union? >> we will discuss with the opposition because we want this to be a process, which we have discussed with the opposition, and which they were able to support her it we would discuss the options that

have to stand up the ?ontracts again p.m. may: we want to leave the european union with a deal. but it is not entirely in the hands of the government. parliament has to ratify an agreement that enables us to leave with a deal. parliament has not been able to do that. and has not been able to accept no deal. that 31st oft to dealer date without a ratified and without having left the european union, i hope we don't come to that position, it would not simply be the decision of the government what happened. point, were there to be a request for a further extension, that would be within hands of the european union as well. >> you referred to the talks of the opposition. if they cannot meet an agreement, you will put a number of options to the house. will this include an option for a customs union? >> we would want this to be a process with which we have discussed. we would discuss with them the options that would be put before the house. >> would it include a customs in? p.m. may: one of the discussions we have been having, and i've said this publicly as well, is the whole question about

already been comprehensively rejected by the european union? the government once to abide with the european union on goods to keep frictionless trade. while at the same time wants to pursue trade deals which would undermine this process. it's simply not compatible. the technology they need to continue to pursue their chequers plan simply doesn't exist. it's already been ruled by the eu as illegal, impractical, and an invitation to fraud. and, mr. speaker, the government has failed to provide in the economic analysis to show this would make us better off. why would the house support such a chaotic and desperate approach? labour set out a sensible, compromised to plan over a year ago, including a comprehensive and permanent customs union with the eu that gives us a say, that would allow us to strike trade deals as part of the world's biggest trading block, ring investment while maintaining the highest standards. it's credible and achievable. and the best way to protect industry manufacturing of jobs, something this government is willfully indifferent to, and the latest crisis in the

british prime minister theresa may discusses the ongoing negotiations on a deal for the european union, education initiatives -- this runs about 45 minutes. mr. bercow: order. questions to the prime minister. mr. allen brown. mr. speaker, may i start by thanking the net -- the mental health foundation for organizing this year's mental health awareness week? we are investing in record levels in mental health. we want to make sure people receive the treatment and care where they need it. i had meetings with ministerial colleagues in addition to my duties in the house, i am joining world leaders and internet companies for tackling terrorist views of the internet. >> allen brown. >> i would like to say that as well. -- approved and after receiving in this cabinet but -- [indiscernible] having to get these answers of the prime minister, make sure the u.k. service nhs blood and , transplant undertakes a case review to identify why this malignancy was not picked up earlier and why red flags were not identified post-operation? pm may: the honorable gentleman has clearly raised a very concerning case, and

ongoing negotiations for a deal for the u.k. to exit the european union. national investments and education initiatives. this is about 45 minutes. order. questions to the prime minister. mr. allen brown. our parliament. we value relations with you and your country. >> questions for the prime minister, mister allen brown. >> mister speaker, may i start by thanking of a mental health foundation for organizing this year's mental health awareness week. we are investing record levels, to make sure people receive treatment and care when they need it. we had meetings with ministerial colleagues, we are joining world leaders and internet companies on tackling terrorist use of the internet. >> instead of market search and improved and extended life, the project received a death sentence. a falling rate with comfort, that is what happened. to get these answers, to make sure that the uk, undertake a case review and identify post operation. >> the honorable gentleman has clearly raised a very concerning case and gave details of that case on the floor of the house. i would ensure the minister

parliament in washington, a long-term european civil servant, and an expert on the european union and the european parliament inside out. we an't ask for anyone better to help explain the european parliament. catherine is the director of the diplomacy project at harvard university kennedy school and the executive director of the project on europe and transatlantic relations and a long-term expert of transatlantic relations. glad to have you here all the way from boston. less than not least, richard young. he is a senior fellow for the democracy program at carnegie based on carnegie europe -- the carnegie europe center in brussels. he is an expert on european foreign policy and politics. i promise i will not ask him all the questions about brexit today. we will jump straight into the election results and discuss the implications. i want to turn first to antoine. what were the key results? is anything we should pay particular attention to? anything you found surprising about the results? and how do you think the results will impact the position of the european element -- european parliament

european union, they have not treated us right. money for manyng years and the european union has not treated us properly, but we will see what happens in regard to tariffs. we have not made a decision on that. >> [indiscernible] pres. trump: it will be discussed next week. >> [indiscernible] say it again, say it again. >> [indiscernible] pres. trump: well, i think i have a very good relationship with some of the press. unfortunately, some of the press does not cover me accurately. they go out of their way to cover me in accurately, so i don't think that is a free press, i think that is a dishonest breast. i want to see a free press. the fronty to see on page of the "new york times" that they were talking about spying on my campaign. that is a big difference between the way they have been covering, but that is a big story. that is a story bigger than watergate, as far as i'm concerned. i want to see freedom of the press, and i get treated fairly by some press, but i get treated very unfairly by other press. i think that is very dishonest and i do consider that when you have stories pu

has been negotiating and exist energy with the european union in parliament for the past three years. a look now at her announcement. theresa may: i have striven to make the united kingdom a country that works not just for a privileged few, but for everyone and to honor the result of the e.u. referendum. back in 2016, we gave the british people a choice. against all productions, the british people voted to leave the european union. i feel as certain today as i did three years ago that in a democracy come if you give people a choice, you have a duty to implement what they decide. i have done my best to do that. i negotiated the terms of our exit and a new relationship with our closest neighbors that protects jobs, our security and union. i have done everything i can to convince mps to back the deal. sadly, i have not been able to do so. . tried three times i believe it was right to persevere even when the odds against success seemed high. it is now clear to me that it is in the best interest of the country for a new promised her to lead that effort. asnnounce that i will resign leader

european union. isn't this new deal just a fantasy? >> i set out the 10 points about the new deal. there is a difference of opinion on the future customs arrangement with the european union which is why this house actually comes to a decision on that issue. allowing the second reading, will enable the house to come to a decision on that issue and labels the house to come to a decision on the second referendum which i continue to believe would not be the right route for this country to go down. we should deliver on the first referendum before suggesting a second. >> look at the benches behind you. the prime minister is fooling no one but herself and the truth is that the people of scotland don't want her deal. her own party doesn't want her deal and even the pro-brexit labor a bench would support her deal. her time is up. tomorrow people in scotland have a choice, to send a message, to send outward looking scottish national parties to brussels to stop brexit. what party does she think the people of scotland will choose? >> there's only one party in scotland guaranteeing no more ref

billion a year. for many years, and the european union has not properly but we'll see what happens with regard to tariffs on cars with the european union. a decision on that. >> -- secretary -- make it official? it will be ump: discussed next week. say it again? [inaudible] president trump: well, i think i with some rels ship of the press, and unfortunately, cover the press doesn't me accurately. in fact, they quo out of their way to cover me inaccurately so free t think that's a press. a dishonest press and i want to see a free press. today i was happy to see on the front page of the "new york times" for the first time where hey were talking about spying and they were talking about my campaign. that's a big difference between the way they have been covering but that's a big story. that's a story bigger than watergate as far as i'm concerned. see freedom of the ress and i get treated fairly by some press but i get treated very unfairly by other press and frankly i think my campaign. that's a big difference between the that's very dishonest. consider, when you have stories that are

world. louisiana starts here and goes around the world. our ambassador to the european union, gordon sunderland. thank you. great job. [applause] pres. trump: and he brought along the vice president of the european commission. [applause] pres. trump: thank you very much. european union. i said before, they are just as tough as china, they are just a little bit smaller. they are pretty tough, too. they are all tough. when they look at your country as not being strong from certain standpoint, like when they used to take advantage of your country, they all get much tougher than they should. this will change very quickly. amazing how quickly. i especially want to thank sempra energy's chairman and ceo jeff martin. jeff, that was great what you said and what you have done. thank you for the tour. [applause] pres. trump: your company president, justin berg, and your chief operating officer. , lisa. that was a great tour. thank you, lisa. thank you very much. [applause] pres. trump: it was not long ago that sempra planned to build a natural gas import terminal on this very spot. that was in

strengthening evolution in the united kingdom. as we leave the european union we will bring new powers and responsibilities. i had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others in addition to my duties in this house and i will have further meetings later today. >> thank you, mister speaker and i agree with what the prime minister said. this suggests 780,000 people with two thirds guaranteed hours, constituents of mine live in a privacy rental accommodation and get a third job and rates went up. he and his family survive by the use of a local food bank. will the prime ministers end these injustices and ban contracts? >> i say to the honorable lady, the issues about the contract was the conservative party. the labour party did nothing about it. it was the conservatives that banned exclusive 0 hours contracts. >> it is a huge issue because historically schools had less funding for decades compared to authorities like bryson holmes. there was a 6% increase and this your schools should be getting a 7.6% increase in people funding for 64,000 pounds of that being kept behind the council. wi

agreements with our allies as well. reaching agreements with canada, mexico, and the european union will allow us to turn, pivot, and address the egregious actions going on right now with china as it relates to trade. so maybe it puts forward a need to get agreements in place with our allies quickly so that we can collectively address china, which is really the big culprit right now on trade and the theft of intellectual property, nontariff barriers, and i would like to see us take them on collectively. host: we saw in the 2016 presidential campaign wisconsin was a big battleground state. are you expect that it will be the same time around for 2020? i think it will be the tip of this beer. that is probably why the democrats planned the dnc convention in milwaukee. wisconsin will be ground zero. it has democrats and republicans evenly mixed, but i think it is great we will have the convention there. i think it will show some of the democratic policies firsthand for people and make a clear decision as to the path that we should go come 2020. host: one of the key democrats, bernie sanders,

partnership it has with many countries in the european union. could -- the neal arms treaty? as i understand, russia has chinased the topic with the-- how have we not seen -- until the chinese part? talks with china -- step with chinese partners. on.crisis is going russia is going forward to. [indiscernible] i do not see that. russia would criticize china in not joining the treaty although russia would like to update new arms control and regime -- as far as i am concerts. our military experts also to be part of the foreman. so i guess this is the picture that we have now and russia , russiave -- well thinks that it would be better for everyone if we negotiates but ate arms control this stage there is nothing we can really do. action we canar do now basically. and the last thing about the standards in the arctic -- this is an adjusting question because china -- has grown and china would like to step up its presence and even if you look at the maps, you will see this is one of the same shipping lanes. china on the way that it needs to have cooperation that russia wants to have somew

only do it by example. that is not the european union. nobody can be thrown out of nato . the treaty does not allow for it . it is an alliance based on consensus decision-making and the only way to change consensus decision-making is for consensus to agree that you can change decision-making. to if you are trying ostracize the country, let's say for the sake of argument, tokey, you need the turks agree they should be ostracize. that's very hard. so, how do you do that? you start putting pressure on them. and somebody needs to be that effort to bring countries together. and saying, the way you are behaving, and the turks, for example, right now with regards to buying 400 russian air defense systems, are not behaving in a way that is good for the alliance. for you can do that in two ways. you can send your vice president out and go publicly castigating them as mike pence did on the 70's anniversary of nato. can diplomatically engage either allies and put the pressure on the turks and try to have them change their mind. and that's how it works. it is sometimes hard work, it is diplomacy

beginning to strengthen their security alongside the united states. in march, the european union commission released a set of recommendations to improve the cyber security of 5g networks, noting evaluations of equipment suppliers should include the risk of influence by third country, notably in relation to its model of governance. this principle should be applied rigorously. two weeks ago, the czech 140blic hosted more than representatives from 32 countries, including the united states, as well as the european union and nato. were there to build consensus on 5g security. this effort produced the principal on how to build secure and resilient 5g networks based on free and fair competition, transparency, and the rule of law. moving forward, we hope the proposals will help our partners and allies to build secure 5g networks. we will continue bilateral and multilateral efforts for the internet and all the critical services 5g will enable our secure and reliable. thank you for the opportunity to appear before the committee today. i look forward to your questions. sen. graham: the criteria you ju

the folks. go, the european union, as an example they badly , mistreated us for many years, -- they're all european union's. we need a doctor, please. a doctor please. , do we have a doctor? doctor in the house, please. thank you, doctor. thank you. take your time. some of these people in the front row have been here for two days and i do not blame them. they have been waiting in line for two days. it is tough. thank you, fellas. take your time, doctor. take your time. those are our friends right there. those are our friends. take your time. >> we love you. [cheering] [crowd chanting four more years] how are they doing? is she going to be good? going to be good? doc, everything ok? you're good? good. thank you. we stick together, folks. we stick together. take your time. take your time. >> we love you, president trump. president trump: we love you, too. [cheering] even with that powerful man's voice, i love that guy. i think i am in love. [crowd chanting we love trump] thank you. thank you very much. and, thank you. thank you. you for doing such a good job. under my adminis

consultation to push it. looking at the european union for example, individual countries may be lagging behind, but there has been a push from the -- from the european union to push harder. we will need to have something that pushes all states in latin america ahead that would require more political action so that there is a political mandate combined with an input -- n mandate, and private mandate for unilateral support. shery: are there any more questions from the floor? talking we have been about investments going into latin america. is there any sector that you would find interesting that the private sector in the u.s. would have an interest in, or any sectors that the u.s. can learn from? sen. cassidy: one thing that seems natural. joaquim mentioned the national gas in brazil. i am told, in argentina, they have shale plays with the same geology as the united states. i can tell you from my state and other states, once you develop these resources it has a great positive impact on the people who work there. were not doing well suddenly are doing very well. begin toy, as you cr

be said, and nothing should be taken for granted. it was said we would be out of the european union by the 29th of march and then by the 12th of april and in due course we maybe on whatever basis. we may be that at the moment the united kingdom remains a member of the european union and there is much debate to be had and policy to be determined, and conclusion to be reached. >> amanda, did you want to come in on this point? >> i wanted to ask where does this leave the country and broader constitutional terms? we have a situation where the government lost a referendum that it brought, where the government has not had a parliamentary majority to deliver on the results of that referendum. so i wonder if we're saying tension between direct democracy with the people able to speak in a referendum, a parliamentary democracy where you have gridlock in parliament and parliament isn't able to deliver on that and then also an executive that is not able to deliver on that. so interested in where you see this tension between direct democracy and parliamentary democracy. then also more broadly what

from the european union, in which there have been three defeats of the government's brexit deal and two extensions of the deadline. last week, the u.k. along with the rest of the e.u. held elections for the european parliament, and the country will soon have a new prime minister. a leadership contest is getting underway within the governing conservative party, following prime minister may's announcement she will step down from party leadership following president trump's state visit and the d-day commemorations next week. background, wes are particularly grateful and very honored to have with us today the 157th speaker of the house of commons, the right honorable john bercow. began hisrcow parliament three career in 1997 when he was elected member of parliament from buckingham as a conservative. he spoke as a spokesman for education and employment starting in 1999, and was appointed shadow secretary to the treasury in 2001. shadow minister for work and pensions in 2002, and then shadow secretary of state for international development in 2003. 2009, elected speaker in and has served in t

european union with the united states and mexico. the result of these agreements now 1.5rs, there are billion customers in canada's free-trade zone. that is creating prosperity for us and our trading partners. believe trade leads to growth and jobs, you understand these trade bridges.s are simply if nobody crosses those bridges, they are stare i'll. -- sterile. we also encourage small and medium-sized enterprise within the government to take full advantage. we have evidence they are doing exactly that. rather than focusing on one negotiation, canadians look at the international trading environment and we see it is in our national interest and the interest of our partners, too. >> canada has taken it seems like a reading -- a leading role trying to foster wto reform threats the institution could be undermined reform happens. what are the chances reform can be accomplished? it seems like not a lot has happened since the g20. body is real risk the could cease to function come december. >> imagine you invite 164 of your neighbors to your backyard for a barbecue on a beautiful july night a

, traditional trading partners to whom we have turned our backs? the european union, canada, mexico, to go into this fight in a true alliance, to make sure there is strength in numbers and there is a far better chance that we get what we are pursuing in the first place. right now, it does not look like we are any closer to achieving our goals, and though we are ratcheting up the pressure and the tariffs, reciprocal tariffs are going to be ratcheted up against our farmers and producers as well. we need to join a larger alliance to make sure we get to the solutions we are looking for. reporter: in arlington, you said that you wanted to focus on face time with voters over, at the time, big media interviews. you have some pretty big ones coming up next week. does that marked a shift in where you are, a new chapter for your campaign? mr. o'rourke: i don't think so, because while we do prioritize town hall meetings, direct voter engagement, conversations like the ones we are having here today in bedford, i have also done hour-long interviews on cnn, i was just on the show on msnbc, sat do

members. european union and others. there should be some kind of different level of cooperation with different partners. recently one of the examples is they have signed a pre-trade agreement with vietnam, russia's third free-trade agreement. of the negotiations are underway with singapore, cambodia, israel, iran, a number of countries. with these considerations, there has been recently a concern in russia and its foreign-policy community about the end of pacific and what the pacific means for russia in what should the response be in the pacific. there has been a speech by in hanoi aietnam, couple of days before the donald trump, kim jong-un summit. the reaction that was formulated by the foreign minister was quite pessimistic and not welcoming the end of pacific because russia feels that it is at the current stage too concentrated on balancing china, which russia would not welcome, and another thing is that it is kind of fostering competitive space rather than cooperative space and when there is an issue with the rules-based order, russia usually sees who is going to present this ro

is not nearly enough. but the european union treats us . would say worse then china they are just smaller. can you believe it? they have trade barriers. they send mercedes-benz here like they are bookies. they send bmws here, we hardly tax them at all, john. we hardly tax them at all. you want to send our cars over there? forget it. you want to send our agricultural products over there are smart oh, i'm sorry we have our own farmers. medical equipment is big business. believe it or not. we make the best in the world. they changed the standard so our equipment does not qualify. they did not make a higher standard but just a different equipment nour longer qualifies. it is a very unfair thing. we protect them. we spent hundreds of billions of dollars protecting them. and then they take advantage of us on trade. it is not fair. we lost $180 billion with the european union. and we all love europe. we love your. they have to be careful, europe but we all love europe but it is not fair the way they treat -- treat us. i have directed federal agencies to drastically accelerate the approva

morning. regina: good morning -- caller: good morning. the european union elections that are coming, some thoughts i am wondering how beh authoritarianism might christian/theologically charged? i remember an anglican bishop saying america and the west will try every social. , social methods -- try every social theory and social methods. little ladies comment on that -- will the ladies comment on that? guest: not covering that you elections, but -- not covering we are. elections, but looking at the role technology plays with increasing calls for social media companies to play a more responsible role. that is something that will be looked at as the next round of elections come up. host: jerred is next. >> good morning, everybody. i'm directing us to the two reporters. when you talk about what the democrats are doing to investigate trump, everybody was going to be the leader in robert mueller's report. thing is he was supposed to testify this week. blaming thee president for him not testifying. but he knows that the republicans are going to be asking all kinds of questions about why he

the decision to leave the european union, so-called brexit. i would say it is comparable. i would say that is a good point. i would not limit it to england. we are seeing the kinds of nationalism that mr. trump represents, us against the rest of the world, and the kind of specific nationalism that breaks down on racial and ethnic boundaries. we are seeing that around the world. it is a response, i think, to not having a communist enemy. it is a retreat from the idea that the world will progress cooperatively as opposed to completely competitively. when the president says america first, he is saying we don't cap allies. he is saying -- don't have allies. he is saying we don't have people we cooperate with. a dramatically important and devastatingly stupid point. when you think about how you are successful, think about your own life and your own community. the way things get done, the way good things happen is when people put aside their self-interest and work together to make things better for everybody. that is what we were doing traditionally with our allies around the world. we

entire european union are in compliance with the unachievable targets set. france, which paris is in, is not even in compliance with the targets. and then they tell us, america, why don't you come into this thing. this disaster of an agreement, that none of the countries in europe are in clines -- compliance with. you look what it would do to wreck america's economy. and talk about carbon emissions. if this is really about carbon emissions like the green new deal and other crazy ideas that would wreck the american economy, get rid of fossil fuels, you don't have to fly on planes, missing a flight because there wouldn't be any flights. that's how lewd chris 24ir ideas -- lewd chris their ideas are ---ludicrous their ideas are. but they do this under carbon emissions. climate action does have cost. talk about that cost. $250 billion in higher taxes and less wages for american families. you wonder why the rioting in the streets of france? in paris, where the accord was signed, they are having riots over this radical idea. by the way, again, they are not even in compliance with them. you

strengthenginning to their security alongside the united states. in march, the european union commission released a set of recommendations to improve the cyber security 5g networks, noting evaluations of equipment suppliers should include the risk of influence by third country, notably, in relation to its model of governance. this principle should be applied rigorously. than republic hosted more 100 represent us from 13 countries, including the united states, as well as the european union and nato. we were they'll -- there to build consensus on 5g security. this effort produced the principal on how to build secure and resilient 5g networks based on free and fair competition, transparency, and the rule of law. moving forward, the proposals provide partners and allies with secure 5g networks p or we will continuing bilateral and multilateral efforts for the internet and all the critical services 5g will enable our secure and reliable. thank you for the opportunity to appear before the committee today. i look forward to your questions. >> they were telling our allies you need to make are sa

don't care whether it's the european union, china, japan, they understand where the future is and these new technologies have to be fossterd at the federal level as the state and local level. let's not kid ourselves that actions in washington don't make a difference. they do. one of the purposes of government is trying to find ways to innovate and create jobs for the future and not rely on the past. and that's all we're saying. we have to send a message with h.r. 9, withdrawal from the paris agreement is not good for our country, jobs or our economy. please support this bill. let us be on the right path again. the chair: all time for general debate has expired. pursuant to the rule, the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule and shall be considered as read. no amendment to the bill shall be in order except those printed in house report 116-4 2. if such amendment may be offered in the amendment ordered in the report by a member designated in the report shall be considered read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally controlled by

russian federation which are not nato members. on the other hand, there are two european union member countries. romania and bulgaria. as well as the other four countries which are not in this european organization. period before 2014, a number of regional security initiatives were taking place into the black sea. it encompassese, all countries in this initiative. it proved to be quite successful putting the same table of all the actors around the black sea and stepping forward and even had some successes in terms of interoperability. among the nato partner for peace , countries as well as the russian federation on the other hand. in addition of that was the black sea harmony, based on information sharing among the countries. the confidence building measure initiative into the black sea that encompasses not only the navy, but also the coast guard and border police of the country's. unfortunately, and against all spring, march, the crimea crisis occurred, when crimea was illegally annexed by russian federation's against the ukraine. all of those initiatives were suspended. harmony isea

the european union to work through mobility issues in europe. much work remains to be done, but we are on the right path. , and theompleted chiefs of defense approved it last week for submission to the minister of defense, the first nato military strategy in decades has been written. it clearly articulates the challenges that confront nato and provides the framework for the various plans that will be in place in the event that deterrence fails. so, i would argue that as an the -- as an alliance nato is , stronger than it was four years ago and i could walk through many other initiatives taken for more capability. do we have more work to do? we certainly do, but when i look back at the four years, one of the things that stands out to meet is the meaningful changes that happen made to enhance its capability. four years ago, i had my confirmation hearing in july of 2015. i was asked, what are the most significant challenges facing our country? i said if i had to point out someone that could pose a threat, i would have to point to russia. i went on to talk about their nuclear capabilit

a deal for the european union, education initiatives -- this runs about 45 minutes. mr. bercow: order. questions to the prime minister. mr. allen brown. mr. speaker, may i start by thanking the net -- the mental health foundation for organizing this year's mental health awareness week? we are investing in record levels in mental health.

-span two. >> after failing it several attempts to get a brexit agreement with the european union, for prime minister theresa may announced