>> guest: well, great question, generally in academia, study many more successful academics chose not to have children but -- which is quite sad but also depending on your outlook, i guess, but generally we have the lowest birthrate since 1978 in the country, 1.76 children which i always laugh what the 1.76 looks like. 1.76 kids now and the main reason that millennials have given the unaffordability of kids, so this is something that you're seeing in all walks of life so every time you look at the rosy numbers you can sort of think about that, well, real people feel like they can't afford kids, what is going on in the country and i hear you, carol. >> host: all right, let's hear from harry in california, hi, harry. >> caller: hi, yeah, i have lived in santa maria, california, since 1971 to 2018, to present date. can you guys hear me? >> host: please go ahead, we are listening, harry. >> caller: anyway santa maria, california is mostly farming and we've had a lot of issues here with housing and-but worst thing we've got corruption, police department, code enforcement, child care, i cou

that that's anecdotal but that it's very, very palpable from people in community, to leaders and in academia, government, philanthropy, across the board, that concern and fear is very palpable. and as i've been saying in california, this applies across the country. every ten years it's tough enough to ensure a complete national population count. it's tough. there is a reason why there is a hard to count designation that we utilize when it comes to the census. so now on top of all that we layer on the citizenship question, layer on top of that years of underfunding and understaffing of the census bureau. we're less prepared today than we would typically be at this stage of the game. layer on top of that the digital first census. most people are used to getting the form in the mail now most people will get a post card with instructions of how to go online and submit your information electronically. they say we'll have other options to get the survey later or do it by phone or what have you but that's the first impression, you know when there is still a digital divide in america including calif

we saw the left wing of academia and the critical theory and all that. those people had no influence outside of the academy. we see it coming back with a vengeance in the far right wing, in the republican party. we saw it in tortured memos during the bush administration. now, under president trump, with kellyanne conway and rudy giuliani continuing to call into question objective truth is an extremely dangerous thing. there is such a thing as objective truth. not always easy to discern, sometimes easy, sometimes not. this is toe tal tearian rhetoric. it's dangerous from kellyanne conway and nobody held her and the president to account for that. it is time for the united states house and senate to convene a hearing to the judiciary committee to o remove this president. he and the people working for him are dangerous. their use of fascist rhetoric shows it. look at what were given by hitler in the 1930s and compare that to had rhetoric. you'll see what i mean. >> karine, the thing that is of also deep concern is that when you begin to destabilize people's

i will admit the academia on it could go either way. reasonable minds could differ, but it's not a sure thing that somebody can be impeached for pre-office activities. and it's just an open question. the fact that someone committed a crime as egregious as murder does not automatically qualify as an impeachable offense because it hasn't in the past. >> i think andrew jackson did a lot of stuff that he could not get away with in 2018. i don't think that precedent is correct. >> it's a killing. it's murder. >> he was andrew jackson, a genocidal maniac. i don't think he would be elected in 2018. >> a duel wasn't considered murder. >> it wasn't considered the same kind of crime as straight up killing, which shows how far we have come. but it was a crime known to everyone at the time it was committed. like i said, open question, if it's pre-office activity. >> how far we have come but we now have a guy who reveres andrew jackson. >> all right. coming up, it's not just mrof manafort who is dumping trump. the man who said he would defend trump

also coming up — the ig—nobel prize ceremony at harvard has been celebrating some of academia's most bizarre research and discoveries — we'll be joined by one of this year's winners. hello — this is afternoon live. hurricane florence may drench north carolina on the us east coast with ten trillion gallons of rain over the next week — that's the prediction of one american meteorologist. the storm's destructive winds have already left more than 100,000 homes in the state without power, and a storm surge has reached nearly 10 feet in some places. the hurricane's eye has just made landfall in the last hour near wilmington — on the north carolina coast, and laura trevelyan is there for us. dramatic scenes as the leading edge of hurricane florence reaches the north carolina coast. rain and wind pummel the barrier islands exposed to the atlantic, then move on. this huge slow—moving storm is now so wide, that it's threatening the south—east coast of the us, from the carolinas to georgia. north carolina's governor is warning that conditions are only going to deteriorate. people in

the bill clinton administration who has been in exile for many years, private practice, think tanks, academia. and so there was a stack of people, as i'm sure chris will tell us in a moment that they had who had experience and that they could choose from but that were willing and able democrats. the other thing, when you say is it unprecedented? this is not a question of what is my opinion? because people keep track of it, and the washington white house transition project keeps numbers. president trump is the highest turnover of top tier of any recent president at the 17 month mark. his number is the highest of clinton, bush, reagan. and obama. so there's compounding the vacancies is that he has turnover. so he has to fill the same job multiple times. >> right. we should put a list of those departures which to me are pretty staggering when you see them all in one place, all the people that have been bounced out, scandal, fallen out with the man on top. and, chris, you know, what was striking to me was the chief of staff hunt. you've got a guy named nick ayers, a guy who's like been doing jobs

make sure state governments are involved and the private sector and academia dealing with covert disinformation campaigns. we need to move to that conversation because 2018 elections are just around the corner. >> representatives will hurd and peter aguilar, good luck in your quest to get a majority of the majority thanks to you both. >> thanks, chris. >>> next, what happened in the nearly ten hours steve bannon spent testifying behind closed doors. tonight, details about the mid testimony phone calls to the white house and what bonnen reportedly let slip about that infamous trump tower meeting in two minutes. nick was born to move. 3 toddlers won't stop him. and neither will lower back pain. because at a dr. scholl's kiosk he got a recommendation for our custom fit orthotic to relieve his foot, knee, or lower back pain, from being on his feet. dr. scholl's. born to move. jimmy's gotten used to his whole yup, he's gone noseblind. odors. he thinks it smells fine, but his mom smells this... luckily there's febreze fabric refresher for all the things you can't wash. it finds odors trapped in fabri

make sure state governments are involved and the private sector and academia dealing with covert disinformation campaigns. we need to move to that conversation because 2018 elections are just around the corner. >> representatives will hurd and peter aguilar, good luck in your quest to get a majority of the majority thanks to you both. >> thanks, chris. >>> next, what happened in the nearly ten hours steve bannon spent testifying behind closed doors. tonight, details about the mid testimony phone calls to the white house and what bonnen reportedly let slip about that infamous trump tower meeting in two minutes. >>> we've learned a little more today about steve bannon's testimony on capital little. what we know is remarkable. bannon spoke yesterday behind closed doors at the house intelligence committee. today the a.p. is reporting he was less than forthcoming. they report his attorney bill burke was asking the white house counsel's office by phone during the tuesday session whether his client could answer questions. bannon's lawyer was on the phone with the white house as bannon was being questi

. >> academia -- efrom right, in order of only hope parody, the growing realization of how many men i've interacted with that i had no idea had such contempt for women. >> you have written about this. you wrote this piece that women recall the first time men masterbate in front of them without consent. i have to say, part of the process for this as a man is having the scales pulled from your eyes about what women are exposed to? what has it been like to cover this? >> yeah, well, i think that people do understand it's worth pointing out that the stories that make the news are the harvey wine steens and the louis c.k.'s, it's becauser that celebrities it makes news, for most women, it's not news, for me a lot of women, most women i've talked to we have been sexually harassed in every job we have been in, the media, the fourth estate, it's the police of institutionalized sexual misconduct, yet it's all over the media, we have all been harassed by men we work with. then, you know, of course, the stories of random men masterbating throughout our lives. the first time it happened to me i was

. >> from academia, to everything? >> right. in order to have some hope of parity, also just the growing realization of how many men that i've interacted with that i actually had no idea had such contempt for women. >> you've written about this. you wrote this piece that women recall the first time man masturbate in front of them without consent. which was part of the process for this as a man is like having the scales fall from your eyes about what women are exposed to. what has it been like to cover this? >> well, people do understand this, but it's worth pointing out that the stories that make the news are harvey weinsteins and louis c.k. it's because they are celebrity that it makes news. but for most women it's not news that men do this. for me, for most women we've talked to we've been sexually harassed every job we've been in, including the media is the fourth state is supposed to be the police of institutionalized sexual misconduct. and yet it's all over the media. we've all been harassed by men we work with. and then yo

hundreds of scientific experts from 13 federal agencies and academia conclude there is no convincing alternative explanation other than humans an greenhouse gas emissions being the dominant change for climate change of as to why this administration has publicly denied that conclusion agreed to sign off on those findings, there was little appetite for a knockdown fight on climate change among mr. trump's top advisers, who are intensity focused on passing a tax reform bill, an effort they think could determine the fate of his presidency. i asked epa what scott pruitt thinks of the final government report showing man made climate change is real. they declined to comment. almost anything. even a swing set standoff. and we covered it, july first, twenty-fifteen. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ that's why feeling safe is priceless. with adt, you can feel safe with an adt starter kit professionally installed for only $49.00. call today, and install an adt starter kit that includes security panel,

hundreds of scientific experts from 13 federal agencies and academia conclude there is no convincing alternative explanation other than humans an greenhouse gas emissions being the dominant change for climate change of as to why this administration has publicly denied that conclusion agreed to sign off on those findings, there was little appetite for a knockdown fight on climate change among mr. trump's top advisers, who are intensity focused on passing a tax reform bill, an effort they think could determine the fate of his presidency. i asked epa what scott pruitt thinks of the final government report showing man made climate change is real. they declined to comment. >>> if you somehow time traveled frr another era in american political life to witness this week in the trump administration, you would be a fool not to think that the events that unfolded since monday were enough to end donald trump's presidency. indictments of his former campaign chair paul manafort for conspiracy against the united states. campaign staffer and associate rick gates. news that george papadopoulos alrea

secondly, can i add onto that, most analysts would never look at white house communications have been in academia or said that when a president says that he has communication problems, what he has is usually political problems. you are arguing that we are not understanding how much the president should be appreciated and how much you lie for him. but can you describe to us, how much you think of that concept and how the president has political and policy problems? >> okay, solicit with the first question. >> legal. you will interact with the president's legal team? >> i am close personal friends with jay sekulow. i have a relationship with john dowd. i am going to work with them again and other people to make sure that we are on message and handling ourselves in the most appropriate way possible. that's the best i can say about that. i have not met ty cobb. i do not know him. >> at the follow-up was, communication problems versus political policy and the way you see that in the context of this. >> not long ago, teddy roosevelt said that a presidency is an open forum. the president has a great gif

eric: he's the dean of liberty university in virginia and academia, good to have you with us. arthel: rudy giuliani is back in the headlines after accidentally dialing an nbc news reporter and leaving a voice mail where he is overheard criticizing the bidens and discussing how he, wrote, needs some money. jacqui heinrich is in the new york city newsroom with more on that. jackie. >> reporter: it was a three minute message, left while the reporter was asleep at 11:00 p.m. and evidently it's not the first butt dial for the president's personal attorney. the first butt dial came last month when the reporter was at a 5-year-old's birthday party. the call went to voice mail and guliani could be heard disparaging the bidens. they said he tried to stop the investigation of a ukrainian gas opinion because his son, hunter, was on the board. there has not been any proof yet in support of those claims. but house democrats are investigating whether the white house withheld military aid to ukraine while pushing them to get to the bottom of it, the subject of the impeachment inquiry against

administrations since the end of the cold war have been influenced by a defective advice coming from academia and campuses. evening has to do with the economy, correct but they missed the fact there is an ideological link. more important to me is the influence and pressure coming from what i call the islamist lobby, the pro iranian lobby who have no interest in having the united states fighting the war of ideas. what happened to them will happen in egypt. bill: you are making the case those groups have the ear of the white house and that's why they explain what they do and have the policy they have? >> it's open information. there is nothing secret about that. look at what these groups are saying when they visit the white house or state department or how they influence academia. if anyone criticizes their argument they accuse them of islamophobia. bill: you hear the president repeatedly say we are not at war with islam. have you heard americans say we are at war with islam? in other words? who is talking like that to -- which would lead the president to say that repeatedly? >> if you take the

fox news has been investigating chinese efforts to infiltrate american academia. i sat down with texas republican senator ted cruz. he is trying to blunt beijing's spying in the u.s. it's called the stop higher education espionage and theft act. china is especially brazen. >> the chinese government is investing vast sums of money infiltrating american universities and businesses. and they are engaged in a host of nefarious activities. it is a systematic threat to undermine our universities and our economy and we need serious combating it. >> the navy says the department of navy recognizes the serious nature of evolving cyber threats and bolsters the department's cybersecurity culture and awareness along with cyber defenses and information technology capabilities. this extends to all of our workforce and partners for security reasons the navy does not comment on specific incidents or vul near abilities. as for penn state they told us they're aware of the threats and say whenever the university does detect a hacking attempt from anywhere, they do notify the governme

elizabeth warren, when she was in academia came up with this idea to have this independent watchdog agency to protect consumers. of course, that happened and picked up steam in the wake of the financial meltdown, which is why it was and is in the dodd/frank bill aimed at trying to remedy and rec lation somegu the problems that led to people really being on the short end of the stick. consumers and people who are not kind of wall street titans. so this is going to have to be, i think, adjudicated in the courts by a judge, but then it's going to have -- no matter which way they go you're going to see know legislative fight over this. i think if the judge rules in favor of the president, that the vacancies act rules and that the president has a right to appoint whom ever he wants, regardless of the statute, you'll see a fight to try to fix the statute or to even maybe even fix the vaek an vacancies act. >> and dana, tax reform. the likely vote in the senate this week. the president meeting with key committee members. the president heading back to the hill tomorrow. are the people to watch sti

is a lot of talk amongst academia talking about actually pushing up the fed inflation targets and perhaps reshaping fed policy overall. how can they even start having this conversation when inflation is not even at 2%? well, i guess that's one of the big issues for the next 18 months or so. if i put myself in the shoes of fed governor, i think just looking at how good the u.s. -- and i was looking at the good industrial production numbers this morning -- basically, inflation is the only weak link in the u.s. economy at this moment. it is looking universally found in other respects. tot allows a possibility keep going with normalizing rate 2%,cy, get rates up to 2.25%, then see what happens from there. that's probably the way to go. if you get a sense there is a lower paradigm, leave them. betty: but there's one problem, because if you continue to have low information -- inflation and the curve continues to flatten, and you have a fed that continues to raise rates, is a possiblepe for massive correction in the equity markets if there is a misstep in the rate hike path? i don't know about a

tech,e sciences, academia, culture, financial services, it is here that we are using gene therapy for the first time to treat the most common form of blindness. in britain, we are leading the world in battery technology that will hot -- help cut co2 and tackle climate change, and produce green jobs for the next generation. prepare for a post-brexit future, it is time we look not at the risks, but the opportunities upon us. let us begin work now to create high skilled jobs in left behind areas. let us deliver the u.k.'s and

take thedon't need to prowess and academic you -- academia? >> there are so many qualified and rowing or another sport is a way to set your kid off and make them more distinctive. examples of kids getting into the schools. at harvard, there was a lawsuit that uncovered documents. coaches can put in a good word for you as well. admissions gets the final decision but rowing can give you a leg up. you are more likely to get in as a athletic recruit than as a legacy. you can get. that you just need something to get you in especially to the schools that have those teams. everyone needs a college degree to move on so the thinking goes. >> rowing has an advantage because you can start late. you have to be strong and get up early in the morning. if you have a child who is not going to get the softball scholarship, you can try them on rowing. the top business leaders also getting in on the action. you can see this all on the bloomberg. we are looking at march madness of course. here is the midwest. this is my bracket. the red indicates where i did not

there are people out there in academia who do not subscribe to the mainstream teensy and -- fed,sian approach at the but they are intelligent enough, like milton friedman was in his day. who are the new milton friedmans? icannot give you the list but have made a note we need to develop one. david: that is club for growth president david mcintosh coming to us from washington. boeing is back in the crosshairs after reports it knew early on about a problem with the software in its boeing 737 but failed to inform those flying the airplanes. we talk about that next. this is bloomberg. ♪ david: boeing is our stock of the hour. shares dropped the most in the month. there are new questions about the company's transparency of the 737 max 8 and emma chandra is here to tell us all about it. emma: the transparency or lack of transparency. boeing new the cockpit release angle of attack sensors on the jet were not working properly and needed -- and they knew months before the first crash of the 737 max jet. the plane makers do not share those findings with any airlines or with the faa until afte

tech,e sciences, academia, culture, financial services, it is here that we are using gene therapy for the first time to treat the most common form of blindness. in britain, we are leading the world in battery technology that will hot -- help cut co2 and tackle climate change, and produce green jobs for the next generation. prepare for a post-brexit future, it is time we look not at the risks, but the opportunities upon us. let us begin work now to create high skilled jobs in left behind areas. let us deliver the u.k.'s and norma's bioscience -- enormous bioscience sector. let us develop the blight resistant crops that will feed the world. let us get going on her own earth and satellite observation systems. u.k. assets orbiting in straight -- in space wealth all of the benefits for this country. let us change the rules to provide extra incentives to invest in capital and research. and, let us promote the welfare of animals, who have always been so close to the hearts of the british people. and yes, let us start now on those free trade deals. it is free trade that has done more than eve

vast range of experience, both in academia and think tanks and oecd. you can't really imagine a better person to be global chief economist. tom: we will do some breaking news and morgan stanley. francine: this is what happened. we had the tax plan passed in december and a lot of big companies, the banks trying to figure out what it means. whether they take immediate hit. morgan stanley's has seen the next tax provision of about $1.25 billion from this new law. they are basically trying to figure out if this is longer-term. i think a little bit more than we were expecting. we heard similar things from credit suisse. tom: they will take it out of his salary. the chart on catherine mann and the trade deficit. it is the trade deficit. carl knows this chart as well. down from the 90's. carl, a lot of critics would say this trade deficit is bad. it impinges on jobs formation. does it? carl: there is obviously some flight of jobs out the u.s., but there is a lot of multinational companies that benefit from a more globalized world. even later this morning we h

even academia, occasionally, and it is the -- it is the crippling force, i think -- and you have to really try to bleep out i love your analogy it is the weather and you can get up and kind of say an awful storm is coming but that doesn't mean you're blaming the creator or it means you're reporting. and i think there's a way to stay on this side of the nonresistance, and to be very empirical and very factual, and because i've done this so many years. sometimes you're just wrong. i thought the ford pardon of -- of nixon was really the last stage of the coverup and i investigated and discovered actually it was an act of courage to let the country move on. so that's very sobering. >> i think one thing that i had always keep in the front of my mind especially with the time pressures that i'm under is i'm always one step on gutter one bad tweet away from destroying my reputation. i'm always you know one wrong story away from hurting myself, and you know, it's just -- it can be -- >> not only yourself. but "new york times." >> yeah, and -- >> this is where you've got to find, the great editor of

that was really good advice, because there's a lot of pomposity in our business, in politics, even academia occasionally. and it is the crippling force, i think. and you have to really try to bleed out. i love your analogy, it's the weather. you can get up and say an awful storm is coming but that doesn't mean you're blaming the creator or it means your reporting. and i think there's a way to stay on this side of nonresistance. and to the very and very cold and very factual and, because i've done this so many years, sometimesyou're just wrong . i thought the ford pardon of nixon was really the last stage of the cover-up that i investigated and discovered actually it was an act of courage to let the country move on. so that's very sobering. >> i think one thing i had always keeping in the front of my mind, especially with the time pressures, but i mother is i'm always one step from the gutter. i'm always one bad story away from destroying my reputation . one wrong story away from hurting myself. and you know, it can be tough. >> but not only yourself, the new york times. and this is where yo

government in addition to employing thousands of its own hackers manages massive teams of experts from academia and industry in cybermilitias that act in chinese national interests with unclear amounts of support and direction from chinese people's liberation army. it seems the analogy in cyberwarfare goes back to the ancient days of naval combat when nations not only sent out ships under their own flag to engage in warfare but also offered to private ship owners to pirates, indeed, letters of mark to go out and act in that nation's interest. what do you believe are the most important structural deficits that we have and need to fix in dealing with state-sponsored cyberattacks on our country that either come through false flags or are hidden behind work stations that are located all around the world in order to be able to deter these attacks. and if it makes a difference, could you distinguish between what mr. rogan referred to as hackers that attack anything and everything in the national security infrastructure on a constant basis and the brain drain that we face from wholesale industrial esp

levchenko's organization, invited people within the states and within academia to be trained on the testing that was done to screen the seafood for any sort of oil contamination. we know that we can smell the pah's at very low levels. we have a very low threshold in our noses. this technology dates back to the early 1960's in japan, where japanese researchers tried to equate -- if i have an oil spill and i take what i think is that concentration and put it in a tank and put in fish and allow them to swim and then take out at certain periods -- how quickly does it take up the compounds. by the same token, put it into water and see how quickly that dissipated. it was shown that they can detect down to .5 parts per million. what does that mean for you? one. one part per million is about a drop. >> our people back to eating gulf seafood now? >> there are still some concerns. we did a lot of training with the harvest through open waters, working with the fda and noaa to guarantee that the seafood is harvested through open waters. they can do that easily. we trained the processors so they could s

. >> i have the feeling this afternoon÷ -- i'm a product of the government and academia and more recently journalism. i have the same feeling that i did when you and mel had your conference a couple of years ago on strategy after the bush administration. it runs something like this. you have three brilliant scholarsç here today who have been in government who understand what it is all about and the whole gist of the conversation is that america is going to go on continuing to be the preeminent worldç power. perhaps challenged but we are going to keep on doing pretty much the way we have done it. do you suppose that barack ob ç obama, in these five sessions that he has hadi] in the last f weeks over the future policy in afghanistan, has brought in anybody who asks the question, what is it going to cost? and is this accountant willing to pay thoseç costs to maintai this kind of international policy into the foreseeable futu future? >> one more question.ç >> i'm a graduate student of the politics department. my question is similar to the last two and gets back to the theme of the la

they have the same amount of strength and personal courage and dedication to get through the world of academia which is tough today. >> thank you so much for coming. >> thank you. >> thank you. >>> and "make your bed" is on sale now. >>> two members of fleetwood mac teamed up to make their own ♪ noeft don't stop thinking about tomorrow ♪ >>> that is of course fleetwood mac "don't stop" from the album "rumors." not guitarist lindsey buckingham and christy mcvie are joining up for the first duet album and it's out today. anthony mason visited them in los angeles where they're busy rehearsing for the upcoming tour. >> good morning. the band is known as a musical soap opera. christine was married to the bassist and lindsey buckingham lived with stevie nicks and then they broke up. for the first time, buckingham and mcvie have teamed up musically. a lot of drama among members of fleetwood mac. >> you can say that. >> but you two never had drama between the two of you? >> no. no. >> it's sort -- sorry. not yet. [ laughter ] ♪ ♪ >> lindsey buckingham and christine mcvie began working on new s

the same amount of strength and personal courage to get through the world of academia, which is tough today. >> flank you so much for coming. >> thank you. my pleasure. >> thank you. "make your bed" is on sale now. >>> two members of fleetwood mac teemed up. they revealed t quin was crazy . but it took a twist of fate to find a high-end curler at such a head turning price. and that's the beauty of a store full of surprises. you never know what you're gonna find, but you know you're gonna love it. ♪ noeft don't stop thinking about tomorrow ♪ >>>that's, of course, fleetwood mack's "don't stop" from their " now lindsey buckingham andine m their new album. it's out today. anthony mason vishe where they' preparing for their upcoming tour. good morning. >> good morning. theyal bit of a musical soap opera. christine mcvie married to john and lindsey living with steve i have knicks. for the first time buckingham and christine mcvie have teemed up musically. >> there's been a lot of drama. >> oh, you can say that. >> you two never had drama between the two of you. >> no, no. >> not yet. >>

to make sure it's very clear what the public sector, what the private sector, what the media, what academia should be doing in handling russian disinformation. >> but do you think the president should be doing more, being more outspoken about russian election meddling? >> maybe he should. but we've got to remember the people that are tasked with this, that care about this issue, that are trying to make sure that we're resilient to russian disinformation is working on this. you know, i'm proud of the works that the folks in the intelligence community are doing to try to collect this information. but we could be doing a better job of sharing information between the private and public sector. when you look at the u.s. social media companies and their research on how russia used their tool to try to influence the elections. all of that was research done by themselves. the federal government still hadn't shared the information that we have access to, in order to make sure that they're looking and turning over every single rock. this is something that the only way we're going to make sure that we

they are working in factories and they work in restaurants and they're in academia and engineering and medicine is & science. they're part of the world of tech and politics and business. there are completes in the olympics and soldiers in the military. >> three of oprah winfrey's close friends till cnn she's actively thinking of running for president of the united states. this afternoon a spokesman said we welcome the challenge whether it be oprah winfrey or anybody else. back with me is the panel. frank, you were writing about last night. what you make of oprah winfrey running for president? >> when i listened to the speech, i knew we would wake up to news like this. i think a big part of it is after a year of the trump presidency, i think people are starved for eloquence and starved for uplift and starved for someone making a unifying statement like the one oprah made. i was really struck by -- although she was talking about the experience for women this year and the big reckoning, she talked about a lot of people. she made that group of women as large as possible. we don't get that

the context is basically a bunch of academics who hide pwr hind academia to talk bute white nationalism. so the fact that he seems unapologetic about that is problematic. steve bannon who was a white nationalists. porter a wife abuser. miller who has white nationalist leanings. now this guy. what is it about this administration that attracts them. he also got his dissertation on a german philosopher who was also a member of the nazi party. this guy is scholarly investigation and study. these are the kinds of people this administration is atrapbgting. >> washington post is reporting that beatty scott resisted the push for him to resign that ultimately led to him being fired. it's skpoezed to be extreme vetting for everybody. tprrsz do you think he'd still be working there if the reporting had not been surfaced? >> ocly because he was working there unhim the reporting was surfaced. it's interesting to hear he resisted his request for resignation. one of the things that should be immediately clear is it's not about you, it's about the president, the institution, the office. and so when you

department included reaching out to tap the energy and the experience and expertise of the civil society, academia, the private sector, anyone who was working to solve problems and wanted to collaborate with others who felt the same way. i even named a special representative for global partnerships because i wanted to encourage our diplomats and development experts to view public-private partnerships as one of their most important problem-solving tools. today, it is even more in portland that we do that here at home -- important that we do that here at home and around the world to unleash the talents of the american people and catalyze the investments that we need. we understand that you cannot look to government to solve all of our problems, you cannot trust the market, we need those partnerships that bring public servants and private leaders together. that is what you will see here at cgi america. we have a lot of work ahead of us and i am excited to be putting my efforts into it. i wanted to briefly describe to you what i am going to do in my new role at the foundation. certainly, i will be foc

this framework seeks to bring together the brightest minds from federal health agencies, from academia and from private research fields, with the hope of yielding new treatments and cures for recalcitrant cancers. i thank chairman pitts and ranking member pallone of the health subcommittee for their steadfast support of the bill. and i thank the chairman of the full committee, mr. upton, and the ranking member, mr. waxman, for their essential help. at a time when so many americans are concerned about the lack of bipartisanship in congress, this legislation is an example where members of the house energy and commerce committee work together as we so often do on critical health care issues. this legislation will reach the president's desk. this is the way congress should work. i give special recognition to congresswoman eshoo for her tireless efforts not only in support of this legislation, her legislation, but for her advocacy throughout her public life in support of cancer research and education. . i thank senator whitehouse on his important work on this issue and my staff for all the

the thinking is paving his way back to academia? for just disagrees minute plea? >> this is one of those baseball, washington d.c. kind of things. it will be signed by the solicitor general. and those heavily involved will frequently signed the brief as well. and as mentioned, when this case first came around, the state department signed the brief, an indication of the state department a the living met the foreign interests were heavily complicated, and they agreed with the brief filed. the inference from the fact that the state department pose a legal adviser did not sign on to the brief. that is just an inference. no matter how powerful. >> let us know when you get to the lake? leak? >> i have a question about the voting rights act. i have a question about, a gentleman was talking about evidence. and shelby county, i thought they laid out some powerful empirical evidence as to the formula that was used in the criteria used dating back to 1973, another is no fit there anymore. that was not convincing to the d.c. circuit. i was wondering if it would be more convin

i want to thank all of those who joined us from academia and the private sector, all who participated and signed concrete actions. across every critical infrastructure sector from energy to financial services to transportation to communication and so many others, a single attack can have widespread and cascading consequences. i look forward to working with the nation's leading minds in the digital realm as we stand up to national risk management center. it's not just risk to prosperity, privacy and infrastructure we have to worry about. that's why we're here today. democracy itself is in the crosshairs. free and fair elections are the cornerstone of our democracy and it has become clear they're the target of our adversaries who seek as the dni said to see discord and undermine our way of life. i share in the past efforts and those today to interfere with our election and the current threat. our adversaries have shown they have the willingness and capability to interfere in our elections. dhs has and continues to work closely with state and local election officials throughout the count

not criticizing academia who enjoys stirring the pot and look for splitting hairs. for 115 years, literally the consistent pattern has been since the adoption of the 14th amendment. end of story. meaning your parents were dead amount or parents were heads of state and just happen to be here at the time your mom gave birth. that's the reference to the five words. neil: but it's evolved over the years. >> it's evolved over the years has as many since the times have changed. the right to privacy in the fourth amendment didn't contemplate peter chips. they probably never contemplated the people they came here illegally for the purpose of having children. that doesn't give the president. that may give the president the idea maybe we should amend the constitution. he can no more change the 14th amendment than barack obama could've change the second amendment which he hated. neil: barack obama did look into hundreds of thousands of immigrants up for deportation and took an executive order to do with it. >> and the courts invalidated back. iraq obama rewrote the immigration

it is hard to be a part from politics, what do most smart people, whether it is doctors, hospitals, academia, or pharmaceutical companies -- what do they think? >> i think it is a wide held aspiration for people to have insurance. charlie: for everybody to have insurance? >> i think you can get democrats and republicans to agree that the fee-for-service is the heart of the problem, that coordinated care is going to be better than uncoordinated care, and the third thing is whatever we do it has to be score-able. if you can build on those three items, you could come along way to finding a solution. i would make the point that both parties are -- we have a problem that each party gets power and it overreaches. i think there is a moment in time that somebody is going to craft something that is bipartisan and whoever is in power when that happens will govern for an extended period of time. charlie: you really believe that? >> you spoke about the magic moment. you look back when we had an economic crisis, you look at 9/11, there will be a moment when there is a catalyst for that kind of activity.

what do most people, most smart people, whether it's doctors, whether it's hospitals, whether it's academia, whether it's pharmaceutical companies, what do they agree on? >> i believe there is a wide-held aspiration for people to have insurance. >> rose: right. i think there's an agreement -- >> rose: for everybody to have insurance. >> i think you can get republicans and democrats even in congress to agree on three things. >> rose: right. the first is that the fee for service system is at the heart of the problem. the second is that coordinated care is going to be better than uncoordinated care, and the third is whatever we do about this has got to be scorable, so that we can show that it's reducing the cost curve. and if you could just build on those three items, you could take it a long ways to finding a solution, and i would just make this point, both parties are -- west virginia got this problem where every party that loses power gets it and overreaches and it flops again and we're just going back and forth. i think there is a moment in time when somebody is for whatever reason and und

government, prevails in academia than trying to engage in peaceful way and it simply seeks to take its place, it's rightful place in the community of nations and we simply have to accept this. that is one possible scenario for china but it's not the only scenario and the idea idea that it's going to be, responsible stakeholder another buzz phrase in the international system is only one possible outcome. i think the real pattern of chinese behavior is an incredibly aggressive and assertive. they are building raises on rocks and reefs in the south china sea that on the good day or only 3 inches above water. they are today mapping the sea bend of the indian ocean and they are not doing it to find fish. they want to know where they can put their sufferings when they develop in undersea fleet. this is a very aggressive development. there's a panel on china tomorrow we will talk more about it but what it requires is a strategy. the president has raised issues of chinese violations of their obligations under the international trade agreement in their piracy on collection will privacy and thei

. >>> telling you, i've seen a lot of these situations with money and academia and i don't think we know exactly how deep this college bribery scandal goes. i'm not talking about just with this guy, singer, but it just doesn't make sense that he's the only one. we've heard about pockets before, but if this guy could worm his way into so many different levels of the process, who else is doing it right now? the impact of money on our education system colliding with the role of wealth and our legal system. let's take it up with laura coates and christopher hunt, in cuomo's court. now, hunt is going to be a good addition because he knows the world of trying to get into college and what is acceptable and what is not and he has his own suspicions so we're going to fold that into our analysis. thank you for being with us, mr. hunt. laura coates, criminality. we understand the ethical violation. we understand it's wrong. we understand it would piss off the universities assuming they didn't know. when does it become a crime? >> well, it becomes a crime, frankly, when you try to use money launderi

you come not from academia or the white house press corps or a think tank but from the intelligence community. the cia officers are not supposed to worry about removing presidents, atleast not american presidents . so what led you to this subject? >> thank you chris, former cia officer, i left quite a while ago. the first book, the president's book of secrets that i wrote was a book about presidents behaving well because it was a story largely of presidents who received this daily intelligence report, internalized it, processed the information and decided how to make the top national security choices that the intelligence reports help you to inform. i think that works well generally. some presidents did better than others but overall the system works. and i almost felt like i needed to balance that. thatwas the presidents behaving well . and sometimes they don't so this is more about presidents breaking bad, presidents behaving badly and what we do about it. i realized in writing the first book i learned more about the modern presidents, the presidents in the last 50 or 60 years. i still knew

you come not from academia or the white house press corps or a think tank, but from the intelligence committee. the ci a officer is not supposed to worry about removing presidents. of these not american presidents. what led you to this subject? >> former cia officer. i left a while ago. the first book you mentioned, the secrets that i wrote, was a book about presidents behaving well. it was a story largely presidents who received this daily intelligence report, internalized it, process the information and decided how to make the top national security choices that the intelligence report helped to inform. i think that works well generally. some presidents did better than others. but overall, it works. almost felt like i need to balance that. there was a presidents behaving well. sometimes they don't. this is about presidents "breaking bad". presidents behaving bad and what we do about it. i realized inviting the first book, i learned a lot about the modern presence. i still knew almost nothing about most of our nations history. yet, when it comes to something as momentous as potential