and i know what's what's happening in mainstream now was in academia in the 1990 s. it just went into the mainstream right now you have hollywood you have big. capitalism they're all channeling the same thing ok the same kind of ideology it's really an ideology of anti-politics go ahead in new york. well i agree with you we do we see a constant attack on on conservatives within within college campuses and i've been saying for a long time and you know i don't blame one particular party i believe that a lot of the weight does fall solely on the left but i believe that both all elected politicians dish falls on their shoulders that we need to upgrade our education system and we need to stop having an indoctrination system you know right now our education system does not prepare people for the future of what it is it's a lot of these radical professors who go into teaching and they want to indoctrinate they want to revise history and it's spilling over so it's not it's no longer just on a college campuses we're seeing a spillover like you said at the dinner table it's sp

that is academia. the village is academia. place to protect kids from reality and they end up in debt. >> eric: it's self-enclosed unit. teachers are guaranteed their job. >> bob: it's a union. >> eric: yes. it votes if democrats. they come back to protect their -- freddie kids are force fed junk. >> bob: do we not have the greatest university system in the world? >> greg: not anymore. >> andrea: once kids fete in real world they see the light. young american foundation sends me to campuses. i love to go. professors show up and students are in a bubble. professors rarely left the campus. on feminism i say the world has changed. girls tell me you don't know how it is when you get out. how do you know how it is? >> greg: the woman in "a" block, michelle, she was a graduate masters in journalism from berk ily. that is what you get. i went to berkeley. i know what it's like. there are a lot of women like that. she compared ann romney to hitler. that is what you get from a masters degree at berkeley. >> andrea: president become bam

the left is dominant in academia, hollywood, then the movies. it has microphones which it can create facts that upon scrutiny are not true. not that people having secret meetings, people on the same side of the aisle find it to be attractive, useful believable and they run with it. >> i heard an interview recently in which he said you're interested in not just getting into the documentary film spent feature films as well to challenge this. >> very often ideological messages are transmitted and so ideas come through romantic comedies, they come through thrillers, common theme of movies is the businessman is the bad guy. the antibusiness sentiment isn't just argued in a rhetorical way, it's just shown in every movie any pretty much have the movie that if you have this this guys can be the villain. >> how far away from your romantic comedy? >> guest: i'm tipping my toe into the water. in the next two or three years of a putting on some feature films alongside documentaries. i'm trying to make a different kind of movie then the ones with all that ho

academiaer i did in should also have some dimension to reach out to people who were interested in the era the way i had been when i was growing up. it seemed there should be more bridges between academia and the public than there are and one of the key places that can happen was at battlefields where you can make a connection to the past in a way that you can't. eastern, the4:00 1967 film "the testimony of truth." i used to come home from school very happy with all of my folks. 15 of them including an unborn baby have been killed. only i am left. are victimsbabies of these american air raids. >> at 6:45 p.m., historians discuss health care policy since world war i. >> trumans would have been universal. thes showed a majority of public come up to 75%, supported the idea of health insurance for all via the social security system. >> explore our nations passed on american history tv all weekend, every weekend, only on c-span3. morning, washington examiner reporter anna the processeviews on the u.s.-mexico border wall. then, former assistant secretary of state heather conley talks about t

it has a presence in hollywood and the media and academia so i sort of reengineered my career a little bit to focus on trying to build up little by little institutions in education and media and also entertainment to get the message out. >> it is a bizarre design for a prison that was made by the philosopher. he believed if you wanted to put them on their best behavior you could create a kind of glass prison in which the prisoner could be observed every second. you wouldn't have to because every prisoner would know that at any given time what they are doing could be seen. so he felt at a very low cost you could make sure prisoners maintain perfect discipline, perfect order, perfect good behavior and that this could be monitored by a regulatory state. the reason i used to the idea is that it seems to me in today's age of prevailing square our every movement and are a free e-mail and every phone call can be tracked and monitored it could be that we are creating not a prison but in america. the government has that ability and potential. it is the pretext for doing this to fight terrorism.

is that theappens idea begins to circulate, .ypically in academia it reverberates through academia, it is picked up by the media, steven spielberg makes it into a movie. hollywood,ant in academia, and the media. it has three megaphones. that is how big lies get disseminated. people on the same side of the i/o find a theme to be useful, attractive, believable, and they run with it. host: you are interested not films, butumentary films as well to challenge this? guest: often ideological onlyges are translated not by macklemore. ideas come through romantic comedies, thrillers, the common is that theies businessman is the bad guy. it is shown in every movie. you get the idea that if you see a white male business man he will be the villain. host: how far are we from dinesh d'souza's romantic comedy? toe intoam dipping my the water. in the next few years i will be putting out feature films along with documentaries. i am trying to make a different kind of movie that hollywood typically makes. host: you're looking to make this book into a documentary? guest: movies are different than books. th

in academia. whereas christians are the historical persecutes. and you take the other fact the people who are persecuting them left and right aren't muslims. they don fit the main stream paradigm. nations that don't share anything, not race, economic -- >> you go so far as to suggest that it's enabling it? >> in the sense, especially in the guise of the so-called arab springs which has prove on the be a disaster, t obama administration has been very supportive of the islamist organizations like the muslim brotherhood. once they come to power we have seen a huge nose-dive of christians in these christians. several churches have been attacked and bombed. nuns have been attacked and kicked out of the country. under morsi more than 100 were attacked. 30 years of mubarak none of that really happened. in syria, the people that we're defending and talking about their human rights are in fact violating the human rights of christia and nonmuslims and in fact there's good evidence if you ask other people, the people on the ground using chemicals are the sy

you may look at academia and we generate now the output for the economic opportunities that are there but government the institution that is the head because we just don't allow technology to be pulling in real-time. >> what he has done and i've got to give you credit because an area whether it's the architecture of our satellites overhead or where we where next-generation telecom, called 5g, moving television from 4g to 5g and it has taken incredibly dug in deep and we are because you get a chance to see this where cutting-edge research is done which comes out of the dod world and we earn credibility with our colleagues that if we come up with colleagues and stay tuned some areas will posell challenges beyond anything we've imagined in the last 50 or 60 years and i think we will have thoughts thank goodness you don't have your committee does not have jurisdiction on that because there's broad bipartisan consensus you cannot get cat videos from. [laughter] [inaudible conversations] moving on, thinking about the work with your committee and i know senator warner is the vice chair and o

for decades and while it was limited to academia people could easily dismiss it or mock it or not think about it but what has happened is that this idea has been really escaped from academia and started penetrating first the institutions that are ideologically sympathetic to race theory and the corporations which have been bullied into adopting these programs and even the federal government so you have public employees were paid by taxpayers perpetuating ideology that is explicitly anti-american, explicitly anti-constitutional and until these stories weren't covered and exposed to the public they had been spreading for years but i think with this order and the continued fight against its at the time it's beginning to turn. lou: it's beginning to turn because of your extraordinary efforts and again i want to commend you for doing so. as we wrap up here, the critical race theory, is it actually an attempt is too if you will indoctrinate america's? is a part of what we see now happening on the streets of democrat run cities or whether it's what we see as indoctrination in schools? is a par

en la real academia de despertar, le mejor solución para combatir la ansiedad podría ser mas facil de lo que se imagina~también, hablamos de tecnología y cómo, usándola, podríamos revisar nuestra correspondencia sin tener que tocar el buzon y modernizar el salón de clases. ♪ >>> las campaÑas presidencias continÚan recaudando cifras millonarias, los republicanos recaudaron 170 millones para roon rooney, se acerca a los 180 millones del presidente obama. >>> un dÍa antes del debate presidencial, obama y mitt romney estÁn empatados, el gran reto lo tendrÁ obama superado en el primer debate, segÚn la mayorÍa de encuestas, pero tienen el reto de aumentar el entusiasmo de los votantes hispanos, como nos cuenta blanca rosa. ♪ >>> aquÍ se ultiman los detalles para convertir una cancha de baloncesto en la cede del segundo debate, mientras ambos candidatos se preparan. solo esta breve visita permitiÓ ver al presidente. mientras mitt romney estÁ en boston. ryan criticÓ el manejo del dÉficit por parte de los demÓcratas. >>> la conducta del vicepresidente joe biden con el co

academia is somewhat insulated from the larger society. all side types of strange people walking around. all this craziness of socialism, identity politics, the extremes of political correctness. at this is a subset of american life. in contrast to this, with mainstream america, but i think what's happened in the last couple of decades is that these academic nonstorms. the craziest of them. have since exploded in a viruslike into the culture. the media has been the transmitter of this. and the democratic party has embraced it. so i think bernie is, in that sense, a product of obscure philosophies concocted by people like john rowles who would say that years and years ago that essentially whether you are hardworking or smart, you are just lucky. you just got those brains by chance. even your hard work is the result of what your parents taught you. you don't deserve the fruits of your labor. >> laura: yeah, you didn't build that. it's going up to obama and all the negativity from reverend wright. because all the original sins of america -- t

so the left is pretty dominant academia, hollywood and the media. it has three huge megaphones in which you can create facts. that's a big lies get disseminated. people on the same side of the seem to be attractive, useful, believable and they run with it. >> host: i heard an interview were said you are interested not just getting to documentary films but feature films as well to challenge this. >> guest: ideological messages are transmitted not necessarily by michael moore more, the bigeye steven spielberg. they come to romantic comedies, common thing is the businessman is the backup. the antibusiness sentiment isn't just argued for, it's just shown in every movie and if you see this white male business guy he's going to be the villain, you can almost tell from the beginning of the movie. >> host: how far away from a romantic comedy? >> guest: in the next two or three years i'll be putting up feature films. i want to expand my portfolio. trying to make a different kind of movie than what hollywood typically makes. >> and you're looking to make this

. >> paul: what is the lesson you draw about the politics of academia and intellectual diversity in academia. >> i wish i could say it was-- it's stomach for dealing with any kind of criticism and the way that they want to get you out is by hurtful attacks and they're not willing to engage in a substantive debate. you're an outsider you don't have a ph.d. and you're the not qualified or start calling you names. >> paul: basically, do they have conservatives still at the chronicle? >> there are a couple. mark bowerline is one of the bloggers and richard vetter. >> paul: some subjects are just off limits? >> i think that's the lesson to future people who want to engage in this kind of debate in academia. >> paul: thanks, we have to take one more break, when we come back, hits and misses of the week. too hard." then there was a moment. when i decided to find a way to keep going. go for olympic gold and go to college too. [ male announcer ] every day we help students earn their bachelor's or master's degree for tomorrow's careers. this is your moment. let nothing stand in your way. devry univers

now, this left has become extremely powerful in the media, in academia, in hollywood. and it's now moving into the elementary and secondary schools. and the conservatives are focused on the election, who's going to take the senate, who's going to win in 2016. not realizing that the culture, the high ground of the culture, is being occupied very powerfully by the left. and it's the left in which ward churchill is not the mainstream but he's a perfectly respectable part of it. and has been for 30 years. that's why guys like ward and bill ayers are surprised when they become controversial figures because they've been inhabiting an academic environment very comfortably. and it's not until the bee gets out of the bottle and people go, whoa, then they go whoa. we can't believe people are shocked because we've been saying this for a long time and nobody raised an objection. >> dinesh, thank you very much. professor churchill, thank you too. >> and that was it. what do you think? it's gotten so much feedback from you our viewers this week over that extremely popular interview

not necessarily academia for that reason this is my social media and celebrities. they have basically been backing the palestinians really backing hamas and the conflict. jon stewart wasn't strong enough at first either and he got some backlash and started to turn it around a little bit. young people are signing on. >> do you think their opinions are informative opinions? katie is shaking her head. they see one or two things and make a decision about how they feel about israel or palestine and that is it. it is not an informed opinion. >> first of all they think palestinians do the same thing, they do not, they do very different things. but these people in academia i can like they are in the same situation on social media aspect we do have somewhat of a drive-by social media, they see one fiction don't see the context context of that. why is it that had to be a bombing at a u.n. school? there were terrorists inside the school. i'm back to what benjamin netanyahu said, why is it people are holding hamas up at some level somehow higher or more moral than al qaeda or

>> exactamente,se hablÓ de que la real academia querÍa imponer,la real academia no es lo que era,no es ese bastiÓn,y todo lo que h@se hacen, todo es consensado por lemÁs academias de la lengua.unto >> quizÁs estamos acostumbrados a ,como dice usted,''falsos amigos'',quiÉnes son? >> son palabras que son muy parecidas al inglÉs pero que tienen un sentido distinto,por ejemplo:''bizarro'',bizarre en inglÉs,es algo extravagante,en espaÑol, todo lo contrario. lo pero es que se diga feeling y no simpatÍa.h@univisional pun? >> eso estÁ aceptado. >> y decir twittear? >> eso estÁ aceptado al igual blog. yo creo que existen palabras. >> y si llamo al rufero promuevan -no me van a entender? >> yo creo que usar varias palabras,si usted ve el programa dice:que escÁndalo lo que dicen? >> sÍ. >> coco >> esas palabras aparecen en el visionario de americanismos. -diccionario. esas palabras tienen que ver con lo que decimos,coo dirÍamos preso.o nada. >> estados unidos es el segundo paÍs del mundo donde hay mÁs hispanoparlantes,despuÉs univi- imparable la cantidad de hispanoparlantes que h

on academia it is a challenge. throughout a 63,000 students all paying 100 cents on the dollar tuition. many of these university have become addicted to that tuition flow. and these are great students and this is an area that we need to be very thoughtful about also have to acknowledge, many universities are kicking off the confucius institutes who really manipulate the students, but the number of our top universities that at intellectual property theft in the last five years has skyrocketed. let me get to the last point matt, which is with business, and this is the part where we've had some pushback, when they see some of her friends in private equity who, much of our bases to mary has acknowledged this but the private equity folks who ney by investing some of these chinese tech companies, or helping build the surveillance state and the social credit system that would make orwell blush in terms of levels of surveillance, and some essay they bear no moral no more responsibility, i think we really need to expose thi

derrick bell was the jeremiah wright of academia. >> jon: oh! it wasn't a hug at all. it was a terrorist chest bump. and while not everybody did consider derrick bell a radical, most did consider him the first tenured black professor at harvard la's history. the point is he did have trefertional vah points and barack obama was actively supporting him, not necessarily on his controversial viewpoints but on tape. and it looked like their nipples touched. (laughter) >> jon: which brings to us our tape. who is sean hannity? because as he has shown us in the facebook era, you are who you like. whether that person be an admitted perjurer. >> back with colonel olver north. >> jon: a convicted watergate burglary. >> g gordon you must have had a rough time with those guards in prison. >> jon: or whether it be a man what stomped another man to death in cleveland. >> don king, how are you. >> jon: only in america. or whatever this is. >> you don't get the obama he's a piece of [bleep]-- let's hear it. you-- . >> that was friend of freak guest on the program ted nudge ent expressi

people in academia really advise you against using the word democracy when it comes to stalinist russia because they include this notion of civil society that is central to today idea of democracy but. what you're describing just there wasn't talent terrorism about point of time either there was somebody in moscow with a limit the security apparatus and the rest of the country was essentially a lot of self governance is that an accurate. hereon ism as in general has sort of been debunked within the academia simply because more regional studies have proved that they simply didn't have the manpower or the infrastructure to monitor people frequently you know i look at collective farms where they have seen district level officials once every one or two years so the rest of the time they're busy doing whatever they want on their own people in the west would see stalin's after it's to encourage this. popular participation as a sham because they would think that genuine democracy would be of the impediment to his. with what you're saying. it may have been quite the opposite that he saw it as a

which is supporting this stuff hollywood wall street new york and academia academia as a big part of it then you're seeing another half of the us which is actively working to subvert this and to move away from this interaction. break free and that's the key word to actually break free and a lot of that is person to fight i think of the support of trump once again half of the country for half the country gets also in practice it half the country for half the country against all these you know these news narratives really really reflect how society is moving real clear division in a clear split you know you know robert it's very interesting to me is that you know again when you look at the over the last maybe 2030 years is that now the media is an arbitrary they arbitrate these ideas and they're always very far left for an example for 2019 they always went after these hate crimes but they never condemned for example in the united states ok they were blindsided by their ideology because anybody that supports trump and i don't always support what the president have to say i give you know

academia shapes culture. if conservatives were to take back some of academia you would see changes young people voted and not. that is very threatening in academia. >> that is question i want to ask sandra real quickly. what does it mean for scheme of things in politics in this country? if jedediah is saying the case you can program people and know how they vote down the road. >> it will be no diversity. look what is coming out of our college campus. people need to take into consideration other viewpoints. look what else is out there. these kids are coming out of college and we'll see one very basic culture and one basic line of thinking. that is a problem. it's a problem when we look at business in country too as well, harris. >> yeah, that's a good example. i hope it is not a boring baseline. ii hope they keep it hip and interesting, right, tucker? >> i hope so. >> we could come to end of employer provided insurance even though the president defended it as a candidate in 2008. we'll crunch of numbers for yo

this brought together government industry leaders in academia to discuss opportunities to join forces to threats to our nation's critical infrastructure. i want to thank all of those who joined us from academia, government and private sector who participated and sign up for concrete actions to cyber security challenges. across every procedure structure from transportation to communication and selling others, a single attack widespread consequences. can have i look forward to working with leaders in the digital realm we stand up to this. but, it is not just risks to our prosperity, privacy and infrastructure we have to worry about and that's why we're here . our democracy itself is in the crosshairs. free and fair elections are the cornerstone of our democracy has become clear they are the target of our adversaries who seek to sow discord and undermine our way of life. i fully share the intelligence community assessment and ask for those that may interfere with our election and other threats. our adversaries shown the willingness and capability to interfere in our elections. dhs has an

i admire you and people at fox news and some in the republican party, brave voices in academia saying i'm going to speak out regardless of the consequences. the romans and greeks believed that luxury announce leads to decadence. somebody in the inner city can hava an iphone with more computing power than six mainframes. a man from mexico in an -- in a kia ride as well as the mercedes. i don't like the lack of gratitude or the trashing of our system or our ancestors that gave us the system. maybe the universities have created an ignorant contrary view, but something has gone wrong. mark: isn't this issue about freedom generally? freedom is a tremendous thing. but peopleto have the opportuniy to destroy freedom. isn't that what the framers of the constitution were worried about? mobocracy. so they create a republic. the president wins the electoral college, they want to get rid of the electoral college. they don't like the president winning senators in the states, so they want to get rid of the senate. twhament they o do. isn't that an attack on our foundational principles and liberty?

curb has all the power to industry and academia to support its efforts. equally troubling are the multinational corporations inadvertently or tacitly providing the technological research behind china's unethical use of ai. cooperation with beijing has consequences, not just for democracy and human rights, but also for the strength of our partnerships abroad. if our allies and partners turn it5g platforms with china, will inject serious risk into our communication and intelligence sharing capabilities. our collective security must not be diminished by a narrow sighted focus on economic opportunity. russia has made its intentions equally clear, calling ai the future of humanity and describing technology as the key to supremacy in the world stage. moscow has demonstrated its eagerness to use the latest free andies against open societies. we should not doubt their abilities on the battlefield either. i mentioned ukraine earlier and we expect russia to continue to deploy high-tech ai capabilities in combat zones. the united states will offer a vision of ai tha

going across fields whether we talk about the arts partnershi partnerships, academia. you know, i am a tenured professor i'm among the 4% in the country. and that includes historically black colleges and universities. so, when you look at the billions of dollars that are being extended without any accountability, and we have constructed this elaborate apparatus of diversity. we have it down. we have a task force and we do the climate surveys that we have hired the consultant. we hired the diversity of hours. i remind you that if this happens after some embarrassing episodes. talk about, and gucci, you name it. starbucks, nfl. and they know who to call. there is this industry and they are treated as one person who does this for a living. the day are treated like fire extinguishers and then they were pretty much forgotten about. she has a lot of numbers in the book and i am a complete nerd i don't want to bore you with them. one of the numbers that blew me away about the industry it is a totally unregulated industry. there is really no standard. there is no no like this

we need to diversify the ideological foundations of academia. we're not going to to change this can el culture on campus. gerry: you're right. it started in academia with, perhaps, and spread to the media and now increasingly embedded in the corporate world. thank you very much, indeed, professor, for joining us and for sharing that ree mark bl and very instructive story with us. >>> just a ahmed -- ahead, i'll talk to one who was canceled by the social media mob which included one of the world's most famous athletes. stay with us. ♪ when you think of a bank, you think of people in a place. but when you have the chase mobile app, your bank can be virtually any place. so, when you get a check... you can deposit it from here. and you can see your transactions and check your balance from here. you can detect suspicious activity on your account from here. and you can pay your friends back from here. so when someone asks you, "where's your bank?" you can tell them: here's my bank. or here's my bank. or, here's my bank. because if you download and u

we need to diversify the ideological foundations of academia. we're not going to to change this can el culture on campus. gerry: you're right. it started in academia with, perhaps, and spread to the media and now increasingly embedded in the corporate world. thank you very much, indeed, professor, for joining us and for sharing that ree mark bl and very instructive story with us. >>> just a ahmed -- ahead, i'll talk to one who was canceled by the social media mob which included one of the world's most famous athletes. stay with us. ♪ hey, can i... hold on one second... sure. okay... okay! safe drivers save 40%!!! guys! guys! check it out. safe drivers save 40%!!! safe drivers save 40%! safe drivers save 40%!!! that's safe drivers save 40%. it is, that's safe drivers save 40%. - he's right there. - it's him! he's here. he's right here. - hi! - hi. hey! - that's totally him. - it's him! that's totally the guy. safe drivers do save 40%. click or call for a quote today. safe simon pagenaud takes the lead at the indy 500! coming to the green flag,

we need to diversify the ideological foundations of academia. we're not going to to change this can el culture on campus. gerry: you're right. it started in academia with, perhaps, and spread to the media and now increasingly embedded in the corporate world. thank you very much, indeed, professor, for joining us and for sharing that ree mark bl and very instructive story with us. >>> just a ahmed -- ahead, i'll talk to one who was canceled by the social media mob which included one of the world's most famous athletes. stay with us. ♪ looks like they picked the wrong getaway driver. they're going to be paying for this for a long time. they will, but with accident forgiveness allstate won't raise your rates just because of an accident, even if it's your fault. cut! sonny. was that good? line! the desert never lies. isn't that what i said? no you were talking about allstate and insurance. i just... when i... let's try again. everybody back to one. accident forgiveness from allstate. click or call for a quote today. accident forgiveness find your

. >> the final liberal loon, academia, all the liberal professors who claim opposing views, how do you explain this? rutgers invited condoleezza rice to make xhepsment remarks. unanimously approved by the rutgers board of directors. liberal academia stepped in and now the faculty wants rutgers to pull the appearance on the rice appearance. all the liberal academia. >> i think it's a big mistake on their part, even though the student newspaper came out in favor of what the faculty did. condoleezza rice has a lot to offer, may not agree with her, but any graduation -- when they say they don't want politics at graduation speeches, give me a break. >> every one is political. >> may not agree with her but the idea of cutting her off and not having her there. >> a former professor, a learned woman. >> i was agreeing. >> i agree. >> don't with v to raise your voice. >> i agree. it pisses me off. she's a woman, an accomplished woman, woman of color minority. if the right did this you can't even imagine but they are getting away it and shameful. only so lucky to have condoleezza rice come speak

because if it's all contrived an overblown how can they work in academia they have to be useful do something real they'll earn their bread their country guarantees it they'll always be safe here but i still think that they should do something maybe something small let them have their own specialty they should feel that the government needs their knowledge and they have to feel needed but how can we consider anyone so handicapped to be complete. and it not been for that speech alexander savor of may never have decided to write his doctoral thesis or achieve the title of professor he would not have written his research articles or trust academic conferences through every moment of despair it was because he remembered those cruel accusations of deficiency that he forced himself to keep going to continue living and working. with i've always it's not just handicapped people who have to overcome difficulties . well if it's not an achievement for an ordinary person. it shouldn't be thought of as an achievement for us either. i'm talking about higher education and finding an interesting job. thanks.

. >> los funerales del mandatario comienzan el miércoles cuando el cuerpo sea trasladado a la academia militar donde estará en capilla ardiente para que el pueblo se pueda despedir de hugo chávez durante 3 días >> veremos la ruta que hay que seguir, será acompañado por todo el pueblo hasta la academia militar de venezuela >> la oposicion también tuvo palabras, henrique caprile radonski expresó su solidaridad con la familia de chávez y llamo a la unidad de los venezolanos. >> el presidente chávez fuimos adversarios nunca enemigos >> iran mandatarios de américa latina y el caribe, no se anuncian donde descansaran los restos mortales del hugo chávez. >> nicolás maduro reiteró el llamado a la paz y calma entre la venezolanos, y mantenerse leales a hugo chávez. >> la palabra clave en este proceso historico es la lealta,de hemos sido clave en hugo chávez en vida, y ahora que esta espiritualmente, solo juntos somos chávez, y garantizar el futuro de la patria, el garantizoñ >> las expectativas del país son inmensas, la ruta está en la constitucion nacional, nuevamente por al

thank you for the introduction what this commission is doing to bring together academia and business is critically important so thank you for inviting me to speak it's great to be here. the world around us is changing at a pace faster than ever before new technologies are emerging to think about plan and prepare for war. twenty years ago i saw firsthand the transformative power from desert storm with the 101st airborne division the deepest aerosol into enemy territory in only 96 hours the first three brigades were cutting off the republican guard. it was the proving ground for a new generation of military weapons and equipment from laserguided smart bombs to widespread use of gps with the iraqi military defeated a number of days they demonstrated mastery of a digital revolution that was cutting edge soviet technology considered obsolete. since and they have been trying to catch up. five years ago they surprised the world how far they have come july 11, 2014 ukrainian forces assembled 5 miles near southeastern ukraine coming off those successes the battalion was preparing a final push

. -- from academia to amateur biologists. they have very different cultures. while the fbi's responsibility is maintaining homeland security, we understand that any type of security program has to assure that there is not a negative impact that impedes research in all of these different fronts. that, in itself, would represent a national security risk. there's the risk that you're now andding viable researcher some of the entrepreneurial efforts going on as well. so it is striking that balance. there was a reported 2000 sex of -- there was a report in 2006 that instigated best practices that looked at how do screen your customers and make sure that that risk is addressed. the fbi took the recommendation and ran with them and conducted outreach to these companies. although they do their due diligence, if they come up with their red flag, what did they do? by conducting our outreach, fbi engaged our wmd core leaders. these are special agents that are dedicated to wmd matters. there are 76 field offices across the u.s.. the companies now know that, if they come a

and you might look at academia and the challenge is conducive to the 24 century. what we generate now is the output for the economic opportunities that are there. government is never going to be under its current structure the institution that is ahead technologically because we just don't allow technology to move in realtime. >> i have to give you credit, this is an area where, whether it's the architecture of our satellite overhead or an area where we are up to our eyeballs in next generation telecoms. it's called 5g, the equivalent of moving to radio to television, from 40 to 5g in all of the things we call the internet of things. he has taken a really incredibly dug in deep, and we are, because we get a chance to see this from where a lot of the cutting edge research is being done which comes out of the d.o.d. world in the intel world. and i think we have learned some credibility from our colleagues, that if we come up with some ideas, and some -- stay tuned -- some of these areas are going to pose economic insecurity challenges beyond anything we have imagine

people in academia really advise you against using the word democracy when it comes to stalinist russia because they include this notion of civil society that is central to today idea of democracy but. what you're describing just there wasn't talent terrorism about point of time either there was somebody in moscow with a limb of the security apparatus the rest of the country was essentially lots of self governance is that an accurate. hereon ism as in general has sort of been debunked within the academia simply because more regional studies have proved that they simply didn't have the manpower or the infrastructure to monitor people frequently you know i look at collective farms where they have seen district level officials once every one or two years so the rest of the time they're busy doing whatever they want on their own people in the west would see stalin's out for its courage this are popular participation as a sham because they would think that genuine democracy would be the impediment to his. with what you're saying. it may have been quite the opposite that he saw it as a means