this animal planet and all of my academia and we all smile quick to rattle off a list i have had to. bring in and it seems to me from singing by having someone come to hear anyone is going to let in what was going on is really. they're trying to run out. in a good drive to hide how dishonest you. are to get out of the shoulder not a five year wish doesn't alter you know you and i have a very good for them to be. near. a good measure it's one of the sure little most lovely and was. and then what about our. teams. really of. the militias which matters. when little as in i literally have. had a facility that they have an image i knew i was going to get attacked the girl was sure that there's a man. six absolutely when most. of. the reddish telegram by the in that name was that he had started when most. in the mob wives an iranian it must have been and it is. wide in the raffle for we don't have the lot of the mob i've been home. but if it is such a hole is interesting never. where the haitian i never liked. least let's hear the. react to the national mood market crashes. was alive the i

i would say definitely my earlier experiences in academia impacted my choices of attending university so late. give us some examples? in my primary school was quite a mixed area, so mainly white but there were a lot of mixes and my year group was but there were a lot of mixes and my year group was predominantly but there were a lot of mixes and my year group was predominantly black. there were a lot of issues with a troublesome year group as we had energy, there were threats of cancelling the prom and in the end we had to get a black male head of year just to have that we had to get a black male head of yearjust to have that person to sit down and understand us. it made a world of difference, it really did, had to be labelled as that troublesome individual because they don't understand where you are coming from. were you label that troublesome individual because of the colour of your skin? definitely. in school, for example, if you had a gripe with someone, to be able to have a discussion and work things out, it could never be left as that, it had to be the uproar of this and this and

deep—seated prejudices and stereotypes are preventing ethnic minority staff from gaining senior positions in academia. baroness amos, who's director of the school of oriental and african studies is with me now. could you outlined the scale of the problem is you see it? it is a huge challenge. less than 1% of our professors, from lack and minority ethnic backgrounds. that is a very low number. we are seeing increasing numbers of young people from this committee is going to university, we are seeing two trends. 0ne committee is going to university, we are seeing two trends. one is a high dropout rate and a lot of universities are trying to do something about that. we are also seeing, even when you make sure that you standardise intensive entry qualifications and so one, black and minority ethnic students leaving university with fewer firsts and upper seconds, for example. clearly a cultural issue that we have to deal with. could a cultural issue that we have to dealwith. could you put a cultural issue that we have to deal with. could you put your finger on what that issue is? why is there that problem?

concur over the last two years we've made a lot of progress in promulgating such advice to not only academia with respect to the threats to other nations dates who are producers in the proprietary data we will continue to do that and work with associations and i would concur with your point the private sector leadership of the ceo level needs to be more active in the obtaining security clearances so that it can get done in a more effective and efficient manner. >> i want to pick up on the vice chair man's point with respect to zte specifically come and thank you for the visit we had in our office i thought it was helpful. in 2012, the houston solutions committee issued a nonclassified bipartisan report on national security issues posed by the chinese telecom companies, and one of them was zte. the report concluded the risks associated with zte provision of equipment to the u.s. critical infrastructure could undermine american national security interests. do you agree with that report? >> i do. >> now they recommended that the united states should be viewed with suspicion by continued penetra

brian: i want to ask you about academia. nicholas brady was a senator and secretary of the treasury. [video clip] >> -- on the constitution of the united states. >> i come from 30 years in the banking business. and though you don't hear the term anymore, i was always taught the best loan you could make was a character loan. -- beyondooked behind hard numbers and took a leap of faith and counted on the character and strength of the individual involved. brian: this man comes from the republican party, paid money for this course, does that matter? has he tried to steer you in a certain direction? john: no. we had one piece of advice from neck when the money came through -- nick when the money came through. i asked him, mr. brady, thank you for your generosity. what should we do with your money? he said, t common sense -- teach common sense. it was wonderful advice that hugeed us hugely way -- leeway. he has never tried to tell us, do this, do that, hire this person. .e maintains a lively interest he is in his upper 80's now tha

bloom, compared the tyranny of feminism in academia to -- he was writing at a time when women accounted for 10% of college tenured faculty. it is worth looking back at what was considered annoyingly outrageously politically correct in the 1980's, the last time we have this debate. having to -- not being able to call indigenous people " indians" or use terms like african-americans. adding women or people of color to the western curriculum, not making gay jokes are using "retart" as the next set. new words stick in your throat the way we are used to talking and thinking natural and normal. by definition, and then the new terms and concepts that have social utility stick and those that don't fall away. if you go back to the 1970's, ms stuck around and women with a y didn't. i hope that someday we will look thatand marvel gender-neutral protons ever seen like an existential threat. i also don't think it is clear that that might not happen because, there are plenty of places that have indeed dialed back cosmopolitanism and reinstated patriarchy in the name of staving off chaos. they seemed l

but also we can outsource to academia and journalists to help us in our research about the down stream consequences of these acts. we're going to continue working with facebook and the other social media companies and hope to make further disclosures about the organic con fent which in many ways far surpasses what was done in strictly advertising. the task in minimizing that to protect personal information is more substantial at that so that's going take longer -- substantial so that's going take longer. ms. pelosi: i'm sorry, we have votes. reporter: are you asking congressman cardenas to resign because of the sexual assault allegations? [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2018]

e promulgated such awareness and threat to not only academia and industry with respect to the threat to china and other nations who are stealing our proprietary data and trade secrets. we'll continue to do that and work with the association. i concur with your point. the private sector, leadership that is at the c.e.o. level needs to be a little bit more active in terms of obtaining security scleernses so that information that is classified can get to them in a more effective and efficient manner. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i want to pick up, mr. evanina, on the vice chairman's work to v.t.e. specifically, and thank you for the visit we had in our office. i thought it was very herphepful. now, in 2012 the house intelligence committee issued a nonclassified bipartisan report on national security issues posed by the chinese telecom companies. one of them was z.t.e. senator wyden: the report concluded the risks associated with z.t.e.'s provision of equipment to u.s. critical infrastructure could undermine american national security interests. do you agree with that bipartisan report? m

a pleasure to see all old friends from the intelligence community, from the think tank and world of academia and other agencies around town. and even some media friends i have made over the years, so thank you for having me today. in the interest of time i'm going to cut right to the chase, and try to identify a core question. and give you my thoughts on that core question and hopefully frame the discussion that we have on the panel, but also during the q and a. so, the core question i have been thinking a lot about is what exactly is putin going to do in the next six years, now that he has won reelection? does have a strategy? what does he really seek to achieve during this timeframe? i'm not even going to get into whether he is running again in 2024. some of you may have seen that story out of of chechnya. their already floating balloons for a story that somebody might want to put in the constitution for 2024, that is a whole -- what's to amend the constitution for 2024, that is a whole subject unto itself. i'm going to focus on the next six years. so if i look -- by the way, i think every

. >> who is a leader you admire in business or philanthropy, or academia? >> i worked for a great ceo at lockheed martin. he came from the humblest of circumstances and was a grunt marine in vietnam. got his first job building aircraft and was the ceo of lockheed martin. never lost the ability to connect with people. in case i left anyone off the list, i was going to say you next. >> does bill clinton's meeting with loretta lynch help make a decision told the press release? >> yes. it was that meeting in conjunction with loretta and loretta's decision to know she would not recuse herself but accept my recommendation. at that point, i decided as much as i like her this would not have credibility with the american people if i announce it standing next to her. i never thought i would be in that situation. given where we are, worse would be standing there having the american people having doubts about the work she said she would accept doing it separately. people can disagree about it but we thought we would have to do bad not worse. >> the justice department l

[applause] >> who's a leader you admire in business or philanthropy or academia? >> i worked for a great ceo al-awlaki's martin in bob stephens who came from the humblest of circumstances, was a marine in vietnam who got his first job helping build aircraft and grew up to be the ceo of lockheed martin and never lost that ability to connect to people and to try to get the truth from them. so i admire him a lot. i'll stop there. and k select off the list, i was going to say you next. [laughing] did bill clinton's meeting with loretta lynch influence your decision to hold a press conference in the summer of 16? >> yes. it was the meeting in conjunction with loretta who i like very much and not a long time. the writers to seek to announce that she recuse herself but would accept my recommendation and that of the career prosecutors. at that point i decided as much as i like loretta, this result will not have credibility with the american people if i announce it standing next to her. and so never thought i would be, never thought of this as a 500 your flood. ever though

committee that encompasses diverse representation from law enforcement, civil rights organizations and academia. we held a series of meetings to hear perspectives from hate crime survivors, academic experts, national and grassroots advocacy leaders and law enforcement officials on barriers and best practices to combat hate. end product will be a summary report out lining critical issues detailing discussions from the advisory group, will be released between this summer and early fall of 2018. it is very comprehensive document. that we will clearly make available to this committee. today i would like to focus on some of the challenges law enforcement faces when it comes to hate crimes. underreporting of hate crime statistics as you heard from the last two presenters. over the years one of the greatest barriers confronting overcoming hate violence has been the lack of statistical data on the occurrence and nature of these crimes. participation in the fbi's national reporting system which like the rest of the ucr, uniform crime reporting program, is voluntary. while participation has increased ove

they owned the press and the academia and bit the centrism and liberalism and they did not feel they needed to build up a counter establishment and charles koch wanted to take it over so we pulled up his own craft and academia and all of these organizations. maybe if the democrats feel endangered enough they will do the same. >> anything else? yes. >> [inaudible] there is a report that there are additional recordings of the torture sessions and tylan that gina was not able to destroy and they said something is that what you've heard as well? do you think those tapes will ever see the light of day? >> i don't know about it but it does not surprise me as a possibility because they recorded everything. one of the things i cannot believe what i was doing the book was in the beginning anyway was it was so meticulous and deliberate and it was there were scientists and doctors and psychologists measuring to make sure that when the water boarded people they measured their oxygen levels so that they did not die but they go right up to the edge of dying and it would not surprise me if there we

[applause] >> was a leader you admire in business or philanthropy or academia? >> i worked for a great ceo at lockheed martin named bob stevens, who came from the humblest of circumstances, was a marine in vietnam, got his first job helping build aircraft and grow to be the ceo of lockheed martin and never lost that ability to connect with people and try and get the truth from then. i admired him a lot. in case i left anyone on off the list, i was going to say you next. >> did though clinton's meeting with loretta lynch influence the press conference? >> yes, it was the meeting in conjunction with the rather worry like very much in about a long time the decision to announce she would not recuse herself, except my recommendation and at that point, i decided as much as they liked the red outcome of this will not have credibility with the american people if i announce it standing next to her. and so, i thought this was a 500 year flood. never thought i'd be in a situation. given where we are, bad and worse, they of course have doubts about the credibility of the wo

in the early 2000 there was very popular in academia, for obvious reasons, there was an over focus on trying to find ideology behind the putin regime. it took ideology i think much too seriously in trying to understand how the kremlin, now there hasn't been in the mainstream enough interrogation of these deceased mentalities, what they need come with a russian pastels ask him to believe about certain things and now it is publicly propagated s and pumping them in to institutions answer network institutions, from the whole secret service world, there really is a world of ragged schools and private hunting lodges and in the bureaucracy and enter the military. i think that when we talk about russia, a comment that one receives from russian officials and myriad, myriad top of it you're talking about fragments, fragments remains of the 1990s. there is a point here which is that certainly the discussion in the media we get is an over focus on a generation of ambitious 1990s oligarchs, heavily criminalized but have the sort of western global financial ambitions. there isn't enough discussion

our country that have specific expertise and cutting-edge technology that have prominent positions in academia and then they recruit them for projects on china or the chinese government and often times we don't have an understanding of what that program was or whether there was a quid pro quo. >> if they have a robust engineering program we have a lot of international researchers coming in and working in partnership with the university. we have the researcher engineer from china working on some stuff and he goes back to china maybe someone from maryland follows him back. i don't know. what the university be in jeopardy that they wouldn't be able to see the future federally funded research dollars? >> if that individual applied for the grant, the educational grant, they would have to certify whether or not they have participatehadparticipated in ae program in the past and from there they can decide. is that person to us-based researcher working with the chinese researcher? >> it's a us-based person as a part of their program. >> not to pummel a dead horse here but that is a problem the certific

an advisory committee that encompasses diverse representation from law enforcement, civil rights and academia. we've hosted a series of meetings to hear perspectives from hate crime survivors, academic experts. national and grass roots leaders and law enforcement officials on barriers and best practices to combat hate. the end product will be a summary report of learning the action items detailing discussions from advisory group and released from this summer and early fall of 2018. it's a comprehensive document that we will clearly make available to this committee. today i'd like to focus on challenges law enforcement faces when it comes to hate crimes. underreporting of hate crime statistics as you've heard from the last two presenters. over the years over coming hate violence has been the lack of statistical data on the occurrence and nature of these crimes. participation the fbi's national reporting system which, like the rest of the ucr, uniform crime reporting program, is voluntary. while participation has increased over the year, participation levels of seriously lacking. we know that f

two years, we've made progress with the fbi and dhs in advice and awareness and threat to not known academia and industry from china and other nation states. we will continue to do that and work with the associations and i concur with your point that i think the private sector leadership at the ceo level needs to be more active in terms of ob staining clearances so that information that is classified can get to them in a more efficient manner. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i want to pick up mr. evanina on the vice chairman's point with respect to zte specifically. thank you for the visit we had in our office. now in 2012, the house intelligence committee issued a nonclassified by partisan report on national security issues posed by the chinese telecom companies. one of them was zte. the report concluded that the risks associated with zte's provision of equipment to u.s. critical infrastructure could undermine american national security interests. do you agree with that bipartisan report? >> senator, i do. >> now, they recommended that the united states should view with suspicion the continued

they must work with the private sector and academia. no less important are investments in stem education, programs that develop junior talent into future tech leaders of policies that promote an environment in which global collaboration, discovery, innovation, public institutions, and industry can thrive. i had an opportunity to read dr. schmidt's statement and i want to thank you because it provides a kind of reality test for us, and how do we continue to do many of the advances that we've been working on, and you note those in your statement very clearly. but also build an architecture that is going to bring us into the future and certainly respond to the needs of the men and women who go to war on behalf of our country. i look forward to hearing your testimony today. thank you. excuse me. and i yield back. >> without objection, both of your written statements will be made a part of the record. i do want to comment, dr. griffin, that nobody's read yours because we just got it. and i think it's important. i realize that when you're an

and once you get all the academia behind you, it still comes down to who are those who are less fortunate that we need to give more concern to? and that's where we are. and i'm hopeful that eventually that we can get there because they are the ones who wake up tomorrow with nothing on the table. and i yield back, mr. chairman. >> are there other amendments to title iv? well, everybody had a five-minute bite at the apple. are there other amendments? recognize mr. walsh for five minutes. >> that's why i'm going to yield to one of those smart people, mr. mcgovern. >> i thank the gentleman for yielding. i'm amazed at how this markup has evolved. in the beginning, my friends on the other side were talking about how these provisions were the greatest thing since slice bread. they were wonderful and then mr. davis basically said don't pay attention to what's in the bill. you may think it's bad but this is the beginning of a process. it will change and change and maybe get better. here is a radical idea. why don't we start off with the very best product we can? rather than something that nobody k

are available, the education and engagement that we can have through the public and partnerships with academia, information technology, security experts and all that. that's the way we're going to guarantee the security of the 2018 election of not placing federal agents in our polling systems. >> can i ask something? dean mentioned the transparency piece of this. we have to balance the transparency and security. that can be a fine line for election administrators to walk. and we're going to see that certainly in 2018 and pull out further in 2020. i want to add not just to the election administrators but what can voters do, right? and one of the things i'd encourage folks to do is volunteer as a poll worker. i'd hate to use the tsa technology, but if you "see something, say something." those administrators can be valuable. and those monitoring the polls can be helpful. i know some of my colleagues would probably strangle me over saying that. but i think it's important for the public to be out there monitoring. >> how do people sign up? >> go to you know website. we'll sign -- our website. we'll

in the early 2000s it was very popular in academia, for obvious reasons there was an overfocus on trying to find ideologies behind the putin regime. it took ideology, i think, much too seriously in trying to understand how the kremlin worked. now there haven't in the mainstream enough interrogation of the besieged fort tress, what they mean, what the russian establishment has come to believe about certain things and how it's propagating ideologies and pumping them into institutions and network institutions from the whole secret service world, it really is a world of private schools and private hunting lodges and into the bureaucracy and into the military. i think that when we talk about russia a comment that one receives from russian officials and then media, media, media sock puppets is you're talking about fragment remains of the 1990s. they do have a point here which is that the -- certainly the discussion in the media we get is an overfocus on a generation of ambitious 1990 oligarchs heavy criminal lysed, but you have these sort of western global financial ambitions and there isn't e

your thoughts about what's going on in academia and why republicans don't take seriously about achieving ideological diversity. >> i work for turning point u.s.a. and this is what we are confronting head-on. i think ought reason democrats and republicans alike don't take it seriously because they don't understand how bad it has gotten. conservative thinkers are under attack. you have students against white supremacy that shout down student for capitalism. they are socialists. they refer to people who wear blue blazers as the symbol of white supremacy. i was at a campus in minnesota that said somebody wearing a blue blazer was the costume for white supremacy. lou: that is stunning. that's one i hadn't heard before. there is so much that's being ginned up by the left in this country. watching the dimms at gina haspel's confirmation hearing. those are some of the nastiest people i have ever seen. utterly disgusting. >> it's so typical unfortunately of democrats in the last 10-15 years for them to turn something so crucial and important as this nomination into a stupid partisan fight in whic

and it's just -- you now, it's time, once you're finished in government, you ought to go to academia and not to try to play the same role. lou: by the way, do we have the president talking about john kerry today? do we have that sound? can you bring that up? it's worthwhile for all of us to see that. it's terrific. let's turn to these remarks today by the president at the nra. great speech. >> very powerful. lou: we referred to love in the room there. i mean, there was a mutual admiration society at the nra -- between the nra and this president. >> very important constituency. and what he challenged them is to get out and use all of the powers that you have in the midterm elections and that's very important that they do that. they're powerful across the country because they've got a lot of active members. lou: and the trump economy, 34.9% unemployment, the lowest unemployment rate since 2000. the lowest hispanic and african-american unemployment ever. and jarrett is trying to take credit for it today. >> again, she should have left the government a long time ago too. at the end of th

i compare and contrast with academia. we were looking with different stats a bit of a transition, segue, howie, looking at stats of commencement speeches, so far of 18 at top 100 colleges, 38 liberal folks, and three conservatives this was a disappointing number to me, because i like idea of diversity of thought. you ought to have just as many conservatives as you do liberals. i would think at a university of all places, you would want that, because again, the more ideas the better. but when you see the likes of nancy pelosi, hillary clinton, et cetera, what does it tell but the sort of next breed of journalists if you would being educated in these institutions? >> first tells me diversity in academia, not so much. separate from the commencement speeches when prominent conservatives supposed to speak on campus there is protests, sometimes they have to back out, all that is very sad day for free speech. i agree first six or eight months, a lot of the press was rooting for hillary to win. thought she won the popular vote, h

reporting around this informant said they were involved in many administrations, a long-term career in academia, it is natural they would be on the list. maria: house republicans want a second special counsel to look deeper into hillary's personal server on the ongoing russia investigation, that is another thing devon nunez is looking at and we are looking at hillary clinton's first email. >> a special calls for additional special councils to wander around town to follow that up. and it will be on the hill in those committees. maria: next johnston coming from the white house to a screen near you, a production deal with netflix could have him on some shows producing others. we will tell you about it. and elon musk's human is closer to reality. he is showing up incredible images. back in a moment right here. [music playing] (vo) from day one, we always came through for our customers. it's how we earned your trust. until... we lost it. today, we're renewing our commitment to you. fixing what went wrong. and ending product sales goals for branch bankers. so we can focus on your satisfaction. it's a

again, it's frustrating, steve, to see the mainstream media and others in academia now as well, take that hamas narrative and run with it at the end of the day, there is not much that separates hamas from isis over the past several years. hamas has fired rockets, missiles at israel suicide bombings, terror tunnels and all the rest. steve: i know it still, each the parents have reached out. nothing from the principal. eric, thank you very much for joining us live. >> thank you, steve. steve: going to step aside. jonathan turley coming up next. non-small cell lung canc . .non-small cell lung canc who'd say no to a...? who wouldn't want a chance to live longer. opdivo (nivolumab). over 40,000 patients have been prescribed opdivo immunotherapy. opdivo can cause your immune system to attack normal organs and tissues in your body and affect how they work. this may happen during or after treatment has ended, and may become serious and lead to death. see your doctor right away if you experience new or worsening cough; chest pain; shortness of breath; diarrhea; severe stomach pain or tenderne

pete: doctor, we cover a lot of crazy stories about academia. great to cover a good one like this. you are a veteran. probably aren't many college veterans who are vets how much of your own background colors your decision here. >> i was a soldier in the gulf war and after that have been connected to the department of defense ever since. i have done research. psychologist by training. done research over the years on veterans issues. i started the national center for veterans studies at the university of utah. so i have been connected and sensitive and aware of veterans issues from the very beginning of my career. and we have been attentive to veterans' challenges. as you know, we have been at war for quite a number of years now. so we feel like we need to do a part -- we need to do some of the lift and we need to help. pete: good on you doctor, for students and parents watching where can they go to get more information. go to the university of memphis. go to our web paige memphis.edu. number of connection. we will help you. we will assist those students and connect them to the right

they teach this in academia because this is an industry. it's a moneymaking multitrillion dollar industry that i wrote a book about. this bias is nonsense, and michael knows it. >> first of all -- >> laura: i will let you respond. i want to show a chart so people get some sense of where we are with unemployment. black unemployment, i guess whoopi goldberg thinks it's all obama. this is what it looks like. it's at 6.6%. it is a record low. that is something to celebrate. i don't care whether you are a democrat or republican. it has occurred under donald trump's watch. michael. >> okay, let me address a couple things. kevin come i don't know if you didn't get the memo but we are not colored people anymore. that's just not how we refer to each other anymore. let me address the unemployment record. if you look at when president obama came into office office, served in .5 is with the african-american on a plumbing record is. now it's a little under 7%. has president trump done some things that if contributed to that? yes. president obama dropped

law enforcement, academia we could go down the list, science. as general hayden said, all of the fact-based institution this is country has built its foundation on over the past several centuries. and i wonder if you do have to be a psychiatrist to figure out that that's donald trumps intent. >> i don't know if you have to be a psychiatrist or just a political analyst. he is going for the jugular. he's fighting as hard as he can to save himself and his presidency and he's attacking targets that let's be honest the public has had some suspicion for. the idea that there's a cabal of elitists in washington, that's something americans have felt for a couple centuries, this suspicion toward washington and central pow er. it's the cynical way that it's being exploited that i find disturbing. we depend on these agencies for our security as a country and bashing them everyday the way the president does causes harm. and to bash the news media -- it was only a decade or so that the arrival of cnn to cover a demonstration or protest in eastern europe and g

general hayden said the intel community like law enforcement officers, like people in journalism, like academia, the one thing they have in common that donald trump is attacking is they are fact-based. they don't always get the facts right but they are driven by facts and that is something that obviously doesn't play in donald trump's benefit so he has to attack. do you agree with general hayden's assessment? >> i do. we ran into this almost immediately on january 6 of 2017 when we went up to trump tower to brief then president-elect and his team on the intelligence community assessment and right a away and i think the president has been consistent that anything that casts doubt on the legitimacy of his election he has problems with. so that was the bad news, the truth to power we were serving up to him and that's been an issu issue. we have alternative facts and relative truth and that's anathema to anyone in the information business. >> one thing you used to do in your previous incarnation is you used to go up every january and february and give the threat briefing and line up the major threa

in the west in the halls of government academia and the media which all echo they continually talk about russia and sometimes china as revisionist or revanche powers against they don't there's two different world orders we're talking about they refer to the liberal world order not to the un a stir. world order they're talking about the world order that they believe started with bretton woods and continued up through the collapse of the soviet union and came to its biggest height of union polarity of u.s. led western hegemony during the one nine hundred ninety s. and what they're talking about is russia and china returning to positions of great power status in the world are blocking their control of the world whereas russia and china and i'm not going to stand for it k.k. from a realist perspective and of course from a relativist position of weakness still to the us prefer the rules bound system one thousand nine hundred five established by the un. whereas the us regards the principle un prince of the security council principles un charter principles of sovereignty and non interference to