. >> let's bring in "the new york times'" column isist james brunei and where you go will not be the admission to the latest college mania, and the reason i ask is because it is not in a vacuum. and it is not just this one fra fraternity, frank b, runi and examples with the freakgreek system all over? >> yes, as you said and erin said we can't stereotype the all of them but what we can do is to take note of them and they are exclusive societies, and they let in like-minded individuals who can exist in a homogeneous society, and that is not what we want the colleges to be. we have racist behaviors from organization organizations that are all white, and sexist behaviors from groups that are all male. >> and this is what you say you should be cultivating the sensibility that make yos a p better citizen of diverse and less fractious society, and how is that served into retreating into a clique of people just like you. >> i have often thought that how is that -- when i went to college, i wanted to know everybody. of aulll different ethnicities and i wanted to know other people and not jus

and when i does have tremendous violations. -- brunei does have tremendous violations. we pulled our event from the beverly hills hotel, which is owned by the sultan of brunei. we are trying to wake up people that these trade agreements sometimes i would countries that are just violating human rights. and we should have higher standards. as i say, trade cannot trump, you know, basic human rights and the rights of women. they will flog women in public, it is just an outrage. at a hope more people understand that, and that we can demand more from our trading partners. if they want to trade with united states, they have to have a better record on human rights. host: let's get one more call here from staten island, new york. catherine is on the independent line. caller: yes, good morning. miss meal, -- ms. smeal, i'm listening to you, and how more equal do you want to be? with whom? guest: you want to have boys and girls, men and women equal. there should be equal education opportunities. and health care. there should be areas of health care in which women are -- i will giv

also, eugene robinson and frank bruney and krystal ball. susan, what more do we know about this apparent drunk driving incident by two secret service agents actually on the grounds of the white house? >> well, i think "the washington post" story did very good job of detailing what i think is unfortunate that it's not all that surprising. i did a story last year that chronicled the use of the disciplinary action that was taken that the secret service takes against its agents and i found that the fbi and even the tsa has a higher standard when it comes to alcohol related incidents. and they have an automatic 30-day suspension, whereas when i looked at the incidents of the secret service over the past five years, they have a very uneven record of punishing their agents and officers for alcohol related events. >> susan, do they have a written policy on it? >> they have what every agency in the federal government has, what is called the table of discipline, or table of punishment. but they would not provide me that table so i could do some compa

the clinton foundation has taken money from all over the world, qatar, kuwait, brunei, we're putting up on the screen the gender gap in terms of this is where they are ranked nationwide and how they treat women. saudi arabia women can't drive, they need male counterparts. i'm just putting it up there. what is your take -- she hasn't been critical the champion of womens rights has taken tens of millions of dollars from countries that have abysmal rights records for women. and what is your take on that? >> well, it comes down to two things. it's real obvious. everybody knows that money is the most important thing with the clintons. period. >> do you think she won't criticize because the money's more important than the principle of standing up. >> exactly. being womens advocate and, you know, the war on women attack is totally bogus. she's got a choice. if she wants to further womens issues and advocate for women all over the world, it's okay to look the other way when she takes all this money from these countries that abuse women. so which is it? is she going to take that money from th

and then brunei the only nation ranking in the top 100 is at 98. here's a closer look at how much money those countries donated to the clinton foundation. some of the examples of their discrimination against women. let's look at saudi arabia. that country donated between $10 million and $25 million to the clinton foundation. in 2011 women were finally granted the right to vote there. but get this women are still not allowed to drive and they need a male guardian's permission to work or to travel. then in kuwait which did give between $5 million and $10 million to her foundation women do not have the right to become public prosecutors and judges and there are not any laws on the books which make domestic violence illegal. then the united arab emirates donated between $1 million and $5 million and considered one of the most socially liberal gulf states, but still women there are required to have a male guardian conclude their marriage contract and then have the legal right to discipline their wives with the use of physical violence. then in oman qata

you look at the donations and the uae and other countries, algeria, brunei these are brutally oppressive regimes to women and makes her seem like a phony. even if it doesn't cost or any belts it takes away the bragging , rights of being able to say she is a great champion of feminist causes around the world. >> the clinton foundation's donation in general will be an issue. a huge issue. >> it is a rat's nest. i totally agree with that. there will be a lot of digging. speaking of countries that have not so good rating on women's rights, unless the senate approves nuclear deal he could be voided once he is no longer president. the president and his people are outraged. today some republicans are seeking to establish a back channel with hard-liners in iran. putting aside the rhetoric, you think this type of republican hardball will force obama, although he does not need to legally, seek congressional approval for deals with iran? >> it may have been republicans who signed the letter but this is a bipartisan concern. it is bob menendez who is trying to force presidential agreement. >> it is

date it's accepted money from saudi arabia the united arab emirates kuwait, oman qatar al algeria and brunei. >> they built a great university with nyu open to people around the world and they have helped us support the work that this foundation does. do i agree with all of the foreign policy of saudi arabia? no. i think it's impressive that the recent king who just died built the first co-educational institution in saudi arabia and they have more women than men in colleges. >> will female voters buy that explanation? with me to talk about this is cnn political commentator and sirius xm host margaret hoover. is the explanation enough? >> hypocrisy is the unforgivable sin in politics. they have to stand by what they say. it doesn't make sense to take money from these countries and using your platform to taut women's rights and then receive funding from countries who are not letting women drive, not letting women vote not letting women really exert the human rights that we support and advocate in the developed world. >> is it possible that hillary clinton could say my foundation is one thing a

we'll look at the sultan of brunei brunei's disturbing record on human rights. >> ban brunei from the transpacific partnership agreement. >>> good to have you with us tonight, folks. we start with foreign policy. today benjamin netanyahu delivered his controversial speech to congress. there was reaction. 36 house democrats, 7 senate democrats, and 1 senate independent skipped today's speech. netanyahu took a hard line against iran. he warned against the iran nuclear deal currently being negotiated. netanyahu made clear he has two major problems with the deal. >> you see, my friends, this deal has two major concessions. one, leaving iran with a vast nuclear program. and two, lifting the restrictions on that program in about a decade. that's why this deal is so bad. it doesn't block iran's path to the bomb. it paves iran's path to the bomb. >> the prime minister admitted certain restrictions would be placed on iran's nuclear program, but he said they cannot be trusted. >> it has violated agreements in 2005, 2006 and 2010. iran broke the locks and shut off the cameras. i know this does n