amendment by mr. frakes. it would regard improvements to army vehicles and an amendment by mr. courtney that would regard aircraft survivability equipment and an amendment by mr. enters that would require a report on the vertical construction and an amendment by mr. enters that would demonstrate technologies and an amendment by myself to clarify that would clarify section 214 in the subcommittee mark regarding ground. it does not moving target indicating air force air aircraft to a manned systems, and an amendment by mr. enters that would report language regarding the joint tactical radio system. >> any discussion of the amendment? >> the question is on the adoption of the amendment. those in favor will say aye. those opposed will say no. the ayes have it. the amendment is agreed to. >> no further amendments? the chair recognizes mr. bartlett for the purpose of offering a motion. >> mr. chairman, i move to adopt the subcommittee report of the tactical air and land force as amended. >> so many in favor

. >> mr. mcintyre. >> i would like to ask a panel what you feel like with regard to am-23 in -- m23 with regard to their ultimate aims, do you feel the threat is subsiding you feel there is a threat of war? >> i will take that question. the m23 is a rebel group that once integrated into the congolese military and has now broken away because they believe the terms that were signed on their integration into the military on march 23, 2009, were broken. what we are seeing in the aredrc is a rebel -- in the eastern drc is a rebel group that has defied its military command. they have been referred -- they have refused to be located out of the eastern region as units and they refuse to be relocated out by separate senior officers. this is at the heart of the current rebellion. but the orangemen -- origin of the m23 is that it was a rebel group prior to 2009. it went under a different akron and then, d cndp, but is basically a rebel group. the military leaders have sought to parlay their influence int

an amendment by mrs. lummis regarding uranium. an amendment by mr. mcintyre, termination of periodic nourishment of water resource development projects. an amendment by mr. mulvaney regarding an across the board reduction. an amendment by mr. pearce regarding funding levels for defense environmental cleanup. an amendment by mr. polis regarding funding levels for weapons activities which shall be debatable for 20 minutes. an amendment by mr. reed regarding funding levels for nondefense environmental cleanup. an amendment by mr. rohrabacher limiting funds for china cleanup center. an amendment by ms. sanchez of california regarding funding levels for defense nuclear nonproliferation by shall be debatable for 20 minutes. an amendment by mr. schock regarding prote hi bigs of planting rural crops. an amendment by mr. stearns regarding funding levels for advanced research energy -- research projects, agencies energy. an amendment by mr. stearns limiting funds to subordinate interest in any loan guarantees. an amendment by mr. stearns limiting funds for pur