i think the attack that happened in china so far by uighur population have already motivated chinese government to take a more serious attitude towards the cooperation on counterterrorism. it has its role in these regions. although there is a problem in the process because i wouldn't name which country it is, but in the process of such cooperation is not discovered that if china has most motivation, most interesting cooperative with these governments because of counterterrorism, then what if the incentives for the government to eliminate that problem so that we can no longer solicit the chinese cooperation in this regard? so we hear the chinese talk about at least privately that some governments are cooperative with china but they are also not cooperative with china. >> do you have a comment on the nuclear issue? >> the nuclear issue, the dialogue is ongoing between not only china and the united states but also china and other nuclear power. chinese policy coming to perception, russia's nuclear weapon is targeted at china so there's not a calmly -- commonly shared question. >> ambass

number two, you have some people who are just osha and the outsiders in the chinese system, the uighurs, some christians, other kindred is that on the outside and that are in some instances protesting and a lot of other places. third, i think this is the most important force that's coming up. when i go to china and i speak to students at stanford where teach has a big center in beijing, when i speak to students there, these millennials have no memory of tiananmen square. they have no memory of crackdown come and they are unbelievably active on social media, just as you said. and some of the things they say are really, they cross over into, there's a guy at berkeley who studies what's trending on chinese social media, and you'd be surprised at some of the things that are out there. so when the people's congress is meeting in beijing, you have a whole update in who are these people? they don't represent me. when we were there a few years ago we had a young government translator and we asked her about this and she said well, you know, we all know that social media is monitored but we keep

janitors, cafeteria uighurs workers, assistants, groundskeepers. opening the door to a new profession, that was something new. he proceeded with discretion. no big announcement in the daily press, no fanfare, but he also proceeded with direction. nothing to herald the arrival of women to the laboratory, but nothing to derail the arrival either. maybe melvin butler was a progressive first time in space or maybe he was just carrying out his duty. state law and virginia customs kept him from truly progressive action. perhaps the promise of a segregated office is just the cover he needed to get the black women in the door. the trojan horse of segregation opening the door. whatever his personal feelings were on race, one thing is clear , he was a langley man through and through. loyal to the laboratory, to his mission, to its worldview and to its charge during the war. by nature and by mandate, he and the rest of the naca were all about practical solutions. so too was philip randolph heard the activism, unrelenting pressure and organizing skills laid th

two, you have some people who are just always going to be outsiders in the chinese system, the uighurs, some christians, other communities that are on the outside and that are in some instances protesting and a lot of other places are underground. and third, and i think this is the most important force that's coming up. when i go to china now and i speak to students, stanford where i teach has a big center in beijing. when i speak to students this, these millennials have no memory of tiananmen square. >> interesting. >> they have no memory of crackdowns. and they are unbelievably active on social media. just as you said. and some of the things they say are really, they cross over into, you know, there's a guy at berkeley who studies what's trending on chinese social media. and you would be surprised at some of the things that are out there. soen when the -- so when the people's congress is meeting in beijing, you have a whole uptick in who are these people, they don't represent me. when i had a young -- actually, when condi and i were there a few years ago, we had a government translat

one of the earliest examples was when the president balked at bringing the uighurs to the united states. but these missed opportunities continue up until now. i think ultimately the are two things that have to happen. two things the president has to do in order to close the prison. what is he needs to get his own house in order. he needs to get all of the agencies in his administration moving in the same direction to implement its mandate to close the prison. there's a dynamic that exists. i think everyone is aware of it if you follow this issue. the state department is trying to transfer people. you have the defense department which is up stopping at the link this at times. that needs to end and that needs to come from the president. the second thing that needs to happen is there needs to be some fundamental policy changes. as an outsider it seems like the administration continues to adhere to policies that adhere to policies and sentences never really make any sense. for example, the resumption of the military commission system. or adhering to policies that may be made since in 234200

. -- uighurs spent that was a defining moment. >> exactly. i'm wondering what the administration thinks was the moment in which they sort of lost the momentum, which they could have decided that they're going to try to regain. we are in a period of absolute drive towards that. there's a plan coming, 16 people left. but like come in the administration gave where did it go off the rail? >> i don't think for the administration so i can't answer that question. >> so in your view? you're right, i should have asked for the administration. it's just where did it go wrong? >> it went wrong early. it went wrong really early. even by the archives o of speech you already knew you were the wrong place to do with like four months. something happen. i know some people have said it was, after obama took office they were the first not guantÁnamo related, the first truly series interrupted attacks against, plots against u.s. soil in the first 11 months after obama came into office that we've seen since 9/11. and in that period of time, a lot of things, i'm n

the uighurs of afghanistan had been picked up. they were in afghanistan at the time of operations. the a lot of situations like that. obama has released 159. i think it is a bit disconcerting, again with this administration, insists on treating these terrorists and those involved in terrorist activities as nothing more than criminals. they are nothing more than like the criminals will be in the united states. that's why perhaps the president finds it impossible to say the words radical islamic terrorists because that is different than just some criminal who is committed an act of violence or murder in the united states. and by doing so, again seen as the weakest, the president is encouraging terrorists around the world to take advantage of this weakness, take advantage of the fact we willing to retreat if we just have a propaganda campaign your i'm glad to hear that we actually are suggesting that our guys didn't commit all sorts of horrible acts against these people. but of the 159 that were released, that have been released, what is disconcerting is when i hear but we don't appro

uighur 8.5% when you look at the facts there's no evidence to indicate that the pendulum has swung in favor of our credit system. thank you for the opportunity to comment. >> could i agree but that? sorry, mr. stark but there are a lot of gses at the but on any of the gses that directly compete with me that try to steal my loans. when we are not allowed to make a $5 million real estate loan, for example, that's a big part of my loan portfolio. that goes to the farm credit services no matter what. is just a way to compete and it will be undercut no matter what great i've quoted come and msha every community banks in the nation can say the same thing. that they rates just are not the same. they will pick those. the young farmer that comes in that has a quote from the farm credit services it's a rate that is higher. they might get a rate that is six or 8% compared to the 3% rate. so does that really mean you are taking care of those young farmers? with high priced below two young farmer that is the same whether a multimillion dollar farmer or they are a young farmer that's really struggl

said they will shun a deal to take some of the uighurs into america. they were sent to bermuda of all places where they were busy working at least one or two people working at a country club, taking care of the sand traps. we could've done this in this country and demonstrated that we too can take some of these people instead of treating them like lepers that are too dangerous to have in your country. i think it is pitiful really. >> host: office calling in from overland park, kansas. you are on the phone with jane mayer. >> guest: greetings from the state of kansas which has been described as koch industries. i am really interested in the last chapter you talk about the rebranding and use site to professor wake forest to describe the powder of reforming in the way up and check dean a new no-space-on free market capitalism. i'm interested in your elaboration because they really see it is really the next major influence and how it being propped up and appearing at universities. >> guest: thank you for asking and heights campus. i read about it and then